Fcirc statistic for steady-state evoked potentials; a generalized version of Tcirc2 statistic

•Fcirc statistic shows how to compare means of multiple groups of Fourier estimates.•Fcirc statistic derives from Welch’s test but for multiple comparisons.•Unlike MANOVA, Fcirc statistic does not need equal variances across multiple means.•Fcirc statistic is used for multiple intra/inter-group comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiomedical signal processing and control Vol. 87
Main Authors Norouzpour, Amir, Roberts, Tawna L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Fcirc statistic shows how to compare means of multiple groups of Fourier estimates.•Fcirc statistic derives from Welch’s test but for multiple comparisons.•Unlike MANOVA, Fcirc statistic does not need equal variances across multiple means.•Fcirc statistic is used for multiple intra/inter-group comparisons of brain response.•Fcirc is primarily for Fourier samples extracted from steady-state evoked potentials. Steady-state evoked potentials (ssEP) provide objective tools for studying brain function in different experimental conditions. Frequency components of brain response to repetitive stimuli have been analyzed using Tcirc2 statistic; however, Tcirc2 statistic is limited to comparisons between two means. Here, we present a generalized version of Tcirc2 statistic which enables us to compare multiple means of Fourier estimates corresponding to multiple conditions within participant(s) or multiple groups of participants. Frequency components of brain response are extracted from ssEP data using Fourier transform. Discrete Fourier measurements at frequency of interest are represented on the complex plane for statistical analyses. We present a new statistic called Fcirc statistic to compare three or more clusters of Fourier estimates whether they have equal or unequal variances or/and numbers of samples. Fcirc statistic derives from Welch’s test but for multiple comparisons. We demonstrate the validity of Fcirc statistic using simulated and empirical clusters of Fourier estimates with equal and unequal variances and numbers of samples. Type-I error remains 0.05 for all the conditions. Furthermore, we illustrate that the probability of achieving a significant difference among multiple means when the true means are unequal depends on the total length of ssEP data but is independent of the duration chosen for performing Fourier transform on a fixed length of ssEP data. Fcirc statistic is useful for multiple intra- and inter-participant and group comparisons of brain response at any frequency component extracted from ssEP data whether the group means have equal or unequal variances.
ISSN:1746-8094
DOI:10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105549