Periprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: Biomechanical analysis

The requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness and the fracture risk after inserting different implants and implant combinations. A total of 48 cadaveric femors were harvested and 8 group...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDer Unfallchirurg Vol. 118; no. 12; pp. 1025 - 1032
Main Authors Rupprecht, M, Schlickewei, C, Fensky, F, Morlock, M, Püschel, K, Rueger, J M, Lehmann, W
Format Journal Article
LanguageGerman
Published Germany 01.12.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness and the fracture risk after inserting different implants and implant combinations. A total of 48 cadaveric femors were harvested and 8 groups were randomized on the basis of the bone mineral density (BMD). Different osteosyntheses following prosthetic stem implantation (hip and knee prostheses) were performed and compared with native femurs. All specimens were biomechanically tested in a four-point bending until fracture. The insertion of a femoral stem decreases the stiffness by approximately 33%. Ipsilateral retrograde nailing reduces the force to failure even more. This instable situation can be stabilized by a lateral locking compression plate. The most stable situation occurred in the presence of two cemented stems. Taken together these results clearly indicate that a hip prosthesis significantly weakens the femur, whereas two stems produce the most stable situation at all. The situation of a hip prosthesis and an retrograde nail should be avoided or covered by a bridging-osteosynthesis. In clinical practice an extramedullary fixation technique for distal femoral fractures should be preferred.
AbstractList The requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness and the fracture risk after inserting different implants and implant combinations. A total of 48 cadaveric femors were harvested and 8 groups were randomized on the basis of the bone mineral density (BMD). Different osteosyntheses following prosthetic stem implantation (hip and knee prostheses) were performed and compared with native femurs. All specimens were biomechanically tested in a four-point bending until fracture. The insertion of a femoral stem decreases the stiffness by approximately 33%. Ipsilateral retrograde nailing reduces the force to failure even more. This instable situation can be stabilized by a lateral locking compression plate. The most stable situation occurred in the presence of two cemented stems. Taken together these results clearly indicate that a hip prosthesis significantly weakens the femur, whereas two stems produce the most stable situation at all. The situation of a hip prosthesis and an retrograde nail should be avoided or covered by a bridging-osteosynthesis. In clinical practice an extramedullary fixation technique for distal femoral fractures should be preferred.
BACKGROUNDThe requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness and the fracture risk after inserting different implants and implant combinations. METHODSA total of 48 cadaveric femors were harvested and 8 groups were randomized on the basis of the bone mineral density (BMD). Different osteosyntheses following prosthetic stem implantation (hip and knee prostheses) were performed and compared with native femurs. All specimens were biomechanically tested in a four-point bending until fracture. RESULTSThe insertion of a femoral stem decreases the stiffness by approximately 33%. Ipsilateral retrograde nailing reduces the force to failure even more. This instable situation can be stabilized by a lateral locking compression plate. The most stable situation occurred in the presence of two cemented stems. CONCLUSIONTaken together these results clearly indicate that a hip prosthesis significantly weakens the femur, whereas two stems produce the most stable situation at all. The situation of a hip prosthesis and an retrograde nail should be avoided or covered by a bridging-osteosynthesis. In clinical practice an extramedullary fixation technique for distal femoral fractures should be preferred.
Author Fensky, F
Rueger, J M
Lehmann, W
Morlock, M
Rupprecht, M
Schlickewei, C
Püschel, K
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: M
  surname: Rupprecht
  fullname: Rupprecht, M
  organization: Abteilung für Kinderorthopädie, Altonaer-Kinderkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
– sequence: 2
  givenname: C
  surname: Schlickewei
  fullname: Schlickewei, C
  organization: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
– sequence: 3
  givenname: F
  surname: Fensky
  fullname: Fensky, F
  organization: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
– sequence: 4
  givenname: M
  surname: Morlock
  fullname: Morlock, M
  organization: Institut für Biomechanik, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Hamburg-Harburg, Deutschland
– sequence: 5
  givenname: K
  surname: Püschel
  fullname: Püschel, K
  organization: Instituts für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland
– sequence: 6
  givenname: J M
  surname: Rueger
  fullname: Rueger, J M
  organization: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
– sequence: 7
  givenname: W
  surname: Lehmann
  fullname: Lehmann, W
  email: w.lehmann@uke.de
  organization: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. w.lehmann@uke.de
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24893727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1j0tLxDAUhYMozkN_gBvp0k31pnm17nTwMTCgCwV35TZNmEib1iZdzL834Lg6cM53L-esyKkfvCHkisItBVB3AYBSlgPleSEqmssTsqScJYfzrwVZhfANiZMCzsmi4GXFVKGWZPtuJjdOQ4h7E53O0LeZ8zGZ_dihj5k1_TBhl9kJdZwnE-6zRzf0Ru_RO50C9NgdggsX5MxiF8zlUdfk8_npY_Oa795etpuHXT5STmOuWxQMK1mibAUCVw2zTBsUCowFxRmlFBqLiNwKbSSzWjFZKFtCyWi6XZObv7-p9c9sQqx7F7TpUlszzKGmSgAvZAVVQq-P6Nz0pq3HtAqnQ_0_n_0CMA5dlw
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00113-014-2591-6
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate Periprothetische und interimplantäre Femurfrakturen : Biomechanische Analyse
EISSN 1433-044X
EndPage 1032
ExternalDocumentID 24893727
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID -5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0VY
1N0
1SB
203
29Q
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
3O-
4.4
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5VS
67Z
6NX
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABLJU
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACBXY
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACIPQ
ACIWK
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACSNA
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADQRH
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQMX
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BDATZ
BGNMA
CAG
CGR
COF
CS3
CSCUP
CUY
CVF
DL5
DNIVK
DU5
EBD
EBS
ECM
EIF
EIOEI
EJD
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
KDC
KOV
KPH
LAS
LLZTM
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NPM
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9I
O9J
OAM
P2P
P9S
PF0
QOK
QOR
QOS
R89
R9I
RIG
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
S16
S1Z
S27
S37
S3B
SAP
SDH
SHX
SISQX
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
YLTOR
Z45
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~S-
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-cda53a968a6d5a047b3f3cea570ef07431110bfaaa4f5ce63fc73627f80831a53
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 00:27:21 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:54:10 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 12
Keywords Bridging osteosynthesis
Fracture, interprosthetic
Osteoporosis
Fracture, femoral
Load stability
Language German
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p141t-cda53a968a6d5a047b3f3cea570ef07431110bfaaa4f5ce63fc73627f80831a53
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 24893727
PQID 1750426909
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1750426909
pubmed_primary_24893727
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-Dec
20151201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-Dec
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Germany
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Germany
PublicationTitle Der Unfallchirurg
PublicationTitleAlternate Unfallchirurg
PublicationYear 2015
References 10884215 - J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jun;15(4):523-8
18587547 - Unfallchirurg. 2008 Oct;111(10):812-20
14625775 - Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Feb;389(1):53-9
9610752 - J Bone Miner Res. 1998 May;13(5):871-82
20093986 - J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1459-63
19513712 - Int Orthop. 2010 Apr;34(4):485-9
15809959 - J Arthroplasty. 2005 Apr;20(3):386-91
14631527 - Unfallchirurg. 2003 Sep;106(9):722-31
8884447 - J Arthroplasty. 1996 Sep;11(6):709-17
14599034 - Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003 Sep;32(9 Suppl):34-6
21613972 - J Trauma. 2011 Apr;70(4):E62-6
18321509 - Injury. 2008 Apr;39(4):472-9
9590651 - J Arthroplasty. 1998 Apr;13(3):361-4
20838138 - J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):670-6
16462560 - J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Feb;20(2):89-93
10925644 - Unfallchirurg. 2000 Jun;103(6):428-36
22182879 - J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1715-9
15999276 - Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Sep;125(7):433-42
14997874 - Unfallchirurg. 2004 Jan;107(1):35-49
10025239 - Unfallchirurg. 1998 Dec;101(12 ):901-6
References_xml
SSID ssj0007650
Score 1.7471733
Snippet The requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness...
BACKGROUNDThe requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1025
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Compressive Strength
Elastic Modulus
Female
Femoral Fractures - physiopathology
Femoral Fractures - therapy
Femur - physiopathology
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Stress, Mechanical
Tensile Strength
Treatment Outcome
Title Periprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: Biomechanical analysis
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24893727
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1750426909
Volume 118
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZtCqWX0HeTPnChVxXJtvzILX2RFrb0kIXclpEssQvOrnHXBPLrM2PJXm9JoO3FGHttw3zL5xn5m28Y-wCi0FDoirtYJjzFdwbXRmYcEmtlIUwOjpYGZj-zs3n640Jd7KZt9t0lW_3RXN_aV_I_qOIxxJW6ZP8B2fGmeAD3EV_cIsK4_SuMf-FDGmrbWNrBd5XsH9rVZVMDmS6RjJY6FKkVqmu9_O0TNdxTv2_wCfCmJNMk9Qs5E64d1LVZrtouWGD1cvimQYb01fxuELFZ1iskgyu72lt2xVCFldlRPTzbtHUg4Nl0vUGqiXbDeo5Mk4SL1AsrRxLdsWg3KqM9J2IKo24la6_P6GefkaYr5ViKSZ5Nf4thaS579GJyycm9j8AfDtnDqfvsQYx0Qzw3j0_H93GOSejwPVv09rH7zyM_6HCHu8uMPt04f8wOQ50QnXrQn7B7lX3KHs6CEuIZ-76PfYTYR1Pso4B9NGJ_Eu0hHw3IP2fzb1_PP5_xMBaDNzKVW24qUAmUWQFZpUCkuU5cYiyoXFjXZ4SY0mkHAKlTxmaJMzmmKbkraKocXvuCHaw3a_uKRTYXyoEzsdJY6MdFYcoSnKy0Fs5CJo_Y-yEeC6Qd-pYEa7vpfi8kjQWIs1KUR-ylD9Si8f4oiyGax3eeec0e7f5ab9jBtu3sW0zutvpdj90N7mRPhA
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27936,27937
linkProvider Springer Nature
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periprosthetic+and+interimplant+femoral+fractures%3A+Biomechanical+analysis&rft.jtitle=Der+Unfallchirurg&rft.au=Rupprecht%2C+M&rft.au=Schlickewei%2C+C&rft.au=Fensky%2C+F&rft.au=Morlock%2C+M&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.eissn=1433-044X&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1025&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00113-014-2591-6&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F24893727&rft.externalDocID=24893727