Lessons from NASA
During the Apollo space program, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) prepared its space missions with reliability as the highest goal. Inflation and budget-cutting have changed that policy on some subsequent missions. Nevertheless, reliability remains a high priority, and con...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE spectrum Vol. 18; no. 10; pp. 79 - 84 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Magazine Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
01.10.1981
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0018-9235 1939-9340 |
DOI | 10.1109/MSPEC.1981.6369642 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | During the Apollo space program, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) prepared its space missions with reliability as the highest goal. Inflation and budget-cutting have changed that policy on some subsequent missions. Nevertheless, reliability remains a high priority, and considerable amounts of project cost are a consequence of building reliability into the NASA systems. Emphasis in providing reliability is centered at the design phase in NASA's work. More component failures have been attributed to errors in design than to any other cause. Thus, NASA's major reliability thrust is in the application of effective design principles and extensive review of designs. When selecting off-the-shelf components, NASA will typically subject the components to burn-in testing to eliminate those units improperly made and subject to early failure. NASA's testing starts at the component level and builds up to testing a complete prototype of the production system. |
---|---|
AbstractList | During the Apollo space program, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) prepared its space missions with reliability as the highest goal. Inflation and budget-cutting have changed that policy on some subsequent missions. Nevertheless, reliability remains a high priority, and considerable amounts of project cost are a consequence of building reliability into the NASA systems. Emphasis in providing reliability is centered at the design phase in NASA's work. More component failures have been attributed to errors in design than to any other cause. Thus, NASA's major reliability thrust is in the application of effective design principles and extensive review of designs. When selecting off-the-shelf components, NASA will typically subject the components to burn-in testing to eliminate those units improperly made and subject to early failure. NASA's testing starts at the component level and builds up to testing a complete prototype of the production system. Particular requirements related to the design and the operation of spacecraft have forced NASA to take a reliability approach that differs somewhat from that used in many other applications. NASA has found that some of the traditional tools of reliability engineering, such as life testing, reliability demonstration testing, maintainability analysis, and direct failure analysis, are impractical for spacecraft. In place of a statistical approach, the space agency uses an engineering approach to mission reliability. Reliability is to be obtained with the aid of three different approaches, including the application of effective design principles, the control and screening of all parts, and the testing of the entire spacecraft or its prototype for predicted capabilities. Attention is given to failure-mode analysis, the enhancement of Voyager reliability by autonomous operation, the redundancy in Shuttle design, the weeding out of bad hardware, and the preference for off-the-shelf devices. |
Author | Williams, Walter C |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Walter surname: Williams middlename: C fullname: Williams, Walter C |
BookMark | eNpdjj1rwzAUAEVJoU7aoWun0KGb3ff0ZFlvNCb9APcDkt3IQoIGx0qt-P830E6dbjmOW4rFGEcvxB1CgQj8-Lb93DQFssFCk2at5IXIkIlzJgULkQGgyVlSeSWWKe0BoDQkM3Hb-pTimNZhiof1e72tr8VlsEPyN39cid3TZte85O3H82tTt_kRFZ1yo50MFbL1Sjlfkg1srTQ9IirtVSDTW4k9V16DtZ6RA2nngiEoK-toJR5-s8cpfs8-nbrDV3J-GOzo45w6SRUYI-ks3v8T93GexvNah6y1ISMV_QBr0UjG |
CODEN | IEESAM |
ContentType | Magazine Article |
Copyright | Copyright Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Oct 1981 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Oct 1981 |
DBID | 7SP 7TA 8FD JG9 JQ2 L7M 7TB FR3 H8D |
DOI | 10.1109/MSPEC.1981.6369642 |
DatabaseName | Electronics & Communications Abstracts Materials Business File Technology Research Database Materials Research Database ProQuest Computer Science Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Engineering Research Database Aerospace Database |
DatabaseTitle | Materials Research Database Technology Research Database Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Materials Business File Electronics & Communications Abstracts ProQuest Computer Science Collection Aerospace Database Engineering Research Database Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Materials Research Database Aerospace Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Physics |
EISSN | 1939-9340 |
EndPage | 84 |
ExternalDocumentID | 1316012 |
GroupedDBID | -Y1 -~X ..I .DC 0R~ 29I 2FS 3EH 3O- 4.4 5GY 6IK 7SP 7TA 85S 8FD AAJGR AAVXG AAWTH AAWTO ABAZT ABEFU ABFSI ABQJQ ABVLG ACGFO ACGOD ACIWK ACKIV ACNCT AENEX AFOGA AGQYO AHBIQ AHDLI AI. ALLEH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ASUFR AZLTO BEFXN BFFAM BGNUA BKEBE BPEOZ CS3 D0L DU5 E.L EBS EJD HZ~ H~9 IBMZZ IFIPE IPLJI JAVBF JG9 JQ2 L7M M43 MS~ O9- OCL P2P PQQKQ RIE RIS RNS RXW TAE TN5 TWZ UCV UKR UPT VH1 VJK VOH WH7 XOL XZL YOJ 7TB FR3 H8D |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p143t-86c2f719ae44ce53af9aa28b11146e4f38ba21b97e60aae919f36ccf83057ac3 |
ISSN | 0018-9235 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 06:18:10 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 05:41:08 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | false |
Issue | 10 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p143t-86c2f719ae44ce53af9aa28b11146e4f38ba21b97e60aae919f36ccf83057ac3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PQID | 196683824 |
PQPubID | 37210 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_23708823 proquest_journals_196683824 |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 19811001 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1981-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 1981 text: 19811001 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 1980 |
PublicationPlace | New York |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York |
PublicationTitle | IEEE spectrum |
PublicationYear | 1981 |
Publisher | The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
SSID | ssj0005832 |
Score | 1.1465569 |
Snippet | During the Apollo space program, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) prepared its space missions with reliability as the highest goal.... Particular requirements related to the design and the operation of spacecraft have forced NASA to take a reliability approach that differs somewhat from that... |
SourceID | proquest |
SourceType | Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 79 |
SubjectTerms | Case studies Design Engineering Failure Redundancy Reliability Shuttles Software Space Testing Vehicles |
Title | Lessons from NASA |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/196683824 https://www.proquest.com/docview/23708823 |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NT8IwHG0UY6IXFTUifuzgQUOGW1tKdyQEQwygCSNyW7quTbyACXjQv95f140hkPhxaZZ2WZe-7vXXru8VoZsg8RnTkrpExMqlLJbAg0S4miucKE4JxUbg3B-w7og-jhvjwo4nVZfM47r83Kgr-Q-qkAe4GpXsH5BdPBQy4BrwhRQQhvRXGPeApsxWl1QjMmgNWyZeBIqQEAsKPTdClVfrw_1RU4XxYD77z2JSM9-rpYrL3JdhZR3mJVtKTaxajvuLbWYLwvOBz7B1BFkhPMtY9iiXfOyjm1k1NSXtD5877bqppc7MKYDWFeu7hfXgKXoY9XpR2BmH22gHQ-zuW1Fdse-GE2vhnr1ZrmTygvv1GtZGyHTYDw_RQe6_7bRs6x-hLTUpo_0lG8cy2k230crZMWIZIo5BxDGIOLcFHs4SHs4SHncnKHzohO2um51M4b5BfDl3OZNYN_1AKEqlahChAyEwj32j8VZUEx4L7MdBUzFPCBX4gSZMSs2BXZtCklNUmkwn6gw58IUIL4GYDcqoTmLBPA3Ez4kKuPKYqKBq3gBR1vNmEbAm44RjWkHXi1KgBfOvR0zU9H0WYdI0kydy_uMdVbRX9JwLVIK-pi4h0JrHVylwX-GiKEE |
linkProvider | IEEE |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons+from+NASA+%28spacecraft+reliability+engineering%29&rft.jtitle=IEEE+spectrum&rft.au=Williams%2C+W+C&rft.date=1981-10-01&rft.issn=0018-9235&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=84&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FMSPEC.1981.6369642&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0018-9235&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0018-9235&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0018-9235&client=summon |