Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin in beef cattle on feed efficiency, body weight gain, and dry matter intake
A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin on growing and finishing beef cattle was conducted after a search of the literature. A total of 40 peer-reviewed articles and 24 additional trial reports with monensin feeding in beef cattle were selected, after meeting apriori quality criteria. Data for eac...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of animal science Vol. 90; no. 12; pp. 4583 - 4592 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.12.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin on growing and finishing beef cattle was conducted after a search of the literature. A total of 40 peer-reviewed articles and 24 additional trial reports with monensin feeding in beef cattle were selected, after meeting apriori quality criteria. Data for each trial were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis software in STATA. Estimated effect size of monensin was calculated for feed efficiency (FE), ADG, and DMI. Monensin use in growing and finishing beef cattle reduced DMI (P < 0.001) and improved both ADG (P < 0.001) and FE (P < 0.001). The average concentration of monensin in feed across studies was 28.1 mg/kg feed (100% DM) and this resulted in approximately a 6.4% (but only 2.5 to 3.5% in the last 2 decades) increase in FE, 3% decrease in DMI, and 2.5% increase in ADG. All 3 outcomes displayed moderate and significant heterogeneity of monensin response (I(2), which is a measure of variation beyond chance, = 29% for FE, 42% for DMI, and 23% for ADG); therefore, random effects models were used for those outcomes. There were no single influential studies that overweighted the findings for any outcome. Meta-regression analysis of the effect sizes obtained from these data showed that dietary factors, dose, and study design were influential in modifying effect size of monensin treatment. Use of corn silage in the diet influenced the effect size of monensin for DMI and FE, with diets containing corn silage resulting in a greater improvement in FE and a larger effect on reducing DMI. Studies conducted to assess multiple doses of monensin showed similar effects to the use of corn silage in the diet. Studies conducted in the United States or with higher ADG in control animals (>1.17 kg/d) showed less effect of monensin on ADG. Pen-level studies showed a greater monensin increase on ADG than did those conducted on individual animals. Linear effect of monensin dose was observed for FE, DMI, and ADG outcomes, with greater effects on improving FE and reducing DMI with larger doses of monensin but lesser improvement in ADG with increasing dose. These findings confirm that monensin improves FE in growing and finishing beef cattle, and that this effect is linear with dose. |
---|---|
AbstractList | A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin on growing and finishing beef cattle was conducted after a search of the literature. A total of 40 peer-reviewed articles and 24 additional trial reports with monensin feeding in beef cattle were selected, after meeting apriori quality criteria. Data for each trial were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis software in STATA. Estimated effect size of monensin was calculated for feed efficiency (FE), ADG, and DMI. Monensin use in growing and finishing beef cattle reduced DMI (P < 0.001) and improved both ADG (P < 0.001) and FE (P < 0.001). The average concentration of monensin in feed across studies was 28.1 mg/kg feed (100% DM) and this resulted in approximately a 6.4% (but only 2.5 to 3.5% in the last 2 decades) increase in FE, 3% decrease in DMI, and 2.5% increase in ADG. All 3 outcomes displayed moderate and significant heterogeneity of monensin response (I(2), which is a measure of variation beyond chance, = 29% for FE, 42% for DMI, and 23% for ADG); therefore, random effects models were used for those outcomes. There were no single influential studies that overweighted the findings for any outcome. Meta-regression analysis of the effect sizes obtained from these data showed that dietary factors, dose, and study design were influential in modifying effect size of monensin treatment. Use of corn silage in the diet influenced the effect size of monensin for DMI and FE, with diets containing corn silage resulting in a greater improvement in FE and a larger effect on reducing DMI. Studies conducted to assess multiple doses of monensin showed similar effects to the use of corn silage in the diet. Studies conducted in the United States or with higher ADG in control animals (>1.17 kg/d) showed less effect of monensin on ADG. Pen-level studies showed a greater monensin increase on ADG than did those conducted on individual animals. Linear effect of monensin dose was observed for FE, DMI, and ADG outcomes, with greater effects on improving FE and reducing DMI with larger doses of monensin but lesser improvement in ADG with increasing dose. These findings confirm that monensin improves FE in growing and finishing beef cattle, and that this effect is linear with dose. A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin on growing and finishing beef cattle was conducted after a search of the literature. A total of 40 peer-reviewed articles and 24 additional trial reports with monensin feeding in beef cattle were selected, after meeting apriori quality criteria. Data for each trial were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis software in STATA. Estimated effect size of monensin was calculated for feed efficiency (FE), ADG, and DMI. Monensin use in growing and finishing beef cattle reduced DMI (P < 0.001) and improved both ADG (P < 0.001) and FE (P < 0.001). The average concentration of monensin in feed across studies was 28.1 mg/kg feed (100% DM) and this resulted in approximately a 6.4% (but only 2.5 to 3.5% in the last 2 decades) increase in FE, 3% decrease in DMI, and 2.5% increase in ADG. All 3 outcomes displayed moderate and significant heterogeneity of monensin response (I(2), which is a measure of variation beyond chance, = 29% for FE, 42% for DMI, and 23% for ADG); therefore, random effects models were used for those outcomes. There were no single influential studies that overweighted the findings for any outcome. Meta-regression analysis of the effect sizes obtained from these data showed that dietary factors, dose, and study design were influential in modifying effect size of monensin treatment. Use of corn silage in the diet influenced the effect size of monensin for DMI and FE, with diets containing corn silage resulting in a greater improvement in FE and a larger effect on reducing DMI. Studies conducted to assess multiple doses of monensin showed similar effects to the use of corn silage in the diet. Studies conducted in the United States or with higher ADG in control animals (>1.17 kg/d) showed less effect of monensin on ADG. Pen-level studies showed a greater monensin increase on ADG than did those conducted on individual animals. Linear effect of monensin dose was observed for FE, DMI, and ADG outcomes, with greater effects on improving FE and reducing DMI with larger doses of monensin but lesser improvement in ADG with increasing dose. These findings confirm that monensin improves FE in growing and finishing beef cattle, and that this effect is linear with dose. |
Author | Merrill, J K Bagg, R N Duffield, T F |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: T F surname: Duffield fullname: Duffield, T F email: tduffiel@ovc.uoguelph.ca organization: Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1. tduffiel@ovc.uoguelph.ca – sequence: 2 givenname: J K surname: Merrill fullname: Merrill, J K – sequence: 3 givenname: R N surname: Bagg fullname: Bagg, R N |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo1kM1LAzEQxYMo9kOPXiVHD92aD9O0Ryl-QcWLnpdJMmlTd7N1kyL737vVCjM8HvzmPZgROY1NREKuOJsKJfTtFtJUMM4Lxfj8hAy5EqqQfCYHZJTSljEu1EKdk4EQc7XQajEk6RUzFBCh6lJItPE0b5Ci92jzr637iphCpP0YRE8t5FwhbSL1iO6ABhsw2m5CTeM6-o1hvcl0DSFOKERHXdvRuj_Cts_I8IkX5MxDlfDyqGPy8fjwvnwuVm9PL8v7VbETnOcCHAPlnQHNJROGacuZmxthlLJ3ms21th48eokOrQBg-rDGgnSeMa_kmNz85e7a5muPKZd1SBarCiI2-1RyoaXQMy1Yj14f0b2p0ZW7NtTQduX_o-QPGiFr2g |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.2527/jas.2011-5018 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1525-3163 |
EndPage | 4592 |
ExternalDocumentID | 22859759 |
Genre | Meta-Analysis Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- ..I .55 .GJ 0R~ 186 18M 29J 2WC 3V. 48X 53G 5GY 5RE 5WD 7RQ 7X2 7X7 7XC 88A 88E 88I 8AF 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FW 8G5 8R4 8R5 AAHBH AAIMJ AAPQZ AAPXW AARHZ AAUAY AAUQX AAVAP AAWDT ABCQX ABJCF ABJNI ABMNT ABPTD ABSAR ABUWG ABWST ABXVV ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACPRK ACQAM ACUTJ ACZBC ADBBV ADFRT ADGZP ADIPN ADNWM ADQBN ADRTK ADVEK AELWJ AENEX AETBJ AFFZL AFGWE AFKRA AFRAH AFYAG AGINJ AGKRT AGMDO AGQXC AHMBA AI. AJEEA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ANFBD AOIJS APJGH AQDSO ASAOO ATCPS ATDFG ATGXG AZQEC BAYMD BBNVY BCRHZ BENPR BES BEYMZ BGLVJ BHPHI BKOMP BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CCPQU CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBS ECGQY ECM EIF EJD ELUNK EYRJQ F5P F9R FHSFR FJW FLUFQ FOEOM FQBLK FYUFA GAUVT GNUQQ GUQSH H13 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE INIJC KBUDW KOP KSI KSN L6V L7B LK8 M0K M0L M1P M2O M2P M2Q M7P M7S MBTAY ML0 MV1 MW2 NEJ NHB NLBLG NOMLY NPM NVLIB O9- OBOKY ODMLO OJZSN OK1 OWPYF P-O P0- P2P PATMY PQQKQ PRG PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PYCSY Q2X ROX RPM RUSNO RWL RXW S0X SJN TAE TCN TJA TR2 TWZ UKHRP VH1 W8F WH7 WOQ X7M XOL YKV YXANX ZCG ZGI ZXP ~KM 7X8 ABEJV |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-ad0a5fdba71302b07c10d8b2b55c470877cfafef3edec2aa07aa07bca3df00f53 |
IngestDate | Wed Dec 04 00:41:08 EST 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:45:55 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p211t-ad0a5fdba71302b07c10d8b2b55c470877cfafef3edec2aa07aa07bca3df00f53 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PMID | 22859759 |
PQID | 1273276720 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1273276720 pubmed_primary_22859759 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012-Dec 20121201 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2012 text: 2012-Dec |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of animal science |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Anim Sci |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
SSID | ssj0012595 |
Score | 2.5138247 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin on growing and finishing beef cattle was conducted after a search of the literature. A total of 40 peer-reviewed... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 4583 |
SubjectTerms | Animal Feed - analysis Animals Cattle - physiology Diet - veterinary Feeding Behavior - drug effects Monensin - pharmacology Proton Ionophores - pharmacology Time Factors Weight Gain - drug effects |
Title | Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin in beef cattle on feed efficiency, body weight gain, and dry matter intake |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859759 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1273276720 |
Volume | 90 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1da9swFBVp-rI9jH2v-yga7C3V5siylT62W7sySBklhTwtSLIUSokTEofR_vreK8mxM1rYBomIZcc29xxfS7pXR4R8ElK4rEgU63N5yAQ0aNkgN4I5waXOCzuQXkh7eJ6fXYof42zc6fxqZS2tK_3Z3N47r-R_UIU6wBVnyf4DspuTQgX8BnyhBISh_CuMh7ZSTLVkRf7I0IAbwfx0n8yorXU94yWLMUDg4K2Fh175Z9tbWs-Lm95vP1Tam6qgLYDD6sXypjfzMpwoLqGut5OHmgatKq9m9RTLhi_f1m6zDPaoySMeoiJkTLBphlqP1dS7nosYIYrDEX3eSu2w0YVyjK1HtxV9bFgStOYSb3lMjNve58p5xqVfQmDldVYZCg-2jwMkFjOPK0cNPhl1xbe1s-tdO2QXhRJFl-wen5z_vNjEmaDzlwXlVbzel62roU50_P_D3Q_fDBk9JU-iuelRIMMz0rHlc_L4aLqMGir2BVlt0YLOHQVa0EgL3KxpQeGDtKCBFnReUqQFbWhxQJEUNJCCIikOKFCCAiVooAQNlHhJLk9PRl_PWFxbgy2gy18xBc9n5gqtJEaudSJNPykGmussM0KiSqRxylmX2sIarlQi8auNSguXJC5LX5FuCXf7hlCpHcBtBbRkExSV1WneV9bYHCoPMyP3yMfaeBPwXRiQUqWdr1cT8A8pl7nkyR55Haw6WQSRlUlt-rcP7nlHHjUEfE-61XJtP0ALsdL7ZEeOJZSD0-_7EfI7_KVpNA |
link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,27924,27925,31720,33374,33745 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-analysis+of+the+effects+of+monensin+in+beef+cattle+on+feed+efficiency%2C+body+weight+gain%2C+and+dry+matter+intake&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+animal+science&rft.au=Duffield%2C+T+F&rft.au=Merrill%2C+J+K&rft.au=Bagg%2C+R+N&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4583&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527%2Fjas.2011-5018&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22859759&rft.externalDocID=22859759 |