Comparison and Analysis of Using Goal Programming and Rotation Cutting Formulas to Determine Forest Harvest / 目标规划与轮伐公式确定森林收获的比较分析

Based the forest resource inventory data of Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, the annual cut of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) and Chinese-fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) timber forests were calculated by multi-goal programming and traditional rotation cutting form...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inForest research (Beijing) Vol. 27; no. 1; p. 38
Main Authors 李婷婷, 陆元昌, 刘宪钊, 王霞, 庞丽峰
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published Beijing Chinese Academy of Forestry 01.01.2014
Subjects
Forests
Goal programming
Harvest
Timber
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Based the forest resource inventory data of Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, the annual cut of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) and Chinese-fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) timber forests were calculated by multi-goal programming and traditional rotation cutting formulas separately, and the different results for the same management period (2009-2019) from these two approaches were discussed. It shows that the harvest is generally larger by rotation cutting formulas, and the annual economic benefits of unit area by goal programming is 10-20 times that by rotation cutting formulas. Application of goal programming in forest harvest can regulate forest structure for normal forest, make forest better and achieve the maximum timber harvest and production and maximum net present value. 利用中国林科院热带林业实验研究中心2009年森林资源二类调查数据，分别利用目标线性规划与传统森林轮伐公式计算热林中心马尾松纯林和杉木纯林用材林年采伐量，比较分析同一个经理期（2009—2019年）两种计算方法的不同；结果表明：轮伐公式计算的采伐量一般偏大，且目标规划单位面积年经济收益是轮伐公式获得经济效益的10 20倍。利用目标规划法在同时实现材积收获量最大、出材量最大、净现值收益最大的目标前提下，
ISSN:1001-1498