Glycaemic control is positively associated with prevalent fractures but not with bone mineral density in patients with Type1 diabetes
Aim There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone mineral density and prevalent fractures. Methods A single-centre, cross-sectional study of men and pre-menopausal women with Type1 diabetes (n=128)...
Saved in:
Published in | Diabetic medicine Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 872 - 875 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.07.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0742-3071 1464-5491 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03286.x |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Aim There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone mineral density and prevalent fractures. Methods A single-centre, cross-sectional study of men and pre-menopausal women with Type1 diabetes (n=128) and a matched control group (n=77) was conducted. The primary outcome measure was bone mineral density and secondary measures were markers of bone metabolism and prevalent fractures. Results Hip and total body bone mineral densities were significantly lower in women with diabetes compared with control subjects. In men, no difference in bone mineral density was found. A multivariate regression analysis in women with diabetes revealed higher BMI as the strongest predictor of higher total hip, femoral neck and total body bone mineral density, whereas previous fractures were inversely associated with total hip bone mineral density and C-terminal telopeptide of typeI collagen with total body bone mineral density. Poor long-term glycaemic control was not associated with low bone mineral density. Fracture frequency was higher in patients with diabetes compared with control subjects (1.64 vs. 0.62 per 100 patient-years; P<0.05). In a multivariable model, long-term HbA1c control was associated with increased clinical fracture prevalence (OR 1.92; 95%CI 1.09-2.75) in those with diabetes. Conclusions Type1 diabetes contributes to low bone mineral density in women. Previous fractures and low BMI were strong predictors of impaired bone mineral density and should therefore be considered in risk estimation. Fractures are more frequent in Type1 diabetes. Long-term hyperglycaemia may account for impaired bone strength, independently from bone mineral density.Original Abstract: Diabet. Med. 28, 872-875 (2011) |
---|---|
AbstractList | Aim There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone mineral density and prevalent fractures. Methods A single-centre, cross-sectional study of men and pre-menopausal women with Type1 diabetes (n=128) and a matched control group (n=77) was conducted. The primary outcome measure was bone mineral density and secondary measures were markers of bone metabolism and prevalent fractures. Results Hip and total body bone mineral densities were significantly lower in women with diabetes compared with control subjects. In men, no difference in bone mineral density was found. A multivariate regression analysis in women with diabetes revealed higher BMI as the strongest predictor of higher total hip, femoral neck and total body bone mineral density, whereas previous fractures were inversely associated with total hip bone mineral density and C-terminal telopeptide of typeI collagen with total body bone mineral density. Poor long-term glycaemic control was not associated with low bone mineral density. Fracture frequency was higher in patients with diabetes compared with control subjects (1.64 vs. 0.62 per 100 patient-years; P<0.05). In a multivariable model, long-term HbA1c control was associated with increased clinical fracture prevalence (OR 1.92; 95%CI 1.09-2.75) in those with diabetes. Conclusions Type1 diabetes contributes to low bone mineral density in women. Previous fractures and low BMI were strong predictors of impaired bone mineral density and should therefore be considered in risk estimation. Fractures are more frequent in Type1 diabetes. Long-term hyperglycaemia may account for impaired bone strength, independently from bone mineral density.Original Abstract: Diabet. Med. 28, 872-875 (2011) |
Author | Saemann, A Lodes, S Kaestner, B Hemmelmann, C Hein, G Lehmann, T Wolf, G Neumann, T Franke, S Kiehntopf, M Mueller, U A |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: T surname: Neumann fullname: Neumann, T – sequence: 2 givenname: A surname: Saemann fullname: Saemann, A – sequence: 3 givenname: S surname: Lodes fullname: Lodes, S – sequence: 4 givenname: B surname: Kaestner fullname: Kaestner, B – sequence: 5 givenname: S surname: Franke fullname: Franke, S – sequence: 6 givenname: M surname: Kiehntopf fullname: Kiehntopf, M – sequence: 7 givenname: C surname: Hemmelmann fullname: Hemmelmann, C – sequence: 8 givenname: T surname: Lehmann fullname: Lehmann, T – sequence: 9 givenname: U surname: Mueller middlename: A fullname: Mueller, U A – sequence: 10 givenname: G surname: Hein fullname: Hein, G – sequence: 11 givenname: G surname: Wolf fullname: Wolf, G |
BookMark | eNo9jrFOwzAYhC1UJNrCO3hkSfjtOEk9ogoKUiWWMleO_Ue4cu0QO4U8AO9NpCBuueG-O92KLHzwSAhlkLNJD6eciUpkpZAs58BYDgXfVPn3FVn-BwuyhFrwrICa3ZBVjCcAxmUhl-Rn50at8Gw11cGnPjhqI-1CtMle0I1UxRi0VQkN_bLpg3Y9XpRDn2jbK52GHiNthkR9SDPQTP_o2XrslaMG_bQ0Uutpp5KdanGmDmOHjBqrGkwYb8l1q1zEuz9fk_fnp8P2Jdu_7V63j_usY1CkTOpaMhAgtGlRSkRTNnVthNpIaEBXmsvWsLJtWqgNVBtelgpQYKUk00zLYk3u592uD58DxnQ826jROeUxDPHIgPOyKrgsi19u-Wve |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | 7QP |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03286.x |
DatabaseName | Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Nursing |
EISSN | 1464-5491 |
EndPage | 875 |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29F 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 7QP 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABLJU ABOCM ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFWVQ AFZJQ AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO KQQ LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SUPJJ TEORI UB1 V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XV2 YFH YUY ZZTAW ~IA ~WT |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p103t-9c7910404cdfe99eed5b77d4a890b0c6c29fd15fbf07d068255a0e4e6a91c1c93 |
ISSN | 0742-3071 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 14:39:37 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p103t-9c7910404cdfe99eed5b77d4a890b0c6c29fd15fbf07d068255a0e4e6a91c1c93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1022563295 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1022563295 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20110701 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2011 text: 20110701 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Diabetic medicine |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
SSID | ssj0012939 |
Score | 2.2663937 |
Snippet | Aim There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone... |
SourceID | proquest |
SourceType | Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 872 |
SubjectTerms | Bone mineral density Bone strength Bone turnover Collagen Data processing Diabetes mellitus Femur Fractures Hip Osteoporosis Regression analysis |
Title | Glycaemic control is positively associated with prevalent fractures but not with bone mineral density in patients with Type1 diabetes |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1022563295 |
Volume | 28 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9QwFA7jiuKL6Kp4J4JvpdK0uTSPKrsuOjuCzsC8DUmawsBuZ9lphfVR8H970qSZri64-lJKCG3a8_XkXL5zitBryzllzJJUc6NSShVNlVA6FbUlda1rVTBXnHw840cL-nHJlpPJjxFrqWv1G_P9yrqS_5EqjIFcXZXsP0g2XhQG4BzkC0eQMByvJeMPJxdG9ez2gXG-3iaehvXNnlwkKrz7gWJ-du6ae_ftmFxxVAeudqK7Nmk2rZ-gN2Bznq77TtRJ5bjtbV8XGLqvhlI457uSGLUdm7eeXwPr-T1lP7MuWdBcYmV_haWHsQij6abyeivaqJ8U7FuhKufdOEbhgq5iiFF4VQYOuIty-SHrVS3lNAXvlIx1cV6OMCdGirX0P_iJezT7m_r31w49Wou85AMtdNxxe_Z5dbiYTlfzg-X8BrqZC-FT_V9iCzJnDknfytU_wWU22JX3-WNb722V-T10NzgZ-K1HzH00sc0-un0cZLKPboUY0QP0M0IIBwjh9RbvIIR3EMJO9jhCCEcIYYAQBgj5CQ5COEAIBwjhdYMHCPlZPYTwAKGHaHF4MH9_lIY_c6RnJCvaVBoBZibNqKlqKyXYWUwLUVFVykxnhptc1hVh8K1nosp4CX6ryiy1XEliiJHFI7TXwHIeI8yNi6UrKWpVUWFLWbnEMMmVS1jnpn6CXg0vcwWaz6WzVGM33XblYhWMF7lkT68x5xm6s0Pmc7TXnnf2BdiTrX7ZC_wXry969A |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glycaemic+control+is+positively+associated+with+prevalent+fractures+but+not+with+bone+mineral+density+in+patients+with+Type1+diabetes&rft.jtitle=Diabetic+medicine&rft.au=Neumann%2C+T&rft.au=Saemann%2C+A&rft.au=Lodes%2C+S&rft.au=Kaestner%2C+B&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.issn=0742-3071&rft.eissn=1464-5491&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=872&rft.epage=875&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1464-5491.2011.03286.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0742-3071&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0742-3071&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0742-3071&client=summon |