Evaluation of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for Detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA)
Methicillin resistant (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of gene. A tot...
Saved in:
Published in | Iranian journal of pathology Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 370 - 376 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Iran
Iranian Society of Pathology
01.09.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Methicillin resistant
(MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of
gene.
A total of 220 clinical isolates of
which were isolated from various clinical specimens from September 2013 until the June of 2014 in Milad Hospital of Tehran, Iran was subject of our study. Methicillin resistance was determined by oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, oxacillin screen agar and CHROMagar™ MRSA medium. The results of these methods were compared with
gene based PCR method as a gold standard method.
Among 220 isolates from
, 105 (47.72%) isolates were positive for
gene by PCR method. The results of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method .CHROMagar™ MRSA medium had 98.13% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Oxacillin disk diffusion and oxacillin screen agar had 95.42% and 97.22% sensitivity respectively.
Result of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method for detection
gene. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method can be used as an alternative method of PCR for detection of MRSA. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of mecA gene.BACKGROUNDMethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of mecA gene.A total of 220 clinical isolates of S. aureus which were isolated from various clinical specimens from September 2013 until the June of 2014 in Milad Hospital of Tehran, Iran was subject of our study. Methicillin resistance was determined by oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, oxacillin screen agar and CHROMagar™ MRSA medium. The results of these methods were compared with mecA gene based PCR method as a gold standard method.METHODSA total of 220 clinical isolates of S. aureus which were isolated from various clinical specimens from September 2013 until the June of 2014 in Milad Hospital of Tehran, Iran was subject of our study. Methicillin resistance was determined by oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, oxacillin screen agar and CHROMagar™ MRSA medium. The results of these methods were compared with mecA gene based PCR method as a gold standard method.Among 220 isolates from S. aureus, 105 (47.72%) isolates were positive for mecA gene by PCR method. The results of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method .CHROMagar™ MRSA medium had 98.13% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Oxacillin disk diffusion and oxacillin screen agar had 95.42% and 97.22% sensitivity respectively.RESULTSAmong 220 isolates from S. aureus, 105 (47.72%) isolates were positive for mecA gene by PCR method. The results of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method .CHROMagar™ MRSA medium had 98.13% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Oxacillin disk diffusion and oxacillin screen agar had 95.42% and 97.22% sensitivity respectively.Result of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method for detection mecA gene. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method can be used as an alternative method of PCR for detection of MRSA.CONCLUSIONResult of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method for detection mecA gene. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method can be used as an alternative method of PCR for detection of MRSA. Methicillin resistant (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of MRSA. The aim of this study was to compare different phenotypic methods with PCR based method as a gold standard for detection of gene. A total of 220 clinical isolates of which were isolated from various clinical specimens from September 2013 until the June of 2014 in Milad Hospital of Tehran, Iran was subject of our study. Methicillin resistance was determined by oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, oxacillin screen agar and CHROMagar™ MRSA medium. The results of these methods were compared with gene based PCR method as a gold standard method. Among 220 isolates from , 105 (47.72%) isolates were positive for gene by PCR method. The results of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method .CHROMagar™ MRSA medium had 98.13% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Oxacillin disk diffusion and oxacillin screen agar had 95.42% and 97.22% sensitivity respectively. Result of cefoxitin disk diffusion method with 100% sensitivity and specificity was the same as PCR method for detection gene. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method can be used as an alternative method of PCR for detection of MRSA. |
Author | Koupahi, Hossein Honarmand Jahromy, Sahar Rahbar, Mohammad |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Dept. of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran 2 Dept. of Microbiology, Iranian Reference Health Laboratory Research Center, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Dept. of Microbiology, Iranian Reference Health Laboratory Research Center, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran – name: 1 Dept. of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hossein surname: Koupahi fullname: Koupahi, Hossein organization: Dept. of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran – sequence: 2 givenname: Sahar surname: Honarmand Jahromy fullname: Honarmand Jahromy, Sahar organization: Dept. of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran – sequence: 3 givenname: Mohammad surname: Rahbar fullname: Rahbar, Mohammad organization: Dept. of Microbiology, Iranian Reference Health Laboratory Research Center, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVkNFPwjAQxhuDEUT-BdNHfFiytmu3vZgQQDSBaECfl667Sc1o59qR8OD_7ohg9F6-XL673-W-a9Qz1sAFGlAW8YAJLnpoQGLGA85C1kcj5z7CY8WhiNkV6tMk4Tyl6QB9zfeyaqXX1mBb4pkuS2jAePyyBWP9odYKS1PgxW-3Ar-1hcOlbfAMPKjz7tHQSleVNngNTjsvO87Gy3p7qKyySrUOy7aBTsZ4td5M7m7QZSkrB6OTDtHbw_x1-hgsnxdP08kyqCknPqC0JHGqeMGiNI9Jkos8glLQNOYiTuI8J0SFKpeJZKnKaRKBIBFlIYRSiVCFbIjuf7h1m--gUN2DjayyutE72RwyK3X23zF6m73bfca5YCnjHWB8AjT2swXns512CqpKGrCty0jKoi5USkk3evv31u-Rc-bsGwd-g2Q |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Iran J Pathol. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Iran J Pathol. All rights reserved. |
DBID | NPM 7X8 5PM |
DatabaseName | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2345-3656 |
EndPage | 376 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5563935 28855929 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 29J 2WC 53G ABDBF ACUHS ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL DIK E3Z EOJEC ESX GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE NPM OBODZ OK1 P6G RNS RPM TR2 TUS 7X8 OVT 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p251t-22f179c5d349b718b6b4ef629756787bb11c0cba8a39cb284e614230e0ac60c03 |
ISSN | 1735-5303 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:11:58 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 04:39:21 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:29:04 EST 2025 |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Methicillin Resistant CHOROM Agar MRSA Staphylococcus aureus mecA gene Oxacillin screen Agar |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p251t-22f179c5d349b718b6b4ef629756787bb11c0cba8a39cb284e614230e0ac60c03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5563935 |
PMID | 28855929 |
PQID | 1934288221 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5563935 proquest_miscellaneous_1934288221 pubmed_primary_28855929 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2016 text: 2016-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Iran |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Iran – name: Tehran, Iran |
PublicationTitle | Iranian journal of pathology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Iran J Pathol |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Iranian Society of Pathology |
Publisher_xml | – name: Iranian Society of Pathology |
References | 23776818 - Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2012 Jul;2(2):84-91 15472303 - J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Oct;42(10):4519-23 23493646 - Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012 Sep;15(5):1010-9 1629321 - J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1685-91 24343828 - Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;58 Suppl 1:S20-7 18952321 - J Hosp Infect. 2008 Dec;70(4):379-81 17050808 - J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Dec;44(12):4561-3 19172055 - Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):27-9 17172515 - J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jan;56(Pt 1):43-6 16293678 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Dec;56(6):1000-18 26351495 - Iran J Pathol. 2015 Fall;10(4):258-64 24404541 - N Am J Med Sci. 2013 Nov;5(11):637-40 26457182 - Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Oct 09;4:39 15722394 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Mar;55(3):379-82 24849624 - PLoS One. 2014 May 21;9(5):e97617 26458264 - PLoS One. 2015 Oct 12;10(10):e0140045 26114763 - Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Oct;16(5):523-5 11682527 - J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Nov;39(11):4037-41 16767493 - Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Jun;25(6):410-2 24150844 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Mar;69(3):616-22 12032344 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(11):7687-92 24308709 - Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Jan;12(1):75-89 21570348 - Int J Med Microbiol. 2011 Aug;301(6):500-5 |
References_xml | – reference: 24343828 - Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;58 Suppl 1:S20-7 – reference: 16293678 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Dec;56(6):1000-18 – reference: 15722394 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Mar;55(3):379-82 – reference: 1629321 - J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1685-91 – reference: 15472303 - J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Oct;42(10):4519-23 – reference: 19172055 - Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):27-9 – reference: 23776818 - Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2012 Jul;2(2):84-91 – reference: 26114763 - Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Oct;16(5):523-5 – reference: 24308709 - Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Jan;12(1):75-89 – reference: 12032344 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(11):7687-92 – reference: 26458264 - PLoS One. 2015 Oct 12;10(10):e0140045 – reference: 26351495 - Iran J Pathol. 2015 Fall;10(4):258-64 – reference: 16767493 - Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Jun;25(6):410-2 – reference: 23493646 - Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012 Sep;15(5):1010-9 – reference: 24150844 - J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Mar;69(3):616-22 – reference: 18952321 - J Hosp Infect. 2008 Dec;70(4):379-81 – reference: 21570348 - Int J Med Microbiol. 2011 Aug;301(6):500-5 – reference: 17172515 - J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jan;56(Pt 1):43-6 – reference: 24404541 - N Am J Med Sci. 2013 Nov;5(11):637-40 – reference: 11682527 - J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Nov;39(11):4037-41 – reference: 24849624 - PLoS One. 2014 May 21;9(5):e97617 – reference: 17050808 - J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Dec;44(12):4561-3 – reference: 26457182 - Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Oct 09;4:39 |
SSID | ssj0000070673 |
Score | 2.0173972 |
Snippet | Methicillin resistant
(MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for laboratory detection of... Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been emerged as a nosocomial and community acquired pathogen worldwide. There are many challenges for... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 370 |
SubjectTerms | Original |
Title | Evaluation of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for Detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA) |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855929 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1934288221 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5563935 |
Volume | 11 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELa2PSAuiDdbHjISB9AqKIntPI5VKV2KgqrSSntb2Y6j7GGTaJscQPwWfivj2PEmqAfoJco6a8vyfBl_MxnPIPQu4rQQKcm9NEm4R0NJvUQwAjYPh80hDUTYlwPKvkXLa3q-YqvZ7PcoaqlrxUf589ZzJXeRKrSBXPUp2f-QrBsUGuAe5AtXkDBc_0nGpy5Vt-Z8n2ytk3ZxUaqqbn80NhfrmfuV9fWi-xQMoGlaJYe--sFGat9L79HXpBLGASYKUoDtrpayu1nwbqe63kubXX4_HnwIltl-gU1vY736luHqascTr_3Xumt4aepkw-asNg6ZSzAI9PGFfHHOy129NRFovOQudviSl8IEg2d1ybdbno8dFkHkIrKsEWunM0Sl6lC_yXSMIo4J8xjxjfJTfVtIKPNIZBKRO-0djFBKR6qYmIIkdlcnpsrMCBTNtkdFmCRgVNkVm2bevshOdPq0lLADdEACXZnhbBU4D57OlBT1IQxusjq1tB3vNovl78DbEZO5eogeWBMEHxs8PUIzVT1G9zIbZPEE_drDCtcFdrDCe1hhkBR2sMIWVhhghR2sdN8RrLCDFZ7CChtY4fcaVB-eouvPp1cnS88W6fAaoMatF4YF6HTJckJTAURHRIKqItIHtoEHxUIEgfSl4AknqRRAhhQQQrB7lc9l5EufPEOHVV2pFwgTGUZ5nDAZUUFpAZZLHrKcFTJgMobh5ujtsKRrUIL6yxavVN3drMEKATMauG4wR8_NEq8bk61lPQhkjuLJ4rs_6ATr0yfVpuwTrVvpH92550t0f_8GvEKH7a5Tr4HEtuJNj6U_boqpRw |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation+of+Different+Phenotypic+and+Genotypic+Methods+for+Detection+of+Methicillin+Resistant+Staphylococcus+aureus+%28MRSA%29&rft.jtitle=Iranian+journal+of+pathology&rft.au=Koupahi%2C+Hossein&rft.au=Honarmand+Jahromy%2C+Sahar&rft.au=Rahbar%2C+Mohammad&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.pub=Iranian+Society+of+Pathology&rft.issn=1735-5303&rft.eissn=2345-3656&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=376&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28855929&rft.externalDocID=PMC5563935 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1735-5303&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1735-5303&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1735-5303&client=summon |