Evaluating the impact of Brainstorming and Scamper technique on promoting the creativity of architectural design skills

Background and Objectives: Creativity or Innovation is a controversial issue in various scientific fields, especially educational sciences and psychology. If we consider design as an imaginative creation of pre intended possible form of things to achieve different humanistic purpose; in this process...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNashrīyah-i ʻIlmī pizhūhishī-i fannāvarī-i āmūzish Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 689 - 706
Main Authors M. Talebi, M. Moosavi, K. Poushaneh
Format Journal Article
LanguagePersian
Published Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (SRTTU) 01.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2008-0441
2345-5462
DOI10.22061/jte.2019.5585.2243

Cover

Abstract Background and Objectives: Creativity or Innovation is a controversial issue in various scientific fields, especially educational sciences and psychology. If we consider design as an imaginative creation of pre intended possible form of things to achieve different humanistic purpose; in this process, Creativity, as a multilevel concept, can be thought as a process that, although formed in the human minds, but is has also objective appearance in architectural patterns, methods and designs. In recent decades, the creativity concept Investigation, its functions and its influence on learning - as well as the ways of teaching creativity - have become a matter of great importance. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the levels of basic and altered creativity in the architectural design studio (3) course, based on the four main components of Torrance Creativity Thinking Test (Fluency, flexibility, originality and Elaboration) and Scamper tecnique. Materials and Methods: The required data of this research were collected by using the experimental research method in the form of the pre-test and post-test design through both Torrance's test  and drawing sketch among the students of Ardabil Azad university in the second semester of the academic year 2017-2018.  The research sample consisted of 40 students divided into two groups with two individual instructors. In first step, by using the pre-test, the level of students' creativity in each of 4 dimensions was measured. Then, in order to evaluate altered creativity, the first group was trained by common training - approved in higher education- and the second group instructed and evaluated through the experimental intervention – implementation of creativity training program (Teaching Brainstorming technique) in 6 sessions, by Related exercises. Finally, in second step, by using Scamper technique, drawing sketch test was given to both groups. Findings: Statistical data were analyzed by running both MANOVA and ANOVA techniques in SPSS. The Results obtained from the implementation of the experimental method, showed statistically significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (common and approved method of training) at the levels of Torrance creative thinking components. And among 4 components of Torrance creative thinking, Fluency has been improved by creativity training techniques more than other components in both multiple choice and sketching tests. In fact, it could be deducted that students, were able to draw more ideas related to the subject of design, after learning creative techniques in the post-test step, which showed an increase in the fluid level of creativity of this group. Also, based on data analysis, the originality dimension is at a lower level than other components. Conclusion: While creativity based instruction enhances architectural design skills and impacts on all   components of creativity (Fluency, flexibility, originality and Elaboration), the current teaching method not only can undermine the students' originality but also may lead the design process to imitation. In addition, in the originality dimension, due to factors which has influence on it such as time and space, the student's experience, adequate practice and group interaction, it is suggested to consider each of these components in assessment techniques.   === COPYRIGHTS  ©2020 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.  ===
AbstractList Background and Objectives: Creativity or Innovation is a controversial issue in various scientific fields, especially educational sciences and psychology. If we consider design as an imaginative creation of pre intended possible form of things to achieve different humanistic purpose; in this process, Creativity, as a multilevel concept, can be thought as a process that, although formed in the human minds, but is has also objective appearance in architectural patterns, methods and designs. In recent decades, the creativity concept Investigation, its functions and its influence on learning - as well as the ways of teaching creativity - have become a matter of great importance. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the levels of basic and altered creativity in the architectural design studio (3) course, based on the four main components of Torrance Creativity Thinking Test (Fluency, flexibility, originality and Elaboration) and Scamper tecnique. Materials and Methods: The required data of this research were collected by using the experimental research method in the form of the pre-test and post-test design through both Torrance's test  and drawing sketch among the students of Ardabil Azad university in the second semester of the academic year 2017-2018.  The research sample consisted of 40 students divided into two groups with two individual instructors. In first step, by using the pre-test, the level of students' creativity in each of 4 dimensions was measured. Then, in order to evaluate altered creativity, the first group was trained by common training - approved in higher education- and the second group instructed and evaluated through the experimental intervention – implementation of creativity training program (Teaching Brainstorming technique) in 6 sessions, by Related exercises. Finally, in second step, by using Scamper technique, drawing sketch test was given to both groups. Findings: Statistical data were analyzed by running both MANOVA and ANOVA techniques in SPSS. The Results obtained from the implementation of the experimental method, showed statistically significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (common and approved method of training) at the levels of Torrance creative thinking components. And among 4 components of Torrance creative thinking, Fluency has been improved by creativity training techniques more than other components in both multiple choice and sketching tests. In fact, it could be deducted that students, were able to draw more ideas related to the subject of design, after learning creative techniques in the post-test step, which showed an increase in the fluid level of creativity of this group. Also, based on data analysis, the originality dimension is at a lower level than other components. Conclusion: While creativity based instruction enhances architectural design skills and impacts on all   components of creativity (Fluency, flexibility, originality and Elaboration), the current teaching method not only can undermine the students' originality but also may lead the design process to imitation. In addition, in the originality dimension, due to factors which has influence on it such as time and space, the student's experience, adequate practice and group interaction, it is suggested to consider each of these components in assessment techniques.   === COPYRIGHTS  ©2020 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.  ===
Author K. Poushaneh
M. Moosavi
M. Talebi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: M. Talebi
  organization: Department of architecture, Faculty of architecture and urban planning, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
– sequence: 2
  fullname: M. Moosavi
  organization: Department of architecture, Faculty of architecture and urban planning, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
– sequence: 3
  fullname: K. Poushaneh
  organization: Department of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
BookMark eNqtjEtOwzAYhC1UJAr0BGx8gRQ_03QLKoJ12Ud_bCdxcOxgO0W9PSlCnIDVjObx3aKVD94g9EDJljFS0schmy0jdL-VspJLJvgVWjMuZCFFyVaLJ6QqiBD0Bm1SGgghy6gkZLdGX4cTuBmy9R3OvcF2nEBlHFr8FMH6lEMcLx14jY8KxslEnI3qvf2cDQ4eTzGM4e-uollYJ5vPFwRE1dtlnecIDmuTbOdx-rDOpXt03YJLZvOrd-jt5fD-_FroAEM9RTtCPNcBbP0ThNjVELNVztTKNJxpUVJaCbFrNAje7LloNZGirVrN_5P1DZHvcpU
ContentType Journal Article
DBID DOA
DOI 10.22061/jte.2019.5585.2243
DatabaseName DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
EISSN 2345-5462
EndPage 706
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ceb32d46118447bda43b934fd054f8fd
GroupedDBID ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
GROUPED_DOAJ
ID FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ceb32d46118447bda43b934fd054f8fd3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2008-0441
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:22:23 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language Persian
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ceb32d46118447bda43b934fd054f8fd3
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/ceb32d46118447bda43b934fd054f8fd
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ceb32d46118447bda43b934fd054f8fd
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Nashrīyah-i ʻIlmī pizhūhishī-i fannāvarī-i āmūzish
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (SRTTU)
Publisher_xml – name: Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (SRTTU)
SSID ssj0002246007
ssib044736757
ssib048878094
Score 4.2162566
Snippet Background and Objectives: Creativity or Innovation is a controversial issue in various scientific fields, especially educational sciences and psychology. If...
SourceID doaj
SourceType Open Website
StartPage 689
SubjectTerms "architectural design"
"brainstorming"
"creativity components"
"scamper"
"torrance creative thinking test"
Title Evaluating the impact of Brainstorming and Scamper technique on promoting the creativity of architectural design skills
URI https://doaj.org/article/ceb32d46118447bda43b934fd054f8fd
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09T8MwELVQJxYEBcS3PLCGOo7z4ZFWrQoSLIDULbJjG1FKUrVF_H3u7FBlY4DVSRzrdPG9i-_eI-SaWYO6i3kUFzqBBEXCJwWhIGJaK65VaoXFBueHx2z6Iu5n6awj9YU1YYEeOBhuUEG2x43IAAgLkWujRKJlIpwBrOEKZ3D3ZZJ1kinwJLgzASS8DazgpXnxk8jMPemLQGJ2VJ7z5_8ACgIlEecQ4AZzz6AZy5sU0DSMYU9Ph9Lfx57JPtlrQSO9DYs9IDtO9VFvua3NOCRf45a0u36lgOho6H2kjaNDlIDACsgPvKZqQ58qBVB5RbfsrbSp6TJU5bWPBySJqhI4ReesARZhfMkHXb-_LRbrI3I3GT-PphGuulwG5ooSuaT9AFi4bC1c_mbh5Jj06qa2J4RKo5TMVGYdq0TBjNKxgz0CjCY1V7E9JcO_v-_sPyY5J7scM2P_v-SC9DarT3sJ8GGjr7ynfANjzMYD
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating+the+impact+of+Brainstorming+and+Scamper+technique+on+promoting+the+creativity+of+architectural+design+skills&rft.jtitle=Nashr%C4%AByah-i+%CA%BBIlm%C4%AB+pizh%C5%ABhish%C4%AB-i+fann%C4%81var%C4%AB-i+%C4%81m%C5%ABzish&rft.au=M.+Talebi&rft.au=M.+Moosavi&rft.au=K.+Poushaneh&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.pub=Shahid+Rajaee+Teacher+Training+University+%28SRTTU%29&rft.issn=2008-0441&rft.eissn=2345-5462&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=689&rft.epage=706&rft_id=info:doi/10.22061%2Fjte.2019.5585.2243&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_ceb32d46118447bda43b934fd054f8fd
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2008-0441&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2008-0441&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2008-0441&client=summon