Why Overfitting Isn't Always Bad: Retrofitting Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings to Dictionaries

Cross-lingual word embeddings (CLWE) are often evaluated on bilingual lexicon induction (BLI). Recent CLWE methods use linear projections, which underfit the training dictionary, to generalize on BLI. However, underfitting can hinder generalization to other downstream tasks that rely on words from t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Zhang, Mozhi, Fujinuma, Yoshinari, Paul, Michael J, Boyd-Graber, Jordan
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 01.05.2020
Subjects
Dictionaries
Downstream effects
Post-processing
Retrofitting
Training
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Cross-lingual word embeddings (CLWE) are often evaluated on bilingual lexicon induction (BLI). Recent CLWE methods use linear projections, which underfit the training dictionary, to generalize on BLI. However, underfitting can hinder generalization to other downstream tasks that rely on words from the training dictionary. We address this limitation by retrofitting CLWE to the training dictionary, which pulls training translation pairs closer in the embedding space and overfits the training dictionary. This simple post-processing step often improves accuracy on two downstream tasks, despite lowering BLI test accuracy. We also retrofit to both the training dictionary and a synthetic dictionary induced from CLWE, which sometimes generalizes even better on downstream tasks. Our results confirm the importance of fully exploiting training dictionary in downstream tasks and explains why BLI is a flawed CLWE evaluation.
ISSN:2331-8422