Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis
We used the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach to study the synergy formation during learning an unusual multi-finger task. The subjects produced accurate force ramps with challenging sets of four fingers (two per hand). We tested hypotheses on stabilization of the contributions of subsets of effe...
Saved in:
Published in | Experimental brain research Vol. 157; no. 3; pp. 336 - 350 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
Springer Nature B.V
01.08.2004
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | We used the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach to study the synergy formation during learning an unusual multi-finger task. The subjects produced accurate force ramps with challenging sets of four fingers (two per hand). We tested hypotheses on stabilization of the contributions of subsets of effectors to the task force ( F(TASK)) and to the moment in the frontal plane (force-stabilization and moment-stabilization, respectively). Force signals were used to compute magnitudes of hypothetical independent signals, modes. The variance of the mode magnitudes across repetitions of the task was partitioned into two components, within the UCM ( V(UCM)), which did not affect the average value of a selected performance variable (force or moment), and orthogonal to the UCM ( V(ORT)), which affected the variable. Prior to practice, subjects showed high error indices and failed to show stabilization of each hand's contribution to F(TASK) ( V(ORT)> or = V(UCM)), while the pronation-supination moment was stabilized by the fingers of each hand ( V(ORT)< V(UCM)). The total forces produced by each of the two hands showed negative covariation across trials, which supported the force-stabilization hypothesis but not moment-stabilization hypothesis. Both force-stabilization and moment-stabilization hypotheses were supported by analysis of mode magnitudes to all eight fingers. Over 2 days of practice, the performance of the subjects improved considerably. This was accompanied by the emergence of within-a-hand force-stabilization for each of the two hands without deterioration of moment-stabilization. Quantitatively better within-a-hand force-stabilization was seen in male subjects as compared to females throughout the course of the experiment. Force-stabilization by all eight fingers improved quantitatively with practice. Practice also resulted in higher finger forces in maximal force production (MVC) trials and higher forces produced by unintended fingers in single-finger MVC trials (higher enslaving). We conclude that the UCM approach allows quantifying changes in the coordination of effectors during practice, and offers insights into the microstructure of this coordination with respect to different performance variables and different subsets of effectors. The approach can be used to test whether new synergies emerge in the process of practice. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We used the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach to study the synergy formation during learning an unusual multi-finger task. The subjects produced accurate force ramps with challenging sets of four fingers (two per hand). We tested hypotheses on stabilization of the contributions of subsets of effectors to the task force (F sub(TASK)) and to the moment in the frontal plane (force-stabilization and moment-stabilization, respectively). Force signals were used to compute magnitudes of hypothetical independent signals, modes. The variance of the mode magnitudes across repetitions of the task was partitioned into two components, within the UCM (V sub(UCM)), which did not affect the average value of a selected performance variable (force or moment), and orthogonal to the UCM (V sub(ORT)), which affected the variable. Prior to practice, subjects showed high error indices and failed to show stabilization of each hand's contribution to F sub(TASK) (V sub(ORT) V sub(UCM)), while the pronation-supination moment was stabilized by the fingers of each hand (V sub(ORT)< V sub(UCM)). The total forces produced by each of the two hands showed negative covariation across trials, which supported the force-stabilization hypothesis but not moment-stabilization hypothesis. Both force-stabilization and moment-stabilization hypotheses were supported by analysis of mode magnitudes to all eight fingers. Over 2 days of practice, the performance of the subjects improved considerably. This was accompanied by the emergence of within-a-hand force-stabilization for each of the two hands without deterioration of moment-stabilization. Quantitatively better within-a-hand force-stabilization was seen in male subjects as compared to females throughout the course of the experiment. Force-stabilization by all eight fingers improved quantitatively with practice. Practice also resulted in higher finger forces in maximal force production (MVC) trials and higher forces produced by unintended fingers in single-finger MVC trials (higher enslaving). We conclude that the UCM approach allows quantifying changes in the coordination of effectors during practice, and offers insights into the microstructure of this coordination with respect to different performance variables and different subsets of effectors. The approach can be used to test whether new synergies emerge in the process of practice. We used the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach to study the synergy formation during learning an unusual multi-finger task. The subjects produced accurate force ramps with challenging sets of four fingers (two per hand). We tested hypotheses on stabilization of the contributions of subsets of effectors to the task force (F TASK) and to the moment in the frontal plane (force-stabilization and moment-stabilization, respectively). Force signals were used to compute magnitudes of hypothetical independent signals, modes. The variance of the mode magnitudes across repetitions of the task was partitioned into two components, within the UCM (V UCM), which did not affect the average value of a selected performance variable (force or moment), and orthogonal to the UCM (V ORT), which affected the variable. Prior to practice, subjects showed high error indices and failed to show stabilization of each hand’s contribution to F TASK (V ORT≥V UCM), while the pronation-supination moment was stabilized by the fingers of each hand (V ORT<V UCM). The total forces produced by each of the two hands showed negative covariation across trials, which supported the force-stabilization hypothesis but not moment-stabilization hypothesis. Both force-stabilization and moment-stabilization hypotheses were supported by analysis of mode magnitudes to all eight fingers. Over 2 days of practice, the performance of the subjects improved considerably. This was accompanied by the emergence of within-a-hand force-stabilization for each of the two hands without deterioration of moment-stabilization. Quantitatively better within-a-hand force-stabilization was seen in male subjects as compared to females throughout the course of the experiment. Force-stabilization by all eight fingers improved quantitatively with practice. Practice also resulted in higher finger forces in maximal force production (MVC) trials and higher forces produced by unintended fingers in single-finger MVC trials (higher enslaving). We conclude that the UCM approach allows quantifying changes in the coordination of effectors during practice, and offers insights into the microstructure of this coordination with respect to different performance variables and different subsets of effectors. The approach can be used to test whether new synergies emerge in the process of practice. We used the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach to study the synergy formation during learning an unusual multi-finger task. The subjects produced accurate force ramps with challenging sets of four fingers (two per hand). We tested hypotheses on stabilization of the contributions of subsets of effectors to the task force (<F<<TASK<) and to the moment in the frontal plane (force-stabilization and moment-stabilization, respectively). Force signals were used to compute magnitudes of hypothetical independent signals, modes. The variance of the mode magnitudes across repetitions of the task was partitioned into two components, within the UCM (<V<<UCM<), which did not affect the average value of a selected performance variable (force or moment), and orthogonal to the UCM (<V<<ORT<), which affected the variable. Prior to practice, subjects showed high error indices and failed to show stabilization of each hand's contribution to <F<<TASK< (<V<<ORT or =<V<<UCM<), while the pronation-supination moment was stabilized by the fingers of each hand (<V<<ORT<<<V<<UCM<). The total forces produced by each of the two hands showed negative covariation across trials, which supported the force-stabilization hypothesis but not moment-stabilization hypothesis. Both force-stabilization and moment-stabilization hypotheses were supported by analysis of mode magnitudes to all eight fingers. Over 2 days of practice, the performance of the subjects improved considerably. This was accompanied by the emergence of within-a-hand force-stabilization for each of the two hands without deterioration of moment-stabilization. Quantitatively better within-a-hand force-stabilization was seen in male subjects as compared to females throughout the course of the experiment. Force-stabilization by all eight fingers improved quantitatively with practice. Practice also resulted in higher finger forces in maximal force production (MVC) trials and higher forces produced by unintended fingers in single-finger MVC trials (higher enslaving). We conclude that the UCM approach allows quantifying changes in the coordination of effectors during practice, and offers insights into the microstructure of this coordination with respect to different performance variables and different subsets of effectors. The approach can be used to test whether new synergies emerge in the process of practice. We used the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach to study the synergy formation during learning an unusual multi-finger task. The subjects produced accurate force ramps with challenging sets of four fingers (two per hand). We tested hypotheses on stabilization of the contributions of subsets of effectors to the task force ( F(TASK)) and to the moment in the frontal plane (force-stabilization and moment-stabilization, respectively). Force signals were used to compute magnitudes of hypothetical independent signals, modes. The variance of the mode magnitudes across repetitions of the task was partitioned into two components, within the UCM ( V(UCM)), which did not affect the average value of a selected performance variable (force or moment), and orthogonal to the UCM ( V(ORT)), which affected the variable. Prior to practice, subjects showed high error indices and failed to show stabilization of each hand's contribution to F(TASK) ( V(ORT)> or = V(UCM)), while the pronation-supination moment was stabilized by the fingers of each hand ( V(ORT)< V(UCM)). The total forces produced by each of the two hands showed negative covariation across trials, which supported the force-stabilization hypothesis but not moment-stabilization hypothesis. Both force-stabilization and moment-stabilization hypotheses were supported by analysis of mode magnitudes to all eight fingers. Over 2 days of practice, the performance of the subjects improved considerably. This was accompanied by the emergence of within-a-hand force-stabilization for each of the two hands without deterioration of moment-stabilization. Quantitatively better within-a-hand force-stabilization was seen in male subjects as compared to females throughout the course of the experiment. Force-stabilization by all eight fingers improved quantitatively with practice. Practice also resulted in higher finger forces in maximal force production (MVC) trials and higher forces produced by unintended fingers in single-finger MVC trials (higher enslaving). We conclude that the UCM approach allows quantifying changes in the coordination of effectors during practice, and offers insights into the microstructure of this coordination with respect to different performance variables and different subsets of effectors. The approach can be used to test whether new synergies emerge in the process of practice.We used the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach to study the synergy formation during learning an unusual multi-finger task. The subjects produced accurate force ramps with challenging sets of four fingers (two per hand). We tested hypotheses on stabilization of the contributions of subsets of effectors to the task force ( F(TASK)) and to the moment in the frontal plane (force-stabilization and moment-stabilization, respectively). Force signals were used to compute magnitudes of hypothetical independent signals, modes. The variance of the mode magnitudes across repetitions of the task was partitioned into two components, within the UCM ( V(UCM)), which did not affect the average value of a selected performance variable (force or moment), and orthogonal to the UCM ( V(ORT)), which affected the variable. Prior to practice, subjects showed high error indices and failed to show stabilization of each hand's contribution to F(TASK) ( V(ORT)> or = V(UCM)), while the pronation-supination moment was stabilized by the fingers of each hand ( V(ORT)< V(UCM)). The total forces produced by each of the two hands showed negative covariation across trials, which supported the force-stabilization hypothesis but not moment-stabilization hypothesis. Both force-stabilization and moment-stabilization hypotheses were supported by analysis of mode magnitudes to all eight fingers. Over 2 days of practice, the performance of the subjects improved considerably. This was accompanied by the emergence of within-a-hand force-stabilization for each of the two hands without deterioration of moment-stabilization. Quantitatively better within-a-hand force-stabilization was seen in male subjects as compared to females throughout the course of the experiment. Force-stabilization by all eight fingers improved quantitatively with practice. Practice also resulted in higher finger forces in maximal force production (MVC) trials and higher forces produced by unintended fingers in single-finger MVC trials (higher enslaving). We conclude that the UCM approach allows quantifying changes in the coordination of effectors during practice, and offers insights into the microstructure of this coordination with respect to different performance variables and different subsets of effectors. The approach can be used to test whether new synergies emerge in the process of practice. |
Author | Shinohara, Minoru Kang, Ning Zatsiorsky, Vladimir M Latash, Mark L |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ning surname: Kang fullname: Kang, Ning organization: Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, Rec. Hall--267L, University Park, PA 16802, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Minoru surname: Shinohara fullname: Shinohara, Minoru – sequence: 3 givenname: Vladimir M surname: Zatsiorsky fullname: Zatsiorsky, Vladimir M – sequence: 4 givenname: Mark L surname: Latash fullname: Latash, Mark L |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15042264$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkLtOwzAUhi0Eohd4ABYUMSAWw_HdZoOKm1SJBebIcZwqVeIUOxn69qRqWRhgOufo__Tp6J-h49AFj9AFgVsCoO4SAKUEA3BMtAAMR2hKOKOYEJDHaApAOOaamAmapbTenUzBKZoQAZxSyafoceltDHVYZe3Q9DWuxtXHLG2Dj6vap_vMhmwIrgt97JrGl1lrQ111TTkGttmmOp2hk8o2yZ8f5hx9Pj99LF7x8v3lbfGwxBvKoMfcWnCElkVVlgUzvqqMLYRU0jnnZSFBQQG6VF4VwB3l0jDGnQGrjBRMazZH13vvJnZfg0993tbJ-aaxwXdDyqVUQEHIEbz5E2REMAlGK_Ovkyih1N559Qtcd0McG0g5JYJQrenuw8sDNBStL_NNrFsbt_lP3ewbf0CCaA |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 0-V 3V. 7QP 7QR 7RV 7TK 7TM 7X7 7XB 88E 88G 88J 8AO 8FD 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ K9. KB0 M0S M1P M2M M2R NAPCQ P64 PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL POGQB PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRQQA PSYQQ Q9U RC3 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00221-004-1850-0 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Neurosciences Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) Social Science Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Psychology Database Social Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic Genetics Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Central Student Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials Nucleic Acids Abstracts ProQuest Social Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Pharma Collection Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Chemoreception Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Social Science Journals ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Neurosciences Abstracts AGRICOLA ProQuest One Psychology MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology Psychology |
EISSN | 1432-1106 |
EndPage | 350 |
ExternalDocumentID | 686390001 15042264 |
Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NINDS NIH HHS grantid: NS-35032 – fundername: NIA NIH HHS grantid: AG-018751 |
GroupedDBID | --- -4W -56 -5G -BR -DZ -EM -XW -Y2 -~C -~X .55 .86 .GJ .VR 0-V 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 199 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29G 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3O- 3SX 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5QI 5RE 5VS 67N 67Z 6NX 78A 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYJJ AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIVO ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABLJU ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACNCT ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACPRK ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYPR ADZKW AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFFNX AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARALO ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN AZQEC B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BKEYQ BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU CGR COF CS3 CSCUP CUY CVF DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EBD EBLON EBS ECM EIF EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 EPAXT ESBYG EX3 FA8 FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GXS H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IAO IHE IHR IHW IJ- IKXTQ INH INR IPY ISR ITC ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH L7B LAS LLZTM M1P M2M M2R M4Y MA- N2Q NAPCQ NB0 NDZJH NPM NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OHT OVD P19 P2P PF- PKN PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S3A S3B SAP SBL SBY SCLPG SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WH7 WJK WK6 WK8 WOW X7M YLTOR Z45 Z7R Z7U Z7W Z7X Z82 Z83 Z87 Z88 Z8M Z8O Z8Q Z8R Z8V Z8W Z91 Z92 ZGI ZMTXR ZOVNA ZXP ~EX ~KM 7QP 7QR 7TK 7TM 7XB 8FD 8FK AAPKM ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA FR3 K9. P64 PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL POGQB PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRQQA Q9U RC3 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p230t-4aa0c12dbfddb39eff9ab5676ccce6b6070b08d7e7b04c2469334c90a79653883 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0014-4819 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 07 15:07:04 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 11:26:21 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:02:37 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 13:24:52 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:36:57 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p230t-4aa0c12dbfddb39eff9ab5676ccce6b6070b08d7e7b04c2469334c90a79653883 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PMID | 15042264 |
PQID | 215128828 |
PQPubID | 47176 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_66702056 proquest_miscellaneous_3153609879 proquest_miscellaneous_17577056 proquest_journals_215128828 pubmed_primary_15042264 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2004-Aug 20040801 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2004-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2004 text: 2004-Aug |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Germany |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Germany – name: Heidelberg |
PublicationTitle | Experimental brain research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Exp Brain Res |
PublicationYear | 2004 |
Publisher | Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | 11713627 - Exp Brain Res. 2001 Nov;141(2):153-65 12740728 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jul;151(1):60-71 15136283 - J Mot Behav. 1986 Mar;18(1):17-54 11458838 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;930:315-29 11918210 - Biol Cybern. 2002 Jan;86(1):29-39 12364526 - J Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;88(4):2035-46 2140862 - J Physiol. 1990 Feb;421:553-68 9791934 - Biol Cybern. 1998 Aug;79(2):139-50 11907686 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 Mar;143(1):11-23 14642441 - Neurosci Lett. 2003 Dec 15;353(1):72-4 12464342 - Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec;113(12):2013-24 11810146 - Exp Brain Res. 2001 Dec;141(4):530-40 10382616 - Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):289-306 14610628 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Dec;153(3):275-88 12567224 - Biol Cybern. 2003 Feb;88(2):91-8 12391031 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Jan;94(1):259-70 11800496 - Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2002 Jan;30(1):26-31 9644289 - Motor Control. 1998 Jul;2(3):189-205 21227151 - Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 May 1;2(5):168-74 12021815 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jun;144(3):336-42 7500130 - J Neurophysiol. 1995 Sep;74(3):1037-45 12232691 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 Oct;146(3):345-55 12898101 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(2):173-84 9551828 - Exp Brain Res. 1998 Apr;119(3):276-86 12404008 - Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35 11337823 - Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001 Apr;29(2):54-9 9463469 - J Neurophysiol. 1998 Feb;79(2):1117-23 11889512 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 Apr;143(3):342-9 12928761 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(1):45-58 2275402 - Acta Physiol Scand. 1990 Sep;140(1):23-30 12478398 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jan;148(1):77-87 10323289 - Exp Brain Res. 1999 Apr;125(4):435-9 12012158 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 May;144(2):200-10 |
References_xml | – reference: 11918210 - Biol Cybern. 2002 Jan;86(1):29-39 – reference: 12740728 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jul;151(1):60-71 – reference: 11713627 - Exp Brain Res. 2001 Nov;141(2):153-65 – reference: 11907686 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 Mar;143(1):11-23 – reference: 11810146 - Exp Brain Res. 2001 Dec;141(4):530-40 – reference: 12391031 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Jan;94(1):259-70 – reference: 9551828 - Exp Brain Res. 1998 Apr;119(3):276-86 – reference: 11800496 - Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2002 Jan;30(1):26-31 – reference: 12928761 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(1):45-58 – reference: 12567224 - Biol Cybern. 2003 Feb;88(2):91-8 – reference: 9644289 - Motor Control. 1998 Jul;2(3):189-205 – reference: 2275402 - Acta Physiol Scand. 1990 Sep;140(1):23-30 – reference: 9791934 - Biol Cybern. 1998 Aug;79(2):139-50 – reference: 11889512 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 Apr;143(3):342-9 – reference: 7500130 - J Neurophysiol. 1995 Sep;74(3):1037-45 – reference: 12012158 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 May;144(2):200-10 – reference: 15136283 - J Mot Behav. 1986 Mar;18(1):17-54 – reference: 12232691 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 Oct;146(3):345-55 – reference: 11337823 - Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001 Apr;29(2):54-9 – reference: 9463469 - J Neurophysiol. 1998 Feb;79(2):1117-23 – reference: 12021815 - Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jun;144(3):336-42 – reference: 12404008 - Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35 – reference: 11458838 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;930:315-29 – reference: 2140862 - J Physiol. 1990 Feb;421:553-68 – reference: 21227151 - Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 May 1;2(5):168-74 – reference: 14610628 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Dec;153(3):275-88 – reference: 10382616 - Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):289-306 – reference: 12898101 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(2):173-84 – reference: 10323289 - Exp Brain Res. 1999 Apr;125(4):435-9 – reference: 14642441 - Neurosci Lett. 2003 Dec 15;353(1):72-4 – reference: 12464342 - Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec;113(12):2013-24 – reference: 12364526 - J Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;88(4):2035-46 – reference: 12478398 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jan;148(1):77-87 |
SSID | ssj0014370 |
Score | 2.1178172 |
Snippet | We used the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach to study the synergy formation during learning an unusual multi-finger task. The subjects produced accurate... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 336 |
SubjectTerms | Adult brain Female Fingers - physiology Hand Strength - physiology Hands Humans Hypotheses Learning - physiology Male males microstructure Models, Neurological Motor Skills - physiology Movement - physiology Muscle Contraction - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Physical Fitness - physiology Posture - physiology Sex Factors Variables variance |
Title | Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15042264 https://www.proquest.com/docview/215128828 https://www.proquest.com/docview/17577056 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153609879 https://www.proquest.com/docview/66702056 |
Volume | 157 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3PT8IwFH5RuHAxCv5AFGtivDWWrbSbFyMGQkwkxkjCbVl_zAsOdHDgv_e1G9zw3GVZ-rr3vq_93leAu4BbbXmmqBUKCQpmPxqlmaRS25AFRgkuXb_z20SMp_x11p9V2pyiklVuc6JP1Gah3R75gy9NCAejp-UPdZdGucPV6gaNQ6g75zKn6JKzHd9CJCDLDpQepxwr3_ZQk3kP0SBAHu1M-6I-o2w_wPSFZnQMRxVCJM9lSE_gwOZNaD3nyI6_N-SeeM2m3wxvQmOXvzYtGFReqV_EqwRp5nfsSLFx7X1IiB9JmhMsY6U4fW4Ncd4X2WJucKC0JjmF6Wj4-TKm1RUJdIncYUV5mjLdwznNjFFhbLMsTlVfSKG1xtkX-EMrFhlppWJcB8iFw5DrmKUyFpjqovAMavkitxdAIufthmTEqEBzwzB0ETc9rZgJe2nGRBs62xlKqnVeJLuotOFmN4oL1J06pLldrIsE8YmUCLPacLvniRCzrmBxJOP9bxFCIrB1bzkvg5MsSzeOBBGt7wa-_Pf7OtAoNTdOuncFtdXv2l4jnFiprl80XagPhpP3jz-IAsr4 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3LTuswEB1xywI2iNe9lKeRgJ2FG7t2goQQT5VXha5AYhfiR9hAWmgR6kfxj4ydpLuyY-3IspzxzDmemWOAnUg440SuqZMaCQp6PxpnuaLKOM4iq6VQvt_5tis7D-Lqsf04BV91L4wvq6x9YnDUtmf8Hfl-CE0IB-Oj_hv1j0b55Gr9gkZpFddu9ImMbXB4eYa_dzeKLs7vTzu0elSA9hFtD6nIMmZauIrcWs0Tl-dJpttSSWMMrlfiEdAstsopzYSJkD1yLkzCMpVIdA4xx3n_wLTgyGQaMH1y3r37P05bCK7KnpeWoAJjbZ1GZUG1NIqQuXuZwLjNKJsMaUNou5iHuQqTkuPSiBZgyhWLsHRcIB9_HZE9EqpEw_X7IsyOPeZoCU4qddZnEuoSaR7uCMlg5BsKkYIfkKwgGDjLcvgXZ4lX28h7LxYHSjGUZXj4lf37C42iV7gVILFXk0P6Y3VkhGVoLLGwLaOZ5a0sZ7IJa_UOpdXJGqRjO2jC1ngUj4TPc2SF630MUkRESiGwa8L2hC84-nnJklglk2eRUiGU9rP8K39O2i_1P1LE0KH_ePXH9W3BTOf-9ia9uexer8FsWfHjCwfXoTF8_3AbCGaGerMyIQJPv22138oNCEg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3LbhMxFL1qi4SyQdBASQPUSIWdFc-MY88gIVQoUdJAxYJI2Q3jF5swSZlUKJ_G33HteezCLmuPLMtzH-fY514DXMbcasudolYoJCgY_WhaOEmltgmLjRJc-nrnr7diuuA3y_HyCP62tTBeVtnGxBCozVr7M_JRSE0IB9ORa1QR364nHzZ31D8g5S9a29c0aguZ290fZG_V-9k1_uo3cTz5_P3TlDYPDNANIu8t5UXBdIQrcsaoJLPOZYUaCym01rh2ge6gWGqklYpxHSOTTBKuM1bITGCgSBOc9xgeyGQceReTy47rIQqRdfVLxCnHrNteqLLQvzSOkcP7hoHpmFG2H9yGJDd5DI8adEquanN6Ake2PIX-VYnM_NeOvCVBLxoO4k-h18XOXR8-Nn1af5KgUKQunBaSaudLC5GMvyNFSTCF1sL4lTXE991w65XBgbotylNYHGT3nsFJuS7tcyCp7yuHRMioWHPD0GxSbiKtmEmiwjExgGG7Q3njY1XeWcQALrpRdA5_41GUdn1f5YiNpESIN4DXe75IMOILlqUy2z-LEBJBtZ_lrP45-abuBJIjmg6VyOf_Xd8FPERbzb_MbudD6NXSH68gfAEn29_39iWimq16FeyHwI9DG-w_QLELGA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning+multi-finger+synergies%3A+an+uncontrolled+manifold+analysis&rft.jtitle=Experimental+brain+research&rft.au=Kang%2C+N&rft.au=Shinohara%2C+M&rft.au=Zatsiorsky%2C+V+M&rft.au=Latash%2C+M+L&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.volume=157&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00221-004-1850-0&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0014-4819&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0014-4819&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0014-4819&client=summon |