Evaluation of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for Detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA)

Methicillin resistant (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of gene. A tot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIranian journal of pathology Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 370 - 376
Main Authors Koupahi, Hossein, Honarmand Jahromy, Sahar, Rahbar, Mohammad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Iran Iranian Society of Pathology 01.09.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Methicillin resistant (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of gene. A total of 220 clinical isolates of which were isolated from various clinical specimens from September 2013 until the June of 2014 in Milad Hospital of Tehran, Iran was subject of our study. Methicillin resistance was determined by oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, oxacillin screen agar and CHROMagar™ MRSA medium. The results of these methods were compared with gene based PCR method as a gold standard method. Among 220 isolates from , 105 (47.72%) isolates were positive for gene by PCR method. The results of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method .CHROMagar™ MRSA medium had 98.13% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Oxacillin disk diffusion and oxacillin screen agar had 95.42% and 97.22% sensitivity respectively. Result of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method for detection gene. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method can be used as an alternative method of PCR for detection of MRSA.
AbstractList Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of mecA gene.BACKGROUNDMethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of mecA gene.A total of 220 clinical isolates of S. aureus which were isolated from various clinical specimens from September 2013 until the June of 2014 in Milad Hospital of Tehran, Iran was subject of our study. Methicillin resistance was determined by oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, oxacillin screen agar and CHROMagar™ MRSA medium. The results of these methods were compared with mecA gene based PCR method as a gold standard method.METHODSA total of 220 clinical isolates of S. aureus which were isolated from various clinical specimens from September 2013 until the June of 2014 in Milad Hospital of Tehran, Iran was subject of our study. Methicillin resistance was determined by oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, oxacillin screen agar and CHROMagar™ MRSA medium. The results of these methods were compared with mecA gene based PCR method as a gold standard method.Among 220 isolates from S. aureus, 105 (47.72%) isolates were positive for mecA gene by PCR method. The results of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method .CHROMagar™ MRSA medium had 98.13% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Oxacillin disk diffusion and oxacillin screen agar had 95.42% and 97.22% sensitivity respectively.RESULTSAmong 220 isolates from S. aureus, 105 (47.72%) isolates were positive for mecA gene by PCR method. The results of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method .CHROMagar™ MRSA medium had 98.13% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Oxacillin disk diffusion and oxacillin screen agar had 95.42% and 97.22% sensitivity respectively.Result of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method for detection mecA gene. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method can be used as an alternative method of PCR for detection of MRSA.CONCLUSIONResult of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method for detection mecA gene. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method can be used as an alternative method of PCR for detection of MRSA.
Methicillin resistant (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of gene. A total of 220 clinical isolates of which were isolated from various clinical specimens from September 2013 until the June of 2014 in Milad Hospital of Tehran, Iran was subject of our study. Methicillin resistance was determined by oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, oxacillin screen agar and CHROMagar™ MRSA medium. The results of these methods were compared with gene based PCR method as a gold standard method. Among 220 isolates from , 105 (47.72%) isolates were positive for gene by PCR method. The results of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method .CHROMagar™ MRSA medium had 98.13% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Oxacillin disk diffusion and oxacillin screen agar had 95.42% and 97.22% sensitivity respectively. Result of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method for detection gene. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method can be used as an alternative method of PCR for detection of MRSA.
Author Koupahi, Hossein
Honarmand Jahromy, Sahar
Rahbar, Mohammad
AuthorAffiliation 1 Dept. of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran
2 Dept. of Microbiology, Iranian Reference Health Laboratory Research Center, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Dept. of Microbiology, Iranian Reference Health Laboratory Research Center, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
– name: 1 Dept. of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hossein
  surname: Koupahi
  fullname: Koupahi, Hossein
  organization: Dept. of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sahar
  surname: Honarmand Jahromy
  fullname: Honarmand Jahromy, Sahar
  organization: Dept. of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mohammad
  surname: Rahbar
  fullname: Rahbar, Mohammad
  organization: Dept. of Microbiology, Iranian Reference Health Laboratory Research Center, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVkNFPwjAQxhuDEUT-BdNHfFiytmu3vZgQQDSBaECfl667Sc1o59qR8OD_7ohg9F6-XL673-W-a9Qz1sAFGlAW8YAJLnpoQGLGA85C1kcj5z7CY8WhiNkV6tMk4Tyl6QB9zfeyaqXX1mBb4pkuS2jAePyyBWP9odYKS1PgxW-3Ar-1hcOlbfAMPKjz7tHQSleVNngNTjsvO87Gy3p7qKyySrUOy7aBTsZ4td5M7m7QZSkrB6OTDtHbw_x1-hgsnxdP08kyqCknPqC0JHGqeMGiNI9Jkos8glLQNOYiTuI8J0SFKpeJZKnKaRKBIBFlIYRSiVCFbIjuf7h1m--gUN2DjayyutE72RwyK3X23zF6m73bfca5YCnjHWB8AjT2swXns512CqpKGrCty0jKoi5USkk3evv31u-Rc-bsGwd-g2Q
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Iran J Pathol. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Iran J Pathol. All rights reserved.
DBID NPM
7X8
5PM
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2345-3656
EndPage 376
ExternalDocumentID PMC5563935
28855929
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 29J
2WC
53G
ABDBF
ACUHS
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
DIK
E3Z
EOJEC
ESX
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
NPM
OBODZ
OK1
P6G
RNS
RPM
TR2
TUS
7X8
OVT
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p251t-22f179c5d349b718b6b4ef629756787bb11c0cba8a39cb284e614230e0ac60c03
ISSN 1735-5303
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:11:58 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 04:39:21 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:29:04 EST 2025
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Methicillin Resistant
CHOROM Agar MRSA
Staphylococcus aureus
mecA gene
Oxacillin screen Agar
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p251t-22f179c5d349b718b6b4ef629756787bb11c0cba8a39cb284e614230e0ac60c03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5563935
PMID 28855929
PQID 1934288221
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5563935
proquest_miscellaneous_1934288221
pubmed_primary_28855929
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Iran
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Iran
– name: Tehran, Iran
PublicationTitle Iranian journal of pathology
PublicationTitleAlternate Iran J Pathol
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Iranian Society of Pathology
Publisher_xml – name: Iranian Society of Pathology
References 23776818 - Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2012 Jul;2(2):84-91
15472303 - J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Oct;42(10):4519-23
23493646 - Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012 Sep;15(5):1010-9
1629321 - J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1685-91
24343828 - Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;58 Suppl 1:S20-7
18952321 - J Hosp Infect. 2008 Dec;70(4):379-81
17050808 - J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Dec;44(12):4561-3
19172055 - Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):27-9
17172515 - J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jan;56(Pt 1):43-6
16293678 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Dec;56(6):1000-18
26351495 - Iran J Pathol. 2015 Fall;10(4):258-64
24404541 - N Am J Med Sci. 2013 Nov;5(11):637-40
26457182 - Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Oct 09;4:39
15722394 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Mar;55(3):379-82
24849624 - PLoS One. 2014 May 21;9(5):e97617
26458264 - PLoS One. 2015 Oct 12;10(10):e0140045
26114763 - Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Oct;16(5):523-5
11682527 - J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Nov;39(11):4037-41
16767493 - Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Jun;25(6):410-2
24150844 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Mar;69(3):616-22
12032344 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(11):7687-92
24308709 - Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Jan;12(1):75-89
21570348 - Int J Med Microbiol. 2011 Aug;301(6):500-5
References_xml – reference: 24343828 - Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;58 Suppl 1:S20-7
– reference: 16293678 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Dec;56(6):1000-18
– reference: 15722394 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Mar;55(3):379-82
– reference: 1629321 - J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1685-91
– reference: 15472303 - J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Oct;42(10):4519-23
– reference: 19172055 - Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):27-9
– reference: 23776818 - Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2012 Jul;2(2):84-91
– reference: 26114763 - Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Oct;16(5):523-5
– reference: 24308709 - Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Jan;12(1):75-89
– reference: 12032344 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(11):7687-92
– reference: 26458264 - PLoS One. 2015 Oct 12;10(10):e0140045
– reference: 26351495 - Iran J Pathol. 2015 Fall;10(4):258-64
– reference: 16767493 - Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Jun;25(6):410-2
– reference: 23493646 - Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012 Sep;15(5):1010-9
– reference: 24150844 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Mar;69(3):616-22
– reference: 18952321 - J Hosp Infect. 2008 Dec;70(4):379-81
– reference: 21570348 - Int J Med Microbiol. 2011 Aug;301(6):500-5
– reference: 17172515 - J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jan;56(Pt 1):43-6
– reference: 24404541 - N Am J Med Sci. 2013 Nov;5(11):637-40
– reference: 11682527 - J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Nov;39(11):4037-41
– reference: 24849624 - PLoS One. 2014 May 21;9(5):e97617
– reference: 17050808 - J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Dec;44(12):4561-3
– reference: 26457182 - Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Oct 09;4:39
SSID ssj0000070673
Score 2.0173972
Snippet Methicillin resistant (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of...
Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 370
SubjectTerms Original
Title Evaluation of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for Detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA)
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855929
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1934288221
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5563935
Volume 11
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELa2PSAuiDdbHjISB9AqKIntPI5VKV2KgqrSSntb2Y6j7GGTaJscQPwWfivj2PEmqAfoJco6a8vyfBl_MxnPIPQu4rQQKcm9NEm4R0NJvUQwAjYPh80hDUTYlwPKvkXLa3q-YqvZ7PcoaqlrxUf589ZzJXeRKrSBXPUp2f-QrBsUGuAe5AtXkDBc_0nGpy5Vt-Z8n2ytk3ZxUaqqbn80NhfrmfuV9fWi-xQMoGlaJYe--sFGat9L79HXpBLGASYKUoDtrpayu1nwbqe63kubXX4_HnwIltl-gU1vY736luHqascTr_3Xumt4aepkw-asNg6ZSzAI9PGFfHHOy129NRFovOQudviSl8IEg2d1ybdbno8dFkHkIrKsEWunM0Sl6lC_yXSMIo4J8xjxjfJTfVtIKPNIZBKRO-0djFBKR6qYmIIkdlcnpsrMCBTNtkdFmCRgVNkVm2bevshOdPq0lLADdEACXZnhbBU4D57OlBT1IQxusjq1tB3vNovl78DbEZO5eogeWBMEHxs8PUIzVT1G9zIbZPEE_drDCtcFdrDCe1hhkBR2sMIWVhhghR2sdN8RrLCDFZ7CChtY4fcaVB-eouvPp1cnS88W6fAaoMatF4YF6HTJckJTAURHRIKqItIHtoEHxUIEgfSl4AknqRRAhhQQQrB7lc9l5EufPEOHVV2pFwgTGUZ5nDAZUUFpAZZLHrKcFTJgMobh5ujtsKRrUIL6yxavVN3drMEKATMauG4wR8_NEq8bk61lPQhkjuLJ4rs_6ATr0yfVpuwTrVvpH92550t0f_8GvEKH7a5Tr4HEtuJNj6U_boqpRw
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation+of+Different+Phenotypic+and+Genotypic+Methods+for+Detection+of+Methicillin+Resistant+Staphylococcus+aureus+%28MRSA%29&rft.jtitle=Iranian+journal+of+pathology&rft.au=Koupahi%2C+Hossein&rft.au=Honarmand+Jahromy%2C+Sahar&rft.au=Rahbar%2C+Mohammad&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.pub=Iranian+Society+of+Pathology&rft.issn=1735-5303&rft.eissn=2345-3656&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=376&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28855929&rft.externalDocID=PMC5563935
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1735-5303&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1735-5303&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1735-5303&client=summon