Abstract LB-249: Examination of analytical factors impacting concordance of plasma-tumor testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS)

• Published in: Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Vol. 77; no. 13_Supplement; p. LB-249
• Main Authors: Stetson, Daniel, Dougherty, Brian, Ahmed, Ambar, Lubinski, Tristan, Markovets, Aleksandra, Thress, Kenneth, McEwen, Robert, Schiavon, Gaia, Whitston, David, Nuttall, Barrett, Barrett, J. Carl
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.07.2017
• ISSN: 0008-5472; 1538-7445
• DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-249

The increased usage of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing for oncology clinical research demonstrates a critical need for sensitive and specific testing. While we have observed a high degree of concordance between single tumor mutations in tumor and plasma, several recent studies have highlighted a lack of concordance between plasma and tumor panel NGS gene panel testing due to biological and technical factors. To explore further these factors and benchmark ctDNA NGS testing services, a set of matched plasma, tumor, and normal samples from 24 subjects were acquired from three biobanking companies. Replicate 2 ml-plasma samples were tested by four ctDNA sequencing companies, and matching tumor/normal samples were tested by two tumor sequencing companies. Concordance was measured by comparing plasma mutations to tumor mutations as well as comparing mutations among the same plasma tested by the ctDNA companies. While our experience with NGS of matched samples from clinical trials typically identifies ~30% of patients with no detectable mutation and therefore likely not shedding tumor DNA, with the retrospectively collected commercial samples ~60% lacked detectable high confidence mutations, likely due to quality control issues with sample collection. We also found variation in the concordance of ctDNA mutation detection rates among the four vendors, due to significant differences in DNA yield and assay sensitivity. While factors such as tumor heterogeneity and timing of plasma-tumor collection can lower concordance rates, the majority of discordance in our study was due to technical rather than biological variation. Assay analytical variance and the impact of reporting false positive variants are key factors that need to be addressed as plasma-based NGS testing is more widely incorporated into translational and clinical research. Examples illustrating the complexity of the analyses and giving support for confidence in ctDNA testing results will be given. Citation Format: Daniel Stetson, Brian Dougherty, Ambar Ahmed, Tristan Lubinski, Aleksandra Markovets, Kenneth Thress, Robert McEwen, Gaia Schiavon, David Whitston, Barrett Nuttall, J. Carl Barrett. Examination of analytical factors impacting concordance of plasma-tumor testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-249. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-249