Early-Phase 18F-Florbetapir and 18F-Flutemetamol Images as Proxies of Brain Metabolism in a Memory Clinic Setting

Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amyloid PET might be able to evaluate Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration with a single tracer injection. Early-phase amyloid PET scans provide a proxy for cerebral perfusi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) Vol. 64; no. 2; pp. 266 - 273
Main Authors Boccalini, Cecilia, Peretti, Débora Elisa, Ribaldi, Federica, Scheffler, Max, Stampacchia, Sara, Tomczyk, Szymon, Rodriguez, Cristelle, Montandon, Marie-Louise, Haller, Sven, Giannakopoulos, Panteleimon, Frisoni, Giovanni B, Perani, Daniela, Garibotto, Valentina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Society of Nuclear Medicine 01.02.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amyloid PET might be able to evaluate Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration with a single tracer injection. Early-phase amyloid PET scans provide a proxy for cerebral perfusion, which has shown good correlations with neural dysfunction measured through metabolic consumption, whereas the late frames depict amyloid distribution. Our study aimed to assess the comparability between early-phase amyloid PET scans and 18F-FDG PET brain topography at the individual level and their ability to discriminate patients. Methods: One hundred sixty-six subjects evaluated at the Geneva Memory Center, ranging from no cognitive impairment to mild cognitive impairment and dementia, underwent early-phase amyloid PET-using either 18F-florbetapir (eFBP) (n = 94) or 18F-flutemetamol (eFMM) (n = 72)-and 18F-FDG PET. Aβ status was assessed. SUV ratios (SUVRs) were extracted to evaluate the correlation of eFBP/eFMM and their respective 18F-FDG PET scans. The single-subject procedure was applied to investigate hypometabolism and hypoperfusion maps and their spatial overlap by the Dice coefficient. Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses were performed to compare the discriminative power of eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR in AD-related meta–regions of interest between Aβ-negative healthy controls and cases in the AD continuum. Results: Positive correlations were found between eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR independently of Aβ status and Aβ radiotracer (R > 0.72, P < 0.001). eFBP/eFMM single-subject analysis revealed clusters of significant hypoperfusion with good correspondence to hypometabolism topographies, independently of the underlying neurodegenerative patterns. Both eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR significantly discriminated AD patients from controls in the AD-related meta–regions of interest (eFBP area under the curve [AUC], 0.888; eFMM AUC, 0.801), with 18F-FDG PET performing slightly better, although not significantly (all P values higher than 0.05), than others (18F-FDG AUC, 0.915 and 0.832 for subjects evaluated with eFBP and eFMM, respectively). Conclusion: The distribution of perfusion was comparable to that of metabolism at the single-subject level by parametric analysis, particularly in the presence of a high neurodegeneration burden. Our findings indicate that eFBP and eFMM imaging can replace 18F-FDG PET imaging, as they reveal typical neurodegenerative patterns or allow exclusion of the presence of neurodegeneration. The findings show cost-saving capacities of amyloid PET and support routine use of the modality for individual classification in clinical practice.
AbstractList Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amyloid-PET might be able to evaluate Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration with a single tracer injection. Early-phase amyloid-PET scans provide a proxy for cerebral perfusion, which has shown good correlations with neural dysfunction measured through metabolic consumption, while the late frames depict amyloid distribution. Our study aims to assess the comparability between early-phase amyloid-PET scans and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-PET brain topography at the individual level, and their ability to discriminate patients. Methods: 166 subjects evaluated at the Geneva Memory Center, ranging from cognitively unimpaired to Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia, underwent early-phase amyloid-PET - using either 18F-florbetapir (eFBP) (n = 94) or 18F-flutemetamol (eFMM) (n = 72) - and 18F-FDG-PET. Aβ status was assessed. Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) were extracted to evaluate the correlation of eFBP/eFMM and their respective 18F-FDG-PET scans. The single-subject procedure was applied to investigate hypometabolism and hypoperfusion maps and their spatial overlap by Dice coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to compare the discriminative power of eFBP/eFMM, and 18F-FDG-PET SUVR in AD-related metaROI between Aβ-negative healthy controls and cases in the AD continuum. Results: Positive correlations were found between eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG-PET SUVR independently of Aβ status and Aβ radiotracer (R>0.72, p<0.001). eFBP/eFMM single-subject analysis revealed clusters of significant hypoperfusion with good correspondence to hypometabolism topographies, independently of the underlying neurodegenerative patterns. Both eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG-PET SUVR significantly discriminated AD patients from controls in the AD-related metaROIs (AUCFBP = 0.888; AUCFMM=0.801), with 18F-FDG-PET performing slightly better, however not significantly (all p-value higher than 0.05), than others (AUCFDG=0.915 and 0.832 for subjects evaluated with 18F-FBP and 18F-FMM, respectively). Conclusion: The distribution of perfusion was comparable to that of metabolism at the single-subject level by parametric analysis, particularly in the presence of a high neurodegeneration burden. Our findings indicate that eFBP/eFMM imaging can replace 18F-FDG-PET imaging, as they reveal typical neurodegenerative patterns, or allow to exclude the presence of neurodegeneration. The finding shows cost-saving capacities of amyloid-PET and supports the routine use of the modality for individual classification in clinical practice.Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amyloid-PET might be able to evaluate Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration with a single tracer injection. Early-phase amyloid-PET scans provide a proxy for cerebral perfusion, which has shown good correlations with neural dysfunction measured through metabolic consumption, while the late frames depict amyloid distribution. Our study aims to assess the comparability between early-phase amyloid-PET scans and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-PET brain topography at the individual level, and their ability to discriminate patients. Methods: 166 subjects evaluated at the Geneva Memory Center, ranging from cognitively unimpaired to Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia, underwent early-phase amyloid-PET - using either 18F-florbetapir (eFBP) (n = 94) or 18F-flutemetamol (eFMM) (n = 72) - and 18F-FDG-PET. Aβ status was assessed. Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) were extracted to evaluate the correlation of eFBP/eFMM and their respective 18F-FDG-PET scans. The single-subject procedure was applied to investigate hypometabolism and hypoperfusion maps and their spatial overlap by Dice coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to compare the discriminative power of eFBP/eFMM, and 18F-FDG-PET SUVR in AD-related metaROI between Aβ-negative healthy controls and cases in the AD continuum. Results: Positive correlations were found between eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG-PET SUVR independently of Aβ status and Aβ radiotracer (R>0.72, p<0.001). eFBP/eFMM single-subject analysis revealed clusters of significant hypoperfusion with good correspondence to hypometabolism topographies, independently of the underlying neurodegenerative patterns. Both eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG-PET SUVR significantly discriminated AD patients from controls in the AD-related metaROIs (AUCFBP = 0.888; AUCFMM=0.801), with 18F-FDG-PET performing slightly better, however not significantly (all p-value higher than 0.05), than others (AUCFDG=0.915 and 0.832 for subjects evaluated with 18F-FBP and 18F-FMM, respectively). Conclusion: The distribution of perfusion was comparable to that of metabolism at the single-subject level by parametric analysis, particularly in the presence of a high neurodegeneration burden. Our findings indicate that eFBP/eFMM imaging can replace 18F-FDG-PET imaging, as they reveal typical neurodegenerative patterns, or allow to exclude the presence of neurodegeneration. The finding shows cost-saving capacities of amyloid-PET and supports the routine use of the modality for individual classification in clinical practice.
Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amyloid PET might be able to evaluate Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration with a single tracer injection. Early-phase amyloid PET scans provide a proxy for cerebral perfusion, which has shown good correlations with neural dysfunction measured through metabolic consumption, whereas the late frames depict amyloid distribution. Our study aimed to assess the comparability between early-phase amyloid PET scans and 18 F-FDG PET brain topography at the individual level and their ability to discriminate patients. Methods: One hundred sixty-six subjects evaluated at the Geneva Memory Center, ranging from no cognitive impairment to mild cognitive impairment and dementia, underwent early-phase amyloid PET—using either 18 F-florbetapir (eFBP) ( n  = 94) or 18 F-flutemetamol (eFMM) ( n  = 72)—and 18 F-FDG PET. Aβ status was assessed. SUV ratios (SUVRs) were extracted to evaluate the correlation of eFBP/eFMM and their respective 18 F-FDG PET scans. The single-subject procedure was applied to investigate hypometabolism and hypoperfusion maps and their spatial overlap by the Dice coefficient. Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses were performed to compare the discriminative power of eFBP/eFMM and 18 F-FDG PET SUVR in AD-related meta–regions of interest between Aβ-negative healthy controls and cases in the AD continuum. Results: Positive correlations were found between eFBP/eFMM and 18 F-FDG PET SUVR independently of Aβ status and Aβ radiotracer ( R  > 0.72, P  < 0.001). eFBP/eFMM single-subject analysis revealed clusters of significant hypoperfusion with good correspondence to hypometabolism topographies, independently of the underlying neurodegenerative patterns. Both eFBP/eFMM and 18 F-FDG PET SUVR significantly discriminated AD patients from controls in the AD-related meta–regions of interest (eFBP area under the curve [AUC], 0.888; eFMM AUC, 0.801), with 18 F-FDG PET performing slightly better, although not significantly (all P values higher than 0.05), than others ( 18 F-FDG AUC, 0.915 and 0.832 for subjects evaluated with eFBP and eFMM, respectively). Conclusion: The distribution of perfusion was comparable to that of metabolism at the single-subject level by parametric analysis, particularly in the presence of a high neurodegeneration burden. Our findings indicate that eFBP and eFMM imaging can replace 18 F-FDG PET imaging, as they reveal typical neurodegenerative patterns or allow exclusion of the presence of neurodegeneration. The findings show cost-saving capacities of amyloid PET and support routine use of the modality for individual classification in clinical practice.
Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amyloid PET might be able to evaluate Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration with a single tracer injection. Early-phase amyloid PET scans provide a proxy for cerebral perfusion, which has shown good correlations with neural dysfunction measured through metabolic consumption, whereas the late frames depict amyloid distribution. Our study aimed to assess the comparability between early-phase amyloid PET scans and 18F-FDG PET brain topography at the individual level and their ability to discriminate patients. Methods: One hundred sixty-six subjects evaluated at the Geneva Memory Center, ranging from no cognitive impairment to mild cognitive impairment and dementia, underwent early-phase amyloid PET-using either 18F-florbetapir (eFBP) (n = 94) or 18F-flutemetamol (eFMM) (n = 72)-and 18F-FDG PET. Aβ status was assessed. SUV ratios (SUVRs) were extracted to evaluate the correlation of eFBP/eFMM and their respective 18F-FDG PET scans. The single-subject procedure was applied to investigate hypometabolism and hypoperfusion maps and their spatial overlap by the Dice coefficient. Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses were performed to compare the discriminative power of eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR in AD-related meta–regions of interest between Aβ-negative healthy controls and cases in the AD continuum. Results: Positive correlations were found between eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR independently of Aβ status and Aβ radiotracer (R > 0.72, P < 0.001). eFBP/eFMM single-subject analysis revealed clusters of significant hypoperfusion with good correspondence to hypometabolism topographies, independently of the underlying neurodegenerative patterns. Both eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR significantly discriminated AD patients from controls in the AD-related meta–regions of interest (eFBP area under the curve [AUC], 0.888; eFMM AUC, 0.801), with 18F-FDG PET performing slightly better, although not significantly (all P values higher than 0.05), than others (18F-FDG AUC, 0.915 and 0.832 for subjects evaluated with eFBP and eFMM, respectively). Conclusion: The distribution of perfusion was comparable to that of metabolism at the single-subject level by parametric analysis, particularly in the presence of a high neurodegeneration burden. Our findings indicate that eFBP and eFMM imaging can replace 18F-FDG PET imaging, as they reveal typical neurodegenerative patterns or allow exclusion of the presence of neurodegeneration. The findings show cost-saving capacities of amyloid PET and support routine use of the modality for individual classification in clinical practice.
Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are 6-amyloid (A6) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amy-loid PET might be able to evaluate A6 deposition and neurodegenera-tion with a single tracer injection. Early-phase amyloid PET scans provide a proxy for cerebral perfusion, which has shown good correla-tions with neural dysfunction measured through metabolic consump-tion, whereas the late frames depict amyloid distribution. Our study aimed to assess the comparability between early-phase amyloid PET scans and 18F-FDG PET brain topography at the individual level and their ability to discriminate patients. Methods: One hundred sixty-six subjects evaluated at the Geneva Memory Center, ranging from no cognitive impairment to mild cognitive impairment and dementia, underwent early-phase amyloid PET-using either 18F-florbetapir (eFBP) (n = 94) or 18F-flutemetamol (eFMM) (n = 72)-and 18F-FDG PET. A6 status was assessed. SUV ratios (SUVRs) were extracted to evaluate the correlation of eFBP/eFMM and their respective 18F-FDG PET scans. The single-subject procedure was applied to investigate hypometabolism and hypoperfusion maps and their spatial overlap by the Dice coefficient. Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses were performed to compare the discriminative power of eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR in AD-related meta-regions of interest between A6-negative healthy controls and cases in the AD continuum. Results: Positive correlations were found between eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR independently of A6 status and A6 radiotracer (R&gt; 0.72, P&lt; 0.001). eFBP/eFMM single-subject analysis revealed clusters of significant hypoperfusion with good correspondence to hypometabo-lism topographies, independently of the underlying neurodegenerative patterns. Both eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR significantly dis-criminated AD patients from controls in the AD-related meta-regions of interest (eFBP area under the curve [AUC], 0.888; eFMM AUC, 0.801), with 18F-FDG PET performing slightly better, although not sig-nificantly (all P values higher than 0.05), than others (18F-FDG AUC, 0.915 and 0.832 for subjects evaluated with eFBP and eFMM, respec-tively). Conclusion: The distribution of perfusion was comparable to that of metabolism at the single-subject level by parametric analysis, particularly in the presence of a high neurodegeneration burden. Our findings indicate that eFBP and eFMM imaging can replace 18F-FDG PET imaging, as they reveal typical neurodegenerative patterns or allow exclusion of the presence of neurodegeneration. The findings show cost-saving capacities of amyloid PET and support routine use of the modality for individual classification in clinical practice.
Author Boccalini, Cecilia
Tomczyk, Szymon
Stampacchia, Sara
Rodriguez, Cristelle
Haller, Sven
Garibotto, Valentina
Giannakopoulos, Panteleimon
Ribaldi, Federica
Peretti, Débora Elisa
Perani, Daniela
Scheffler, Max
Montandon, Marie-Louise
Frisoni, Giovanni B
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Cecilia
  surname: Boccalini
  fullname: Boccalini, Cecilia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Débora
  surname: Peretti
  middlename: Elisa
  fullname: Peretti, Débora Elisa
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Federica
  surname: Ribaldi
  fullname: Ribaldi, Federica
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Max
  surname: Scheffler
  fullname: Scheffler, Max
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Sara
  surname: Stampacchia
  fullname: Stampacchia, Sara
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Szymon
  surname: Tomczyk
  fullname: Tomczyk, Szymon
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Cristelle
  surname: Rodriguez
  fullname: Rodriguez, Cristelle
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Marie-Louise
  surname: Montandon
  fullname: Montandon, Marie-Louise
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Sven
  surname: Haller
  fullname: Haller, Sven
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Panteleimon
  surname: Giannakopoulos
  fullname: Giannakopoulos, Panteleimon
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Giovanni
  surname: Frisoni
  middlename: B
  fullname: Frisoni, Giovanni B
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Daniela
  surname: Perani
  fullname: Perani, Daniela
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Valentina
  surname: Garibotto
  fullname: Garibotto, Valentina
BackLink https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-503657$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNpdkE1vEzEQhi1URNPCD-BmiQsHNvgj_rogtaGBSkVU4uNq2buzqaNdO7V3ofn3NWou5TQz7zzzjmbO0ElMERB6S8mSGak-7uI8QrekjC2ZXDEhX6AFFVw0Qkp1ghaEStoIQcQpOitlRwiRWutX6JQLLbk2coHur1weDs3tnSuAqd40myFlD5Pbh4xd7I7aPMFYxTEN-Hp0WyjYFXyb00OoaerxZXYh4m8V8WkIZcS1crUeUz7g9RBiaPEPmKYQt6_Ry94NBd4c4zn6tbn6uf7a3Hz_cr2-uGn2jOup6YxeAfetJpr7vmUGFNeuA99KrVTXQ8-d46ZjnaBQT6etkd4rwjUo6oHxc_Thybf8hf3s7T6H0eWDTS7Yz-H3hU15a-fZCsKlUBX_9IRXtj61hThlNzybet6J4c5u0x9rDGFa0Grw_miQ0_0MZbJjKC0Mg4uQ5mKZNFwpZVb_dr37D92lOcf6DcuU4pxrYjh_BErtleo
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Feb 1, 2023
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Feb 1, 2023
– notice: Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
– notice: 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2023
DBID 4T-
8FD
FR3
K9.
M7Z
NAPCQ
P64
7X8
5PM
ADTPV
AOWAS
DF2
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.122.264256
DatabaseName Docstoc
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
SwePub
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Uppsala universitet
DatabaseTitle Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Technology Research Database
Docstoc
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

Nursing & Allied Health Premium

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1535-5667
EndPage 273
ExternalDocumentID oai_DiVA_org_uu_503657
PMC9902851
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.55
29L
2WC
4T-
53G
5RE
8FD
8R4
8R5
8WZ
A6W
ABSQV
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADDZX
ADMOG
AENEX
AFOSN
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
F9R
FR3
H13
I-F
INIJC
K9.
KQ8
L7B
M7Z
NAPCQ
OK1
P2P
P64
Q2X
R0Z
RHI
RNS
RWL
SJN
SV3
TAE
TR2
TSM
TUS
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
YHG
7X8
5PM
.GJ
3O-
41~
7RV
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
ABEFU
ABUWG
ADTPV
AFFNX
AFKRA
AI.
AOWAS
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
DF2
DWQXO
EX3
FYUFA
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
HMCUK
IL9
J5H
LK8
M1P
M2P
M2Q
M7P
N4W
P62
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
S0X
UKHRP
VH1
WOW
YQJ
ZGI
ZXP
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p238t-d984e3bc8083bfc29e738adebc6877dfef3aa39d2d51e2561c96bb7038e71be23
ISSN 0161-5505
1535-5667
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 06:42:07 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:42:29 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 12:37:23 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 10:41:49 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p238t-d984e3bc8083bfc29e738adebc6877dfef3aa39d2d51e2561c96bb7038e71be23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Published online Jul. 21, 2022.
PMID 35863896
PQID 2773338093
PQPubID 40808
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_503657
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9902851
proquest_miscellaneous_2693777947
proquest_journals_2773338093
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
PublicationTitle The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publisher_xml – name: Society of Nuclear Medicine
SSID ssj0006888
Score 2.4889445
Snippet Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amyloid PET might be able to...
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amyloid-PET might...
Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are 6-amyloid (A6) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amy-loid PET might be able to...
SourceID swepub
pubmedcentral
proquest
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
StartPage 266
SubjectTerms 18F-FDG PET
Alzheimer's disease
Brain
Brain architecture
Clinical Investigation
Cluster analysis
Cognitive ability
Dementia disorders
Deposition
early-phase amyloid PET
Evaluation
Fluorine isotopes
Hypometabolism
Impairment
individual maps
Medical imaging
Memory
Metabolism
Neurodegeneration
Neurodegenerative diseases
Neuroimaging
Parametric analysis
Perfusion
Positron emission
Positron emission tomography
Radioactive tracers
Tau protein
β-Amyloid
Title Early-Phase 18F-Florbetapir and 18F-Flutemetamol Images as Proxies of Brain Metabolism in a Memory Clinic Setting
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2773338093
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2693777947
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9902851
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-503657
Volume 64
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fb9MwELaqIU17QeOXKAxkJHiqUogTx_bjNqgGqGjAhvYW2Y7DgtqkWxNp4v_l_-BsJ21aeIC9RI3j2q3vy_l8vvuM0MuccamVMYHJiAhiJmnA81wHBmRtFNU0UdYPOf2UnJzHHy7oxWDwqxe11NRqrH_-Na_kNlKFMpCrzZL9D8muGoUC-AzyhStIGK7_JGPHThycXsJMNAr5JJjA4luZWi4KHxnpy5razKFwXs1G7-fScjrIpU0QuCk84eyRPSViNIUqqprZMzPgTsL93G6_e95QUCkuPrpvyq6TymY-GkTbEyhWm_WOAQoWjz1Xw1EFgrTtOe-s0cWskGvVbCOGfda737y34LRRZ8tVnS-FkrPM1ZlYDoxemNFXwF6et1mNU3nTd2aQqIt_7pyZbaSqc5b4Xz3thxi0PtAkDOzCyk9hnd6mAVimrK_YPT16C2DS19JJ0pvwiT9LZXsuISKxu9k_SmgqG4eEjMF2JJ4FvYetxdyBK6Lc2n5brN7OTjidHgvLkWMT_e8QWM1Ydfzx85rUPuHueNTV__Kb77b_13_0vod2u6421kTbEb0bvLfOVjrbR3dbVOBDj9h7aGDK-2i3G-MH6KoHXLwFXAzAxdvAxR64WC5xC1xc5dgBF6-Bi-FOYg9c7IGLW-A-ROeTd2fHJ0F79kewACOyDjLBYxMpzWGJoHJNhGERl5lROuGMZbnJIykjkZGMhgbGJdQiUQqmL25YqAyJHqGdsirNY4S5iDmoI6qJFjGLqaBEECW0BFNXZEoN0UE3jmn7ci9TkFMURfyNiIboxeoxqF67nyZLUzVQJwHbnsGExoaIbYx_uvBUMaklb998UhaXjsS9hcQQvfKS2vjK2-LbYVpdf0-bJqVgY1L25NY9PEV76zftAO3U1415BoZ0rZ47GP4GesTNng
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early-Phase+18F-Florbetapir+and+18F-Flutemetamol+Images+as+Proxies+of+Brain+Metabolism+in+a+Memory+Clinic+Setting&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+nuclear+medicine+%281978%29&rft.au=Boccalini%2C+Cecilia&rft.au=Peretti%2C+D%C3%A9bora+Elisa&rft.au=Ribaldi%2C+Federica&rft.au=Scheffler%2C+Max&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.pub=Society+of+Nuclear+Medicine&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=273&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967%2Fjnumed.122.264256&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35863896&rft.externalDocID=PMC9902851
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon