Double isocenter optimization with HD-MLC linear accelerator to treat extended fields in patients with head and neck cancers

• Published in: Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology Vol. 26; no. 4; p. 1571
• Main Authors: Saglam, Yucel, Selek, Ugur, Bolukbasi, Yasemin, Atasoy, Ali Ihsan, Karakose, Fatih, Alpan, Vildan, Akdemir, Eyub Yasar, Senyurek, Sukran, Kilic Durankus, Nulifer, Sezen, Duygu, Kucuk, Ahmet, Topkan, Erkan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cyprus 01.07.2021
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Humans; Middle Aged; Particle Accelerators
• ISSN: 2241-6293

For departments with a congested patient burden or with a limited number of eligible LINACs, we investigated whether LINACS dedicated for SRS-SBRT with limited field high-definition (HD) multi-leaf collimator (MLC) could help to carry this load, and utilized a double-isocenter (DI) optimization with a limited field size of HD-MLC to defeat the craniocaudal field size restriction to match treated plans in a wide-field MLC LINAC for head and neck cancer patients. Fourteen patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers were included, previously treated with simultaneous integrated boost volumetric modulated arc treatment (VMAT) in 33 fractions of clinical target volumes (CTV) of 70Gy, 63Gy, and 57Gy, via single isocenter (SI) plans in Millennium MLC-120 of Varian Trilogy. The DI plans were generated on Pinnacle TPS to be delivered in HD 120 leaves MLC on Varian Truebeam. The organs at risk (OAR) doses and the prescription volume parameters were compared. The DI plans in HD-MLC LINACs were successfully matching the previously treated plans for OAR and CTV constraints. The CI (1.18 versus 1.26; p=0.004) and HI (0.23 versus 0.29; p<0.001) were significantly improved with DI, while the MUs (1321.5 versus 800.3; p<0.001) and the treatment delivery times (6.1 versus 3.7 min; p<0.001) per fraction increased modestly with DI compared to SI, respectively. We revealed that DI optimization plans prepared for HD-MLC could effectively accomplish our goal dosimetrically in locoregionally advanced head and neck cases, despite a modest increase in the MU and treatment delivery times per fraction. This technique may provide an alternative in case of downtimes of standard MLC systems or a standalone treatment machine in case of high volumes requiring extended-field IMRT procedures, or possibly shorten the lengthy waiting times in facilities with limited SRS or SBRT patients.