THE EFFECTS OF RESOURCE SHORTAGE ON DEESCALATION IN A SIMULATED PRICE WAR

A simulated price war between two competing gas stations provided the context to assess the effects on deescalation of the subject's financial shortage, the competitor's financial shortage, and a message from the competitor conveying a nonexploitative intent. Subject shortages encouraged g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe International journal of conflict management Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 5 - 20
Main Authors Rick Fry, William, Betz, Brian, Pruitt, Dean G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published MCB UP Ltd 01.01.1996
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A simulated price war between two competing gas stations provided the context to assess the effects on deescalation of the subject's financial shortage, the competitor's financial shortage, and a message from the competitor conveying a nonexploitative intent. Subject shortages encouraged gasoline price increases deescalation and competitor shortages encouraged price decreases escalation. Subjects who were suffering a financial shortage rated their competitor as less likely to cooperate and more likely to exploit them than those who were not. Results were discussed in terms of a simplification of Pruitt and Kimmel's 1977 goalexpectation hypothesis. One possible explanation for our results is that subjects make a comparison of relative strength before choosing either to deescalate or escalate.
Bibliography:istex:B222F242C94C89E64B36759B22B1CD72990BACA3
ark:/67375/4W2-VLWQ82WF-P
original-pdf:3440070101.pdf
filenameID:3440070101
href:eb022773.pdf
ISSN:1044-4068
1758-8545
DOI:10.1108/eb022773