Influence of lidocaine on the neuromuscular block produced by rocuronium: study in rat phrenic-diaphragmatic nerve preparation.

The action mechanism of local anesthetics (LA) on neuromuscular junction motivated several studies. When administered at low doses, they do not interfere on neuromuscular transmission. But high doses may compromise neuromuscular transmission and increase the effects of neuromuscular blockers. The ob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista brasileira de anestesiologia Vol. 56; no. 2; pp. 147 - 156
Main Authors Loyola, Yolanda Christina S, Braga, Angélica de Fátima de Assunção, Potério, Glória Maria Braga, Sousa, Silmara Rodrigues de, Fernandes, Samanta Cristina Antoniassi, Braga, Franklin S da Silva
Format Journal Article
LanguagePortuguese
Published Brazil 01.04.2006
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The action mechanism of local anesthetics (LA) on neuromuscular junction motivated several studies. When administered at low doses, they do not interfere on neuromuscular transmission. But high doses may compromise neuromuscular transmission and increase the effects of neuromuscular blockers. The objective of this study was to evaluate lidocaine interaction with rocuronium on rat diaphragm through its influence on neuromuscular block degree. Rats, weighing between 250 and 300 g, were used. Preparation was set according to the technique described by Bulbring. Groups were formed (n = 5) according to the drug being studied: lidocaine - 20 microg.mL-1 (Group I); rocuronium - 4 microg.mL-1 (Group II), and rocuronium - 4 microg.mL-1 with lidocaine - 20 microg.mL-1 (Group III). The following items were assessed: 1) the extent of diaphragm muscle responses to indirect stimulation, both before and 60 minutes after adding lidocaine and a neuromuscular blocker; 2) membrane potentials (MP) and miniature end-plate potentials (MEPP); 3) the effectiveness of neostigmine, and 4) aminopyridine on neuromuscular blockage reversal. When administered separately, lidocaine did not alter the extent of muscular responses. With the previous use of lidocaine, rocuronium neuromuscular blockage was 82.8% +/- 1.91%, with a significant difference (p = 0.0079) when compared to the group with isolated rocuronium (57.8% +/- 1.9%). Blockage was both partially and fully reverted by neostigmine and 4-aminopyridine, respectively. Lidocaine did not alter membrane potential and caused an initial increase on MEPP, followed by a blockage. Lidocaine increases the neuromuscular blocking produced by rocuronium. MEPP modifications identify a presynaptic action. The complete antagonism of 4-aminopyridine indicates a presynaptic component. This idea is supported by the partial antagonism through neostigmine.
AbstractList BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESThe action mechanism of local anesthetics (LA) on neuromuscular junction motivated several studies. When administered at low doses, they do not interfere on neuromuscular transmission. But high doses may compromise neuromuscular transmission and increase the effects of neuromuscular blockers. The objective of this study was to evaluate lidocaine interaction with rocuronium on rat diaphragm through its influence on neuromuscular block degree. METHODSRats, weighing between 250 and 300 g, were used. Preparation was set according to the technique described by Bulbring. Groups were formed (n = 5) according to the drug being studied: lidocaine - 20 microg.mL-1 (Group I); rocuronium - 4 microg.mL-1 (Group II), and rocuronium - 4 microg.mL-1 with lidocaine - 20 microg.mL-1 (Group III). The following items were assessed: 1) the extent of diaphragm muscle responses to indirect stimulation, both before and 60 minutes after adding lidocaine and a neuromuscular blocker; 2) membrane potentials (MP) and miniature end-plate potentials (MEPP); 3) the effectiveness of neostigmine, and 4) aminopyridine on neuromuscular blockage reversal. RESULTSWhen administered separately, lidocaine did not alter the extent of muscular responses. With the previous use of lidocaine, rocuronium neuromuscular blockage was 82.8% +/- 1.91%, with a significant difference (p = 0.0079) when compared to the group with isolated rocuronium (57.8% +/- 1.9%). Blockage was both partially and fully reverted by neostigmine and 4-aminopyridine, respectively. Lidocaine did not alter membrane potential and caused an initial increase on MEPP, followed by a blockage. CONCLUSIONSLidocaine increases the neuromuscular blocking produced by rocuronium. MEPP modifications identify a presynaptic action. The complete antagonism of 4-aminopyridine indicates a presynaptic component. This idea is supported by the partial antagonism through neostigmine.
The action mechanism of local anesthetics (LA) on neuromuscular junction motivated several studies. When administered at low doses, they do not interfere on neuromuscular transmission. But high doses may compromise neuromuscular transmission and increase the effects of neuromuscular blockers. The objective of this study was to evaluate lidocaine interaction with rocuronium on rat diaphragm through its influence on neuromuscular block degree. Rats, weighing between 250 and 300 g, were used. Preparation was set according to the technique described by Bulbring. Groups were formed (n = 5) according to the drug being studied: lidocaine - 20 microg.mL-1 (Group I); rocuronium - 4 microg.mL-1 (Group II), and rocuronium - 4 microg.mL-1 with lidocaine - 20 microg.mL-1 (Group III). The following items were assessed: 1) the extent of diaphragm muscle responses to indirect stimulation, both before and 60 minutes after adding lidocaine and a neuromuscular blocker; 2) membrane potentials (MP) and miniature end-plate potentials (MEPP); 3) the effectiveness of neostigmine, and 4) aminopyridine on neuromuscular blockage reversal. When administered separately, lidocaine did not alter the extent of muscular responses. With the previous use of lidocaine, rocuronium neuromuscular blockage was 82.8% +/- 1.91%, with a significant difference (p = 0.0079) when compared to the group with isolated rocuronium (57.8% +/- 1.9%). Blockage was both partially and fully reverted by neostigmine and 4-aminopyridine, respectively. Lidocaine did not alter membrane potential and caused an initial increase on MEPP, followed by a blockage. Lidocaine increases the neuromuscular blocking produced by rocuronium. MEPP modifications identify a presynaptic action. The complete antagonism of 4-aminopyridine indicates a presynaptic component. This idea is supported by the partial antagonism through neostigmine.
Author Sousa, Silmara Rodrigues de
Fernandes, Samanta Cristina Antoniassi
Loyola, Yolanda Christina S
Braga, Angélica de Fátima de Assunção
Braga, Franklin S da Silva
Potério, Glória Maria Braga
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yolanda Christina S
  surname: Loyola
  fullname: Loyola, Yolanda Christina S
  organization: Departamento de Farmacologia, FCM, UNICAMP
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Angélica de Fátima de Assunção
  surname: Braga
  fullname: Braga, Angélica de Fátima de Assunção
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Glória Maria Braga
  surname: Potério
  fullname: Potério, Glória Maria Braga
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Silmara Rodrigues de
  surname: Sousa
  fullname: Sousa, Silmara Rodrigues de
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Samanta Cristina Antoniassi
  surname: Fernandes
  fullname: Fernandes, Samanta Cristina Antoniassi
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Franklin S da Silva
  surname: Braga
  fullname: Braga, Franklin S da Silva
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kEtLAzEUhYMo9qF_QbJzNZJ0mszEnRQfhYKbLtwNN4-x0UwyJhOhK_-6AevqngMfH4e7QOc-eHOG5rQlvBKkeZuhRUofhKw4o-QSzahY85ZxOkc_W9-7bLwyOPTYWR0UWF-Kx9PBYG9yDENOKjuIWLqgPvEYg87KaCyPOAZVAG_zcI_TlPURW48jTHg8ROOtqrSFEuF9gMmqoovfpgjMCAWywd9doYseXDLXp7tE-6fH_eal2r0-bzcPu2pkjFZSCCla4KJnQokeQLG-5TVlnLeaKsIYrJigYtUSSSWjwijewBoaRbhWRNZLdPunLeO_sklTN9ikjHPgTcipa-qaEioYK-TNicxyMLobox0gHrv_l9W_kktrYw
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
7X8
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate Influência da lidocaína no bloqueio neuromuscular produzido pelo rocurônio: estudo em preparação nervo frênico-diafragma de rato
EISSN 1806-907X
EndPage 156
ExternalDocumentID 19468561
Genre English Abstract
Journal Article
GroupedDBID --K
.1-
0R~
0SF
123
1B1
1P~
29P
2WC
457
53G
5VS
6I.
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAIKJ
AALRI
AAXUO
ABMAC
ABXHO
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADCUG
ADEZE
ADVLN
AENEX
AEXQZ
AFCTW
AFTJW
AGHFR
AITUG
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APOWU
AZFZN
BAWUL
BCNDV
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FDB
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HZ~
IPNFZ
IXB
J1W
KQ8
M41
M~E
NCXOZ
NPM
O-L
O9-
OK1
RIG
RNS
ROL
RSC
SCD
SES
SSZ
XH2
XSB
Z5R
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p551-b99b98a69f59c9faac5f86315668d1c055a25919280b1b519ec67a4a7c06dc0b3
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 11:41:07 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:46:40 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language Portuguese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p551-b99b98a69f59c9faac5f86315668d1c055a25919280b1b519ec67a4a7c06dc0b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 19468561
PQID 733101955
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_733101955
pubmed_primary_19468561
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2006-Apr
20060401
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2006-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2006
  text: 2006-Apr
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Brazil
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Brazil
PublicationTitle Revista brasileira de anestesiologia
PublicationTitleAlternate Rev Bras Anestesiol
PublicationYear 2006
SSID ssj0026510
Score 1.6309754
Snippet The action mechanism of local anesthetics (LA) on neuromuscular junction motivated several studies. When administered at low doses, they do not interfere on...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESThe action mechanism of local anesthetics (LA) on neuromuscular junction motivated several studies. When administered at low doses,...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 147
Title Influence of lidocaine on the neuromuscular block produced by rocuronium: study in rat phrenic-diaphragmatic nerve preparation.
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468561
https://search.proquest.com/docview/733101955
Volume 56
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nj9MwELW6e-KCQHwtX_KBWxUUbxon4baL2F0QcIAi9VbZTrKKaJOqTQ67F34d_4s34zbNSrsScLESu7UVz9N4Zjx-FuKNKeJCFakNEhM5OCgJUd7CkLOJSyONlpyZmL581Rc_Jp9m8Ww0-j3IWupa-9Zd33qu5H-kijrIlU7J_oNk-05RgWfIFyUkjPKvZPxxd8MImXyLKse6REajj_-Pmapy2W0zTS1WrZ-UjpV3zludWLo6YsbtOFbPPLN8usW0Y5-E5wKAB4_m0vO61pQdSawCni8cXzk0bWmXAabmGO73BqqmWptxTnsTFFDd8KGYql8CPjdXcKlZ_TeUWmm2JAdVbfax2FMM7KO-0Ee8n08BRur0jF9VWy35FRDraq5KuIyaXuE3rf_nuuKQ8PmCXk8jyIZOKaHkQfowU9NteMTv1WKJbxx_a_J1dYmV09-ifiM-0qfVFF6np6jMwmQ2VPqezXwL7uOBBleeAHSAntWS4aOyiU5jrfYLZ5_OuGs6EAeRorzS81mfZ3SsofWYmtb_5m5Phi2a6QNxf-uKyBOPq4ditGofiV89pmRTyh5TsqklMCVvYEoypuQOU9JeyT2m3klGlKxqCbDIWxElGVFyiKjHYnr2Yfr-Ithe0hGsYGwHNstslhqdlXHmstIYF5epjigqkObKhXFs4GDDjUhDqyzchcLpxExM4kKdu9BGT8Rh3dTFMyFtpiLUqVxrutRBpWlhJy4q0FOpizI_EnI3c3PoQNrYAoYBjDndO0oHX-Mj8dTP6HzluVrmu2l_fmfLC3FvD5uX4rBdd8UrGJqtfc2C_AOKDIh9
link.rule.ids 315,786,790
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence+of+lidocaine+on+the+neuromuscular+block+produced+by+rocuronium%3A+study+in+rat+phrenic-diaphragmatic+nerve+preparation.&rft.jtitle=Revista+brasileira+de+anestesiologia&rft.au=Loyola%2C+Yolanda+Christina+S&rft.au=Braga%2C+Ang%C3%A9lica+de+F%C3%A1tima+de+Assun%C3%A7%C3%A3o&rft.au=Pot%C3%A9rio%2C+Gl%C3%B3ria+Maria+Braga&rft.au=Sousa%2C+Silmara+Rodrigues+de&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.eissn=1806-907X&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19468561&rft.externalDocID=19468561