Addressing complex structures of measurement error arising in the exposure assessment in occupational epidemiology using a Bayesian hierarchical approach
Exposure assessment in occupational epidemiology may involve multiple unknown quantities that are measured or reconstructed simultaneously for groups of workers and over several years. Additionally, exposures may be collected using different assessment strategies, depending on the period of exposure...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
21.03.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
DOI | 10.48550/arxiv.2503.17161 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Exposure assessment in occupational epidemiology may involve multiple unknown
quantities that are measured or reconstructed simultaneously for groups of
workers and over several years. Additionally, exposures may be collected using
different assessment strategies, depending on the period of exposure. As a
consequence, researchers who are analyzing occupational cohort studies are
commonly faced with challenging structures of exposure measurement error,
involving complex dependence structures and multiple measurement error models,
depending on the period of exposure. However, previous work has often made many
simplifying assumptions concerning these errors. In this work, we propose a
Bayesian hierarchical approach to account for a broad range of error structures
arising in occupational epidemiology. The considered error structures may
involve several unknown quantities that can be subject to mixtures of Berkson
and classical measurement error. It is possible to account for different error
structures, depending on the exposure period and the location of a worker.
Moreover, errors can present complex dependence structures over time and
between workers. We illustrate the proposed hierarchical approach on a subgroup
of the German cohort of uranium miners to account for potential exposure
uncertainties in the association between radon exposure and lung cancer
mortality. The performance of the proposed approach and its sensitivity to
model misspecification are evaluated in a simulation study. The results show
that biases in estimates arising from very complex measurement errors can be
corrected through the proposed Bayesian hierarchical approach. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2503.17161 |