Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system

Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research documenting how effectively they are used. This study assessed the ability of medical and nurse-practitioner students to answer clinical questions using an information retrieval system. It also attempted t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBulletin of the Medical Library Association Vol. 88; no. 4; pp. 323 - 331
Main Authors HERSH, William R, CRABTREE, M. Katherine, HICKAM, David H, SACHEREK, Lynetta, ROSE, Linda, FRIEDMAN, Charles P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago, IL Medical Library Association 01.10.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research documenting how effectively they are used. This study assessed the ability of medical and nurse-practitioner students to answer clinical questions using an information retrieval system. It also attempted to identify the demographic, experience, cognitive, personality, search mechanics, and user-satisfaction factors associated with successful use of a retrieval system. Twenty-nine students completed questionnaires of clinical and computer experience as well as tests of cognitive abilities and personality type. They were then administered three clinical questions to answer in a medical library setting using the MEDLINE database and electronic and print full-text resources. Medical students were able to answer more questions correctly than nurse-practitioner students before and after searching, but both had comparable improvements in the number of correct questions before and after searching. Successful ability to answer questions was also associated with having experience in literature searching and higher standardized test-score percentiles. Medical and nurse-practitioner students obtained comparable benefits in the ability to answer clinical questions from use of the information retrieval system. Future research must examine strategies that improve successful search and retrieval of clinical questions posed by clinicians in practice.
AbstractList Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research documenting how effectively they are used. This study assessed the ability of medical and nurse-practitioner students to answer clinical questions using an information retrieval system. It also attempted to identify the demographic, experience, cognitive, personality, search mechanics, and user-satisfaction factors associated with successful use of a retrieval system.OBJECTIVESDespite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research documenting how effectively they are used. This study assessed the ability of medical and nurse-practitioner students to answer clinical questions using an information retrieval system. It also attempted to identify the demographic, experience, cognitive, personality, search mechanics, and user-satisfaction factors associated with successful use of a retrieval system.Twenty-nine students completed questionnaires of clinical and computer experience as well as tests of cognitive abilities and personality type. They were then administered three clinical questions to answer in a medical library setting using the MEDLINE database and electronic and print full-text resources.METHODSTwenty-nine students completed questionnaires of clinical and computer experience as well as tests of cognitive abilities and personality type. They were then administered three clinical questions to answer in a medical library setting using the MEDLINE database and electronic and print full-text resources.Medical students were able to answer more questions correctly than nurse-practitioner students before and after searching, but both had comparable improvements in the number of correct questions before and after searching. Successful ability to answer questions was also associated with having experience in literature searching and higher standardized test-score percentiles.RESULTSMedical students were able to answer more questions correctly than nurse-practitioner students before and after searching, but both had comparable improvements in the number of correct questions before and after searching. Successful ability to answer questions was also associated with having experience in literature searching and higher standardized test-score percentiles.Medical and nurse-practitioner students obtained comparable benefits in the ability to answer clinical questions from use of the information retrieval system. Future research must examine strategies that improve successful search and retrieval of clinical questions posed by clinicians in practice.CONCLUSIONSMedical and nurse-practitioner students obtained comparable benefits in the ability to answer clinical questions from use of the information retrieval system. Future research must examine strategies that improve successful search and retrieval of clinical questions posed by clinicians in practice.
Objectives: Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research documenting how effectively they are used. This study assessed the ability of medical and nurse-practitioner students to answer clinical questions using an information retrieval system. It also attempted to identify the demographic, experience, cognitive, personality, search mechanics, and user-satisfaction factors associated with successful use of a retrieval system. Methods: Twenty-nine students completed questionnaires of clinical and computer experience as well as tests of cognitive abilities and personality type. They were then administered three clinical questions to answer in a medical library setting using the MEDLINE database and electronic and print full-text resources. Results: Medical students were able to answer more questions correctly than nurse-practitioner students before and after searching, but both had comparable improvements in the number of correct questions before and after searching. Successful ability to answer questions was also associated with having experience in literature searching and higher standardized test-score percentiles. Conclusions: Medical and nurse-practitioner students obtained comparable benefits in the ability to answer clinical questions from use of the information retrieval system. Future research must examine strategies that improve successful search and retrieval of clinical questions posed by clinicians in practice.
Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research into how effectively they are used. Reports results of a study to assess the ability of medical and nurse-practitioner students to answer clinical questions using an information retrieval system. It also attempted to identify the demographic, experience, cognitive, personality, search mechanics, and user-satisfaction factors associated with successful use of a retrieval system. Twenty-nine students completed questionnaires of clinical and computer experience as well as tests of cognitive abilities and personality type. They were then administered three clinical questions to answer in a medical library setting using the MEDLINE database and electronic and print full-text resources. Results indicated that medical students were able to answer more questions correctly than nurse-practitioner students before and after searching, but both had comparable improvements in the number of correct questions before and after searching. Successful ability to answer questions was also associated with having experience in literature searching and higher standardised test-score percentiles. Concludes that medical and nurse practitioner students obtained comparable benefits in the ability to answer clinical questions from use of the information retrieval system. Future research must examine strategies that improve successful search and retrieval of clinical questions posed by clinicians in practice. (Original abstract - amended)
Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research documenting how effectively they are used. This study assessed the ability of medical and nurse-practitioner students to answer clinical questions using an information retrieval system. It also attempted to identify the demographic, experience, cognitive, personality, search mechanics, and user-satisfaction factors associated with successful use of a retrieval system. Twenty-nine students completed questionnaires of clinical and computer experience as well as tests of cognitive abilities and personality type. They were then administered three clinical questions to answer in a medical library setting using the MEDLINE database and electronic and print full-text resources. Medical students were able to answer more questions correctly than nurse-practitioner students before and after searching, but both had comparable improvements in the number of correct questions before and after searching. Successful ability to answer questions was also associated with having experience in literature searching and higher standardized test-score percentiles. Medical and nurse-practitioner students obtained comparable benefits in the ability to answer clinical questions from use of the information retrieval system. Future research must examine strategies that improve successful search and retrieval of clinical questions posed by clinicians in practice.
Author FRIEDMAN, Charles P
ROSE, Linda
HICKAM, David H
CRABTREE, M. Katherine
HERSH, William R
SACHEREK, Lynetta
AuthorAffiliation 1 Oregon Health Sciences University3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park RoadPortland, Oregon 97201
5 Oregon Health Sciences UniversityPortland, Oregon
3 Health Services Research and DevelopmentPortland VA Medical CenterPortland, Oregon
6 University of PittsburghPittsburgh, Pennsylvania
4 Oregon Health Sciences UniversityPortland, Oregon
2 Oregon Health Sciences UniversityPortland, Oregon
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Oregon Health Sciences University3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park RoadPortland, Oregon 97201
– name: 4 Oregon Health Sciences UniversityPortland, Oregon
– name: 6 University of PittsburghPittsburgh, Pennsylvania
– name: 2 Oregon Health Sciences UniversityPortland, Oregon
– name: 5 Oregon Health Sciences UniversityPortland, Oregon
– name: 3 Health Services Research and DevelopmentPortland VA Medical CenterPortland, Oregon
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: William R
  surname: HERSH
  fullname: HERSH, William R
  organization: Division of Medical Informatics and Outcomes Research, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon 97201, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: M. Katherine
  surname: CRABTREE
  fullname: CRABTREE, M. Katherine
  organization: School of Nursing, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States
– sequence: 3
  givenname: David H
  surname: HICKAM
  fullname: HICKAM, David H
  organization: Division of Medical Informatics and Outcomes Research, Oregon Health Sciences University and Health Services Research and Development, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, United States
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Lynetta
  surname: SACHEREK
  fullname: SACHEREK, Lynetta
  organization: Division of Medical Informatics and Outcomes Research, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Linda
  surname: ROSE
  fullname: ROSE, Linda
  organization: School of Nursing, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Charles P
  surname: FRIEDMAN
  fullname: FRIEDMAN, Charles P
  organization: Center for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=864289$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11055299$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkU1LxDAQhntQ_P4LEhC8LaRJkybgRRa_YMGLnss0nbqRNlkz7S7-e7u6ip48Dcz7vMM7M8fZXogB97IjzoWalVKaw-yY6JXzvDTKHmSHec6VEtYeZctbcENMxIAoOg8DNmzjhyWj0TkkaseOQaANJh9eWGyZ63zwDjr2NiINPgZiI201CMyHNqYetl2WcEge1xNI7zRgf5rtt9ARnu3qSfZ8e_M0v58tHu8e5teL2UrmdpgVulYKpeZc19zo0qI0hRZaFc4WYBoUdWucNbotLGCTNwgW6lI3Te60BpQn2dXX3NVY99g4DEOCrlol30N6ryL46q8S_LJ6ietKKqHkZL_c2VP83LDqPTnsOggYR6pKIXU5of-CqiysELycwPPfgX6SfP9gAi52ANB02DZBcJ5-OKMLYaz8ANZulIw
CODEN BMLAAG
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2001 INIST-CNRS
Copyright © 2000, Medical Library Association 2000
Copyright_xml – notice: 2001 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright © 2000, Medical Library Association 2000
DBID IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
E3H
F2A
7X8
5PM
DatabaseName Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)
Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Library & Information Science
Medicine
EndPage 331
ExternalDocumentID PMC35253
11055299
864289
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NLM NIH HHS
  grantid: LM-06311
GroupedDBID 0B8
23N
2WC
41~
53G
5GY
5VS
85S
AAFWJ
AAWTL
ABCQX
ABPPZ
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
DIK
E3Z
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
H~9
IQODW
KQ8
L7B
OK1
P-O
RPM
TR2
WH7
WOQ
XSB
XZL
ZGI
ZXP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
E3H
F2A
OVT
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p319t-46b55e36006b08679e38462654c94a8de2bf8c986f49aed1dea9ab76dd1c66ae3
ISSN 0025-7338
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:14:10 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:58:39 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 21:55:45 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 28 07:36:48 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 28 05:44:57 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Medicine
Information system
Biomedical information
User study
Information retrieval
Bibliographic database
Student
Effectiveness factor
User behavior
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p319t-46b55e36006b08679e38462654c94a8de2bf8c986f49aed1dea9ab76dd1c66ae3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 11055299
PQID 57492207
PQPubID 23477
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_35253
proquest_miscellaneous_72367352
proquest_miscellaneous_57492207
pubmed_primary_11055299
pascalfrancis_primary_864289
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2000-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2000-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2000
  text: 2000-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Chicago, IL
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Chicago, IL
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
PublicationTitleAlternate Bull Med Libr Assoc
PublicationYear 2000
Publisher Medical Library Association
Publisher_xml – name: Medical Library Association
References 8947616 - Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996;:2-6
7783571 - Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):113-9
8711050 - Psychol Rep. 1996 Jun;78(3 Pt 1):938
8183655 - Nurs Res. 1994 May-Jun;43(3):144-50
9794316 - JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1347-52
7575924 - Acad Med. 1995 Oct;70(10):932-3
References_xml – reference: 9794316 - JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1347-52
– reference: 8183655 - Nurs Res. 1994 May-Jun;43(3):144-50
– reference: 8711050 - Psychol Rep. 1996 Jun;78(3 Pt 1):938
– reference: 8947616 - Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996;:2-6
– reference: 7575924 - Acad Med. 1995 Oct;70(10):932-3
– reference: 7783571 - Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):113-9
SSID ssj0017859
Score 1.6176456
Snippet Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research documenting how effectively they are used. This study assessed...
Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research into how effectively they are used. Reports results of a study...
Objectives: Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research documenting how effectively they are used. This...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 323
SubjectTerms Adult
Analysis of Variance
Attitude
Clinical Medicine
Cognition
Computer Literacy
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Doctors
Exact sciences and technology
Female
Humans
Information and communication sciences
Information processing and retrieval
Information retrieval. Man machine relationship
Information science. Documentation
Information seeking behaviour
Information Systems - utilization
Library and information science. General aspects
Male
Medicine
MEDLINE
Nurse Practitioners - education
Nurses
Online information retrieval
Personality
Research process. Evaluation
Sciences and techniques of general use
Searching
Students
Students, Medical
Students, Nursing
Surveys and Questionnaires
Use and user studies. Information needs
User surveys
Title Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11055299
https://www.proquest.com/docview/57492207
https://www.proquest.com/docview/72367352
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC35253
Volume 88
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFBZpH8ZgjK27ZWs3PYy9DA_bkmzppVC6hmx03cMSljcjyTItAyfE8Qb99T2S5dvWscuLCbYQQd-HdHQu30HoNdFaE6VEAKa4CSiPRSBDxQI420MZJbnmhVP7vEjmS_pxxVaTyfEga6neqXf6-ta6kv9BFd4BrrZK9h-Q7SaFF_Ab8IUnIAzPv8J45pvlSL_GbSp5Vbs2iC79uKx-OLVBlz_elkG6w8ClwNVVU6X41iuoOjpsXZut77aUxAk9jyK_Xq-7TS5oIz2-AOIXvJ2fdVs5783XPj3xdCuVDYg7h2zva51f6W8NRd_3ZRNfnOi06Tq-926KsEt468sGWJCSRsql3Xo5H1CMDvZR0hQh-yO5LeoaqWVffM5my_PzbHG2WuyhPRLR1lfjY0gpZ6Jr2EtsAdK9jaxgRYqmZcltd4qfU2MHtsbiAbrvLwn4pEH8IZqY8gAd-RXGb_CHHivsN-cDdOeTT5N4hC49MXBPDGyJgXti4I4YeF3glhi4IwZ2xIBReEAM3BEDN8R4jJazs8XpPPAtNYIN7LW7gCaKMUPAyk1UaLUWDQEDNE4Y1YJKnptYFVwLnhRUSJNHuZFCqjTJ80gniTTkCdov16V5hrAscrB-NGXUMFqQmHOwxGOjC8Fhas6m6HC03NmmkU_JuL3yiil61a5-BjuaDVPJ0qzrKmMpFXEcpr8fkVrZQbg5TNHTBq1u7sj2ewULa4rYCMdugFVTH38pry6dqrrVBSbP__ivXqC7Pb0P0f5uW5sjsEt36qWj3w3iip2E
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors+associated+with+successful+answering+of+clinical+questions+using+an+information+retrieval+system&rft.jtitle=Bulletin+of+the+Medical+Library+Association&rft.au=Hersh%2C+W+R&rft.au=Crabtree%2C+M+K&rft.au=Hickam%2C+D+H&rft.au=Sacherek%2C+L&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.issn=0025-7338&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=331&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0025-7338&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0025-7338&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0025-7338&client=summon