A Comparative Study of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Open Repair

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has dramatically changed the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) as the number of open aneurysm repairs have declined over time. This report compares AAA-related demographics, operative data, complications, and mortality after treatment by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of chest surgery pp. 263 - 269
Main Authors 배미주, 정성운, 이충원, 송승환, 김은지, 김창원
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 대한흉부외과학회 01.08.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2765-1606
2765-1614

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has dramatically changed the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) as the number of open aneurysm repairs have declined over time. This report compares AAA-related demographics, operative data, complications, and mortality after treatment by open aneurysm repair or EVAR. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 136 patients with AAAs who were treated over an 8-year time period with open aneurysm repair or EVAR. Results: The mean age of the EVAR group was higher than that of the open repair group (p=0.001), and hospital mortality did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.360). However, overall survival was significantly lower in the EVAR group (p=0.033). Conclusion: Although EVAR is the primary treatment modality for elderly patients, it would be ideal to set slightly more stringent criteria within the anatomical guidelines contained in the instructions for use of the EVAR device when treating younger patients. KCI Citation Count: 0
Bibliography:https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.4.263
ISSN:2765-1606
2765-1614