Visual Field Progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study : The Impact of Treatment and Other Baseline Factors
To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS). Longitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Six hundred seve...
Saved in:
Published in | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 116; no. 2; pp. 200 - 207 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier
01.02.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS).
Longitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial.
Six hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients.
In a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models.
Visual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit.
Follow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery.
The CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation.
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS).PURPOSETo evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS).Longitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial.DESIGNLongitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial.Six hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients.PARTICIPANTSSix hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients.In a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models.METHODSIn a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models.Visual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESVisual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit.Follow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery.RESULTSFollow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery.The CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation.CONCLUSIONSThe CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation.The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS). Longitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Six hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients. In a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models. Visual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit. Follow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery. The CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. |
Author | JANZ, Nancy K NIZIOL, Leslie M MUSCH, David C LICHTER, Paul R GILLESPIE, Brenda W |
AuthorAffiliation | 4 Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 2 Department of Epidemiology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 3 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 3 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan – name: 2 Department of Epidemiology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan – name: 1 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan – name: 4 Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: David C surname: MUSCH fullname: MUSCH, David C organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States – sequence: 2 givenname: Brenda W surname: GILLESPIE fullname: GILLESPIE, Brenda W organization: Department of Biostatistics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States – sequence: 3 givenname: Paul R surname: LICHTER fullname: LICHTER, Paul R organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States – sequence: 4 givenname: Leslie M surname: NIZIOL fullname: NIZIOL, Leslie M organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States – sequence: 5 givenname: Nancy K surname: JANZ fullname: JANZ, Nancy K organization: Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21097032$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19019444$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVkEFr3DAQhUVJaDZJ_0EpurQ3bzWSVrZ7KKRLNl0IJJBtr2ZsyVkFW3IlOZBz_3gVug0pDMzhffPe8E7JkfPOEPIe2BIYqM8PSz_t0x6XnLFq-TwreEMWsJJ1IUsQR2SRMSiU5OyEnMb4wBhTSsi35ARqBrWUckF-_7RxxoFurBk0vQ3-PpgYrXfUOpr2hq79MGDrAyb7aOjW2WQzfjXg3PkR6S4YTKNxid6lWT_RL3SXj7bjhF2ivn-lo9P0JjsG-g2jGawzdJMhH-I5Oe5xiObdYZ-RH5vL3fp7cX1ztV1fXBcTr2Uq0EDZV6xEQKwqrUSpYVWBBKFR6061IFsuhexV14GpWkRuyla1K8573bZCnJGvf32nuR2N7vJXAYdmCnbE8NR4tM3_irP75t4_NkKAkjVkg08Hg-B_zSamZrSxM7kgZ_wcG6WqSjFZZvDD66SXiH-9Z-DjAcDY4dAHdJ2NLxwHVpdMcPEHueSY8Q |
CODEN | OPHTDG |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2009 INIST-CNRS 2008 American Academy of Ophthalmology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2008 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2009 INIST-CNRS – notice: 2008 American Academy of Ophthalmology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2008 |
CorporateAuthor | CIGTS Study Investigators |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: CIGTS Study Investigators |
DBID | IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.051 |
DatabaseName | Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1549-4713 |
EndPage | 207 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC3316491 19019444 21097032 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY09100 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY09145 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: R03 EY015860 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: R21 EY018690 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY09149 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY09150 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY09143 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY015860 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY09141 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY09144 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .1- .55 .FO .GJ 0R~ 123 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~5 29N 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO ABCQX ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABOCM ABWVN ACGFO ACGFS ACIUM ACNCT ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADMUD ADNMO AEFWE AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AGCQF AGQPQ AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ BELOY C5W CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE IQODW J1W K-O KOM L7B M27 M41 MO0 N4W N9A NQ- O9- OF- OPF OQ~ P2P R2- RIG ROL RPZ SDG SEL SES SSZ UHS UNMZH UV1 WH7 X7M XH2 XPP Z5R ZGI ZXP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-ae17f807a1aa88d637d1581413daddc6b14b2434f6cc1e8baa2e7b6b522fdbb33 |
ISSN | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:11:21 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:00:45 EDT 2025 Fri May 30 10:59:45 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:14:54 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Glaucoma Protozoa Eye disease Prognosis Treatment Glaucoma (eye) Visual field Evolution Ciliata Ophthalmology |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p294t-ae17f807a1aa88d637d1581413daddc6b14b2434f6cc1e8baa2e7b6b522fdbb33 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 The CIGTS Study Investigators are listed in the Appendix (available at http://aaojournal.org) |
PMID | 19019444 |
PQID | 66886047 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3316491 proquest_miscellaneous_66886047 pubmed_primary_19019444 pascalfrancis_primary_21097032 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2009-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2009 text: 2009-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | New York, NY |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, NY – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ophthalmology |
PublicationYear | 2009 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier |
SSID | ssj0006634 |
Score | 2.4576461 |
Snippet | To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed pascalfrancis |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 200 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aging - physiology Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Disease Progression Female Follow-Up Studies Glaucoma and intraocular pressure Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery Humans Intraocular Pressure - physiology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Ophthalmology Risk Factors Tonometry, Ocular Trabeculectomy Vision Disorders - physiopathology Visual Acuity - physiology Visual Field Tests Visual Fields |
Title | Visual Field Progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study : The Impact of Treatment and Other Baseline Factors |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19019444 https://www.proquest.com/docview/66886047 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3316491 |
Volume | 116 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9owELYQK1W9VH2XPrY-9IaC4sQ4SW9bBEu6sFQltKtekJ04hWobUAk99Nr_1d_WceyEZHelPiQUobwIni_2N-Nvxgi9SmKuyqS7lp0E0qJAkS1fqFl2HnCX-TY4RSo5eXrOxgv69qJ_0Wr9qqmW9rnoxT9uzCv5H6vCPrCrypL9B8tWN4Ud8B3sC1uwMGz_ysYf1juV_TFSKjQl-f-sRa2VeHFwMPJ3pZFc5yo-fnrJ9_A0vBtVIvN5UVq6VGCEVeZk1JChzxRZ7L7hRQ677I70Uj11ejvbrvIVv_yqCzsV0QmzIJeW6GdZrxZ6mC7mg3ElrD_Ea0_DyWQ4fxcONfhklvBuFQqahINxpOUbStV4EDyeh5_C2aSIM0ggz9LEecuIRlCKoMswm-EE9agnIxY4Snaj29Y5mgafTr0Ttu3aeO7oVXWvDRU6avGltylaxqhq4WPq3zYqc18ZMSsdo6Pm720XKMCRA26K00ZHJ2fvP55VXAD4nKkur_9AmbxZKAyv_7JS5vIdvJypXlXlJrfnqnq3Roeiu-iO8WPwiQblPdSS2X10a2qUGg_QT41NXGAT17CJ1xkGHOEGNrHBJi6xiSvk4QKb-DUGZGKNTLxJa8cBmbhAJi6RiQ0yH6LFaBgNxpZZ8MPaOgHNLS6Jl_q2xwnnvp8w10tI3yfAsxIYhmMmCBUOdWnK4phIX3DuSE8wAT5Emgjhuo9QO9tk8gnCPCWJ9FhsEyloKhJBPJf2wftwPMrjPu-g40ZLL7e6uMuyNGkHvSybfgk9rppG45nc7HdLxnyf2dTroMfaENW1ilwHlNIO8homqk5QtdybR7L1qqjp7rqE0YA8_dNjPUO3D6_Mc9TOv-3lC6DFuTg22PsNs_i8fQ |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual+Field+Progression+in+the+Collaborative+Initial+Glaucoma+Treatment+Study+%3A+The+Impact+of+Treatment+and+Other+Baseline+Factors&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology+%28Rochester%2C+Minn.%29&rft.au=MUSCH%2C+David+C&rft.au=GILLESPIE%2C+Brenda+W&rft.au=LICHTER%2C+Paul+R&rft.au=NIZIOL%2C+Leslie+M&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.pub=Elsevier&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=207&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ophtha.2008.08.051&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=21097032 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-6420&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-6420&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-6420&client=summon |