파랑하중에 의한 Steel Catenary Riser 피로손상 평가 방법의 비교검토

The purpose of this study is to suggest guidelines for riser fatigue analysis in terms of selection of reasonable analysis method. Three analysis methods (spectral, regular wave, rain-flow counting) are introduced and compared. As the riser systems give non-linear response, the time-domain analysis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in大韓造船學會 論文集 Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 222 - 235
Main Authors 이정대(Jeong-Dae Lee), 이성제(Sung-Je Lee), 장창환(Chang-Hwan Jang), 전석희(Seock-Hee Jun), 오영태(Yeong-Tae Oh)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한조선학회 2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The purpose of this study is to suggest guidelines for riser fatigue analysis in terms of selection of reasonable analysis method. Three analysis methods (spectral, regular wave, rain-flow counting) are introduced and compared. As the riser systems give non-linear response, the time-domain analysis method is more preferred than frequency-domain analysis method. The spectral fatigue analysis method, however, is still useful for identifying fatigue prone areas. Once stress RAO is established, fatigue damage can be calculated very quickly. The regular wave method and the rain-flow counting method are more time consuming but give more exact results compare to spectral method. In case of regular wave method, a set of regular waves which represent random sea states is considered for dynamic analysis. The rain-flow counting method is the most intuitive and exact method because it refers time history stresses containing most of non-linear effects of the riser system. However, it is not common for early design stage to use rain-flow counting method because of its high cost. In this study, it was confirmed that the regular wave method is the most cost effective way in specific cases. However, if the system is highly non-linear, it seems that the regular wave method gives less accurate results than rain-flow counting method. Therefore, it is imperative that the engineers select appropriate analysis method based on design stage and given engineering period. This paper also discusses the theoretical background of each calculation method and hydrodynamic aspects of marine riser systems. A steel catenary riser (SCR) line on FPSO was considered and marine dynamic program (OrcaFlex) was used for static and dynamic analysis.
AbstractList The purpose of this study is to suggest guidelines for riser fatigue analysis in terms of selection of reasonable analysis method. Three analysis methods (spectral, regular wave, rain-flow counting) are introduced and compared. As the riser systems give non-linear response, the time-domain analysis method is more preferred than frequency-domain analysis method. The spectral fatigue analysis method, however, is still useful for identifying fatigue prone areas. Once stress RAO is established, fatigue damage can be calculated very quickly. The regular wave method and the rain-flow counting method are more time consuming but give more exact results compare to spectral method. In case of regular wave method, a set of regular waves which represent random sea states is considered for dynamic analysis. The rain-flow counting method is the most intuitive and exact method because it refers time history stresses containing most of non-linear effects of the riser system. However, it is not common for early design stage to use rain-flow counting method because of its high cost. In this study, it was confirmed that the regular wave method is the most cost effective way in specific cases. However, if the system is highly non-linear, it seems that the regular wave method gives less accurate results than rain-flow counting method. Therefore, it is imperative that the engineers select appropriate analysis method based on design stage and given engineering period. This paper also discusses the theoretical background of each calculation method and hydrodynamic aspects of marine riser systems. A steel catenary riser (SCR) line on FPSO was considered and marine dynamic program (OrcaFlex) was used for static and dynamic analysis. KCI Citation Count: 0
The purpose of this study is to suggest guidelines for riser fatigue analysis in terms of selection of reasonable analysis method. Three analysis methods (spectral, regular wave, rain-flow counting) are introduced and compared. As the riser systems give non-linear response, the time-domain analysis method is more preferred than frequency-domain analysis method. The spectral fatigue analysis method, however, is still useful for identifying fatigue prone areas. Once stress RAO is established, fatigue damage can be calculated very quickly. The regular wave method and the rain-flow counting method are more time consuming but give more exact results compare to spectral method. In case of regular wave method, a set of regular waves which represent random sea states is considered for dynamic analysis. The rain-flow counting method is the most intuitive and exact method because it refers time history stresses containing most of non-linear effects of the riser system. However, it is not common for early design stage to use rain-flow counting method because of its high cost. In this study, it was confirmed that the regular wave method is the most cost effective way in specific cases. However, if the system is highly non-linear, it seems that the regular wave method gives less accurate results than rain-flow counting method. Therefore, it is imperative that the engineers select appropriate analysis method based on design stage and given engineering period. This paper also discusses the theoretical background of each calculation method and hydrodynamic aspects of marine riser systems. A steel catenary riser (SCR) line on FPSO was considered and marine dynamic program (OrcaFlex) was used for static and dynamic analysis.
Author 이정대(Jeong-Dae Lee)
전석희(Seock-Hee Jun)
이성제(Sung-Je Lee)
장창환(Chang-Hwan Jang)
오영태(Yeong-Tae Oh)
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 이정대(Jeong-Dae Lee)
– sequence: 2
  fullname: 이성제(Sung-Je Lee)
– sequence: 3
  fullname: 장창환(Chang-Hwan Jang)
– sequence: 4
  fullname: 전석희(Seock-Hee Jun)
– sequence: 5
  fullname: 오영태(Yeong-Tae Oh)
BackLink https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001998280$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNpNkDFLw0AcxQ9RsNZ-h1scHAJ3l9zlMpZatVos1OJ6XJOLHKmpJHVwqygFoWALFjtUUXBxKwUHwU_UJN_BYB1c_u8__N7j8bbAetgN1RooEMJtwzYpXQcFTAg1MLbMTVCKY91GmCPOuE0L4CwbDpOXcTaZpu_j9GkE0-dpNpnB055SHViRPRXK6Bo2dawimD1-J2-zdDBKb29g9nC_nPdhMv9IFpPcBZOvu-XnaLnoZ4PXbbDhy06sSn9aBK39aqtyaNQbB7VKuW4EjsUMW7mKu5Q6nLu-jz3i552Y7SgbYUktizHFPGRKhSg3McKKIuxiakmf-7jtcrMIdlexYeSLwNWiK_WvnndFEIlys1UTODfaxM7ZnRUb6LinRejFHXFUPm4QhCmhDsMMIQf_48KrSF8oT0txmT_5CuKksVdFzKTcye8PHJt7ow
ContentType Journal Article
DBID DBRKI
TDB
JDI
ACYCR
DEWEY 623.8
DatabaseName DBPIA - 디비피아
Korean Database (DBpia)
KoreaScience
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Military & Naval Science
DocumentTitleAlternate Comparative Study on Wave Induced Fatigue Analysis Methods for Steel Catenary Riser
DocumentTitle_FL Comparative Study on Wave Induced Fatigue Analysis Methods for Steel Catenary Riser
EISSN 2287-7355
EndPage 235
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1101727
JAKO201525961600917
NODE06358906
GroupedDBID .UV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
DBRKI
TDB
JDI
ACYCR
M~E
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-k946-7ece8c55988cff1d2f875679e701a54466e6d03ae0583101e501c154af8f1bc83
ISSN 1225-1143
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:31:39 EST 2023
Fri Dec 22 12:03:28 EST 2023
Fri Oct 18 15:32:23 EDT 2024
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 3
Keywords SCR(스틸 카테너리 라이저)
Rain-flow counting(레인플로우 카운팅)
Spectral response analysis(스팩트럴 응답해석)
Regular wave scatter diagram(규칙파 산포도)
Language Korean
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-k946-7ece8c55988cff1d2f875679e701a54466e6d03ae0583101e501c154af8f1bc83
Notes KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201525961600917
G704-000005.2015.52.3.005
OpenAccessLink http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/LinkingDetailView?cn=JAKO201525961600917&dbt=JAKO&org_code=O481&site_code=SS1481&service_code=01
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1101727
kisti_ndsl_JAKO201525961600917
nurimedia_primary_NODE06358906
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2015
  text: 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle 大韓造船學會 論文集
PublicationTitleAlternate Journal of the society of naval architects of korea
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher 대한조선학회
Publisher_xml – name: 대한조선학회
SSID ssib018086875
ssib044734094
ssib000717722
ssib001148908
ssib036278526
ssib022235208
ssib053377058
Score 1.5813962
Snippet The purpose of this study is to suggest guidelines for riser fatigue analysis in terms of selection of reasonable analysis method. Three analysis methods...
SourceID nrf
kisti
nurimedia
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Publisher
StartPage 222
SubjectTerms 조선공학
Title 파랑하중에 의한 Steel Catenary Riser 피로손상 평가 방법의 비교검토
URI https://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE06358906
http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/LinkingDetailView?cn=JAKO201525961600917&dbt=JAKO&org_code=O481&site_code=SS1481&service_code=01
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001998280
Volume 52
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX 대한조선학회 논문집, 2015, 52(3), 201, pp.222-235
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1daxNB8Kh90RdRVKwf5RD3qZzc3ufu411yJUZsQav07chd9kpJuUhtEHyQilIQCrZgsQ9VFHzxrRR8EPxFTfIfnJnLJVcpqIVwWXZndnZnP2Zm2ZnVtLuJLUXq8NTIksQ2HD9JDdGWeO3P5Z6b-YmkEBsPF7zGE6e57C5PnTuo3FrqbST30pen-pWcZVQhD8YVvWT_Y2THlUIGpGF84QsjDN9_GmMW1Zmo4S8KmYyY5JgjXSYFi2oscCinxqTPpDlHqTqVFUB0x0utoRegIq_cR_gw8xwVOyykWgMOcIgpPKiDEjZonwQk5pmQLApYaDKB9YeYCiQlLCRRUizKJBMOgbtUVYBAwqSaPBaYVT0Z4bFn5rit1CGOBLANDsCXRZISAcATGeGWTa-xsOADdH88s0ZtCh0qMamVJS1LNFU3XzHqLfRzUpVTkhNYQD3kJXoNsB7Djmk0T8WJWEBsgHaHdWqoxBGwBLl1GI0X6D5GZ_Yn8KBmUdKSBV4dOwS0FEgwo6HUXLOXl1ijY5vCZZWW2NkYWBFRsAMbYMUWYkFRngV2r-HbRcDjUq65VmX92lUhVXiCj_QdqwgX80fU8YXFegTaqyskxbPHGEx4L_ZVVNVNwTKrOF2DYS0ngaK4AGNZTHRT1ENda1IOipMv3Inu7zi-XT1rADPE9016X3fcYzAg0apaBT0wXwf18XzewzcwYCOt6IRLl7SLI2NOD4qVeVmb6nSvaE-H29v9z7vDvf3Bt93Bxx198Gl_uHeg01rTy7Wm01rThx9-9b8eDLZ2Bm9e68P3744PN_X-4ff-0R5g6f2fb49_7BwfbQ63vlzVluajpVrDGL1eYnSk4xm-SpVI8fkDkWYZb1sZMMPzpfJN3nLxFoXy2qbdUtBHMLG4ck2egj3TykTGk1TY17TpvJur65puCem221Yrc1qJA2xrpbLtCzRFrAzEp5jRZoktcd5-vhY3gweLOOEsV3oczBnJ_RntDvAr7qSrMUaTx_-VbtxZj8Fmvh9zlMoWAM2O2Rk_K0LdxNVpcONvADe1C0i4OKC8pU1vrPfUbVDZN5JZmjq_AYUvuos
link.rule.ids 230,315,786,790,891,4043
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%ED%8C%8C%EB%9E%91%ED%95%98%EC%A4%91%EC%97%90+%EC%9D%98%ED%95%9C+Steel+Catenary+Riser+%ED%94%BC%EB%A1%9C%EC%86%90%EC%83%81+%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80+%EB%B0%A9%EB%B2%95%EC%9D%98+%EB%B9%84%EA%B5%90%EA%B2%80%ED%86%A0&rft.jtitle=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%A1%B0%EC%84%A0%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C+%EB%85%BC%EB%AC%B8%EC%A7%91&rft.au=%EC%9D%B4%EC%A0%95%EB%8C%80%28Jeong-Dae+Lee%29&rft.au=%EC%9D%B4%EC%84%B1%EC%A0%9C%28Sung-Je+Lee%29&rft.au=%EC%9E%A5%EC%B0%BD%ED%99%98%28Chang-Hwan+Jang%29&rft.au=%EC%A0%84%EC%84%9D%ED%9D%AC%28Seock-Hee+Jun%29&rft.date=2015&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%A1%B0%EC%84%A0%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=1225-1143&rft.eissn=2287-7355&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=235&rft.externalDocID=NODE06358906
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1225-1143&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1225-1143&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1225-1143&client=summon