Are there any differences in the cardiovascular tolerance between classical NSAIDs and coxibs?
Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses...
Saved in:
Published in | La Presse médicale (1983) Vol. 35; no. 9 Spec No 1; p. 1S25 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | French |
Published |
France
01.09.2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0755-4982 2213-0276 2213-0276 |
DOI | 10.1016/S0755-4982(06)74937-5 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAIDs in comparison with non-exposed subjects. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown on increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found on increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, aedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAIDs. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAIDs and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAIDs. These studies suggest that all the NSAIDs, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAIDs, specific (coxibs) or not. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAIDs in comparison with non-exposed subjects. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown on increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found on increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, aedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAIDs. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAIDs and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAIDs. These studies suggest that all the NSAIDs, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAIDs, specific (coxibs) or not.Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAIDs in comparison with non-exposed subjects. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown on increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found on increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, aedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAIDs. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAIDs and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAIDs. These studies suggest that all the NSAIDs, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAIDs, specific (coxibs) or not. Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk, have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAID in comparison with non-exposed subjects,. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown an increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found an increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, oedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAID. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAID and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAID. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAID. These studies suggest that all the NSAID, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAID, specific (coxibs) or not.Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk, have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAID in comparison with non-exposed subjects,. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown an increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found an increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, oedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAID. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAID and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAID. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAID. These studies suggest that all the NSAID, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAID, specific (coxibs) or not. Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be determined whether this CV toxicity is specific to coxibs, or shared with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seven meta-analyses show that, in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs, the risk of thrombotic CV accident is increased with rofecoxib and celecoxib, but not with valdecoxib or lumiracoxib. Concerning the risk of thrombotic CV accident, seven of the ten observational studies which have evaluated the risk have found an increased risk for the non-specific NSAIDs in comparison with non-exposed subjects. The seven observational studies, which evaluated the risk of coxibs, have all found an increased risk with rofecoxib, and two with celecoxib. Three studies out of six have shown on increase of risk with rofecoxib and one study out of five with celecoxib. Two of the three studies, which have compared rofecoxib with celecoxib, have found on increased risk with rofecoxib. Concerning the risk of arterial hypertension, aedemas or congestive cardiac insufficiency, a meta-analysis and a randomised trial have shown a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with celecoxib and non-specific NSAIDs. Two studies have shown a deleterious effect of the non-selective NSAIDs and three a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-exposed subjects. Three studies have demonstrated a deleterious effect of rofecoxib in comparison with non-specific NSAIDs. No study has shown any deleterious effect of celecoxib in comparison with subjects non-exposed or exposed to non-specific NSAIDs. These studies suggest that all the NSAIDs, specific or not, increase the CV and renal risk. This risk seems variable from a compound to another one and must be evaluated, for each patient, according to the susceptibility and associated risk factors. While waiting for other long-term controlled studies, the available data show the existence of a risk of CV secondary effect linked to the class of NSAIDs, specific (coxibs) or not. |
Author | Deray, Gilbert Héloire, François Valat, Jean-Pierre |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jean-Pierre surname: Valat fullname: Valat, Jean-Pierre email: valat@med.univ-tours.fr organization: Université François Rabelais, Faculté de Médecine, Tours 37000. valat@med.univ-tours.fr – sequence: 2 givenname: Gilbert surname: Deray fullname: Deray, Gilbert – sequence: 3 givenname: François surname: Héloire fullname: Héloire, François |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17078592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqF0E1PwzAMBuAIDbEP-AmgnBAcCk7SJM0JTeNr0gSH7UyVpK4o6trRtIz9e4oYXLnYlvz4PXhMBlVdISGnDK4YMHW9BC1lFJuEX4C61LEROpIHZMQ5ExFwrQZk9EeGZBzCGwBnsTZHZMg06EQaPiIv0wZp-4p9tdWOZkWe93PlMdCi-l5Qb5usqD9s8F1pG9rWJTa2B9Rhu0WsqC9tCIW3JX1aTue3oQ_KqK8_CxdujslhbsuAJ_s-Iav7u9XsMVo8P8xn00W0SSSPfJI4JgTLtECjLAjvHGppnFGKiThTOtfAJcuZ4SIHnUtvM6mRAYCOmRMTcv4Tu2nq9w5Dm66L4LEsbYV1F1Jl-nPO4X-YCKmkjnt4toedW2OWbppibZtd-vs58QVcrnHe |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/S0755-4982(06)74937-5 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Y a-t-il des différences de tolérance cardiovasculaire entre AINS classiques et coxibs? |
EISSN | 2213-0276 |
ExternalDocumentID | 17078592 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study Review |
GroupedDBID | --M .~1 08J 08T 0R~ 1~. 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5VS 7-5 8P~ AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AATTM AAXKI AAXUO ABFNM ABMAC ABOCM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACRLP ACRPL ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AFJKZ AFOST AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJRQY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX AXJTR BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CGR CUY CVF EBS ECM EFJIC EIF EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FIRID FNPLU FYGXN GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ J1W KOM MO0 N9A NPM O-L O9- OAUVE P-8 P-9 PC. Q38 SDF SEM SES SHL SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K ZXP ~G- 7X8 AAYWO ACIEU AGCQF AIIUN EFLBG |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p852-c88b1331d73e96a03cbbe759b966134d67f70251f1923f07f5cad57e1000741b3 |
ISSN | 0755-4982 2213-0276 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 13:14:52 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 13:49:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:59:52 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 Spec No 1 |
Language | French |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p852-c88b1331d73e96a03cbbe759b966134d67f70251f1923f07f5cad57e1000741b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
PMID | 17078592 |
PQID | 68356574 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_69025220 proquest_miscellaneous_68356574 pubmed_primary_17078592 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2006-Sep 20060901 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2006 text: 2006-Sep |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | France |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: France |
PublicationTitle | La Presse médicale (1983) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Presse Med |
PublicationYear | 2006 |
SSID | ssj0021479 |
Score | 1.6765438 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Three placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated deleterious cardiovascular (CV) effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and pare/valdecoxib. It remains to be... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1S25 |
SubjectTerms | Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects Cardiovascular Diseases - chemically induced Case-Control Studies Celecoxib Cohort Studies Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - adverse effects Diclofenac - administration & dosage Diclofenac - adverse effects Diclofenac - analogs & derivatives Edema - chemically induced Heart Failure - chemically induced Humans Hypertension - chemically induced Isoxazoles - administration & dosage Isoxazoles - adverse effects Lactones - administration & dosage Lactones - adverse effects Meta-Analysis as Topic Middle Aged Odds Ratio Placebos Prospective Studies Pyrazoles - administration & dosage Pyrazoles - adverse effects Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Risk Factors Sulfonamides - administration & dosage Sulfonamides - adverse effects Sulfones - administration & dosage Sulfones - adverse effects Thrombosis - chemically induced Time Factors |
Title | Are there any differences in the cardiovascular tolerance between classical NSAIDs and coxibs? |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17078592 https://www.proquest.com/docview/68356574 https://www.proquest.com/docview/69025220 |
Volume | 35 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jj9MwFLbKICEuiJ1h9QEkUJWhduI4OaGKmVFBnYI0GdQTke3YUqWSjLpIwIHfzvPSpANlvUTRa2SneZ-ev7fZCD1NNSxaRiRRBqtDlCjwU7Kcm4iLOKHWw5bcNgqfTNLRWfJ2yqa9ntmqWlqv5IH6urOv5H-0CjLQq-2S_QfNtoOCAO5Bv3AFDcP1r3Q8XGhLHF0K4Et71omvsXKMUl2sNl01c71wPQKb8ixlybPT0-R0-OZwGdrcPs_k8oeSv7Hw5Rq6_8kn112CxzFUkmfb8doPYi58hkOLOnoP625XYHsI8_vemJndXKutuRn5MedNCJVbPu1EvJn9FJnIN5EJZ8AoJS5HHLa63iELFjhmfXeGaZ9sm1K208L7YMMpMB2AVp7RZzY1DP-RJ0C0ItYta5tU_uRdeXw2HpfF0bS4hC5Tzl06_-BbWwpkj2qyblL7bl2n18tuoueD9EWY5NfeiGMlxXV0LbgTeOixcQP1zOImunISCiZuoY8AEewgggEieAsieFbbH_BFiOAWIjhABLcQwR4iMFCFPURe3UbF8VHxehSFIzWi84zRSGWZJHFMKh7rPBWDWEmpOcslOL0kTqqUG26dTmN5vxlww5SoGNfEU08Z30F7dVPrewhTQxXhmSbUdhhxYO4JqaiiwqQChMk-erL5RiVYLJuGErVu1ssyBdKfMv67J2zum9LBPrrrP2557rdeKYndnIrl9P4fR3-ArnaYfIj2Vou1fgT8cSUfO-V_BznOaPk |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are+there+any+differences+in+the+cardiovascular+tolerance+between+classical+NSAIDs+and+coxibs%3F&rft.jtitle=La+Presse+m%C3%A9dicale+%281983%29&rft.au=Valat%2C+Jean-Pierre&rft.au=Deray%2C+Gilbert&rft.au=H%C3%A9loire%2C+Fran%C3%A7ois&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.issn=2213-0276&rft.eissn=2213-0276&rft.volume=35+Suppl+1&rft.spage=25&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0755-4982%2806%2974937-5&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0755-4982&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0755-4982&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0755-4982&client=summon |