VALVE IN VALVE TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION VERSUS REDO SURGICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN FAILING BIOPROSTHETIC VALVES: AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS

Valve in Valve - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (ViV-TAVI) has emerged as an alternative to the redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (redo-SAVR), which has been the standard of care. Methods A systematic electronic search of the scientific literature was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPU...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 71; no. 11; p. A1428
Main Authors Nalluri, Nikhil, Atti, Varunsiri, Kumar, Varun, Munir, Abdullah B, Asti, Deepak, Saouma, Samer, Gaddam, Sainath, Randhawa, Mandeep, Zgheib, Mohammad, Karam, Boutros, Spagnola, Jonathan, Royzman, Roman, Kandov, Ruben, Tamburrino, Frank, Maniatis, Gregory, Lafferty, James, Kliger, Chad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Limited 10.03.2018
Subjects
Aortic valve
Cardiology
Implantation
Meta-analysis
Surgeons
Surgery
Surgical implants
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Valve in Valve - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (ViV-TAVI) has emerged as an alternative to the redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (redo-SAVR), which has been the standard of care. Methods A systematic electronic search of the scientific literature was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(18)31969-7