Physiopharmacological approach to mechanical factors of hypertension in the atherosclerotic process

• Published in: Journal of human hypertension Vol. 5 Suppl 1; p. 15
• Main Authors: Simon, A C, Pithois-Merli, I, Levenson, J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.08.1991
• Subjects: Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use; Arteries - physiopathology; Arteriosclerosis - etiology; Blood Circulation; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension - complications; Hypertension - drug therapy; Hypertension - physiopathology; Stress, Mechanical; Vascular Resistance
• ISSN: 0950-9240

Hypertension may influence the atherosclerotic process of large arteries via pressure and shear forces. The pressure force dilates and stiffens arteries because of the non-linear elastic behaviour of arterial walls. This partly explains the increased diameter and decreased compliance of the brachial artery in hypertensive subjects compared with normotensive controls. However, pressure lowering by antihypertensive drugs does not always reverse large artery alterations indicating that other mechanisms are involved. Reversal of low compliance obtained with certain antihypertensive drugs is generally concomitant with large artery vasodilation, suggesting that smooth muscle relaxation plays a major role in the compliance response to drugs. Atherosclerosis associated with hypertension also causes additional loss of compliance and creates a vicious circle of sclerosis development by accelerating the biophysical fatigue of bioelastomers. Hypertension may contribute to atherogenesis by means of wall shear stress which is the frictional force exerted by the circulating blood column on the intima of arteries. Since it is likely that atherosis lesions may develop preferentially in low shear conditions, hypertension may promote the haemodynamic conditions of atherogenesis at the blood-wall interface. The response of wall shear to antihypertensive treatment is not unequivocal. For example, the beta-blocker, atenolol, does not change shear whereas carteolol increases shear rate and stress and these effects are closely related to change in platelet-free calcium concentration. This finding is consistent with the effect of shear forces on cell permeability to calcium demonstrated in vitro and points to the crucial role of wall shear as a biophysical signal capable of modifying the endothelial structure and function of arteries.