Visual Field Progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study : The Impact of Treatment and Other Baseline Factors

To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS). Longitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Six hundred seve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 116; no. 2; pp. 200 - 207
Main Authors MUSCH, David C, GILLESPIE, Brenda W, LICHTER, Paul R, NIZIOL, Leslie M, JANZ, Nancy K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier 01.02.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS). Longitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Six hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients. In a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models. Visual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit. Follow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery. The CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
AbstractList To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS).PURPOSETo evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS).Longitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial.DESIGNLongitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial.Six hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients.PARTICIPANTSSix hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients.In a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models.METHODSIn a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models.Visual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESVisual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit.Follow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery.RESULTSFollow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery.The CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation.CONCLUSIONSThe CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation.The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS). Longitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Six hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients. In a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models. Visual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit. Follow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery. The CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Author JANZ, Nancy K
NIZIOL, Leslie M
MUSCH, David C
LICHTER, Paul R
GILLESPIE, Brenda W
AuthorAffiliation 4 Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2 Department of Epidemiology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
1 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
– name: 2 Department of Epidemiology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
– name: 1 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
– name: 4 Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: David C
  surname: MUSCH
  fullname: MUSCH, David C
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Brenda W
  surname: GILLESPIE
  fullname: GILLESPIE, Brenda W
  organization: Department of Biostatistics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Paul R
  surname: LICHTER
  fullname: LICHTER, Paul R
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Leslie M
  surname: NIZIOL
  fullname: NIZIOL, Leslie M
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Nancy K
  surname: JANZ
  fullname: JANZ, Nancy K
  organization: Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21097032$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19019444$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVkEFr3DAQhUVJaDZJ_0EpurQ3bzWSVrZ7KKRLNl0IJJBtr2ZsyVkFW3IlOZBz_3gVug0pDMzhffPe8E7JkfPOEPIe2BIYqM8PSz_t0x6XnLFq-TwreEMWsJJ1IUsQR2SRMSiU5OyEnMb4wBhTSsi35ARqBrWUckF-_7RxxoFurBk0vQ3-PpgYrXfUOpr2hq79MGDrAyb7aOjW2WQzfjXg3PkR6S4YTKNxid6lWT_RL3SXj7bjhF2ivn-lo9P0JjsG-g2jGawzdJMhH-I5Oe5xiObdYZ-RH5vL3fp7cX1ztV1fXBcTr2Uq0EDZV6xEQKwqrUSpYVWBBKFR6061IFsuhexV14GpWkRuyla1K8573bZCnJGvf32nuR2N7vJXAYdmCnbE8NR4tM3_irP75t4_NkKAkjVkg08Hg-B_zSamZrSxM7kgZ_wcG6WqSjFZZvDD66SXiH-9Z-DjAcDY4dAHdJ2NLxwHVpdMcPEHueSY8Q
CODEN OPHTDG
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2009 INIST-CNRS
2008 American Academy of Ophthalmology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2008
Copyright_xml – notice: 2009 INIST-CNRS
– notice: 2008 American Academy of Ophthalmology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2008
CorporateAuthor CIGTS Study Investigators
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: CIGTS Study Investigators
DBID IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.051
DatabaseName Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1549-4713
EndPage 207
ExternalDocumentID PMC3316491
19019444
21097032
Genre Multicenter Study
Comparative Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY09100
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY09145
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: R03 EY015860
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: R21 EY018690
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY09149
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY09150
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY09143
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY015860
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY09141
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY09144
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
0R~
123
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~5
29N
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABCQX
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABWVN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACNCT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEFWE
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
BELOY
C5W
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IQODW
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
M27
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
NQ-
O9-
OF-
OPF
OQ~
P2P
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDG
SEL
SES
SSZ
UHS
UNMZH
UV1
WH7
X7M
XH2
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-ae17f807a1aa88d637d1581413daddc6b14b2434f6cc1e8baa2e7b6b522fdbb33
ISSN 0161-6420
1549-4713
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:11:21 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 10:00:45 EDT 2025
Fri May 30 10:59:45 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:14:54 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Glaucoma
Protozoa
Eye disease
Prognosis
Treatment
Glaucoma (eye)
Visual field
Evolution
Ciliata
Ophthalmology
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p294t-ae17f807a1aa88d637d1581413daddc6b14b2434f6cc1e8baa2e7b6b522fdbb33
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
The CIGTS Study Investigators are listed in the Appendix (available at http://aaojournal.org)
PMID 19019444
PQID 66886047
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3316491
proquest_miscellaneous_66886047
pubmed_primary_19019444
pascalfrancis_primary_21097032
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2009
  text: 2009-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace New York, NY
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, NY
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
PublicationTitleAlternate Ophthalmology
PublicationYear 2009
Publisher Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier
SSID ssj0006634
Score 2.4576461
Snippet To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 200
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Aging - physiology
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Disease Progression
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma and intraocular pressure
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery
Humans
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Ophthalmology
Risk Factors
Tonometry, Ocular
Trabeculectomy
Vision Disorders - physiopathology
Visual Acuity - physiology
Visual Field Tests
Visual Fields
Title Visual Field Progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study : The Impact of Treatment and Other Baseline Factors
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19019444
https://www.proquest.com/docview/66886047
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3316491
Volume 116
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9owELYQK1W9VH2XPrY-9IaC4sQ4SW9bBEu6sFQltKtekJ04hWobUAk99Nr_1d_WceyEZHelPiQUobwIni_2N-Nvxgi9SmKuyqS7lp0E0qJAkS1fqFl2HnCX-TY4RSo5eXrOxgv69qJ_0Wr9qqmW9rnoxT9uzCv5H6vCPrCrypL9B8tWN4Ud8B3sC1uwMGz_ysYf1juV_TFSKjQl-f-sRa2VeHFwMPJ3pZFc5yo-fnrJ9_A0vBtVIvN5UVq6VGCEVeZk1JChzxRZ7L7hRQ677I70Uj11ejvbrvIVv_yqCzsV0QmzIJeW6GdZrxZ6mC7mg3ElrD_Ea0_DyWQ4fxcONfhklvBuFQqahINxpOUbStV4EDyeh5_C2aSIM0ggz9LEecuIRlCKoMswm-EE9agnIxY4Snaj29Y5mgafTr0Ttu3aeO7oVXWvDRU6avGltylaxqhq4WPq3zYqc18ZMSsdo6Pm720XKMCRA26K00ZHJ2fvP55VXAD4nKkur_9AmbxZKAyv_7JS5vIdvJypXlXlJrfnqnq3Roeiu-iO8WPwiQblPdSS2X10a2qUGg_QT41NXGAT17CJ1xkGHOEGNrHBJi6xiSvk4QKb-DUGZGKNTLxJa8cBmbhAJi6RiQ0yH6LFaBgNxpZZ8MPaOgHNLS6Jl_q2xwnnvp8w10tI3yfAsxIYhmMmCBUOdWnK4phIX3DuSE8wAT5Emgjhuo9QO9tk8gnCPCWJ9FhsEyloKhJBPJf2wftwPMrjPu-g40ZLL7e6uMuyNGkHvSybfgk9rppG45nc7HdLxnyf2dTroMfaENW1ilwHlNIO8homqk5QtdybR7L1qqjp7rqE0YA8_dNjPUO3D6_Mc9TOv-3lC6DFuTg22PsNs_i8fQ
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual+Field+Progression+in+the+Collaborative+Initial+Glaucoma+Treatment+Study+%3A+The+Impact+of+Treatment+and+Other+Baseline+Factors&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology+%28Rochester%2C+Minn.%29&rft.au=MUSCH%2C+David+C&rft.au=GILLESPIE%2C+Brenda+W&rft.au=LICHTER%2C+Paul+R&rft.au=NIZIOL%2C+Leslie+M&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.pub=Elsevier&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=207&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ophtha.2008.08.051&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=21097032
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-6420&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-6420&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-6420&client=summon