Evaluation of Techniques to Reduce Deer and Elk Damage to Agricultural Crops
Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) provide important recreational, ecological, and economic benefits, but can also cause substantial damage to agricultural crops. Cervid damage to agriculture creates challenges for wildlife agencies responsible for minimi...
Saved in:
Published in | Wildlife Society bulletin (2011) Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 358 - 365 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Wildlife Society
01.06.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) provide important recreational, ecological, and economic benefits, but can also cause substantial damage to agricultural crops. Cervid damage to agriculture creates challenges for wildlife agencies responsible for minimizing crop depredation while maintaining healthy deer and elk populations. Sunflower producers in southwestern Colorado, USA, have experienced high deer and elk damage and were interested in temporary methods to reduce damage that were cost-effective for rotational crops. To address this challenge, we investigated 3 temporary, non-lethal exclusion and repellent techniques for reducing deer and elk damage to sunflowers: 1) a polyrope electric fence, 2) the chemical repellent Plantskydd™, and 3) a winged fence. During July through October 2011 and 2012, we used a randomized block design to test the efficacy of these techniques by quantifying cervid damage to sunflowers and the number of deer and elk tracks traversing treatment and control plot boundaries. Using generalized linear mixedmodels we found that polyrope electric fences reduced deer and elk damage and presence within plots, while the repellent and winged fences did not reduce ungulate activity. Polyrope electric fences may be a suitable tool in areas where wildlife management agencies want to maintain deer and elk populations but reduce seasonal damage by cervids to high-value crops. In Colorado, use of an effective exclusion technique such as polyrope electric fence could also decrease the need for lethal depredation permits and damage compensation payments, and increase satisfaction among producers and the public. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) provide important recreational, ecological, and economic benefits, but can also cause substantial damage to agricultural crops. Cervid damage to agriculture creates challenges for wildlife agencies responsible for minimizing crop depredation while maintaining healthy deer and elk populations. Sunflower producers in southwestern Colorado, USA, have experienced high deer and elk damage and were interested in temporary methods to reduce damage that were cost-effective for rotational crops. To address this challenge, we investigated 3 temporary, non-lethal exclusion and repellent techniques for reducing deer and elk damage to sunflowers: 1) a polyrope electric fence, 2) the chemical repellent Plantskydd™, and 3) a winged fence. During July through October 2011 and 2012, we used a randomized block design to test the efficacy of these techniques by quantifying cervid damage to sunflowers and the number of deer and elk tracks traversing treatment and control plot boundaries. Using generalized linear mixedmodels we found that polyrope electric fences reduced deer and elk damage and presence within plots, while the repellent and winged fences did not reduce ungulate activity. Polyrope electric fences may be a suitable tool in areas where wildlife management agencies want to maintain deer and elk populations but reduce seasonal damage by cervids to high-value crops. In Colorado, use of an effective exclusion technique such as polyrope electric fence could also decrease the need for lethal depredation permits and damage compensation payments, and increase satisfaction among producers and the public. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. |
Author | Justin W. Fischer Matthew Hammond Heather E. Johnson Charles Anderson Patricia D. Dorsey Kurt C. Ver Cauteren W. David Walter |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Heather E. Johnson organization: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 415 Turner Drive, Durango, CO 81303, USA – sequence: 2 fullname: Justin W. Fischer organization: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA – sequence: 3 fullname: Matthew Hammond organization: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 151 E 16th Street, Durango, CO 81301, USA – sequence: 4 fullname: Patricia D. Dorsey organization: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 415 Turner Drive, Durango, CO 81303, USA – sequence: 5 fullname: W. David Walter organization: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA – sequence: 6 fullname: Charles Anderson organization: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA – sequence: 7 fullname: Kurt C. Ver Cauteren organization: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA |
BookMark | eNqVyzEKwjAUgOEgClbtHd4FKklqoY7SVhycxD3E9FVTY6JJo3h7EbyA0z98_DMyts7iiCQ852VWFCs6JWkIPaWUrVi5Zjwh--YpTZSDdhZcB0dUF6sfEQMMDg7YRoVQI3qQtoXGXKGWN3nGr27OXqtohuilgcq7e1iQSSdNwPTXOVlum2O1y_owOC_uXt-kf4uXNm1wSp-iMZwyJvJScJEXZf738AFf70dN |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2014 The Wildlife Society |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2014 The Wildlife Society |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 2328-5540 |
EndPage | 365 |
ExternalDocumentID | wildsocibull2011.38.2.358 |
GroupedDBID | 05W 1OC 24P 2AX 33P 8-1 A00 AAESR AAHKG AAXRX ABBHK ABCUV ABHUG ABPLY ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACCZN ACPOU ACXBN ADAWD ADDAD ADEOM ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADZMN AEUPB AEUQT AFAZZ AFGKR AFPWT AFVGU AGJLS AGUYK AIURR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMYDB AQVQM AZVAB BDRZF BRXPI CBGCD CWIXF DCZOG DOOOF DWIUU G-S JAAYA JBMMH JBS JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JSODD JST LATKE LEEKS LITHE LOXES MEWTI MRFUL MRSTM MY~ M~E P2W P4E SA0 SUPJJ WBKPD WIK WXSBR WYJ |
ID | FETCH-jstor_primary_wildsocibull2011_38_2_3583 |
IngestDate | Fri Feb 02 07:01:05 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-jstor_primary_wildsocibull2011_38_2_3583 |
ParticipantIDs | jstor_primary_wildsocibull2011_38_2_358 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20140601 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 6 year: 2014 text: 20140601 day: 1 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Wildlife Society bulletin (2011) |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Wildlife Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wildlife Society |
SSID | ssj0001418912 |
Score | 3.8512638 |
Snippet | Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) provide important recreational, ecological, and economic benefits, but can also... |
SourceID | jstor |
SourceType | Publisher |
StartPage | 358 |
SubjectTerms | Crop damage Crop rotation Crops Deer Elks Fences Original Article Sunflowers Wildlife damage management Wildlife ecology Wildlife management |
Title | Evaluation of Techniques to Reduce Deer and Elk Damage to Agricultural Crops |
URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/wildsocibull2011.38.2.358 |
Volume | 38 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ07T8MwEMct2gkGxFO85QGJIUrUxGmajlUJqhBlQEV0i5zaQRUlqdKyMPDZubPTOFQMhSWK8lLin3U-X87_I-TaD_wgkEFieyLt2ljlyOYcZincFVxMeKfVFrg4efgYDJ79-3F7bMqlqtUly8SZfP66ruQ_VOEYcMVVsn8gWz0UDsA-8IUtEIbtRoyjSqobfb7RSo5ViTY8oSYrJgVJnSUZzd4A8Tum6MDZ3mthRDf6RT5f1L1UMBViNk1lldOZlCLd6I_iWF6LHwy0D2lFjlVW26qScrBQWGa9ONbddIF9w0S_VY1xC6PmeSbMXyysFjDl1q0Dfn2xKP84lyEJ1zepUyvD9-Ml9VCjbBr4b6ENHkyrboBZWOtoXs2aMq3qXg7MTBeVWJPHhhmFwH6MDaEEWVnoeA7c2SAN5mKS5_CrFnXz3bCL1UfryafKlRjtkd1yDkB7Gug-2ZLZAdkxSOQheTBoaZ5Sg5Yuc6rRUkRLAS0FtFSjxbN1tFShPSLOXTTqD2z1NvFcC4zE698UszD2YvgmdkyaWZ7JE0Jdzjye8E7ShglvKkU36SayM-mIlE2ggdkpudnwoWcbX3lOtg3uC9JcFh_yEnyyZXKlmvkbYcNI5g |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787 |
linkProvider | ISSN International Centre |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation+of+Techniques+to+Reduce+Deer+and+Elk+Damage+to+Agricultural+Crops&rft.jtitle=Wildlife+Society+bulletin+%282011%29&rft.au=Heather+E.+Johnson&rft.au=Justin+W.+Fischer&rft.au=Matthew+Hammond&rft.au=Patricia+D.+Dorsey&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.pub=Wildlife+Society&rft.eissn=2328-5540&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=358&rft.epage=365&rft.externalDocID=wildsocibull2011.38.2.358 |