fish community of Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario: Status, stressors, and remediation over 25 years

Hamilton Harbour is a large (21 km ²) protected harbour located at the western end of Lake Ontario that was designated as an Area of Concern in 1985 by the International Joint Commission. As part of the designation, the fish community was deemed “impaired.” One of the long-term goals of the Ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAquatic ecosystem health & management Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 206 - 218
Main Authors Boston, C. M, R. G. Randall, J. A. Hoyle, J. L. Mossman, J. N. Bowlby
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis 2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hamilton Harbour is a large (21 km ²) protected harbour located at the western end of Lake Ontario that was designated as an Area of Concern in 1985 by the International Joint Commission. As part of the designation, the fish community was deemed “impaired.” One of the long-term goals of the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan is to rehabilitate the fishery to a state, at least in part, to what it was prior to the degrading effects of industrial and municipal pollution, habitat loss, and invasive species. Since the Area of Concern designation, the nearshore fish community has been monitored regularly via a federal boat electrofishing program (1988–2013) and more recently, by a trap net program (2006–2012). During the study period, the harbour underwent significant physical and biological change which was related to both lake-wide (e.g. Dreissenids) and localized harbour events (e.g. habitat restoration). The fish community was assessed temporally using two indices of ecosystem health, the Great Lakes Index of Biotic Integrity and Proportion of Piscivore Biomass, and species-specific catch trends at unaltered sites or sites modified by habitat restoration. Early on, the fish community was dominated by tolerant species characteristic of degraded, eutrophic environments and piscivore abundance was low. The fish community responded positively to ecosystem actions during the first decade that improved water quality, increased physical habitat and reduced invasive species, but further progress was confounded by the interactions with other factors in the last decade that included new invasive species and a decline in water quality. Fish community assessments in the last decade, using both the indices found that the fish community was still impaired and dominated by non-native and pollution tolerant species. The Index of Biotic Integrity was a suitable indicator of ecosystem health strengthened by a consistent assessment with the Proportion of Piscivore Biomass index. A science based refinement of the existing Index in the future would benefit the ability to assess nearshore fish assemblages in the context of conservation goals.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2015.1106290
ISSN:1539-4077
1539-4077