Are there any differences in the cardiovascular tolerance between classical NSAIDs and coxibs?

Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLa Presse médicale (1983) Vol. 35; no. 9 Spec No 1; p. 1S25
Main Authors Valat, Jean-Pierre, Deray, Gilbert, Héloire, François
Format Journal Article
LanguageFrench
Published France 01.09.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0755-4982
2213-0276
2213-0276
DOI10.1016/S0755-4982(06)74937-5

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAIDs in comparison with non-exposed subjects. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown on increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found on increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, aedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAIDs. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAIDs and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAIDs. These studies suggest that all the NSAIDs, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAIDs, specific (coxibs) or not.
AbstractList Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAIDs in comparison with non-exposed subjects. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown on increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found on increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, aedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAIDs. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAIDs and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAIDs. These studies suggest that all the NSAIDs, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAIDs, specific (coxibs) or not.Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAIDs in comparison with non-exposed subjects. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown on increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found on increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, aedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAIDs. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAIDs and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAIDs. These studies suggest that all the NSAIDs, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAIDs, specific (coxibs) or not.
Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk, have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAID in comparison with non-exposed subjects,. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown an increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found an increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, oedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAID. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAID and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAID. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAID. These studies suggest that all the NSAID, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAID, specific (coxibs) or not.Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk, have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAID in comparison with non-exposed subjects,. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown an increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found an increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, oedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAID. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAID and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAID. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAID. These studies suggest that all the NSAID, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAID, specific (coxibs) or not.
Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAIDs in comparison with non-exposed subjects. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown on increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found on increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, aedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAIDs. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAIDs and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAIDs. These studies suggest that all the NSAIDs, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAIDs, specific (coxibs) or not.
Author Deray, Gilbert
Héloire, François
Valat, Jean-Pierre
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jean-Pierre
  surname: Valat
  fullname: Valat, Jean-Pierre
  email: valat@med.univ-tours.fr
  organization: Université François Rabelais, Faculté de Médecine, Tours 37000. valat@med.univ-tours.fr
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Gilbert
  surname: Deray
  fullname: Deray, Gilbert
– sequence: 3
  givenname: François
  surname: Héloire
  fullname: Héloire, François
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17078592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqF0E1PwzAMBuAIDbEP-AmgnBAcCk7SJM0JTeNr0gSH7UyVpK4o6trRtIz9e4oYXLnYlvz4PXhMBlVdISGnDK4YMHW9BC1lFJuEX4C61LEROpIHZMQ5ExFwrQZk9EeGZBzCGwBnsTZHZMg06EQaPiIv0wZp-4p9tdWOZkWe93PlMdCi-l5Qb5usqD9s8F1pG9rWJTa2B9Rhu0WsqC9tCIW3JX1aTue3oQ_KqK8_CxdujslhbsuAJ_s-Iav7u9XsMVo8P8xn00W0SSSPfJI4JgTLtECjLAjvHGppnFGKiThTOtfAJcuZ4SIHnUtvM6mRAYCOmRMTcv4Tu2nq9w5Dm66L4LEsbYV1F1Jl-nPO4X-YCKmkjnt4toedW2OWbppibZtd-vs58QVcrnHe
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/S0755-4982(06)74937-5
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate Y a-t-il des différences de tolérance cardiovasculaire entre AINS classiques et coxibs?
EISSN 2213-0276
ExternalDocumentID 17078592
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
Review
GroupedDBID --M
.~1
08J
08T
0R~
1~.
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5VS
7-5
8P~
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
ABFNM
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACRLP
ACRPL
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AFJKZ
AFOST
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
AXJTR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CGR
CUY
CVF
EBS
ECM
EFJIC
EIF
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
J1W
KOM
MO0
N9A
NPM
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
P-8
P-9
PC.
Q38
SDF
SEM
SES
SHL
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
ZXP
~G-
7X8
AAYWO
ACIEU
AGCQF
AIIUN
EFLBG
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p852-c88b1331d73e96a03cbbe759b966134d67f70251f1923f07f5cad57e1000741b3
ISSN 0755-4982
2213-0276
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 13:14:52 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 13:49:58 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:59:52 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9 Spec No 1
Language French
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p852-c88b1331d73e96a03cbbe759b966134d67f70251f1923f07f5cad57e1000741b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
PMID 17078592
PQID 68356574
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_69025220
proquest_miscellaneous_68356574
pubmed_primary_17078592
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2006-Sep
20060901
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2006-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2006
  text: 2006-Sep
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace France
PublicationPlace_xml – name: France
PublicationTitle La Presse médicale (1983)
PublicationTitleAlternate Presse Med
PublicationYear 2006
SSID ssj0021479
Score 1.6765438
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1S25
SubjectTerms Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects
Cardiovascular Diseases - chemically induced
Case-Control Studies
Celecoxib
Cohort Studies
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - adverse effects
Diclofenac - administration & dosage
Diclofenac - adverse effects
Diclofenac - analogs & derivatives
Edema - chemically induced
Heart Failure - chemically induced
Humans
Hypertension - chemically induced
Isoxazoles - administration & dosage
Isoxazoles - adverse effects
Lactones - administration & dosage
Lactones - adverse effects
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Placebos
Prospective Studies
Pyrazoles - administration & dosage
Pyrazoles - adverse effects
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Sulfonamides - administration & dosage
Sulfonamides - adverse effects
Sulfones - administration & dosage
Sulfones - adverse effects
Thrombosis - chemically induced
Time Factors
Title Are there any differences in the cardiovascular tolerance between classical NSAIDs and coxibs?
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17078592
https://www.proquest.com/docview/68356574
https://www.proquest.com/docview/69025220
Volume 35
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jj9MwFLbKICEuiJ1h9QEkUJWhduI4OaGKmVFBnYI0GdQTke3YUqWSjLpIwIHfzvPSpANlvUTRa2SneZ-ev7fZCD1NNSxaRiRRBqtDlCjwU7Kcm4iLOKHWw5bcNgqfTNLRWfJ2yqa9ntmqWlqv5IH6urOv5H-0CjLQq-2S_QfNtoOCAO5Bv3AFDcP1r3Q8XGhLHF0K4Et71omvsXKMUl2sNl01c71wPQKb8ixlybPT0-R0-OZwGdrcPs_k8oeSv7Hw5Rq6_8kn112CxzFUkmfb8doPYi58hkOLOnoP625XYHsI8_vemJndXKutuRn5MedNCJVbPu1EvJn9FJnIN5EJZ8AoJS5HHLa63iELFjhmfXeGaZ9sm1K208L7YMMpMB2AVp7RZzY1DP-RJ0C0ItYta5tU_uRdeXw2HpfF0bS4hC5Tzl06_-BbWwpkj2qyblL7bl2n18tuoueD9EWY5NfeiGMlxXV0LbgTeOixcQP1zOImunISCiZuoY8AEewgggEieAsieFbbH_BFiOAWIjhABLcQwR4iMFCFPURe3UbF8VHxehSFIzWi84zRSGWZJHFMKh7rPBWDWEmpOcslOL0kTqqUG26dTmN5vxlww5SoGNfEU08Z30F7dVPrewhTQxXhmSbUdhhxYO4JqaiiwqQChMk-erL5RiVYLJuGErVu1ssyBdKfMv67J2zum9LBPrrrP2557rdeKYndnIrl9P4fR3-ArnaYfIj2Vou1fgT8cSUfO-V_BznOaPk
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are+there+any+differences+in+the+cardiovascular+tolerance+between+classical+NSAIDs+and+coxibs%3F&rft.jtitle=La+Presse+m%C3%A9dicale+%281983%29&rft.au=Valat%2C+Jean-Pierre&rft.au=Deray%2C+Gilbert&rft.au=H%C3%A9loire%2C+Fran%C3%A7ois&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.issn=2213-0276&rft.eissn=2213-0276&rft.volume=35+Suppl+1&rft.spage=25&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0755-4982%2806%2974937-5&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0755-4982&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0755-4982&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0755-4982&client=summon