Outcomes of 4 methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology
To compare the clinical efficacy of 4 debridement alternatives in pressure ulcer management. Nonexperimental design combining computer modeling and a decision analysis methodology. Data input into the model were derived from a literature review of the MEDLINE database for the years 1985 to 1995 (ind...
Saved in:
Published in | Advances in wound care Vol. 12; no. 2; p. 81 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.03.1999
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To compare the clinical efficacy of 4 debridement alternatives in pressure ulcer management.
Nonexperimental design combining computer modeling and a decision analysis methodology. Data input into the model were derived from a literature review of the MEDLINE database for the years 1985 to 1995 (indexing terms: pressure ulcer, decubitus, economics, cost-effectiveness, and outcome) and a Delphi consensus process with an independent panel of 9 specialists in geriatric care.
Long-term care.
Hypothetical elderly female resident with a new full-thickness pressure ulcer (mild odor, minimal draining, no undermining, intact periulcer skin).
The study patient underwent 1 month of therapy with each of 4 debridement methods: autolysis, wet-to-dry dressings, collagenase (Santyl) or fibrinolysin (Elase).
Specific clinical outcomes (time to clean wound bed, risk of infection) and relative cost-effectiveness of each debridement method were calculated.
The likelihood of achieving a clean wound bed at 2 weeks was 70% for collagenase, 57% for fibrinolysin, 50% for autolysis, and 30% for wet-to-dry dressings. The total cost for 1 month of treatment was $610.96 for collagenase, $920.73 for autolysis, $986.38 for fibrinolysin, and $1,008.72 for wet-to-dry dressings.
The study patient was most likely to have a clean wound bed after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, less likely to need to switch debridement methods, and of equal or less likelihood of experiencing and infection and subsequent hospitalization when her wound was debrided with collagenase. Treatment with collagenase also resulted in the lowest total cost of treatment. Longer term, prospective studies using actual utilization data are needed to refine these estimates of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of each product. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To compare the clinical efficacy of 4 debridement alternatives in pressure ulcer management.
Nonexperimental design combining computer modeling and a decision analysis methodology. Data input into the model were derived from a literature review of the MEDLINE database for the years 1985 to 1995 (indexing terms: pressure ulcer, decubitus, economics, cost-effectiveness, and outcome) and a Delphi consensus process with an independent panel of 9 specialists in geriatric care.
Long-term care.
Hypothetical elderly female resident with a new full-thickness pressure ulcer (mild odor, minimal draining, no undermining, intact periulcer skin).
The study patient underwent 1 month of therapy with each of 4 debridement methods: autolysis, wet-to-dry dressings, collagenase (Santyl) or fibrinolysin (Elase).
Specific clinical outcomes (time to clean wound bed, risk of infection) and relative cost-effectiveness of each debridement method were calculated.
The likelihood of achieving a clean wound bed at 2 weeks was 70% for collagenase, 57% for fibrinolysin, 50% for autolysis, and 30% for wet-to-dry dressings. The total cost for 1 month of treatment was $610.96 for collagenase, $920.73 for autolysis, $986.38 for fibrinolysin, and $1,008.72 for wet-to-dry dressings.
The study patient was most likely to have a clean wound bed after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, less likely to need to switch debridement methods, and of equal or less likelihood of experiencing and infection and subsequent hospitalization when her wound was debrided with collagenase. Treatment with collagenase also resulted in the lowest total cost of treatment. Longer term, prospective studies using actual utilization data are needed to refine these estimates of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of each product. |
Author | Mosher, B A Boudreau, D M Thomas, D R Cuddigan, J |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: B A surname: Mosher fullname: Mosher, B A organization: Kay-Rem Associates, Clinton, WA, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: J surname: Cuddigan fullname: Cuddigan, J – sequence: 3 givenname: D R surname: Thomas fullname: Thomas, D R – sequence: 4 givenname: D M surname: Boudreau fullname: Boudreau, D M |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10326360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo1j8tqwzAURLVIaR7tLxT9gEG6siS0LKFPAtm063AtXacqtmQse-G_b2jT1TDDmYHZslXKiVZsI4U1FUgn12xbyrcQwgK4W7aWQoFRRmzY-3GefO6p8Nzymvc0feXwawI1YwzUU5r4XGI6c7xkPpaYE8eE3VJiuRZyl8_LHbtpsSt0f9Ud-3x--ti_Vofjy9v-8VANEmCqPAZthEJEF5R1iA2g9iC1qo0kY1urnG5rq6WqpW-lF4QXDBoXtBZEsGMPf7vD3PQUTsMYexyX0_8p-AFU5Um1 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
ExternalDocumentID | 10326360 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | .GJ 23M 5GY 5VS 9V3 AAWTL ACEWU ACGFS ADFPA ADNKB AE3 AEETU AEQHQ AHVBC AJNYG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AWKKM BS7 CGR CUY CVF DUNZO ECM EIF F5P JK3 JK8 K8S NPM N~M OCUKA ODA OLG ONV ORAPC ORVUJ OUVQU OVD P-K R58 S4R TAE TEORI U5U VQP X3W YCJ ZZMQN |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p122t-cad5603aaa9d379aab2a5c2153461e67f7395f4751341cf1c0ea79a2b9d550ee2 |
ISSN | 1076-2191 |
IngestDate | Sat Sep 28 07:34:25 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | false |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p122t-cad5603aaa9d379aab2a5c2153461e67f7395f4751341cf1c0ea79a2b9d550ee2 |
PMID | 10326360 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_10326360 |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 1999-Mar |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1999-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 1999 text: 1999-Mar |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Advances in wound care |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Adv Wound Care |
PublicationYear | 1999 |
SSID | ssj0007229 |
Score | 1.3540838 |
Snippet | To compare the clinical efficacy of 4 debridement alternatives in pressure ulcer management.
Nonexperimental design combining computer modeling and a decision... |
SourceID | pubmed |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | 81 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Autolysis Bandages - economics Collagenases - economics Collagenases - therapeutic use Cost-Benefit Analysis Debridement - economics Debridement - methods Decision Support Techniques Delphi Technique Female Fibrinolysin - economics Fibrinolysin - therapeutic use Humans Pressure Ulcer - nursing Treatment Outcome Wound Healing |
Title | Outcomes of 4 methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10326360 |
Volume | 12 |
hasFullText | |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS8MwFA5OQXwR73fJg2-jsqVpsz7qUMZg82WDvY3cKj647aFF8Nd7cmvrULy8lDZJQ8mXnp6cnnwfQjeJlCqnSkZgIUlEe1pEWax5RJnKRaJonNpswtE4HUzpcJbMahVHu7ukELfy_ct9Jf9BFcoAV7NL9g_IVp1CAZwDvnAEhOH4K4yfygK6dbSx1ItB2wulzUYsG_lrlzYawKHMqem0eeAhcTfUcfVARuvSAmyi7JtRXbL01RUyy6CVfl_HQfulUi_PLpZaBZ5d7pE1as20xFKBn1q64lEddHBEBSHrytvJDksjMHbdT4aUNCYMaVhFJ8rSAGT1ahExZH6Gr-zn2jVO7FDVQi3WM9ZtbGI0_vvLiNWmqx7R8ML69mtrB-tDTPbQrnf-8Z1Dch9t6MUB2h759IZDNAyA4mWOKfaAmosGoNgCijkOgOIAKG4AeoSmjw-T_iDyYhfRqktIEUmuwPmMOeeZilnGuSA8keCQxTTt6pTl5o9qTlliGPhk3pUdzaEZEZmCRabW5BhtLpYLfYqwkU6JlcoUAWMrZE90wAdmHDw5WElRmZ2hEzcK85VjNJmH8Tn_tuYC7dTz4BJt5fAK6SvwxwpxbYf_A2i6Nq4 |
link.rule.ids | 783 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes+of+4+methods+of+debridement+using+a+decision+analysis+methodology&rft.jtitle=Advances+in+wound+care&rft.au=Mosher%2C+B+A&rft.au=Cuddigan%2C+J&rft.au=Thomas%2C+D+R&rft.au=Boudreau%2C+D+M&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.issn=1076-2191&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=81&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F10326360&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F10326360&rft.externalDocID=10326360 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1076-2191&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1076-2191&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1076-2191&client=summon |