Radiological properties of neurological injury following acute type A aortic dissection repairCentral MessagePerspective

Objective: The study objective was to assess the radiological properties of acute type A aortic dissection–related neurological injuries and identify predictors of neurological injury. Methods: Our single-center, retrospective, observational study included all patients who underwent acute type A aor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJTCVS open Vol. 15; pp. 38 - 60
Main Authors Jacob Ede, MD, Karl Teurneau-Hermansson, MD, Birgitta Ramgren, MD, PhD, Marion Moseby-Knappe, MD, PhD, Mårten Larsson, MD, Johan Sjögren, MD, PhD, Per Wierup, MD, PhD, Shahab Nozohoor, MD, PhD, Igor Zindovic, MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: The study objective was to assess the radiological properties of acute type A aortic dissection–related neurological injuries and identify predictors of neurological injury. Methods: Our single-center, retrospective, observational study included all patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair between January 1998 and December 2021. Multivariable analyses and Cox regression were performed to identify predictors of embolic lesions, watershed lesions, neurological injury, 30-day mortality, and late mortality. Results: A total of 538 patients were included. Of these, 120 patients (22.3%) experienced postoperative neurological injury; 74 patients (13.8%) had postoperative stroke, and 36 patients (6.8%) had postoperative coma. The 30-day mortality was 22.7% in the neurological injury group versus 5.8% in the no neurological injury group (P < .001). We identified several independent predictors of neurological injury. Cerebral malperfusion (odds ratio, 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-5.00), systemic hypotensive shock (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.43), and aortic arch replacement (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-8.08) predicted embolic lesions. Diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 5.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-15.42), previous cardiac surgery (odds ratio, 8.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-50.43), duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08), cardiopulmonary bypass time (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01), ascending aortic/arch cannulation (odds ratio, 5.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-17.12), and left ventricular cannulation (odds ratio, 17.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-188.01) predicted watershed lesions. Retrograde cerebral perfusion (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.84) had a protective effect against watershed lesions. Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated that the radiological features of neurological injury may be as important as clinical characteristics in understanding the pathophysiology and causality behind neurological injury related to acute type A aortic dissection repair.
ISSN:2666-2736
2666-2736