A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided Pectoral Nerve Block Type II versus Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy
Abstract Background Breast surgery is becoming more and more common. Patients are often middle-aged women and with high public awareness around issues of breast cancer. The numbers are increasing. Breast surgery is an exceedingly common procedure and associated with an increased incidence of acute a...
Saved in:
Published in | QJM : An International Journal of Medicine Vol. 117; no. Supplement_1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
03.07.2024
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Abstract Background Breast surgery is becoming more and more common. Patients are often middle-aged women and with high public awareness around issues of breast cancer. The numbers are increasing. Breast surgery is an exceedingly common procedure and associated with an increased incidence of acute and chronic pain. Regional anaesthesia techniques may improve post-operative analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgery. Aim of the Work The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of PECS block versus PCA with iv morphine to provide prolonged post-operative analgesia. The secondary objective is to identify the side effects of both techniques as post-operative analgesic techniques. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized clinical trial study conducted in Ain-shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt for 6 months after medical ethical committee approval. The participants were allocated randomly into two groups of 25 patients each: group A: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by PECS block at the end of the operation before extubation, group B: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by the PCA at the end of surgery after extubation. Results The VAS score in the PECS group was statistically significantly lower at the 1st, 2nd and 4th hours. In this case, the use of PECS for postoperative analgesia is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment, but with less systemic side effect as the nausea and vomiting is significantly higher in the PCA group than the PECS group at the 6th hour, however, the need of intra operative opioids in PCA group is significant. Conclusion In modified radical mastectomy, PECS block is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment. Compared with intravenous PCA, PECS block can be considered as a more preferable method because it can avoid the systemic actions of morphine used for PCA, and can decrease the need of analgesia intra-operative, however PCA analgesic effect last longer, less invasive technique and easier to be used while PECS block require hand skills and limited to 24 hours analgesia only. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Background Breast surgery is becoming more and more common. Patients are often middle-aged women and with high public awareness around issues of breast cancer. The numbers are increasing. Breast surgery is an exceedingly common procedure and associated with an increased incidence of acute and chronic pain. Regional anaesthesia techniques may improve post-operative analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgery. Aim of the Work The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of PECS block versus PCA with iv morphine to provide prolonged post-operative analgesia. The secondary objective is to identify the side effects of both techniques as post-operative analgesic techniques. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized clinical trial study conducted in Ain-shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt for 6 months after medical ethical committee approval. The participants were allocated randomly into two groups of 25 patients each: group A: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by PECS block at the end of the operation before extubation, group B: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by the PCA at the end of surgery after extubation. Results The VAS score in the PECS group was statistically significantly lower at the 1st, 2nd and 4th hours. In this case, the use of PECS for postoperative analgesia is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment, but with less systemic side effect as the nausea and vomiting is significantly higher in the PCA group than the PECS group at the 6th hour, however, the need of intra operative opioids in PCA group is significant. Conclusion In modified radical mastectomy, PECS block is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment. Compared with intravenous PCA, PECS block can be considered as a more preferable method because it can avoid the systemic actions of morphine used for PCA, and can decrease the need of analgesia intra-operative, however PCA analgesic effect last longer, less invasive technique and easier to be used while PECS block require hand skills and limited to 24 hours analgesia only. |
Author | Ali, Eman Adel Salama Awad, Hala Gomaa Salem Ahmed, Sarah Ahmed Tharwat Sayed, Ayman Ibraheem |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Eman Adel surname: Ali fullname: Ali, Eman Adel – sequence: 2 givenname: Hala Gomaa surname: Salama Awad fullname: Salama Awad, Hala Gomaa – sequence: 3 givenname: Ayman Ibraheem surname: Tharwat Sayed fullname: Tharwat Sayed, Ayman Ibraheem – sequence: 4 givenname: Sarah Ahmed surname: Salem Ahmed fullname: Salem Ahmed, Sarah Ahmed |
BookMark | eNqdUEtOwzAQtVCRaIEDsJsLpHWaQOiyVECzKETQriMTT4KLYwfbCcplOQsutII1q3kavZ_eiAyUVkjIRUjHIZ1Fk_dtjXzyWjCkCR3TmB6RYRhf0WAazaLBASfTyxMysnZLKY2T-HpIPuew0HXDDHOiQ3h2Le_hBd0HooKNdIZZ3SoO963gyCHDwmnDJDyg8fQbqYs3WPcNQppCh8a2FlLlVR0q7XHmbVE5n-GfWkpvMVdMVmgFg1KbH3Lw2OC-APNZmbbuz-tXINTB0MJGcTSVFqqCleaiFN76iXFR-HIrZt2uaN2fkeOSSYvn-3tKwrvb9WIZFEZba7DMGyNqZvo8pPluyPx7yHw_ZO6HjP6j-QJmg4d_ |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1093/qjmed/hcae070.040 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1460-2393 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_040 |
GroupedDBID | --- -E4 .2P .I3 .XZ .ZR 08G 0R~ 123 18M 29P 2WC 4.4 482 48X 5RE 5VS 5WA 5WD 70D 8F7 AABZA AACZT AAJKP AAMDB AAMVS AAOGV AAPNW AAPQZ AAPXW AARHZ AASNB AAUAY AAVAP AAYEP AAYXX ABEUO ABIXL ABJNI ABKDP ABLJU ABNHQ ABNKS ABOCM ABPTD ABQLI ABQNK ABWST ABXVV ABZBJ ACGFS ACUFI ACUTJ ACUTO ACYHN ADBBV ADEYI ADEZT ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIPN ADJQC ADOCK ADQBN ADRIX ADRTK ADVEK ADYVW ADZXQ AEGPL AEJOX AEKSI AEMDU AENZO AEPUE AETBJ AEWNT AFFZL AFIYH AFOFC AFXAL AFXEN AGINJ AGKEF AGQXC AGSYK AGUTN AHMBA AHXPO AIJHB AJEEA AKWXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC APIBT APWMN ATGXG AXUDD BAWUL BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BHONS BTRTY BVRKM C45 CDBKE CITATION CS3 CZ4 DAKXR DILTD D~K E3Z EBS EE~ ENERS F5P F9B FECEO FLUFQ FOEOM FOTVD FQBLK GAUVT GJXCC GX1 H13 H5~ HAR HW0 HZ~ IOX J21 JXSIZ KAQDR KOP KQ8 KSI KSN M-Z MHKGH N9A NGC NOMLY NOYVH O9- OAUYM OAWHX OB2 OCZFY ODMLO OHH OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OPAEJ OVD OWPYF P2P PAFKI PEELM PQQKQ Q1. Q5Y R44 RD5 RHF RIG ROL ROX ROZ RUSNO RW1 RXO TCURE TEORI TJX TR2 VVN WH7 WOQ X7H YAYTL YKOAZ YOC YXANX ZKX ~91 |
ID | FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_0403 |
ISSN | 1460-2725 |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 12 20:59:16 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | Supplement_1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-crossref_primary_10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_0403 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_040 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-07-03 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-07-03 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2024 text: 2024-07-03 day: 03 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | QJM : An International Journal of Medicine |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
SSID | ssj0004748 |
Score | 4.942348 |
Snippet | Abstract Background Breast surgery is becoming more and more common. Patients are often middle-aged women and with high public awareness around issues of... |
SourceID | crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database |
Title | A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided Pectoral Nerve Block Type II versus Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy |
Volume | 117 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1Lb5tAEMdXSSpVvVR9qulLc-ipCCdmAeMjrZKYSKRp7Ui-oQWWmDa2U4MVpR-2n6WzD2BjJVLSC7IRjLDnBzvM_meWkE85hvAe6zM7y_sUX1AK306DrLBpkHtOwBmnXBQ4xyf-6Mw9nnrTre2hoVpa12kv-3NrXcn_eBX3oV9FlewDPNsaxR34Gf2LW_Qwbu_l41Ddzrp591j2h26EV2cX9YpVYtEkxKDMMa48lQl6dMmJUDlaX3AY-2WJ91AriiyhzlhXIkEo1iOSfVtPVctVURQo1OwXaEK0MDnnVcmkOlEebH-75PoCZOHBsqqNXd0J5aIxKCQ5OV-dL0WWIl7mZSHC4B9MzRjFrBLzGk2lhY6bvx_H1p05TB1QxxsygVBVfh-IWYow562UZMzwLmBWeKXoHuFX62g5Z-0ANZmx1RWrrTG7Vqng8FrYiFJ8MHOd6lZ2-NwKZ3Pe5dbVVzOV4rhSdkuNp7_r79vOQFVi97ixj6plHNshQ9Wb6ntDrr8qk7lJ_9ZRSXXs-v1TXs_hLGMcH7S9fdWn6mYP8I2xuVVMKq0ATaSRRJtI0MQ2eeQMhp5Qsx5NO3WTO5ALx7W_qJnQH9I9aWLPuAojJDNiq8kz8lT7EEJF-HOyxRcvyOPGny_J3xAM0EGCDhp06EAHBTo0oIMEHSToIECHKAIFOhigg-YSOtCh5RYQdNgAHRB0uAm6cUK5aAxW0IEODeigQYcO9Fekf3gw-Tqym_8nuVQ9YJI7_UFfk53FcsHfECgYRtd-ihGfW7isyANOPTrMBjQLnMLz-S75fH-7bx9y8DvypOP7PdmpV2v-AYPnOv0oMfkHCxzZGw |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,27955,27956 |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Comparative+Study+between+Ultrasound+Guided+Pectoral+Nerve+Block+Type+II+versus+Intravenous+Patient+Controlled+Analgesia+for+Intra-Operative+and+Post-Operative+Analgesia+in+Patients+Undergoing+Modified+Radical+Mastectomy&rft.jtitle=QJM+%3A+An+International+Journal+of+Medicine&rft.au=Ali%2C+Eman+Adel&rft.au=Salama+Awad%2C+Hala+Gomaa&rft.au=Tharwat+Sayed%2C+Ayman+Ibraheem&rft.au=Salem+Ahmed%2C+Sarah+Ahmed&rft.date=2024-07-03&rft.issn=1460-2725&rft.eissn=1460-2393&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fqjmed%2Fhcae070.040&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1093_qjmed_hcae070_040 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1460-2725&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1460-2725&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1460-2725&client=summon |