A data-driven model of biomarker changes in sporadic Alzheimer's disease

We demonstrate the use of a probabilistic generative model to explore the biomarker changes occurring as Alzheimer's disease develops and progresses. We enhanced the recently introduced event-based model for use with a multi-modal sporadic disease data set. This allows us to determine the seque...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain (London, England : 1878) Vol. 137; no. Pt 9; pp. 2564 - 2577
Main Authors Young, Alexandra L, Oxtoby, Neil P, Daga, Pankaj, Cash, David M, Fox, Nick C, Ourselin, Sebastien, Schott, Jonathan M, Alexander, Daniel C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.09.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1460-2156
0006-8950
1460-2156
DOI10.1093/brain/awu176

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We demonstrate the use of a probabilistic generative model to explore the biomarker changes occurring as Alzheimer's disease develops and progresses. We enhanced the recently introduced event-based model for use with a multi-modal sporadic disease data set. This allows us to determine the sequence in which Alzheimer's disease biomarkers become abnormal without reliance on a priori clinical diagnostic information or explicit biomarker cut points. The model also characterizes the uncertainty in the ordering and provides a natural patient staging system. Two hundred and eighty-five subjects (92 cognitively normal, 129 mild cognitive impairment, 64 Alzheimer's disease) were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with measurements of 14 Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers including cerebrospinal fluid proteins, regional magnetic resonance imaging brain volume and rates of atrophy measures, and cognitive test scores. We used the event-based model to determine the sequence of biomarker abnormality and its uncertainty in various population subgroups. We used patient stages assigned by the event-based model to discriminate cognitively normal subjects from those with Alzheimer's disease, and predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment. The model predicts that cerebrospinal fluid levels become abnormal first, followed by rates of atrophy, then cognitive test scores, and finally regional brain volumes. In amyloid-positive (cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β1-42 < 192 pg/ml) or APOE-positive (one or more APOE4 alleles) subjects, the model predicts with high confidence that the cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers become abnormal in a distinct sequence: amyloid-β1-42, phosphorylated tau, total tau. However, in the broader population total tau and phosphorylated tau are found to be earlier cerebrospinal fluid markers than amyloid-β1-42, albeit with more uncertainty. The model's staging system strongly separates cognitively normal and Alzheimer's disease subjects (maximum classification accuracy of 99%), and predicts conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (maximum balanced accuracy of 77% over 3 years), and from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (maximum balanced accuracy of 76% over 5 years). By fitting Cox proportional hazards models, we find that baseline model stage is a significant risk factor for conversion from both mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (P = 2.06 × 10(-7)) and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (P = 0.033). The data-driven model we describe supports hypothetical models of biomarker ordering in amyloid-positive and APOE-positive subjects, but suggests that biomarker ordering in the wider population may diverge from this sequence. The model provides useful disease staging information across the full spectrum of disease progression, from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. This approach has broad application across neurodegenerative disease, providing insights into disease biology, as well as staging and prognostication.
AbstractList We demonstrate the use of a probabilistic generative model to explore the biomarker changes occurring as Alzheimer's disease develops and progresses. We enhanced the recently introduced event-based model for use with a multi-modal sporadic disease data set. This allows us to determine the sequence in which Alzheimer's disease biomarkers become abnormal without reliance on a priori clinical diagnostic information or explicit biomarker cut points. The model also characterizes the uncertainty in the ordering and provides a natural patient staging system. Two hundred and eighty-five subjects (92 cognitively normal, 129 mild cognitive impairment, 64 Alzheimer's disease) were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with measurements of 14 Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers including cerebrospinal fluid proteins, regional magnetic resonance imaging brain volume and rates of atrophy measures, and cognitive test scores. We used the event-based model to determine the sequence of biomarker abnormality and its uncertainty in various population subgroups. We used patient stages assigned by the event-based model to discriminate cognitively normal subjects from those with Alzheimer's disease, and predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment. The model predicts that cerebrospinal fluid levels become abnormal first, followed by rates of atrophy, then cognitive test scores, and finally regional brain volumes. In amyloid-positive (cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β1-42 < 192 pg/ml) or APOE-positive (one or more APOE4 alleles) subjects, the model predicts with high confidence that the cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers become abnormal in a distinct sequence: amyloid-β1-42, phosphorylated tau, total tau. However, in the broader population total tau and phosphorylated tau are found to be earlier cerebrospinal fluid markers than amyloid-β1-42, albeit with more uncertainty. The model's staging system strongly separates cognitively normal and Alzheimer's disease subjects (maximum classification accuracy of 99%), and predicts conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (maximum balanced accuracy of 77% over 3 years), and from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (maximum balanced accuracy of 76% over 5 years). By fitting Cox proportional hazards models, we find that baseline model stage is a significant risk factor for conversion from both mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (P = 2.06 × 10(-7)) and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (P = 0.033). The data-driven model we describe supports hypothetical models of biomarker ordering in amyloid-positive and APOE-positive subjects, but suggests that biomarker ordering in the wider population may diverge from this sequence. The model provides useful disease staging information across the full spectrum of disease progression, from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. This approach has broad application across neurodegenerative disease, providing insights into disease biology, as well as staging and prognostication.
Young et al. reformulate an event-based model for the progression of Alzheimer's disease to make it applicable to a heterogeneous sporadic disease population. The enhanced model predicts the ordering of biomarker abnormality in sporadic Alzheimer's disease independently of clinical diagnoses or biomarker cut-points, and shows state-of-the-art diagnostic classification performance. We demonstrate the use of a probabilistic generative model to explore the biomarker changes occurring as Alzheimer’s disease develops and progresses. We enhanced the recently introduced event-based model for use with a multi-modal sporadic disease data set. This allows us to determine the sequence in which Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers become abnormal without reliance on a priori clinical diagnostic information or explicit biomarker cut points. The model also characterizes the uncertainty in the ordering and provides a natural patient staging system. Two hundred and eighty-five subjects (92 cognitively normal, 129 mild cognitive impairment, 64 Alzheimer’s disease) were selected from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with measurements of 14 Alzheimer’s disease-related biomarkers including cerebrospinal fluid proteins, regional magnetic resonance imaging brain volume and rates of atrophy measures, and cognitive test scores. We used the event-based model to determine the sequence of biomarker abnormality and its uncertainty in various population subgroups. We used patient stages assigned by the event-based model to discriminate cognitively normal subjects from those with Alzheimer’s disease, and predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment. The model predicts that cerebrospinal fluid levels become abnormal first, followed by rates of atrophy, then cognitive test scores, and finally regional brain volumes. In amyloid-positive (cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β 1–42 < 192 pg/ml) or APOE-positive (one or more APOE4 alleles) subjects, the model predicts with high confidence that the cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers become abnormal in a distinct sequence: amyloid-β 1–42 , phosphorylated tau, total tau. However, in the broader population total tau and phosphorylated tau are found to be earlier cerebrospinal fluid markers than amyloid-β 1–42 , albeit with more uncertainty. The model’s staging system strongly separates cognitively normal and Alzheimer’s disease subjects (maximum classification accuracy of 99%), and predicts conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease (maximum balanced accuracy of 77% over 3 years), and from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (maximum balanced accuracy of 76% over 5 years). By fitting Cox proportional hazards models, we find that baseline model stage is a significant risk factor for conversion from both mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease ( P = 2.06 × 10 −7 ) and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment ( P = 0.033). The data-driven model we describe supports hypothetical models of biomarker ordering in amyloid-positive and APOE-positive subjects, but suggests that biomarker ordering in the wider population may diverge from this sequence. The model provides useful disease staging information across the full spectrum of disease progression, from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. This approach has broad application across neurodegenerative disease, providing insights into disease biology, as well as staging and prognostication.
We demonstrate the use of a probabilistic generative model to explore the biomarker changes occurring as Alzheimer's disease develops and progresses. We enhanced the recently introduced event-based model for use with a multi-modal sporadic disease data set. This allows us to determine the sequence in which Alzheimer's disease biomarkers become abnormal without reliance on a priori clinical diagnostic information or explicit biomarker cut points. The model also characterizes the uncertainty in the ordering and provides a natural patient staging system. Two hundred and eighty-five subjects (92 cognitively normal, 129 mild cognitive impairment, 64 Alzheimer's disease) were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with measurements of 14 Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers including cerebrospinal fluid proteins, regional magnetic resonance imaging brain volume and rates of atrophy measures, and cognitive test scores. We used the event-based model to determine the sequence of biomarker abnormality and its uncertainty in various population subgroups. We used patient stages assigned by the event-based model to discriminate cognitively normal subjects from those with Alzheimer's disease, and predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment. The model predicts that cerebrospinal fluid levels become abnormal first, followed by rates of atrophy, then cognitive test scores, and finally regional brain volumes. In amyloid-positive (cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β1-42 < 192 pg/ml) or APOE-positive (one or more APOE4 alleles) subjects, the model predicts with high confidence that the cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers become abnormal in a distinct sequence: amyloid-β1-42, phosphorylated tau, total tau. However, in the broader population total tau and phosphorylated tau are found to be earlier cerebrospinal fluid markers than amyloid-β1-42, albeit with more uncertainty. The model's staging system strongly separates cognitively normal and Alzheimer's disease subjects (maximum classification accuracy of 99%), and predicts conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (maximum balanced accuracy of 77% over 3 years), and from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (maximum balanced accuracy of 76% over 5 years). By fitting Cox proportional hazards models, we find that baseline model stage is a significant risk factor for conversion from both mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (P = 2.06 × 10(-7)) and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (P = 0.033). The data-driven model we describe supports hypothetical models of biomarker ordering in amyloid-positive and APOE-positive subjects, but suggests that biomarker ordering in the wider population may diverge from this sequence. The model provides useful disease staging information across the full spectrum of disease progression, from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. This approach has broad application across neurodegenerative disease, providing insights into disease biology, as well as staging and prognostication.We demonstrate the use of a probabilistic generative model to explore the biomarker changes occurring as Alzheimer's disease develops and progresses. We enhanced the recently introduced event-based model for use with a multi-modal sporadic disease data set. This allows us to determine the sequence in which Alzheimer's disease biomarkers become abnormal without reliance on a priori clinical diagnostic information or explicit biomarker cut points. The model also characterizes the uncertainty in the ordering and provides a natural patient staging system. Two hundred and eighty-five subjects (92 cognitively normal, 129 mild cognitive impairment, 64 Alzheimer's disease) were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with measurements of 14 Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers including cerebrospinal fluid proteins, regional magnetic resonance imaging brain volume and rates of atrophy measures, and cognitive test scores. We used the event-based model to determine the sequence of biomarker abnormality and its uncertainty in various population subgroups. We used patient stages assigned by the event-based model to discriminate cognitively normal subjects from those with Alzheimer's disease, and predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment. The model predicts that cerebrospinal fluid levels become abnormal first, followed by rates of atrophy, then cognitive test scores, and finally regional brain volumes. In amyloid-positive (cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β1-42 < 192 pg/ml) or APOE-positive (one or more APOE4 alleles) subjects, the model predicts with high confidence that the cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers become abnormal in a distinct sequence: amyloid-β1-42, phosphorylated tau, total tau. However, in the broader population total tau and phosphorylated tau are found to be earlier cerebrospinal fluid markers than amyloid-β1-42, albeit with more uncertainty. The model's staging system strongly separates cognitively normal and Alzheimer's disease subjects (maximum classification accuracy of 99%), and predicts conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (maximum balanced accuracy of 77% over 3 years), and from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (maximum balanced accuracy of 76% over 5 years). By fitting Cox proportional hazards models, we find that baseline model stage is a significant risk factor for conversion from both mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (P = 2.06 × 10(-7)) and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (P = 0.033). The data-driven model we describe supports hypothetical models of biomarker ordering in amyloid-positive and APOE-positive subjects, but suggests that biomarker ordering in the wider population may diverge from this sequence. The model provides useful disease staging information across the full spectrum of disease progression, from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. This approach has broad application across neurodegenerative disease, providing insights into disease biology, as well as staging and prognostication.
Author Young, Alexandra L
Oxtoby, Neil P
Daga, Pankaj
Cash, David M
Fox, Nick C
Alexander, Daniel C
Schott, Jonathan M
Ourselin, Sebastien
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Alexandra L
  surname: Young
  fullname: Young, Alexandra L
  email: alexandra.young.11@ucl.ac.uk
  organization: 1 Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK alexandra.young.11@ucl.ac.uk
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Neil P
  surname: Oxtoby
  fullname: Oxtoby, Neil P
  organization: 1 Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Pankaj
  surname: Daga
  fullname: Daga, Pankaj
  organization: 1 Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
– sequence: 4
  givenname: David M
  surname: Cash
  fullname: Cash, David M
  email: alexandra.young.11@ucl.ac.uk
  organization: 1 Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK2 Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK alexandra.young.11@ucl.ac.uk
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Nick C
  surname: Fox
  fullname: Fox, Nick C
  organization: 2 Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Sebastien
  surname: Ourselin
  fullname: Ourselin, Sebastien
  organization: 1 Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK2 Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Jonathan M
  surname: Schott
  fullname: Schott, Jonathan M
  organization: 2 Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Daniel C
  surname: Alexander
  fullname: Alexander, Daniel C
  email: alexandra.young.11@ucl.ac.uk
  organization: 1 Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK alexandra.young.11@ucl.ac.uk
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYh9w44xyg0tZkzRpckGaJmBIk7jAuXKbdAu0yUjaIfj1VGKgcbGt19b72J6gY-edQeiCpDckVWxWBrBuBh89ycURGpNMpAklXBwf1CM0ifE1TUnGqDhFI8pTQinNxmg5xxo6SHSwO-Nw67VpsK9xaX0L4c0EXG3ArU3E1uG49QG0rfC8-doY25pwFbG20UA0Z-ikhiaa832eopf7u-fFMlk9PTwu5qtkS5ToEsalVGrg51KLHFTKtOIcOJRlBYQooErJKpNDEAqqXJpM0nrQuKiorEs2Rbc_vtu-bI2ujOsCNMU22GHfz8KDLf53nN0Ua78rMjLcnsnB4HpvEPx7b2JXtDZWpmnAGd_HgnDO8jQXhA2jl4esP8jv-9g3O4h0JQ
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
– notice: The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. 2014
CorporateAuthor Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1093/brain/awu176
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1460-2156
EndPage 2577
ExternalDocumentID PMC4132648
25012224
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
– fundername: NIA NIH HHS
  grantid: U24 AG021886
– fundername: NIA NIH HHS
  grantid: U01 AG024904
GroupedDBID ---
-E4
-~X
.2P
.55
.GJ
.I3
.XZ
.ZR
0R~
1CY
1TH
23N
2WC
354
3O-
4.4
41~
482
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
5WA
5WD
6PF
70D
AABZA
AACZT
AAGKA
AAIMJ
AAJKP
AAJQQ
AAMDB
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPGJ
AAPNW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AAQQT
AARHZ
AAUAY
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAVLN
AAWDT
AAWTL
AAYJJ
ABDFA
ABDPE
ABEJV
ABEUO
ABGNP
ABIME
ABIVO
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABKDP
ABLJU
ABMNT
ABNGD
ABNHQ
ABNKS
ABPIB
ABPQP
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABQNK
ABSMQ
ABVGC
ABWST
ABXVV
ABXZS
ABZBJ
ABZEO
ACBNA
ACFRR
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPQN
ACPRK
ACUFI
ACUKT
ACUTJ
ACUTO
ACVCV
ACYHN
ACZBC
ADBBV
ADEYI
ADEZT
ADGKP
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADMTO
ADNBA
ADOCK
ADQBN
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYVW
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEHUL
AEJOX
AEKPW
AEKSI
AELWJ
AEMDU
AEMQT
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFFNX
AFFQV
AFFZL
AFGWE
AFIYH
AFOFC
AFSHK
AFXAL
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKEF
AGKRT
AGMDO
AGORE
AGQPQ
AGQXC
AGSYK
AGUTN
AHGBF
AHMBA
AHMMS
AHXPO
AI.
AIJHB
AJBYB
AJDVS
AJEEA
AJNCP
AKWXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
ALXQX
ANFBD
APIBT
APJGH
APWMN
AQDSO
AQKUS
ARIXL
ASAOO
ASPBG
ATDFG
ATGXG
ATTQO
AVNTJ
AVWKF
AXUDD
AYOIW
AZFZN
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BHONS
BQDIO
BR6
BSWAC
BTRTY
BVRKM
BZKNY
C1A
C45
CAG
CDBKE
CGR
COF
CS3
CUY
CVF
CXTWN
CZ4
DAKXR
DFGAJ
DIK
DILTD
DU5
D~K
E3Z
EBS
ECM
EE~
EIF
EIHJH
EJD
ELUNK
EMOBN
ENERS
F5P
F9B
FECEO
FEDTE
FHSFR
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
GAUVT
GJXCC
GX1
H13
H5~
HAR
HVGLF
HW0
HZ~
IOX
J21
J5H
JXSIZ
KAQDR
KBUDW
KOP
KQ8
KSI
KSN
L7B
M-Z
MBLQV
MBTAY
MHKGH
ML0
MVM
N4W
N9A
NGC
NLBLG
NOMLY
NOYVH
NPM
NTWIH
NU-
NVLIB
O0~
O9-
OAUYM
OAWHX
OBFPC
OBOKY
OCZFY
ODMLO
OHH
OHT
OJQWA
OJZSN
OK1
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
O~Y
P2P
PAFKI
PB-
PEELM
PQQKQ
Q1.
Q5Y
QBD
R44
RD5
RIG
RNI
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
RZF
RZO
TCN
TCURE
TEORI
TJX
TLC
TMA
TR2
VH1
VVN
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7H
X7M
XJT
XOL
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YQJ
YSK
YXANX
ZCG
ZGI
ZKB
ZKX
ZXP
~91
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p196t-35889925078d67a903d955a5abbca119a2998c4898c69ac78e482f99856c28fb3
ISSN 1460-2156
0006-8950
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 13:54:16 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 22:49:38 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:28:04 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue Pt 9
Keywords biomarker ordering
event-based model
disease progression
Alzheimer’s disease
biomarkers
Language English
License The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p196t-35889925078d67a903d955a5abbca119a2998c4898c69ac78e482f99856c28fb3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4132648
PMID 25012224
PQID 1553707613
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4132648
proquest_miscellaneous_1553707613
pubmed_primary_25012224
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Brain (London, England : 1878)
PublicationTitleAlternate Brain
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
References 14991808 - Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):306-19
6496779 - Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;141(11):1356-64
23522844 - Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Aug;34(8):1996-2002
22917145 - Biomark Med. 2012 Aug;6(4):431-9
22213792 - Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;69(1):98-106
18302232 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Apr;27(4):685-91
20034579 - Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):516-23
20538373 - Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Aug;31(8):1263-74
19557866 - Ann Neurol. 2009 Jun;65(6):650-7
6610841 - Neurology. 1984 Jul;34(7):939-44
21825215 - Arch Neurol. 2011 Dec;68(12):1526-35
21181717 - Ann Neurol. 2010 Dec;68(6):825-34
20451875 - Alzheimers Dement. 2010 May;6(3):265-73
22917141 - Biomark Med. 2012 Aug;6(4):391-400
23419830 - Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;19(2):148-9
20083042 - Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jan;9(1):119-28
23390179 - Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11):1048-56
15074306 - Lancet. 2004 Jan 31;363(9406):392-4
17347250 - Brain. 2007 Apr;130(Pt 4):1148-58
20230901 - Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15;51(4):1345-59
21670386 - Arch Neurol. 2011 Oct;68(10):1257-66
20139996 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Feb;6(2):67-77
19251758 - Brain. 2009 Apr;132(Pt 4):1067-77
22784036 - N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):795-804
21514248 - Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):280-92
23109153 - Ann Neurol. 2012 Oct;72(4):578-86
24179825 - Neuroimage Clin. 2013 May 19;2:735-45
1759558 - Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239-59
24360540 - Neuron. 2013 Dec 18;80(6):1347-58
20451872 - Alzheimers Dement. 2010 May;6(3):239-46
12130773 - Science. 2002 Jul 19;297(5580):353-6
16401755 - Arch Neurol. 2006 Jan;63(1):155-6
21679929 - Biol Psychiatry. 2012 May 1;71(9):792-7
11113031 - Cereb Cortex. 2001 Jan;11(1):1-16
21170538 - Acta Neuropathol. 2011 Feb;121(2):171-81
14505582 - Lancet Neurol. 2003 Oct;2(10):605-13
22951070 - Lancet Neurol. 2012 Oct;11(10):868-77
19296504 - Ann Neurol. 2009 Apr;65(4):403-13
23332364 - Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):207-16
22281676 - Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 15;60(3):1880-9
20472326 - Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Aug;31(8):1275-83
23477989 - Lancet Neurol. 2013 Apr;12(4):357-67
20157306 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Mar;6(3):131-44
21245183 - JAMA. 2011 Jan 19;305(3):275-83
11930016 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4703-7
23303849 - Neurology. 2013 Feb 12;80(7):648-54
References_xml – reference: 23477989 - Lancet Neurol. 2013 Apr;12(4):357-67
– reference: 1759558 - Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239-59
– reference: 23332364 - Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):207-16
– reference: 21514248 - Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):280-92
– reference: 22784036 - N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):795-804
– reference: 23109153 - Ann Neurol. 2012 Oct;72(4):578-86
– reference: 23303849 - Neurology. 2013 Feb 12;80(7):648-54
– reference: 21670386 - Arch Neurol. 2011 Oct;68(10):1257-66
– reference: 19557866 - Ann Neurol. 2009 Jun;65(6):650-7
– reference: 20538373 - Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Aug;31(8):1263-74
– reference: 20083042 - Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jan;9(1):119-28
– reference: 20451872 - Alzheimers Dement. 2010 May;6(3):239-46
– reference: 23419830 - Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;19(2):148-9
– reference: 17347250 - Brain. 2007 Apr;130(Pt 4):1148-58
– reference: 21181717 - Ann Neurol. 2010 Dec;68(6):825-34
– reference: 21245183 - JAMA. 2011 Jan 19;305(3):275-83
– reference: 19251758 - Brain. 2009 Apr;132(Pt 4):1067-77
– reference: 20034579 - Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):516-23
– reference: 24179825 - Neuroimage Clin. 2013 May 19;2:735-45
– reference: 21679929 - Biol Psychiatry. 2012 May 1;71(9):792-7
– reference: 20451875 - Alzheimers Dement. 2010 May;6(3):265-73
– reference: 23390179 - Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11):1048-56
– reference: 11930016 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4703-7
– reference: 18302232 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Apr;27(4):685-91
– reference: 14991808 - Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):306-19
– reference: 6610841 - Neurology. 1984 Jul;34(7):939-44
– reference: 12130773 - Science. 2002 Jul 19;297(5580):353-6
– reference: 14505582 - Lancet Neurol. 2003 Oct;2(10):605-13
– reference: 6496779 - Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;141(11):1356-64
– reference: 15074306 - Lancet. 2004 Jan 31;363(9406):392-4
– reference: 24360540 - Neuron. 2013 Dec 18;80(6):1347-58
– reference: 20230901 - Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15;51(4):1345-59
– reference: 20472326 - Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Aug;31(8):1275-83
– reference: 22951070 - Lancet Neurol. 2012 Oct;11(10):868-77
– reference: 23522844 - Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Aug;34(8):1996-2002
– reference: 20139996 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Feb;6(2):67-77
– reference: 11113031 - Cereb Cortex. 2001 Jan;11(1):1-16
– reference: 19296504 - Ann Neurol. 2009 Apr;65(4):403-13
– reference: 20157306 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Mar;6(3):131-44
– reference: 22917141 - Biomark Med. 2012 Aug;6(4):391-400
– reference: 21170538 - Acta Neuropathol. 2011 Feb;121(2):171-81
– reference: 22213792 - Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;69(1):98-106
– reference: 16401755 - Arch Neurol. 2006 Jan;63(1):155-6
– reference: 22917145 - Biomark Med. 2012 Aug;6(4):431-9
– reference: 22281676 - Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 15;60(3):1880-9
– reference: 21825215 - Arch Neurol. 2011 Dec;68(12):1526-35
SSID ssj0014326
Score 2.5486815
Snippet We demonstrate the use of a probabilistic generative model to explore the biomarker changes occurring as Alzheimer's disease develops and progresses. We...
Young et al. reformulate an event-based model for the progression of Alzheimer's disease to make it applicable to a heterogeneous sporadic disease population....
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 2564
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease - cerebrospinal fluid
Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis
Alzheimer Disease - psychology
Amyloid beta-Peptides - cerebrospinal fluid
Apolipoproteins E - cerebrospinal fluid
Biomarkers - cerebrospinal fluid
Cognitive Dysfunction - cerebrospinal fluid
Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis
Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Databases, Factual - trends
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Models, Neurological
Neuropsychological Tests
Original
Peptide Fragments - cerebrospinal fluid
tau Proteins - cerebrospinal fluid
Title A data-driven model of biomarker changes in sporadic Alzheimer's disease
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012224
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1553707613
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4132648
Volume 137
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Li9swEBbpFkovpe-mL1Qo9GCc9UOW5GPYdgmlKTnsQm5BthTi7dYJjkPL_qH-zY4eUewSSrsXEWwnwpov34xG80DofSIVZ6DmQlaSJCQZI6HIJA2LiIllFHNQgjp3ePqVTi7J53k2Hwx-daKWdm0xKm-O5pXcRqpwDeSqs2T_Q7L-R-ECfAb5wggShvGfZDwOdIBnKBtNWbapjTb-dEq9jrppXFqvCXnV21chqzIYX9-sVGWaprBt74DG1zkSVX201Yf1H3DGO_4DTxcuVaYRwZeRd93-BL6wLK6q62Dmb3wU1qE7E_U3cXU4CNmufKB9MB11XRIx8TFX7d9SHXs0TEOe24qzI2WZl9AoBPuD9qjZFoRxGMy7RJvZ4udOaQPxsKMKwRbLKhrjZjkXP3axbTfTQcfmu4EH2IIxGEvkoBh9uOJsega6XscC3kF3E9iPmB4hcx9LBDan6evn38tlWMDkp2bqUzuxrjztZjm2ofkzLrdj6Fw8RA_cDgWPLdweoYGqH6N7UxeD8QRNxriDOmxQh9dL7FGHHepwVeM96rBH3Yctdph7ii7PP12cTULXjyPcAE-3YZpx2J3DGzAuKRN5lMo8y0QmiqIUcZwLMG14STgMNBcl44rwZAnXMlomfFmkz9BJva7VC4QVPFZSKSlVkkhGct2mIZdZruJIqjQeonf75VkA3-lDLFGr9W670H2umHa-pUP03C7XYmMLsyz2iztErLeQ_gFdS71_p65Wpqa6k-_LW3_zFbp_-Cu8Ridts1NvwF5ti7cGK78BKrKVDg
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+data-driven+model+of+biomarker+changes+in+sporadic+Alzheimer%27s+disease&rft.jtitle=Brain+%28London%2C+England+%3A+1878%29&rft.au=Young%2C+Alexandra+L.&rft.au=Oxtoby%2C+Neil+P.&rft.au=Daga%2C+Pankaj&rft.au=Cash%2C+David+M.&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.pub=Oxford+University+Press&rft.issn=0006-8950&rft.eissn=1460-2156&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2564&rft.epage=2577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fbrain%2Fawu176&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25012224&rft.externalDocID=PMC4132648
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1460-2156&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1460-2156&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1460-2156&client=summon