Glycaemic control is positively associated with prevalent fractures but not with bone mineral density in patients with Type1 diabetes

Aim There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone mineral density and prevalent fractures. Methods A single-centre, cross-sectional study of men and pre-menopausal women with Type1 diabetes (n=128)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetic medicine Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 872 - 875
Main Authors Neumann, T, Saemann, A, Lodes, S, Kaestner, B, Franke, S, Kiehntopf, M, Hemmelmann, C, Lehmann, T, Mueller, U A, Hein, G, Wolf, G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.07.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0742-3071
1464-5491
DOI10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03286.x

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Aim There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone mineral density and prevalent fractures. Methods A single-centre, cross-sectional study of men and pre-menopausal women with Type1 diabetes (n=128) and a matched control group (n=77) was conducted. The primary outcome measure was bone mineral density and secondary measures were markers of bone metabolism and prevalent fractures. Results Hip and total body bone mineral densities were significantly lower in women with diabetes compared with control subjects. In men, no difference in bone mineral density was found. A multivariate regression analysis in women with diabetes revealed higher BMI as the strongest predictor of higher total hip, femoral neck and total body bone mineral density, whereas previous fractures were inversely associated with total hip bone mineral density and C-terminal telopeptide of typeI collagen with total body bone mineral density. Poor long-term glycaemic control was not associated with low bone mineral density. Fracture frequency was higher in patients with diabetes compared with control subjects (1.64 vs. 0.62 per 100 patient-years; P<0.05). In a multivariable model, long-term HbA1c control was associated with increased clinical fracture prevalence (OR 1.92; 95%CI 1.09-2.75) in those with diabetes. Conclusions Type1 diabetes contributes to low bone mineral density in women. Previous fractures and low BMI were strong predictors of impaired bone mineral density and should therefore be considered in risk estimation. Fractures are more frequent in Type1 diabetes. Long-term hyperglycaemia may account for impaired bone strength, independently from bone mineral density.Original Abstract: Diabet. Med. 28, 872-875 (2011)
AbstractList Aim There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone mineral density and prevalent fractures. Methods A single-centre, cross-sectional study of men and pre-menopausal women with Type1 diabetes (n=128) and a matched control group (n=77) was conducted. The primary outcome measure was bone mineral density and secondary measures were markers of bone metabolism and prevalent fractures. Results Hip and total body bone mineral densities were significantly lower in women with diabetes compared with control subjects. In men, no difference in bone mineral density was found. A multivariate regression analysis in women with diabetes revealed higher BMI as the strongest predictor of higher total hip, femoral neck and total body bone mineral density, whereas previous fractures were inversely associated with total hip bone mineral density and C-terminal telopeptide of typeI collagen with total body bone mineral density. Poor long-term glycaemic control was not associated with low bone mineral density. Fracture frequency was higher in patients with diabetes compared with control subjects (1.64 vs. 0.62 per 100 patient-years; P<0.05). In a multivariable model, long-term HbA1c control was associated with increased clinical fracture prevalence (OR 1.92; 95%CI 1.09-2.75) in those with diabetes. Conclusions Type1 diabetes contributes to low bone mineral density in women. Previous fractures and low BMI were strong predictors of impaired bone mineral density and should therefore be considered in risk estimation. Fractures are more frequent in Type1 diabetes. Long-term hyperglycaemia may account for impaired bone strength, independently from bone mineral density.Original Abstract: Diabet. Med. 28, 872-875 (2011)
Author Saemann, A
Lodes, S
Kaestner, B
Hemmelmann, C
Hein, G
Lehmann, T
Wolf, G
Neumann, T
Franke, S
Kiehntopf, M
Mueller, U A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: T
  surname: Neumann
  fullname: Neumann, T
– sequence: 2
  givenname: A
  surname: Saemann
  fullname: Saemann, A
– sequence: 3
  givenname: S
  surname: Lodes
  fullname: Lodes, S
– sequence: 4
  givenname: B
  surname: Kaestner
  fullname: Kaestner, B
– sequence: 5
  givenname: S
  surname: Franke
  fullname: Franke, S
– sequence: 6
  givenname: M
  surname: Kiehntopf
  fullname: Kiehntopf, M
– sequence: 7
  givenname: C
  surname: Hemmelmann
  fullname: Hemmelmann, C
– sequence: 8
  givenname: T
  surname: Lehmann
  fullname: Lehmann, T
– sequence: 9
  givenname: U
  surname: Mueller
  middlename: A
  fullname: Mueller, U A
– sequence: 10
  givenname: G
  surname: Hein
  fullname: Hein, G
– sequence: 11
  givenname: G
  surname: Wolf
  fullname: Wolf, G
BookMark eNo9jrFOwzAYhC1UJNrCO3hkSfjtOEk9ogoKUiWWMleO_Ue4cu0QO4U8AO9NpCBuueG-O92KLHzwSAhlkLNJD6eciUpkpZAs58BYDgXfVPn3FVn-BwuyhFrwrICa3ZBVjCcAxmUhl-Rn50at8Gw11cGnPjhqI-1CtMle0I1UxRi0VQkN_bLpg3Y9XpRDn2jbK52GHiNthkR9SDPQTP_o2XrslaMG_bQ0Uutpp5KdanGmDmOHjBqrGkwYb8l1q1zEuz9fk_fnp8P2Jdu_7V63j_usY1CkTOpaMhAgtGlRSkRTNnVthNpIaEBXmsvWsLJtWqgNVBtelgpQYKUk00zLYk3u592uD58DxnQ826jROeUxDPHIgPOyKrgsi19u-Wve
ContentType Journal Article
DBID 7QP
DOI 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03286.x
DatabaseName Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
DatabaseTitle Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Nursing
EISSN 1464-5491
EndPage 875
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29F
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6PF
702
7PT
7QP
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIAGR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
KQQ
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XV2
YFH
YUY
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p103t-9c7910404cdfe99eed5b77d4a890b0c6c29fd15fbf07d068255a0e4e6a91c1c93
ISSN 0742-3071
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 14:39:37 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p103t-9c7910404cdfe99eed5b77d4a890b0c6c29fd15fbf07d068255a0e4e6a91c1c93
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PQID 1022563295
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1022563295
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20110701
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2011
  text: 20110701
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Diabetic medicine
PublicationYear 2011
SSID ssj0012939
Score 2.2663937
Snippet Aim There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone...
SourceID proquest
SourceType Aggregation Database
StartPage 872
SubjectTerms Bone mineral density
Bone strength
Bone turnover
Collagen
Data processing
Diabetes mellitus
Femur
Fractures
Hip
Osteoporosis
Regression analysis
Title Glycaemic control is positively associated with prevalent fractures but not with bone mineral density in patients with Type1 diabetes
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/1022563295
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9QwFA7jiuKL6Kp4J4JvpdK0uTSPKrsuOjuCzsC8DUmawsBuZ9lphfVR8H970qSZri64-lJKCG3a8_XkXL5zitBryzllzJJUc6NSShVNlVA6FbUlda1rVTBXnHw840cL-nHJlpPJjxFrqWv1G_P9yrqS_5EqjIFcXZXsP0g2XhQG4BzkC0eQMByvJeMPJxdG9ez2gXG-3iaehvXNnlwkKrz7gWJ-du6ae_ftmFxxVAeudqK7Nmk2rZ-gN2Bznq77TtRJ5bjtbV8XGLqvhlI457uSGLUdm7eeXwPr-T1lP7MuWdBcYmV_haWHsQij6abyeivaqJ8U7FuhKufdOEbhgq5iiFF4VQYOuIty-SHrVS3lNAXvlIx1cV6OMCdGirX0P_iJezT7m_r31w49Wou85AMtdNxxe_Z5dbiYTlfzg-X8BrqZC-FT_V9iCzJnDknfytU_wWU22JX3-WNb722V-T10NzgZ-K1HzH00sc0-un0cZLKPboUY0QP0M0IIBwjh9RbvIIR3EMJO9jhCCEcIYYAQBgj5CQ5COEAIBwjhdYMHCPlZPYTwAKGHaHF4MH9_lIY_c6RnJCvaVBoBZibNqKlqKyXYWUwLUVFVykxnhptc1hVh8K1nosp4CX6ryiy1XEliiJHFI7TXwHIeI8yNi6UrKWpVUWFLWbnEMMmVS1jnpn6CXg0vcwWaz6WzVGM33XblYhWMF7lkT68x5xm6s0Pmc7TXnnf2BdiTrX7ZC_wXry969A
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glycaemic+control+is+positively+associated+with+prevalent+fractures+but+not+with+bone+mineral+density+in+patients+with+Type1+diabetes&rft.jtitle=Diabetic+medicine&rft.au=Neumann%2C+T&rft.au=Saemann%2C+A&rft.au=Lodes%2C+S&rft.au=Kaestner%2C+B&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.issn=0742-3071&rft.eissn=1464-5491&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=872&rft.epage=875&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1464-5491.2011.03286.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0742-3071&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0742-3071&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0742-3071&client=summon