전립선 재생검 방법: 초음파 또는 자기공명영상 유도하에 따른 생검 결과와 수술 후 성적 비교

Purpose: We compared biopsy results and surgical outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy to demonstrate efficacy of MRI-guided biopsy on previous biopsy negative patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Urologic Oncology, 15(2) pp. 72 - 78
Main Authors 정현우, 송완, 유재호, 강민용, 전황균, 정병창, 서성일, 전성수, 최한용, 김찬교, 박병관, 이현무
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한비뇨기종양학회 01.08.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2951-603X
2982-7043
DOI10.22465/kjuo.2017.15.2.72

Cover

Abstract Purpose: We compared biopsy results and surgical outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy to demonstrate efficacy of MRI-guided biopsy on previous biopsy negative patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 120 patients who were categorized into MRI-guided biopsy groups (n=20) and TRUS-guided biopsy groups (n=100). All patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) and had undergone radical prostatectomy (RP) after MRI-guided or TRUS-guided repeat biopsy between January 2010 and March 2016. Detection rate of significant cancer and Gleason score upgrading and downgrading were examined, in addition to biopsy results and subsequent RP outcomes. Results: Median values for prostate-specific antigen level of the TRUS-guided biopsy group and the MRI-guided biopsy group were 6.67 and 5.86 ng/mL (p=0.303), respectively. Median prostate volume of each group (34.1 mL vs. 23.5 mL, p=0.007), number of positive cores (2.0 vs. 3.0, p=0.001) and maximum cancer/core rate (30.0% vs. 60.0%, p<0.001) were statistically different. Positive core rates of each group were 21.9% and 87.1%, respectively. Pathologic T stage was the only variable that showed difference in surgical outcomes (p=0.002). Most of PCa was confirmed as clinically significant PCa after RP in MRI-guided biopsy group (95%). Conclusions: MRI-guided biopsy showed higher positive core rate and detection rate of clinically significant PCa than TRUS-guided biopsy in repeat biopsy setting. Prospective multicenter large-scale study and accumulation of data is expected to further define superiority of the MRI-guided biopsy. KCI Citation Count: 0
AbstractList Purpose: We compared biopsy results and surgical outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy to demonstrate efficacy of MRI-guided biopsy on previous biopsy negative patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 120 patients who were categorized into MRI-guided biopsy groups (n=20) and TRUS-guided biopsy groups (n=100). All patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) and had undergone radical prostatectomy (RP) after MRI-guided or TRUS-guided repeat biopsy between January 2010 and March 2016. Detection rate of significant cancer and Gleason score upgrading and downgrading were examined, in addition to biopsy results and subsequent RP outcomes. Results: Median values for prostate-specific antigen level of the TRUS-guided biopsy group and the MRI-guided biopsy group were 6.67 and 5.86 ng/mL (p=0.303), respectively. Median prostate volume of each group (34.1 mL vs. 23.5 mL, p=0.007), number of positive cores (2.0 vs. 3.0, p=0.001) and maximum cancer/core rate (30.0% vs. 60.0%, p<0.001) were statistically different. Positive core rates of each group were 21.9% and 87.1%, respectively. Pathologic T stage was the only variable that showed difference in surgical outcomes (p=0.002). Most of PCa was confirmed as clinically significant PCa after RP in MRI-guided biopsy group (95%). Conclusions: MRI-guided biopsy showed higher positive core rate and detection rate of clinically significant PCa than TRUS-guided biopsy in repeat biopsy setting. Prospective multicenter large-scale study and accumulation of data is expected to further define superiority of the MRI-guided biopsy. KCI Citation Count: 0
Author 전황균
김찬교
이현무
최한용
정병창
정현우
유재호
서성일
송완
전성수
박병관
강민용
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 정현우
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 2
  fullname: 송완
  organization: (이화여자대학교)
– sequence: 3
  fullname: 유재호
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 4
  fullname: 강민용
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 5
  fullname: 전황균
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 6
  fullname: 정병창
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 7
  fullname: 서성일
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 8
  fullname: 전성수
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 9
  fullname: 최한용
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 10
  fullname: 김찬교
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 11
  fullname: 박병관
  organization: (성균관대학교)
– sequence: 12
  fullname: 이현무
  organization: (성균관대학교)
BackLink https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002252031$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNrjYmDJy89LZWCQMjTQMzIyMTPVz84qzdczMjA01zM01TPSMzdiYuA0srQw0jU3MDFmAbFNDXXNDIwjOBh4i4szkwxMzc2NjEzNLTkZat8saHm9bO-blgUKb-atedM899WmBoXXG1a-3jTVSuHNlo43c3ve9vQovJ4x4XXXFKCSCa92bHi1eevrVa1vZjS-aW5UeDNnwev-lrdTZ7yZPkHh9ZQNr5fuUIAa82oTUOmeNzMbFN50zHjTsUDh7ewWhTctG98saFR4vbPl1dYJPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQdPNNcTZQzevKC0-OzkzPj8xE0yn58dnF8U7BoV4xptZWpgaW5gbk6IWAMxUgGw
ContentType Journal Article
DBID ACYCR
DOI 10.22465/kjuo.2017.15.2.72
DatabaseName Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate Comparison of Biopsy Results and Surgical Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Repeat Biopsy
EISSN 2982-7043
EndPage 78
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_6985387
GroupedDBID ACYCR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
GROUPED_DOAJ
ID FETCH-nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_69853873
ISSN 2951-603X
IngestDate Sun Mar 09 07:52:07 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language Korean
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_69853873
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_6985387
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-08
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-08
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Journal of Urologic Oncology, 15(2)
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher 대한비뇨기종양학회
Publisher_xml – name: 대한비뇨기종양학회
SSID ssib057722579
Score 3.9883745
Snippet Purpose: We compared biopsy results and surgical outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided...
SourceID nrf
SourceType Open Website
StartPage 72
SubjectTerms 비뇨기과학
Title 전립선 재생검 방법: 초음파 또는 자기공명영상 유도하에 따른 생검 결과와 수술 후 성적 비교
URI https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002252031
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Journal of Urologic Oncology, 2017, 15(2), , pp.72-78
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NaxNBFF9qvHgRRcVvBnEOEhL3e2e8zW5TqqBeWugtmM1WNJBCaC-C0NIIRQrm0GJEK7koKB5qtVBB_6Hs9H_wvZndZK0Vq5fl7cyb3_vaZd4M82EY1xsw7oHhP684iRlUXMdtVpgVBxW76dsP8AT-wMP9znfv-dOz7p05b26iVCqsWlpabFTjJ4fuK_mfqEIZxBV3yf5DZEegUAA0xBeeEGF4HinGtBZRYVLm0lpIhU_DSSyBV2GWkeI1KiJV5FAOdYKGuLShjOyhSQVXhE25hxMDyBhCaslU00nKoKl6ski14IxyEwkmKHdzAVgEuAwBkXBo6Cl1BGWe4mGQrWZKMEs3U2oj0pRSfhI14FpuAIhanKsgAckD-PKhZihqLFjZyrmui9ASDQqE8gjIAZladZAbWrkDLe0SrrQRaIG-XfSQtH22o7uL8v12PNrpg0dnMLswq5IBg1kolClcUA2gzSIL86mwcqXdYk3molEMFUrIxiwIpfDBQVO56QJiWpzHgdwgX0Wo_zzl9AiXt2ROjwqGQ1VABSvEE5Sw8zD6lFt5K64IiHA07khsyKIrvqnuXYY-PyvDkZXpOoXOS9-hlKVB-mKlgx0sHj-Ih5G0Hi_hzlkrqFpe1a7mLYunmR_IMn45z7wVP6o_XKi3OnUYtd2u-xySRhYcM47bQaAXW2QTI9AreDD-g34Fx7EjQ_TuN6XMzd9UgSyx3ZkvZIkzp4yT2XdChP5XTxsTrYUzxlM56Kbvf8jugMi3n-Tq1nBnmaTbH9KdzVtEfl2TW-v76-sk7ffS5xvA0hvubQ-_7KYfn8n-ilxdIfLNIH3R3d_sy5c9km5sp-_2SAYz3AHW7_LVMpFrfbk2IPuvu0R2P8vBCkm_dYe7vbPGjanaTDRdAXWVS_7sGuecUWovtJPzBnGasdkwE9dJrMSNbb8Rz7tWEMcBYy5PzOYF49rf8S4ehemScWL8oV42SoudpeQKpOCLjasqQj8BTVa9sg
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%EC%A0%84%EB%A6%BD%EC%84%A0+%EC%9E%AC%EC%83%9D%EA%B2%80+%EB%B0%A9%EB%B2%95%3A+%EC%B4%88%EC%9D%8C%ED%8C%8C+%EB%98%90%EB%8A%94+%EC%9E%90%EA%B8%B0%EA%B3%B5%EB%AA%85%EC%98%81%EC%83%81+%EC%9C%A0%EB%8F%84%ED%95%98%EC%97%90+%EB%94%B0%EB%A5%B8+%EC%83%9D%EA%B2%80+%EA%B2%B0%EA%B3%BC%EC%99%80+%EC%88%98%EC%88%A0+%ED%9B%84+%EC%84%B1%EC%A0%81+%EB%B9%84%EA%B5%90&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Urologic+Oncology%2C+15%282%29&rft.au=%EC%A0%95%ED%98%84%EC%9A%B0&rft.au=%EC%86%A1%EC%99%84&rft.au=%EC%9C%A0%EC%9E%AC%ED%98%B8&rft.au=%EA%B0%95%EB%AF%BC%EC%9A%A9&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%B9%84%EB%87%A8%EA%B8%B0%EC%A2%85%EC%96%91%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=2951-603X&rft.eissn=2982-7043&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=78&rft_id=info:doi/10.22465%2Fkjuo.2017.15.2.72&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_6985387
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2951-603X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2951-603X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2951-603X&client=summon