Small Thyroid Nodules: Ultrasonographic Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Lesions

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of ultrasonography in the differentiation between benignity and malignancy in the evaluation of small thyroid nodules (the longest diameter <10 mm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fine needle aspiration or surgery was performed for the evaluation of seventy two (44 ben...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea) Vol. 23; no. 1; p. 23
Main Authors Seon Jeong Min, Dae Young Yoon, Choi, Chul Soon, Lim, Kyoung Ja, Moon, Jeung Hee, Young Lan Seo, Park, Sang Joon, Yoon, Young Cheol, Yun, Eun Joo, Kang, Ik Won, Lee, Gyung Kyu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Seoul Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 01.03.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of ultrasonography in the differentiation between benignity and malignancy in the evaluation of small thyroid nodules (the longest diameter <10 mm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fine needle aspiration or surgery was performed for the evaluation of seventy two (44 benign and 28 malignant) small thyroid nodules from fifty eight patients. Ultrasonographic findings were retrospectively reviewed for the margin, echogenecity, presence of microcalcification, intranodular cystic change and peripheral hypoechoic halo. RESULTS: Ill-defined margin was more common in malignant nodules (61% vs 11%, p<0.05). In internal echogenecity, either iso- or hyperechogenicity was more coomon in benign nodules (45% vs 18%, p<0.05) while malignant nodules were often markedly hypoechoic (39% vs 18%, p<0.05). Malignant nodules contained more microcalcifications (36% vs 9%, p<0.05) whereas benign nodules often showed intranodular cystic change(39% vs 7%, p<0.05) and hypoechoic halo (41% vs 18%, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography can be useful in the differentiation between benign and malignant small thyroid nodules.
ISSN:2288-5919
2288-5943