Measuring the cochlea using a tablet-based software package: influence of imaging modality and rater background

• Published in: HNO Vol. 70; no. 10; p. 769
• Main Authors: Weber, Lena, Kwok, Pingling, Picou, Erin M, Wendl, Christina, Bohr, Christopher, Marcrum, Steven C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: German
• Published: Germany 01.10.2022
• Subjects: Cochlea - diagnostic imaging; Cochlea - surgery; Cochlear Duct - anatomy & histology; Cochlear Duct - surgery; Cochlear Implantation - methods; Cochlear Implants; Humans; Software; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Cochlear implant; OTOPLAN; Cochlear duct length; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging
• DOI: 10.1007/s00106-022-01208-3
• ISSN: 1433-0458

Cochlear duct length (CDL) is subject to significant individual variation. In the context of cochlear implantation, adapting the electrode array length to the CDL is of potential interest, as it has been associated with improvements in both speech recognition and sound quality. Using a tablet-based software package, it is possible to measure CDL at the level of the organ of Corti (CDL ) to select appropriate electrode array lengths based on individual cochlear anatomy. To identify effects of imaging modality and rater background on CDL estimates. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and flat-panel volume CT (fpVCT) scans of 10 patients (20 cochleae) were analyzed using the OTOPLAN software package (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria). Raters were an otorhinolaryngology (ORL) specialist, an ORL resident, and an audiologist. To analyze effects of rater background and imaging modality on CDL measurements, linear mixed models were constructed. Measurements showed mean CDL (fpVCT) = 36.69 ± 1.78 mm and CDL (MRI) = 36.81 ± 1.87 mm. Analyses indicated no significant effect of rater background (F(2, 105) = 0.84; p = 0.437) on CDL estimates. Imaging modality, on the other hand, significantly affected CDL (F (1, 105) = 20.70; p < 0.001), whereby estimates obtained using MRI were 0.89 mm larger than those obtained using fpVCT. No effect of rater background on CDL estimates could be identified, suggesting that comparable measurements could be obtained by personnel other than specially trained neurootologists. While imaging modality (fpVCT vs. MRI) did impact CDL results, the difference was small and of questionable clinical significance.