Review of applications of Bayesian meta-analysis in systematic reviews

Background: Systematic reviews are important sources of evidence in health care research. These reviews may or may not include meta-analysis as a statistical assimilation of the results of several studies in order to acquire a pooled estimate. Systematic review with meta-analysis is considered as a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal journal of medicine and public health Vol. 4; no. 1
Main Authors Melissa Glenda Lewis, N Sreekumaran Nair
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Makhdoomi Printers 01.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background: Systematic reviews are important sources of evidence in health care research. These reviews may or may not include meta-analysis as a statistical assimilation of the results of several studies in order to acquire a pooled estimate. Systematic review with meta-analysis is considered as a robust method of evidence synthesis. The methodology concerned with traditional meta-analysis does not incorporate external prior information. Hence, Bayesian methods are essential due to the natural process of incorporating the past information and updating the belief. Bayesian methods to meta-analysis have been developed with a motivation from the limitations of traditional meta-analysis such as dealing with missing data, problem with limited number of studies and problem with sparse event data in both the groups. The present article aims to unearth as to what extent Bayesian methods have been used in systematic reviews, evolution and its applications. This article also highlights the existing challenges and opportunities. Methods: The literature search was performed in databases such as Cochrane, PubMed, ProQuest and Scopus using the keywords “Bayesian Meta-analysis” and “Bayesian Meta-analyses”. All the methodology and application oriented papers specific to Bayesian meta-analysis were considered relevant for this review. Conclusion: Bayesian meta-analysis has gained popularity in the field of evidence synthesis of clinical trials. However, it did not pick up momentum in summarizing public health interventions, owing to the fact that public health interventions are targeted to highly heterogeneous population, multi-component interventions, and multiple outcomes and influenced by the context
AbstractList Background: Systematic reviews are important sources of evidence in health care research. These reviews may or may not include meta-analysis as a statistical assimilation of the results of several studies in order to acquire a pooled estimate. Systematic review with meta-analysis is considered as a robust method of evidence synthesis. The methodology concerned with traditional meta-analysis does not incorporate external prior information. Hence, Bayesian methods are essential due to the natural process of incorporating the past information and updating the belief. Bayesian methods to meta-analysis have been developed with a motivation from the limitations of traditional meta-analysis such as dealing with missing data, problem with limited number of studies and problem with sparse event data in both the groups. The present article aims to unearth as to what extent Bayesian methods have been used in systematic reviews, evolution and its applications. This article also highlights the existing challenges and opportunities. Methods: The literature search was performed in databases such as Cochrane, PubMed, ProQuest and Scopus using the keywords “Bayesian Meta-analysis” and “Bayesian Meta-analyses”. All the methodology and application oriented papers specific to Bayesian meta-analysis were considered relevant for this review. Conclusion: Bayesian meta-analysis has gained popularity in the field of evidence synthesis of clinical trials. However, it did not pick up momentum in summarizing public health interventions, owing to the fact that public health interventions are targeted to highly heterogeneous population, multi-component interventions, and multiple outcomes and influenced by the context
Author N Sreekumaran Nair
Melissa Glenda Lewis
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Melissa Glenda Lewis
– sequence: 2
  fullname: N Sreekumaran Nair
BookMark eNqtjE0KwjAUhIMo-Nc75AKFNLVJu1UsuhX34VlfJaVNSl5Renu1eARXwwzfN2s2d97hjK2k1DoulNgtWUTUCCESmSmRyRUrL_i0-OK-5tD3ra1gsN7Rt-9hRLLgeIcDxOCgHckSt47TSAN2H7LiYdJpyxY1tITRLzfsXB6vh1N899CYPtgOwmg8WDMNPjwMhI_foqnvqtAF5LLSeodplSst9U1CmtcpFolK__n1BhcsVyE
ContentType Journal Article
DBID DOA
DatabaseName Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2277-9604
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_fd6979a82c774e3c86727b2a38f3e916
GroupedDBID 5VS
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
KQ8
M~E
OK1
ID FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fd6979a82c774e3c86727b2a38f3e9163
IEDL.DBID DOA
IngestDate Thu Jul 04 21:09:17 EDT 2024
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fd6979a82c774e3c86727b2a38f3e9163
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/fd6979a82c774e3c86727b2a38f3e916
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fd6979a82c774e3c86727b2a38f3e916
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Global journal of medicine and public health
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Makhdoomi Printers
Publisher_xml – name: Makhdoomi Printers
SSID ssj0001256052
Score 4.622942
Snippet Background: Systematic reviews are important sources of evidence in health care research. These reviews may or may not include meta-analysis as a statistical...
SourceID doaj
SourceType Open Website
SubjectTerms Bayesian Meta-analysis, Systematic Reviews, Public Health
Title Review of applications of Bayesian meta-analysis in systematic reviews
URI https://doaj.org/article/fd6979a82c774e3c86727b2a38f3e916
Volume 4
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8QwDLbQDYgF8RRvZWCN0CVtmowcojqQjgmk26okdSUGegiVgX-P3USiGwOMyZDEjmR_ju0vANeEABSaSstYuEoWNhjpWlOyMQx-rimEiNycvHoyy5ficV2uJ199cU1YogdOirvpWuMq562KBFRQR8upw6C8tp1Gwjaj9Z2Xk2Aqva6QJ-dmogkR_-gx6j3YzVBP3KYt9mEL-wPYXuVk9iHU6V1ebDoxTSPzeOG_kLsbxRsOXvpMHCJee_HDvCwykegRPNT3z3dLyWdo3hN7RMN8zuMESdlkKZvfpNTHMOs3PZ6ACFy5Elj1SKGM66zyhFFM4csY2hCrU1j8fb-z_1jkHHYUQYBUWHUBs-HjEy_JhQ_harytbwCzoa4
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,2115
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review+of+applications+of+Bayesian+meta-analysis+in+systematic+reviews&rft.jtitle=Global+journal+of+medicine+and+public+health&rft.au=Melissa+Glenda+Lewis&rft.au=N+Sreekumaran+Nair&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.pub=Makhdoomi+Printers&rft.eissn=2277-9604&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_fd6979a82c774e3c86727b2a38f3e916