Outcomes of 4 methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology

To compare the clinical efficacy of 4 debridement alternatives in pressure ulcer management. Nonexperimental design combining computer modeling and a decision analysis methodology. Data input into the model were derived from a literature review of the MEDLINE database for the years 1985 to 1995 (ind...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvances in wound care Vol. 12; no. 2; p. 81
Main Authors Mosher, B A, Cuddigan, J, Thomas, D R, Boudreau, D M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.03.1999
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To compare the clinical efficacy of 4 debridement alternatives in pressure ulcer management. Nonexperimental design combining computer modeling and a decision analysis methodology. Data input into the model were derived from a literature review of the MEDLINE database for the years 1985 to 1995 (indexing terms: pressure ulcer, decubitus, economics, cost-effectiveness, and outcome) and a Delphi consensus process with an independent panel of 9 specialists in geriatric care. Long-term care. Hypothetical elderly female resident with a new full-thickness pressure ulcer (mild odor, minimal draining, no undermining, intact periulcer skin). The study patient underwent 1 month of therapy with each of 4 debridement methods: autolysis, wet-to-dry dressings, collagenase (Santyl) or fibrinolysin (Elase). Specific clinical outcomes (time to clean wound bed, risk of infection) and relative cost-effectiveness of each debridement method were calculated. The likelihood of achieving a clean wound bed at 2 weeks was 70% for collagenase, 57% for fibrinolysin, 50% for autolysis, and 30% for wet-to-dry dressings. The total cost for 1 month of treatment was $610.96 for collagenase, $920.73 for autolysis, $986.38 for fibrinolysin, and $1,008.72 for wet-to-dry dressings. The study patient was most likely to have a clean wound bed after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, less likely to need to switch debridement methods, and of equal or less likelihood of experiencing and infection and subsequent hospitalization when her wound was debrided with collagenase. Treatment with collagenase also resulted in the lowest total cost of treatment. Longer term, prospective studies using actual utilization data are needed to refine these estimates of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of each product.
AbstractList To compare the clinical efficacy of 4 debridement alternatives in pressure ulcer management. Nonexperimental design combining computer modeling and a decision analysis methodology. Data input into the model were derived from a literature review of the MEDLINE database for the years 1985 to 1995 (indexing terms: pressure ulcer, decubitus, economics, cost-effectiveness, and outcome) and a Delphi consensus process with an independent panel of 9 specialists in geriatric care. Long-term care. Hypothetical elderly female resident with a new full-thickness pressure ulcer (mild odor, minimal draining, no undermining, intact periulcer skin). The study patient underwent 1 month of therapy with each of 4 debridement methods: autolysis, wet-to-dry dressings, collagenase (Santyl) or fibrinolysin (Elase). Specific clinical outcomes (time to clean wound bed, risk of infection) and relative cost-effectiveness of each debridement method were calculated. The likelihood of achieving a clean wound bed at 2 weeks was 70% for collagenase, 57% for fibrinolysin, 50% for autolysis, and 30% for wet-to-dry dressings. The total cost for 1 month of treatment was $610.96 for collagenase, $920.73 for autolysis, $986.38 for fibrinolysin, and $1,008.72 for wet-to-dry dressings. The study patient was most likely to have a clean wound bed after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, less likely to need to switch debridement methods, and of equal or less likelihood of experiencing and infection and subsequent hospitalization when her wound was debrided with collagenase. Treatment with collagenase also resulted in the lowest total cost of treatment. Longer term, prospective studies using actual utilization data are needed to refine these estimates of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of each product.
Author Mosher, B A
Boudreau, D M
Thomas, D R
Cuddigan, J
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: B A
  surname: Mosher
  fullname: Mosher, B A
  organization: Kay-Rem Associates, Clinton, WA, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: J
  surname: Cuddigan
  fullname: Cuddigan, J
– sequence: 3
  givenname: D R
  surname: Thomas
  fullname: Thomas, D R
– sequence: 4
  givenname: D M
  surname: Boudreau
  fullname: Boudreau, D M
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10326360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1j8tqwzAURLVIaR7tLxT9gEG6siS0LKFPAtm063AtXacqtmQse-G_b2jT1TDDmYHZslXKiVZsI4U1FUgn12xbyrcQwgK4W7aWQoFRRmzY-3GefO6p8Nzymvc0feXwawI1YwzUU5r4XGI6c7xkPpaYE8eE3VJiuRZyl8_LHbtpsSt0f9Ud-3x--ti_Vofjy9v-8VANEmCqPAZthEJEF5R1iA2g9iC1qo0kY1urnG5rq6WqpW-lF4QXDBoXtBZEsGMPf7vD3PQUTsMYexyX0_8p-AFU5Um1
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
ExternalDocumentID 10326360
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID .GJ
23M
5GY
5VS
9V3
AAWTL
ACEWU
ACGFS
ADFPA
ADNKB
AE3
AEETU
AEQHQ
AHVBC
AJNYG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AWKKM
BS7
CGR
CUY
CVF
DUNZO
ECM
EIF
F5P
JK3
JK8
K8S
NPM
N~M
OCUKA
ODA
OLG
ONV
ORAPC
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
P-K
R58
S4R
TAE
TEORI
U5U
VQP
X3W
YCJ
ZZMQN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p122t-cad5603aaa9d379aab2a5c2153461e67f7395f4751341cf1c0ea79a2b9d550ee2
ISSN 1076-2191
IngestDate Sat Sep 28 07:34:25 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p122t-cad5603aaa9d379aab2a5c2153461e67f7395f4751341cf1c0ea79a2b9d550ee2
PMID 10326360
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_10326360
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1999-Mar
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1999-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 1999
  text: 1999-Mar
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Advances in wound care
PublicationTitleAlternate Adv Wound Care
PublicationYear 1999
SSID ssj0007229
Score 1.3540838
Snippet To compare the clinical efficacy of 4 debridement alternatives in pressure ulcer management. Nonexperimental design combining computer modeling and a decision...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 81
SubjectTerms Aged
Autolysis
Bandages - economics
Collagenases - economics
Collagenases - therapeutic use
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Debridement - economics
Debridement - methods
Decision Support Techniques
Delphi Technique
Female
Fibrinolysin - economics
Fibrinolysin - therapeutic use
Humans
Pressure Ulcer - nursing
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
Title Outcomes of 4 methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10326360
Volume 12
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS8MwFA5OQXwR73fJg2-jsqVpsz7qUMZg82WDvY3cKj647aFF8Nd7cmvrULy8lDZJQ8mXnp6cnnwfQjeJlCqnSkZgIUlEe1pEWax5RJnKRaJonNpswtE4HUzpcJbMahVHu7ukELfy_ct9Jf9BFcoAV7NL9g_IVp1CAZwDvnAEhOH4K4yfygK6dbSx1ItB2wulzUYsG_lrlzYawKHMqem0eeAhcTfUcfVARuvSAmyi7JtRXbL01RUyy6CVfl_HQfulUi_PLpZaBZ5d7pE1as20xFKBn1q64lEddHBEBSHrytvJDksjMHbdT4aUNCYMaVhFJ8rSAGT1ahExZH6Gr-zn2jVO7FDVQi3WM9ZtbGI0_vvLiNWmqx7R8ML69mtrB-tDTPbQrnf-8Z1Dch9t6MUB2h759IZDNAyA4mWOKfaAmosGoNgCijkOgOIAKG4AeoSmjw-T_iDyYhfRqktIEUmuwPmMOeeZilnGuSA8keCQxTTt6pTl5o9qTlliGPhk3pUdzaEZEZmCRabW5BhtLpYLfYqwkU6JlcoUAWMrZE90wAdmHDw5WElRmZ2hEzcK85VjNJmH8Tn_tuYC7dTz4BJt5fAK6SvwxwpxbYf_A2i6Nq4
link.rule.ids 783
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes+of+4+methods+of+debridement+using+a+decision+analysis+methodology&rft.jtitle=Advances+in+wound+care&rft.au=Mosher%2C+B+A&rft.au=Cuddigan%2C+J&rft.au=Thomas%2C+D+R&rft.au=Boudreau%2C+D+M&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.issn=1076-2191&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=81&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F10326360&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F10326360&rft.externalDocID=10326360
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1076-2191&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1076-2191&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1076-2191&client=summon