A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided Pectoral Nerve Block Type II versus Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy

Abstract Background Breast surgery is becoming more and more common. Patients are often middle-aged women and with high public awareness around issues of breast cancer. The numbers are increasing. Breast surgery is an exceedingly common procedure and associated with an increased incidence of acute a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQJM : An International Journal of Medicine Vol. 117; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors Ali, Eman Adel, Salama Awad, Hala Gomaa, Tharwat Sayed, Ayman Ibraheem, Salem Ahmed, Sarah Ahmed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 03.07.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Abstract Background Breast surgery is becoming more and more common. Patients are often middle-aged women and with high public awareness around issues of breast cancer. The numbers are increasing. Breast surgery is an exceedingly common procedure and associated with an increased incidence of acute and chronic pain. Regional anaesthesia techniques may improve post-operative analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgery. Aim of the Work The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of PECS block versus PCA with iv morphine to provide prolonged post-operative analgesia. The secondary objective is to identify the side effects of both techniques as post-operative analgesic techniques. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized clinical trial study conducted in Ain-shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt for 6 months after medical ethical committee approval. The participants were allocated randomly into two groups of 25 patients each: group A: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by PECS block at the end of the operation before extubation, group B: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by the PCA at the end of surgery after extubation. Results The VAS score in the PECS group was statistically significantly lower at the 1st, 2nd and 4th hours. In this case, the use of PECS for postoperative analgesia is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment, but with less systemic side effect as the nausea and vomiting is significantly higher in the PCA group than the PECS group at the 6th hour, however, the need of intra operative opioids in PCA group is significant. Conclusion In modified radical mastectomy, PECS block is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment. Compared with intravenous PCA, PECS block can be considered as a more preferable method because it can avoid the systemic actions of morphine used for PCA, and can decrease the need of analgesia intra-operative, however PCA analgesic effect last longer, less invasive technique and easier to be used while PECS block require hand skills and limited to 24 hours analgesia only.
AbstractList Abstract Background Breast surgery is becoming more and more common. Patients are often middle-aged women and with high public awareness around issues of breast cancer. The numbers are increasing. Breast surgery is an exceedingly common procedure and associated with an increased incidence of acute and chronic pain. Regional anaesthesia techniques may improve post-operative analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgery. Aim of the Work The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of PECS block versus PCA with iv morphine to provide prolonged post-operative analgesia. The secondary objective is to identify the side effects of both techniques as post-operative analgesic techniques. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized clinical trial study conducted in Ain-shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt for 6 months after medical ethical committee approval. The participants were allocated randomly into two groups of 25 patients each: group A: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by PECS block at the end of the operation before extubation, group B: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by the PCA at the end of surgery after extubation. Results The VAS score in the PECS group was statistically significantly lower at the 1st, 2nd and 4th hours. In this case, the use of PECS for postoperative analgesia is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment, but with less systemic side effect as the nausea and vomiting is significantly higher in the PCA group than the PECS group at the 6th hour, however, the need of intra operative opioids in PCA group is significant. Conclusion In modified radical mastectomy, PECS block is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment. Compared with intravenous PCA, PECS block can be considered as a more preferable method because it can avoid the systemic actions of morphine used for PCA, and can decrease the need of analgesia intra-operative, however PCA analgesic effect last longer, less invasive technique and easier to be used while PECS block require hand skills and limited to 24 hours analgesia only.
Author Ali, Eman Adel
Salama Awad, Hala Gomaa
Salem Ahmed, Sarah Ahmed
Tharwat Sayed, Ayman Ibraheem
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Eman Adel
  surname: Ali
  fullname: Ali, Eman Adel
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hala Gomaa
  surname: Salama Awad
  fullname: Salama Awad, Hala Gomaa
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ayman Ibraheem
  surname: Tharwat Sayed
  fullname: Tharwat Sayed, Ayman Ibraheem
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Sarah Ahmed
  surname: Salem Ahmed
  fullname: Salem Ahmed, Sarah Ahmed
BookMark eNqdUEtOwzAQtVCRaIEDsJsLpHWaQOiyVECzKETQriMTT4KLYwfbCcplOQsutII1q3kavZ_eiAyUVkjIRUjHIZ1Fk_dtjXzyWjCkCR3TmB6RYRhf0WAazaLBASfTyxMysnZLKY2T-HpIPuew0HXDDHOiQ3h2Le_hBd0HooKNdIZZ3SoO963gyCHDwmnDJDyg8fQbqYs3WPcNQppCh8a2FlLlVR0q7XHmbVE5n-GfWkpvMVdMVmgFg1KbH3Lw2OC-APNZmbbuz-tXINTB0MJGcTSVFqqCleaiFN76iXFR-HIrZt2uaN2fkeOSSYvn-3tKwrvb9WIZFEZba7DMGyNqZvo8pPluyPx7yHw_ZO6HjP6j-QJmg4d_
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1093/qjmed/hcae070.040
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1460-2393
ExternalDocumentID 10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_040
GroupedDBID ---
-E4
.2P
.I3
.XZ
.ZR
08G
0R~
123
18M
29P
2WC
4.4
482
48X
5RE
5VS
5WA
5WD
70D
8F7
AABZA
AACZT
AAJKP
AAMDB
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPNW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AARHZ
AASNB
AAUAY
AAVAP
AAYEP
AAYXX
ABEUO
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABKDP
ABLJU
ABNHQ
ABNKS
ABOCM
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABQNK
ABWST
ABXVV
ABZBJ
ACGFS
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ACUTO
ACYHN
ADBBV
ADEYI
ADEZT
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADJQC
ADOCK
ADQBN
ADRIX
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYVW
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEJOX
AEKSI
AEMDU
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFFZL
AFIYH
AFOFC
AFXAL
AFXEN
AGINJ
AGKEF
AGQXC
AGSYK
AGUTN
AHMBA
AHXPO
AIJHB
AJEEA
AKWXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
APIBT
APWMN
ATGXG
AXUDD
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BHONS
BTRTY
BVRKM
C45
CDBKE
CITATION
CS3
CZ4
DAKXR
DILTD
D~K
E3Z
EBS
EE~
ENERS
F5P
F9B
FECEO
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
GAUVT
GJXCC
GX1
H13
H5~
HAR
HW0
HZ~
IOX
J21
JXSIZ
KAQDR
KOP
KQ8
KSI
KSN
M-Z
MHKGH
N9A
NGC
NOMLY
NOYVH
O9-
OAUYM
OAWHX
OB2
OCZFY
ODMLO
OHH
OJQWA
OJZSN
OK1
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
P2P
PAFKI
PEELM
PQQKQ
Q1.
Q5Y
R44
RD5
RHF
RIG
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
TCURE
TEORI
TJX
TR2
VVN
WH7
WOQ
X7H
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YOC
YXANX
ZKX
~91
ID FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_0403
ISSN 1460-2725
IngestDate Thu Sep 12 20:59:16 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue Supplement_1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-crossref_primary_10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_0403
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_040
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-07-03
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-07-03
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-07-03
  day: 03
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle QJM : An International Journal of Medicine
PublicationYear 2024
SSID ssj0004748
Score 4.942348
Snippet Abstract Background Breast surgery is becoming more and more common. Patients are often middle-aged women and with high public awareness around issues of...
SourceID crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Title A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided Pectoral Nerve Block Type II versus Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy
Volume 117
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1Lb5tAEMdXSSpVvVR9qulLc-ipCCdmAeMjrZKYSKRp7Ui-oQWWmDa2U4MVpR-2n6WzD2BjJVLSC7IRjLDnBzvM_meWkE85hvAe6zM7y_sUX1AK306DrLBpkHtOwBmnXBQ4xyf-6Mw9nnrTre2hoVpa12kv-3NrXcn_eBX3oV9FlewDPNsaxR34Gf2LW_Qwbu_l41Ddzrp591j2h26EV2cX9YpVYtEkxKDMMa48lQl6dMmJUDlaX3AY-2WJ91AriiyhzlhXIkEo1iOSfVtPVctVURQo1OwXaEK0MDnnVcmkOlEebH-75PoCZOHBsqqNXd0J5aIxKCQ5OV-dL0WWIl7mZSHC4B9MzRjFrBLzGk2lhY6bvx_H1p05TB1QxxsygVBVfh-IWYow562UZMzwLmBWeKXoHuFX62g5Z-0ANZmx1RWrrTG7Vqng8FrYiFJ8MHOd6lZ2-NwKZ3Pe5dbVVzOV4rhSdkuNp7_r79vOQFVi97ixj6plHNshQ9Wb6ntDrr8qk7lJ_9ZRSXXs-v1TXs_hLGMcH7S9fdWn6mYP8I2xuVVMKq0ATaSRRJtI0MQ2eeQMhp5Qsx5NO3WTO5ALx7W_qJnQH9I9aWLPuAojJDNiq8kz8lT7EEJF-HOyxRcvyOPGny_J3xAM0EGCDhp06EAHBTo0oIMEHSToIECHKAIFOhigg-YSOtCh5RYQdNgAHRB0uAm6cUK5aAxW0IEODeigQYcO9Fekf3gw-Tqym_8nuVQ9YJI7_UFfk53FcsHfECgYRtd-ihGfW7isyANOPTrMBjQLnMLz-S75fH-7bx9y8DvypOP7PdmpV2v-AYPnOv0oMfkHCxzZGw
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27955,27956
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Comparative+Study+between+Ultrasound+Guided+Pectoral+Nerve+Block+Type+II+versus+Intravenous+Patient+Controlled+Analgesia+for+Intra-Operative+and+Post-Operative+Analgesia+in+Patients+Undergoing+Modified+Radical+Mastectomy&rft.jtitle=QJM+%3A+An+International+Journal+of+Medicine&rft.au=Ali%2C+Eman+Adel&rft.au=Salama+Awad%2C+Hala+Gomaa&rft.au=Tharwat+Sayed%2C+Ayman+Ibraheem&rft.au=Salem+Ahmed%2C+Sarah+Ahmed&rft.date=2024-07-03&rft.issn=1460-2725&rft.eissn=1460-2393&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fqjmed%2Fhcae070.040&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_040
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1460-2725&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1460-2725&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1460-2725&client=summon