Abstract TP356: Post-Acute Stroke Experience Survey- Development and Pilot Testing

Abstract only Background: Administrative claims data show variability in post-acute stroke care. Stroke survivors without health insurance are not included in claims data statistics. The PASES survey was developed and tested to describe stroke care experience of underserved survivors participating i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStroke (1970) Vol. 51; no. Suppl_1
Main Authors Anderson, Jane A, Kimmel, Barbara, Martin, Kirt, Ovalle, Anette, Ifeorah, Chizoba, Jobe, Emilia, Evans-Hudnall, Gina, Venkatasubba Rao, Chethan P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.02.2020
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only Background: Administrative claims data show variability in post-acute stroke care. Stroke survivors without health insurance are not included in claims data statistics. The PASES survey was developed and tested to describe stroke care experience of underserved survivors participating in V-STOP a telehealth self-management program. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were completed to elicit feedback from survivors on experiences during their stroke event, emergency and hospital care, and after discharge. Items on PASES were established based on participants’ responses and survey was piloted in a sample of underserved survivors (N=95). Descriptive statistics and Chi-square analysis were applied to describe stroke survivors’ experiences and differences based on health insurance status. Results: The sample was 45% female, mean age 57, 18% Black and 60% Hispanic. Most (60%) had an annual income of less than $25,000 and 44% had no insurance. Only 25% reported calling 911. However (60%) report presenting to a hospital within 2 hours of stroke symptoms recognition. Nearly half (42%) reported not knowing whether they received a “clot dissolving” medication. Fifty-four percent did not receive rehabilitation after discharge. Eighty-percent reported seeing a healthcare provider after discharge. Most (61%) saw a primary care provider and 22% saw a neurologist. However, only 24% reported seeing a provider within one month of hospital discharge. No significant differences were identified between insured vs. uninsured with respect to race, ethnicity, income, calling 911, receiving inpatient rehab, seeing a provider after discharge and follow up with primary care provider vs. neurologist. Significant differences were identified between insured vs. uninsured with respect to presenting to a hospital within 2 hours of stroke symptoms (35 vs 18 [p=0.023]) and in receiving no rehab after discharge (27 vs 12 [p=0.02]). Conclusion: Results suggest low utilization of EMS, delayed presentation to hospital, limited access to rehabilitation after discharge and limited access to timely follow-up with stroke specialist among underserved stroke survivors. Health insurance status may influence delayed hospital presentation and access to rehabilitation services.
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.TP356