Developing Thinking Communities through Talk: Two Case Studies from Science Classes. CELA Research Report

One especially productive avenue of research is the close analysis of classroom talk. In the micro-ethnographic approach used in this study, conversation is not simply a metaphor, but becomes the unit of analysis. For the study, one key element to the functioning of thinking communities is the way t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors Hellermann, John, Cole, KimMarie, Zuengler, Jane
Format Report
LanguageEnglish
Published National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement, University at Albany, State University of New York 2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract One especially productive avenue of research is the close analysis of classroom talk. In the micro-ethnographic approach used in this study, conversation is not simply a metaphor, but becomes the unit of analysis. For the study, one key element to the functioning of thinking communities is the way they are co-constructed by participants. While all the talk that occurs in any given classroom is potentially relevant to some aspect of learning and achievement, it is the discussion of the subject matter--the content--that can provide crucial insights into the kinds of learning and achievement that are valued and made available in schools. This paper focuses on the subset of data involving exchanges coded by the field team in the classroom as subject matter exchanges; data are drawn from a 5-year longitudinal study of language use in linguistically and culturally diverse subject matter classrooms. The paper explains that, during data collection, research teams of two people were in each classroom, with two video cameras; team members also took observational field notes during classes, and periodically interviewed teachers and students. It notes that the dominant pattern for classroom discourse is teacher-centered, but classroom discourse research has begun to acknowledge student-initiated discourse. The paper finds that, after reviewing the discourse in two high school science classrooms in some detail, the observation is that learning and achievement is accomplished by the construction of thinking communities through quite different discourse practices. It notes some issues relevant to the co-construction of classroom discourse practices across the two classrooms. (Contains 23 references.) (NKA)
AbstractList One especially productive avenue of research is the close analysis of classroom talk. In the micro-ethnographic approach used in this study, conversation is not simply a metaphor, but becomes the unit of analysis. For the study, one key element to the functioning of thinking communities is the way they are co-constructed by participants. While all the talk that occurs in any given classroom is potentially relevant to some aspect of learning and achievement, it is the discussion of the subject matter--the content--that can provide crucial insights into the kinds of learning and achievement that are valued and made available in schools. This paper focuses on the subset of data involving exchanges coded by the field team in the classroom as subject matter exchanges; data are drawn from a 5-year longitudinal study of language use in linguistically and culturally diverse subject matter classrooms. The paper explains that, during data collection, research teams of two people were in each classroom, with two video cameras; team members also took observational field notes during classes, and periodically interviewed teachers and students. It notes that the dominant pattern for classroom discourse is teacher-centered, but classroom discourse research has begun to acknowledge student-initiated discourse. The paper finds that, after reviewing the discourse in two high school science classrooms in some detail, the observation is that learning and achievement is accomplished by the construction of thinking communities through quite different discourse practices. It notes some issues relevant to the co-construction of classroom discourse practices across the two classrooms. (Contains 23 references.) (NKA)
Author Zuengler, Jane
Cole, KimMarie
Hellermann, John
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Hellermann, John
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Cole, KimMarie
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Zuengler, Jane
BackLink http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED456451$$DView record in ERIC
BookMark eNqFybsKwjAUgOEMOnh7A4fzAgpi6-AmacXByWYvIT1tDs2lJKni22vB3en_4F-ymfMOF4wKfKLxA7kOhCbXT-De2tFRIoyQdPBjp0FI059BvDxwGRGqNDbTboO3UClCpxC4kTFi3AMv7xd4YEQZlP5i8CGt2byVJuLm1xXbXkvBbzsMpOohkJXhXZdFlp-y_HD8sz-NKz6W
ContentType Report
CorporateAuthor National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement, Albany, NY
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement, Albany, NY
DBID ERI
GA5
DatabaseName ERIC
ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
DatabaseTitle ERIC
DatabaseTitleList ERIC
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ERI
  name: ERIC
  url: https://eric.ed.gov/
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
ERIC ED456451
ExternalDocumentID ED456451
GroupedDBID ERI
GA5
ID FETCH-eric_primary_ED4564513
IEDL.DBID ERI
IngestDate Tue Sep 02 19:10:06 EDT 2025
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-eric_primary_ED4564513
OpenAccessLink http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED456451
PageCount 37
ParticipantIDs eric_primary_ED456451
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2001-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2001-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2001
  text: 2001-00-00
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationYear 2001
Publisher National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement, University at Albany, State University of New York
Publisher_xml – name: National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement, University at Albany, State University of New York
Score 2.491353
Snippet One especially productive avenue of research is the close analysis of classroom talk. In the micro-ethnographic approach used in this study, conversation is...
SourceID eric
SourceType Open Access Repository
SubjectTerms Case Studies
Classroom Communication
Classroom Research
Communication Research
Conversation
Discourse Analysis
Ethnography
High Schools
Longitudinal Studies
Science Instruction
Title Developing Thinking Communities through Talk: Two Case Studies from Science Classes. CELA Research Report
URI http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED456451
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwY2BQSTRJMU81TQQmXktgbjJJTjTTTbRIM9FNs0ixNEwGtg-S0kAD-r5-Zh6hJl4RphFMDLBbHIldUekCPgUF2OthBlZRkE4PaHM5VBi6dhmponATZGCDtGiFGJhS80QYMl3ge5IUQDdkgsalFaB7MkAnmSpAr8lRCEnMybZSCCnPV3AGVisK0NV9CqDNHwrQ7KcAvr8S2K9VcHb1cVSALZlTgFgoyiDj5hri7KELclJ8AeQMiXiYU43FGFiA_fxUCQYFA-M0ozTjxERgBZoI7DSZWRgkGRonGqVYpIIO1zUxk2QQxWqEFA5xaQYuyIIpEJJhYCkpKk2VBdagJUly4AADAPRddzw
linkProvider ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.title=Developing+Thinking+Communities+through+Talk%3A+Two+Case+Studies+from+Science+Classes.+CELA+Research+Report&rft.au=Hellermann%2C+John&rft.au=Cole%2C+KimMarie&rft.au=Zuengler%2C+Jane&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.pub=National+Research+Center+on+English+Learning+%26+Achievement%2C+University+at+Albany%2C+State+University+of+New+York&rft.externalDocID=ED456451