Evaluation of Techniques to Reduce Deer and Elk Damage to Agricultural Crops

Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) provide important recreational, ecological, and economic benefits, but can also cause substantial damage to agricultural crops. Cervid damage to agriculture creates challenges for wildlife agencies responsible for minimi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWildlife Society bulletin (2011) Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 358 - 365
Main Authors Heather E. Johnson, Justin W. Fischer, Matthew Hammond, Patricia D. Dorsey, W. David Walter, Charles Anderson, Kurt C. Ver Cauteren
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Wildlife Society 01.06.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) provide important recreational, ecological, and economic benefits, but can also cause substantial damage to agricultural crops. Cervid damage to agriculture creates challenges for wildlife agencies responsible for minimizing crop depredation while maintaining healthy deer and elk populations. Sunflower producers in southwestern Colorado, USA, have experienced high deer and elk damage and were interested in temporary methods to reduce damage that were cost-effective for rotational crops. To address this challenge, we investigated 3 temporary, non-lethal exclusion and repellent techniques for reducing deer and elk damage to sunflowers: 1) a polyrope electric fence, 2) the chemical repellent Plantskydd™, and 3) a winged fence. During July through October 2011 and 2012, we used a randomized block design to test the efficacy of these techniques by quantifying cervid damage to sunflowers and the number of deer and elk tracks traversing treatment and control plot boundaries. Using generalized linear mixedmodels we found that polyrope electric fences reduced deer and elk damage and presence within plots, while the repellent and winged fences did not reduce ungulate activity. Polyrope electric fences may be a suitable tool in areas where wildlife management agencies want to maintain deer and elk populations but reduce seasonal damage by cervids to high-value crops. In Colorado, use of an effective exclusion technique such as polyrope electric fence could also decrease the need for lethal depredation permits and damage compensation payments, and increase satisfaction among producers and the public. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
AbstractList Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) provide important recreational, ecological, and economic benefits, but can also cause substantial damage to agricultural crops. Cervid damage to agriculture creates challenges for wildlife agencies responsible for minimizing crop depredation while maintaining healthy deer and elk populations. Sunflower producers in southwestern Colorado, USA, have experienced high deer and elk damage and were interested in temporary methods to reduce damage that were cost-effective for rotational crops. To address this challenge, we investigated 3 temporary, non-lethal exclusion and repellent techniques for reducing deer and elk damage to sunflowers: 1) a polyrope electric fence, 2) the chemical repellent Plantskydd™, and 3) a winged fence. During July through October 2011 and 2012, we used a randomized block design to test the efficacy of these techniques by quantifying cervid damage to sunflowers and the number of deer and elk tracks traversing treatment and control plot boundaries. Using generalized linear mixedmodels we found that polyrope electric fences reduced deer and elk damage and presence within plots, while the repellent and winged fences did not reduce ungulate activity. Polyrope electric fences may be a suitable tool in areas where wildlife management agencies want to maintain deer and elk populations but reduce seasonal damage by cervids to high-value crops. In Colorado, use of an effective exclusion technique such as polyrope electric fence could also decrease the need for lethal depredation permits and damage compensation payments, and increase satisfaction among producers and the public. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Author Justin W. Fischer
Matthew Hammond
Heather E. Johnson
Charles Anderson
Patricia D. Dorsey
Kurt C. Ver Cauteren
W. David Walter
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Heather E. Johnson
  organization: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 415 Turner Drive, Durango, CO 81303, USA
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Justin W. Fischer
  organization: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Matthew Hammond
  organization: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 151 E 16th Street, Durango, CO 81301, USA
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Patricia D. Dorsey
  organization: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 415 Turner Drive, Durango, CO 81303, USA
– sequence: 5
  fullname: W. David Walter
  organization: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Charles Anderson
  organization: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Kurt C. Ver Cauteren
  organization: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
BookMark eNqVyzEKwjAUgOEgClbtHd4FKklqoY7SVhycxD3E9FVTY6JJo3h7EbyA0z98_DMyts7iiCQ852VWFCs6JWkIPaWUrVi5Zjwh--YpTZSDdhZcB0dUF6sfEQMMDg7YRoVQI3qQtoXGXKGWN3nGr27OXqtohuilgcq7e1iQSSdNwPTXOVlum2O1y_owOC_uXt-kf4uXNm1wSp-iMZwyJvJScJEXZf738AFf70dN
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 The Wildlife Society
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 The Wildlife Society
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 2328-5540
EndPage 365
ExternalDocumentID wildsocibull2011.38.2.358
GroupedDBID 05W
1OC
24P
2AX
33P
8-1
A00
AAESR
AAHKG
AAXRX
ABBHK
ABCUV
ABHUG
ABPLY
ABTLG
ABXSQ
ACAHQ
ACCZN
ACPOU
ACXBN
ADAWD
ADDAD
ADEOM
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADZMN
AEUPB
AEUQT
AFAZZ
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFVGU
AGJLS
AGUYK
AIURR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMYDB
AQVQM
AZVAB
BDRZF
BRXPI
CBGCD
CWIXF
DCZOG
DOOOF
DWIUU
G-S
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBS
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLS
JLXEF
JPM
JSODD
JST
LATKE
LEEKS
LITHE
LOXES
MEWTI
MRFUL
MRSTM
MY~
M~E
P2W
P4E
SA0
SUPJJ
WBKPD
WIK
WXSBR
WYJ
ID FETCH-jstor_primary_wildsocibull2011_38_2_3583
IngestDate Fri Feb 02 07:01:05 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-jstor_primary_wildsocibull2011_38_2_3583
ParticipantIDs jstor_primary_wildsocibull2011_38_2_358
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20140601
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 6
  year: 2014
  text: 20140601
  day: 1
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Wildlife Society bulletin (2011)
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Wildlife Society
Publisher_xml – name: Wildlife Society
SSID ssj0001418912
Score 3.8512638
Snippet Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) provide important recreational, ecological, and economic benefits, but can also...
SourceID jstor
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 358
SubjectTerms Crop damage
Crop rotation
Crops
Deer
Elks
Fences
Original Article
Sunflowers
Wildlife damage management
Wildlife ecology
Wildlife management
Title Evaluation of Techniques to Reduce Deer and Elk Damage to Agricultural Crops
URI https://www.jstor.org/stable/wildsocibull2011.38.2.358
Volume 38
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ07T8MwEMct2gkGxFO85QGJIUrUxGmajlUJqhBlQEV0i5zaQRUlqdKyMPDZubPTOFQMhSWK8lLin3U-X87_I-TaD_wgkEFieyLt2ljlyOYcZincFVxMeKfVFrg4efgYDJ79-3F7bMqlqtUly8SZfP66ruQ_VOEYcMVVsn8gWz0UDsA-8IUtEIbtRoyjSqobfb7RSo5ViTY8oSYrJgVJnSUZzd4A8Tum6MDZ3mthRDf6RT5f1L1UMBViNk1lldOZlCLd6I_iWF6LHwy0D2lFjlVW26qScrBQWGa9ONbddIF9w0S_VY1xC6PmeSbMXyysFjDl1q0Dfn2xKP84lyEJ1zepUyvD9-Ml9VCjbBr4b6ENHkyrboBZWOtoXs2aMq3qXg7MTBeVWJPHhhmFwH6MDaEEWVnoeA7c2SAN5mKS5_CrFnXz3bCL1UfryafKlRjtkd1yDkB7Gug-2ZLZAdkxSOQheTBoaZ5Sg5Yuc6rRUkRLAS0FtFSjxbN1tFShPSLOXTTqD2z1NvFcC4zE698UszD2YvgmdkyaWZ7JE0Jdzjye8E7ShglvKkU36SayM-mIlE2ggdkpudnwoWcbX3lOtg3uC9JcFh_yEnyyZXKlmvkbYcNI5g
link.rule.ids 315,783,787
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation+of+Techniques+to+Reduce+Deer+and+Elk+Damage+to+Agricultural+Crops&rft.jtitle=Wildlife+Society+bulletin+%282011%29&rft.au=Heather+E.+Johnson&rft.au=Justin+W.+Fischer&rft.au=Matthew+Hammond&rft.au=Patricia+D.+Dorsey&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.pub=Wildlife+Society&rft.eissn=2328-5540&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=358&rft.epage=365&rft.externalDocID=wildsocibull2011.38.2.358