Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases: e114083

Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys involving BLAST searches for RT genes in prokaryotic genomes revealed the presence of large numbers of diverse, uncharacterized RTs and RT-like se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 11
Main Authors Toro, Nicolas, Nisa-Martinez, Rafael
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.11.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys involving BLAST searches for RT genes in prokaryotic genomes revealed the presence of large numbers of diverse, uncharacterized RTs and RT-like sequences. Here, using consistent annotation across all sequenced bacterial species from GenBank and other sources via RAST, available from the PATRIC (Pathogenic Resource Integration Center) platform, we have compiled the data for currently annotated reverse transcriptases from completely sequenced bacterial genomes. RT sequences are broadly distributed across bacterial phyla, but green sulfur bacteria and cyanobacteria have the highest levels of RT sequence diversity ( less than or equal to 85% identity) per genome. By contrast, phylum Actinobacteria, for which a large number of genomes have been sequenced, was found to have a low RT sequence diversity. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that bacterial RTs could be classified into 17 main groups: group II introns, retrons/retron-like RTs, diversity-generating retroelements (DGRs), Abi-like RTs, CRISPR-Cas-associated RTs, group II-like RTs (G2L), and 11 other groups of RTs of unknown function. Proteobacteria had the highest potential functional diversity, as they possessed most of the RT groups. Group II introns and DGRs were the most widely distributed RTs in bacterial phyla. Our results provide insights into bacterial RT phylogeny and the basis for an update of annotation systems based on sequence/domain homology.
AbstractList Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys involving BLAST searches for RT genes in prokaryotic genomes revealed the presence of large numbers of diverse, uncharacterized RTs and RT-like sequences. Here, using consistent annotation across all sequenced bacterial species from GenBank and other sources via RAST, available from the PATRIC (Pathogenic Resource Integration Center) platform, we have compiled the data for currently annotated reverse transcriptases from completely sequenced bacterial genomes. RT sequences are broadly distributed across bacterial phyla, but green sulfur bacteria and cyanobacteria have the highest levels of RT sequence diversity ( less than or equal to 85% identity) per genome. By contrast, phylum Actinobacteria, for which a large number of genomes have been sequenced, was found to have a low RT sequence diversity. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that bacterial RTs could be classified into 17 main groups: group II introns, retrons/retron-like RTs, diversity-generating retroelements (DGRs), Abi-like RTs, CRISPR-Cas-associated RTs, group II-like RTs (G2L), and 11 other groups of RTs of unknown function. Proteobacteria had the highest potential functional diversity, as they possessed most of the RT groups. Group II introns and DGRs were the most widely distributed RTs in bacterial phyla. Our results provide insights into bacterial RT phylogeny and the basis for an update of annotation systems based on sequence/domain homology.
Author Toro, Nicolas
Nisa-Martinez, Rafael
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nicolas
  surname: Toro
  fullname: Toro, Nicolas
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Rafael
  surname: Nisa-Martinez
  fullname: Nisa-Martinez, Rafael
BookMark eNqVjb0KwjAURoMo-PsGDhldrEnTptZNi-JYxF1CudWUNKm5reDbW9AXcPrgcDjflAyts0DIkrOAi4RvKtd5q0zQ9DhgnEdsKwZkwlMRrmXIxJhMESvGYrGVckLyzNWNhwdY1C-g-eNt3B0stLqg-77zRo3UlfSgiha8VoZe4AUegV69slh43bQKAXcUvl9zMiqVQVj8dkZWp-M1O68b754dYHurNRZgjLLgOrxxGUcyFWkSij_UD0ZES9I
ContentType Journal Article
DBID 7QL
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
RC3
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0114083
DatabaseName Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
DatabaseTitle Genetics Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList Genetics Abstracts
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sciences (General)
EISSN 1932-6203
GroupedDBID ---
123
29O
2WC
3V.
53G
5VS
7QL
7RV
7X2
7X7
7XC
88E
8AO
8C1
8CJ
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
ABDBF
ABIVO
ABJCF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
APEBS
ARAPS
ATCPS
BAWUL
BBNVY
BBORY
BCNDV
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
BWKFM
C1K
CCPQU
CS3
D1I
D1J
D1K
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAP
EAS
EBD
EMOBN
ESTFP
ESX
EX3
F5P
FPL
FR3
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HH5
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
IOV
IPY
ISE
ISR
ITC
K6-
KB.
KQ8
L6V
LK5
LK8
M0K
M1P
M48
M7P
M7R
M7S
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
P62
P64
PATMY
PDBOC
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
PYCSY
RC3
RNS
RPM
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~02
~KM
ID FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16546939723
IEDL.DBID M48
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 22:19:46 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-proquest_miscellaneous_16546939723
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
PQID 1654693972
PQPubID 23462
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1654693972
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20141101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2014
  text: 20141101
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle PloS one
PublicationYear 2014
SSID ssj0053866
Score 3.876693
Snippet Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys...
SourceID proquest
SourceType Aggregation Database
SubjectTerms Actinobacteria
Cyanobacteria
Proteobacteria
Title Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases: e114083
URI https://search.proquest.com/docview/1654693972
Volume 9
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LS8NAEB76uHgR6wOfYQUP9ZBim300gogtjcVDCcVCbiVpJvQgiSYt6L93dpN4UdHLnrLLJrvfzjfZ-WYAruRq6CYiErYTomtzTG7sMFGR7QilhBggIcpE-c7kdMGfAhE0oK7ZWn3A4kfXTteTWuQvvfe3j3sC_J2p2qD6dafea5ZiTxN8ohVNaA-0GEgH8_GvewVCt5SVgO63nt8OZWNpvD3YrSgieyjXtAMNTPehU4GwYN0qU_T1AfgazTmuyyB05q_J-6YNoXWJrM42wrKEjcqUzDToHHUYBjJjosyBQVasuGVYzuoQut7keTy167ktaRvof_thitm2WBpRkuvoGmJH0ErpfY6BIXEPHq3kSjqSRyF3YxFzjBPlECuKY3UCl38Od_qPZ85gh3gELyV659Da5Fu8IFu9iSxoqkBROxz3des9WtAeTWb-3DLer2WW5xNVe6GB
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,867,24331,27937,27938,31733,33280,33387,33758
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehensive+Phylogenetic+Analysis+of+Bacterial+Reverse+Transcriptases%3A+e114083&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Toro%2C+Nicolas&rft.au=Nisa-Martinez%2C+Rafael&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0114083&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT