Periprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: Biomechanical analysis
The requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness and the fracture risk after inserting different implants and implant combinations. A total of 48 cadaveric femors were harvested and 8 group...
Saved in:
Published in | Der Unfallchirurg Vol. 118; no. 12; pp. 1025 - 1032 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | German |
Published |
Germany
01.12.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness and the fracture risk after inserting different implants and implant combinations.
A total of 48 cadaveric femors were harvested and 8 groups were randomized on the basis of the bone mineral density (BMD). Different osteosyntheses following prosthetic stem implantation (hip and knee prostheses) were performed and compared with native femurs. All specimens were biomechanically tested in a four-point bending until fracture.
The insertion of a femoral stem decreases the stiffness by approximately 33%. Ipsilateral retrograde nailing reduces the force to failure even more. This instable situation can be stabilized by a lateral locking compression plate. The most stable situation occurred in the presence of two cemented stems.
Taken together these results clearly indicate that a hip prosthesis significantly weakens the femur, whereas two stems produce the most stable situation at all. The situation of a hip prosthesis and an retrograde nail should be avoided or covered by a bridging-osteosynthesis. In clinical practice an extramedullary fixation technique for distal femoral fractures should be preferred. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness and the fracture risk after inserting different implants and implant combinations.
A total of 48 cadaveric femors were harvested and 8 groups were randomized on the basis of the bone mineral density (BMD). Different osteosyntheses following prosthetic stem implantation (hip and knee prostheses) were performed and compared with native femurs. All specimens were biomechanically tested in a four-point bending until fracture.
The insertion of a femoral stem decreases the stiffness by approximately 33%. Ipsilateral retrograde nailing reduces the force to failure even more. This instable situation can be stabilized by a lateral locking compression plate. The most stable situation occurred in the presence of two cemented stems.
Taken together these results clearly indicate that a hip prosthesis significantly weakens the femur, whereas two stems produce the most stable situation at all. The situation of a hip prosthesis and an retrograde nail should be avoided or covered by a bridging-osteosynthesis. In clinical practice an extramedullary fixation technique for distal femoral fractures should be preferred. BACKGROUNDThe requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness and the fracture risk after inserting different implants and implant combinations. METHODSA total of 48 cadaveric femors were harvested and 8 groups were randomized on the basis of the bone mineral density (BMD). Different osteosyntheses following prosthetic stem implantation (hip and knee prostheses) were performed and compared with native femurs. All specimens were biomechanically tested in a four-point bending until fracture. RESULTSThe insertion of a femoral stem decreases the stiffness by approximately 33%. Ipsilateral retrograde nailing reduces the force to failure even more. This instable situation can be stabilized by a lateral locking compression plate. The most stable situation occurred in the presence of two cemented stems. CONCLUSIONTaken together these results clearly indicate that a hip prosthesis significantly weakens the femur, whereas two stems produce the most stable situation at all. The situation of a hip prosthesis and an retrograde nail should be avoided or covered by a bridging-osteosynthesis. In clinical practice an extramedullary fixation technique for distal femoral fractures should be preferred. |
Author | Fensky, F Rueger, J M Lehmann, W Morlock, M Rupprecht, M Schlickewei, C Püschel, K |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: M surname: Rupprecht fullname: Rupprecht, M organization: Abteilung für Kinderorthopädie, Altonaer-Kinderkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland – sequence: 2 givenname: C surname: Schlickewei fullname: Schlickewei, C organization: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland – sequence: 3 givenname: F surname: Fensky fullname: Fensky, F organization: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland – sequence: 4 givenname: M surname: Morlock fullname: Morlock, M organization: Institut für Biomechanik, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Hamburg-Harburg, Deutschland – sequence: 5 givenname: K surname: Püschel fullname: Püschel, K organization: Instituts für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland – sequence: 6 givenname: J M surname: Rueger fullname: Rueger, J M organization: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland – sequence: 7 givenname: W surname: Lehmann fullname: Lehmann, W email: w.lehmann@uke.de organization: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. w.lehmann@uke.de |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24893727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo1j0tLxDAUhYMozkN_gBvp0k31pnm17nTwMTCgCwV35TZNmEib1iZdzL834Lg6cM53L-esyKkfvCHkisItBVB3AYBSlgPleSEqmssTsqScJYfzrwVZhfANiZMCzsmi4GXFVKGWZPtuJjdOQ4h7E53O0LeZ8zGZ_dihj5k1_TBhl9kJdZwnE-6zRzf0Ru_RO50C9NgdggsX5MxiF8zlUdfk8_npY_Oa795etpuHXT5STmOuWxQMK1mibAUCVw2zTBsUCowFxRmlFBqLiNwKbSSzWjFZKFtCyWi6XZObv7-p9c9sQqx7F7TpUlszzKGmSgAvZAVVQq-P6Nz0pq3HtAqnQ_0_n_0CMA5dlw |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00113-014-2591-6 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Periprothetische und interimplantäre Femurfrakturen : Biomechanische Analyse |
EISSN | 1433-044X |
EndPage | 1032 |
ExternalDocumentID | 24893727 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06C 06D 0VY 1N0 1SB 203 29Q 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 3O- 4.4 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5VS 67Z 6NX 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AAHNG AAIAL AAJKR AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABLJU ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABWNU ABXPI ACBXY ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACIPQ ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACSNA ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADQRH ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFLOW AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BDATZ BGNMA CAG CGR COF CS3 CSCUP CUY CVF DL5 DNIVK DU5 EBD EBS ECM EIF EIOEI EJD EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GXS H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ IXC IXD IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX KDC KOV KPH LAS LLZTM M4Y MA- N2Q N9A NB0 NPM NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9I O9J OAM P2P P9S PF0 QOK QOR QOS R89 R9I RIG ROL RPX RRX RSV S16 S1Z S27 S37 S3B SAP SDH SHX SISQX SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 YLTOR Z45 ZMTXR ZOVNA ~S- 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-cda53a968a6d5a047b3f3cea570ef07431110bfaaa4f5ce63fc73627f80831a53 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 00:27:21 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:54:10 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | false |
Issue | 12 |
Keywords | Bridging osteosynthesis Fracture, interprosthetic Osteoporosis Fracture, femoral Load stability |
Language | German |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p141t-cda53a968a6d5a047b3f3cea570ef07431110bfaaa4f5ce63fc73627f80831a53 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 24893727 |
PQID | 1750426909 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1750426909 pubmed_primary_24893727 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-Dec 20151201 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2015 text: 2015-Dec |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Germany |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Germany |
PublicationTitle | Der Unfallchirurg |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Unfallchirurg |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
References | 10884215 - J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jun;15(4):523-8 18587547 - Unfallchirurg. 2008 Oct;111(10):812-20 14625775 - Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Feb;389(1):53-9 9610752 - J Bone Miner Res. 1998 May;13(5):871-82 20093986 - J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1459-63 19513712 - Int Orthop. 2010 Apr;34(4):485-9 15809959 - J Arthroplasty. 2005 Apr;20(3):386-91 14631527 - Unfallchirurg. 2003 Sep;106(9):722-31 8884447 - J Arthroplasty. 1996 Sep;11(6):709-17 14599034 - Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003 Sep;32(9 Suppl):34-6 21613972 - J Trauma. 2011 Apr;70(4):E62-6 18321509 - Injury. 2008 Apr;39(4):472-9 9590651 - J Arthroplasty. 1998 Apr;13(3):361-4 20838138 - J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):670-6 16462560 - J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Feb;20(2):89-93 10925644 - Unfallchirurg. 2000 Jun;103(6):428-36 22182879 - J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1715-9 15999276 - Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Sep;125(7):433-42 14997874 - Unfallchirurg. 2004 Jan;107(1):35-49 10025239 - Unfallchirurg. 1998 Dec;101(12 ):901-6 |
References_xml | |
SSID | ssj0007650 |
Score | 1.7471733 |
Snippet | The requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral stiffness... BACKGROUNDThe requirements for treatment of femoral fractures are increasing with the rising age of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate femoral... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1025 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods Compressive Strength Elastic Modulus Female Femoral Fractures - physiopathology Femoral Fractures - therapy Femur - physiopathology Hip Prosthesis Humans Male Stress, Mechanical Tensile Strength Treatment Outcome |
Title | Periprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: Biomechanical analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24893727 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1750426909 |
Volume | 118 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZtCqWX0HeTPnChVxXJtvzILX2RFrb0kIXclpEssQvOrnHXBPLrM2PJXm9JoO3FGHttw3zL5xn5m28Y-wCi0FDoirtYJjzFdwbXRmYcEmtlIUwOjpYGZj-zs3n640Jd7KZt9t0lW_3RXN_aV_I_qOIxxJW6ZP8B2fGmeAD3EV_cIsK4_SuMf-FDGmrbWNrBd5XsH9rVZVMDmS6RjJY6FKkVqmu9_O0TNdxTv2_wCfCmJNMk9Qs5E64d1LVZrtouWGD1cvimQYb01fxuELFZ1iskgyu72lt2xVCFldlRPTzbtHUg4Nl0vUGqiXbDeo5Mk4SL1AsrRxLdsWg3KqM9J2IKo24la6_P6GefkaYr5ViKSZ5Nf4thaS579GJyycm9j8AfDtnDqfvsQYx0Qzw3j0_H93GOSejwPVv09rH7zyM_6HCHu8uMPt04f8wOQ50QnXrQn7B7lX3KHs6CEuIZ-76PfYTYR1Pso4B9NGJ_Eu0hHw3IP2fzb1_PP5_xMBaDNzKVW24qUAmUWQFZpUCkuU5cYiyoXFjXZ4SY0mkHAKlTxmaJMzmmKbkraKocXvuCHaw3a_uKRTYXyoEzsdJY6MdFYcoSnKy0Fs5CJo_Y-yEeC6Qd-pYEa7vpfi8kjQWIs1KUR-ylD9Si8f4oiyGax3eeec0e7f5ab9jBtu3sW0zutvpdj90N7mRPhA |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,27936,27937 |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periprosthetic+and+interimplant+femoral+fractures%3A+Biomechanical+analysis&rft.jtitle=Der+Unfallchirurg&rft.au=Rupprecht%2C+M&rft.au=Schlickewei%2C+C&rft.au=Fensky%2C+F&rft.au=Morlock%2C+M&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.eissn=1433-044X&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1025&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00113-014-2591-6&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F24893727&rft.externalDocID=24893727 |