Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases: e114083
Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys involving BLAST searches for RT genes in prokaryotic genomes revealed the presence of large numbers of diverse, uncharacterized RTs and RT-like se...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 9; no. 11 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.11.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys involving BLAST searches for RT genes in prokaryotic genomes revealed the presence of large numbers of diverse, uncharacterized RTs and RT-like sequences. Here, using consistent annotation across all sequenced bacterial species from GenBank and other sources via RAST, available from the PATRIC (Pathogenic Resource Integration Center) platform, we have compiled the data for currently annotated reverse transcriptases from completely sequenced bacterial genomes. RT sequences are broadly distributed across bacterial phyla, but green sulfur bacteria and cyanobacteria have the highest levels of RT sequence diversity ( less than or equal to 85% identity) per genome. By contrast, phylum Actinobacteria, for which a large number of genomes have been sequenced, was found to have a low RT sequence diversity. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that bacterial RTs could be classified into 17 main groups: group II introns, retrons/retron-like RTs, diversity-generating retroelements (DGRs), Abi-like RTs, CRISPR-Cas-associated RTs, group II-like RTs (G2L), and 11 other groups of RTs of unknown function. Proteobacteria had the highest potential functional diversity, as they possessed most of the RT groups. Group II introns and DGRs were the most widely distributed RTs in bacterial phyla. Our results provide insights into bacterial RT phylogeny and the basis for an update of annotation systems based on sequence/domain homology. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys involving BLAST searches for RT genes in prokaryotic genomes revealed the presence of large numbers of diverse, uncharacterized RTs and RT-like sequences. Here, using consistent annotation across all sequenced bacterial species from GenBank and other sources via RAST, available from the PATRIC (Pathogenic Resource Integration Center) platform, we have compiled the data for currently annotated reverse transcriptases from completely sequenced bacterial genomes. RT sequences are broadly distributed across bacterial phyla, but green sulfur bacteria and cyanobacteria have the highest levels of RT sequence diversity ( less than or equal to 85% identity) per genome. By contrast, phylum Actinobacteria, for which a large number of genomes have been sequenced, was found to have a low RT sequence diversity. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that bacterial RTs could be classified into 17 main groups: group II introns, retrons/retron-like RTs, diversity-generating retroelements (DGRs), Abi-like RTs, CRISPR-Cas-associated RTs, group II-like RTs (G2L), and 11 other groups of RTs of unknown function. Proteobacteria had the highest potential functional diversity, as they possessed most of the RT groups. Group II introns and DGRs were the most widely distributed RTs in bacterial phyla. Our results provide insights into bacterial RT phylogeny and the basis for an update of annotation systems based on sequence/domain homology. |
Author | Toro, Nicolas Nisa-Martinez, Rafael |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Nicolas surname: Toro fullname: Toro, Nicolas – sequence: 2 givenname: Rafael surname: Nisa-Martinez fullname: Nisa-Martinez, Rafael |
BookMark | eNqVjb0KwjAURoMo-PsGDhldrEnTptZNi-JYxF1CudWUNKm5reDbW9AXcPrgcDjflAyts0DIkrOAi4RvKtd5q0zQ9DhgnEdsKwZkwlMRrmXIxJhMESvGYrGVckLyzNWNhwdY1C-g-eNt3B0stLqg-77zRo3UlfSgiha8VoZe4AUegV69slh43bQKAXcUvl9zMiqVQVj8dkZWp-M1O68b754dYHurNRZgjLLgOrxxGUcyFWkSij_UD0ZES9I |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | 7QL 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 |
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0114083 |
DatabaseName | Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | Genetics Abstracts |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Sciences (General) |
EISSN | 1932-6203 |
GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 3V. 53G 5VS 7QL 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 8AO 8C1 8CJ 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ ABDBF ABIVO ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ADBBV ADRAZ AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFRAH AHMBA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS APEBS ARAPS ATCPS BAWUL BBNVY BBORY BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM C1K CCPQU CS3 D1I D1J D1K DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EMOBN ESTFP ESX EX3 F5P FPL FR3 FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISE ISR ITC K6- KB. KQ8 L6V LK5 LK8 M0K M1P M48 M7P M7R M7S M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 P2P P62 P64 PATMY PDBOC PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PYCSY RC3 RNS RPM SV3 TR2 UKHRP WOQ WOW ~02 ~KM |
ID | FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16546939723 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 22:19:46 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-proquest_miscellaneous_16546939723 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
PQID | 1654693972 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1654693972 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20141101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2014 text: 20141101 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | PloS one |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
SSID | ssj0053866 |
Score | 3.876693 |
Snippet | Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys... |
SourceID | proquest |
SourceType | Aggregation Database |
SubjectTerms | Actinobacteria Cyanobacteria Proteobacteria |
Title | Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases: e114083 |
URI | https://search.proquest.com/docview/1654693972 |
Volume | 9 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LS8NAEB76uHgR6wOfYQUP9ZBim300gogtjcVDCcVCbiVpJvQgiSYt6L93dpN4UdHLnrLLJrvfzjfZ-WYAruRq6CYiErYTomtzTG7sMFGR7QilhBggIcpE-c7kdMGfAhE0oK7ZWn3A4kfXTteTWuQvvfe3j3sC_J2p2qD6dafea5ZiTxN8ohVNaA-0GEgH8_GvewVCt5SVgO63nt8OZWNpvD3YrSgieyjXtAMNTPehU4GwYN0qU_T1AfgazTmuyyB05q_J-6YNoXWJrM42wrKEjcqUzDToHHUYBjJjosyBQVasuGVYzuoQut7keTy167ktaRvof_thitm2WBpRkuvoGmJH0ErpfY6BIXEPHq3kSjqSRyF3YxFzjBPlECuKY3UCl38Od_qPZ85gh3gELyV659Da5Fu8IFu9iSxoqkBROxz3des9WtAeTWb-3DLer2WW5xNVe6GB |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,867,24331,27937,27938,31733,33280,33387,33758 |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehensive+Phylogenetic+Analysis+of+Bacterial+Reverse+Transcriptases%3A+e114083&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Toro%2C+Nicolas&rft.au=Nisa-Martinez%2C+Rafael&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0114083&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |