PFOS 대체물질의 환경유해성에 관한 연구

While PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) was not degraded by microorganisms for 28 days, the 4 alternatives were biodegraded at the rates of 21.6% for $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$, 20.5% for $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, 15.8% for $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$ and 6.4% for $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDaehan hwan'gyeong gonghag hoeji Vol. 38; no. 6; pp. 317 - 322
Main Authors 최봉인(Bong-In Choi), 정선용(Seon-Yong Chung), 나숙현(Suk-Hyun Na), 신동수(Dong-Soo Shin), 유병택(Byung-Taek Ryu)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한환경공학회 2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1225-5025
2383-7810
DOI10.4491/KSEE.2016.38.6.317

Cover

Loading…
Abstract While PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) was not degraded by microorganisms for 28 days, the 4 alternatives were biodegraded at the rates of 21.6% for $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$, 20.5% for $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, 15.8% for $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$ and 6.4% for $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$, respectively. The acute toxicity test using Daphnia magna was conducted for 48 hours, the half effective concentration ($EC_{50}$) of PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) was evaluated in 54.5 mg/L. While the 4 alternatives did not show any effect at 500.0 mg/L. The surface tension of the PFOS salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) is 46.2 mN/m at a concentration of 500.0 mg/L. While the surface tension of the 4 alternatives was found to be superior to PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$). The surface tension of $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$ (20.9 mN/m) has the lowest, followed by $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$ (23.4 mN/m), $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$ (27.3 mN/m), $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$ (28.2 mN/m). The four kinds of alternatives ($C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$) were found to be superior to PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) in terms of biodegradation, Daphnia sp. acute toxicity and surface tension, and thus they were considered applicable as PFOS alternatives. Especially biodegradation rate of $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$ and $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$ was relatively high as 15.8~21.6%, and Daphnia sp. acute toxicity and surface tension were considerably superior (surface tension 39~55%) to PFOS sodium salt. Therefore, these alternatives are considered to be available as an alternative of PFOS. PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$)는 28일 동안 미생물에 의한 분해가 이루어지지 않은 반면 4종의 대체물질($C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$, $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$)은 각각 21.6%, 20.5%, 15.8% 그리고 6.4% 분해가 이루어졌다. Daphnia magna를 이용하여 48시간 동안 수행한 물벼룩급성독성시험에서 sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$)의 반수영향농도($EC_{50}$)는 54.5 mg/L 인 것으로 확인된 반면 4종의 대체물질은 500.0 mg/L에서 아무런 영향이 나타나지 않았다. 500.0 mg/L에서 PFOS sodium salt($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$)의 표면장력은 46.2 mN/m이었으며 대체물질 4종의 표면장력은 모두 PFOS sodium salt 보다 우수한 것으로 확인되었다. $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$ (20.9 mN/m)는 가장 낮은 표면장력을 갖고 있었다. 그 다음은 $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$ (23.4 mN/m), $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$ (27.3 mN/m) 그리고 $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$ (28.2 mN/m) 순인 것으로 확인되었다. 미생물분해시험, 물벼룩급성독성시험 그리고 표면장력측정 결과를 종합해 보면 4종의 PFOS 대체물질($C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$, $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$)은 모두 PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) 보다 우수한 것으로 확인되었으며 특히 3종의 대체물질($C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$)은 미생물분해율이 15.8~21.6%로 상대적으로 높고, 물벼룩급성독성과 표면장력측정이 PFOS sodium salt 보다 상당히 우수하다. 그러므로 이들 4종의 대체물질은 PFOS 대체물질로 활용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.
AbstractList While PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) was not degraded by microorganisms for 28 days, the 4 alternatives were biodegraded at the rates of 21.6% for $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$, 20.5% for $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, 15.8% for $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$ and 6.4% for $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$, respectively. The acute toxicity test using Daphnia magna was conducted for 48 hours, the half effective concentration ($EC_{50}$) of PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) was evaluated in 54.5 mg/L. While the 4 alternatives did not show any effect at 500.0 mg/L. The surface tension of the PFOS salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) is 46.2 mN/m at a concentration of 500.0 mg/L. While the surface tension of the 4 alternatives was found to be superior to PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$). The surface tension of $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$ (20.9 mN/m) has the lowest, followed by $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$ (23.4 mN/m), $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$ (27.3 mN/m), $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$ (28.2 mN/m). The four kinds of alternatives ($C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$) were found to be superior to PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) in terms of biodegradation, Daphnia sp. acute toxicity and surface tension, and thus they were considered applicable as PFOS alternatives. Especially biodegradation rate of $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$ and $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$ was relatively high as 15.8~21.6%, and Daphnia sp. acute toxicity and surface tension were considerably superior (surface tension 39~55%) to PFOS sodium salt. Therefore, these alternatives are considered to be available as an alternative of PFOS. PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$)는 28일 동안 미생물에 의한 분해가 이루어지지 않은 반면 4종의 대체물질($C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$, $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$)은 각각 21.6%, 20.5%, 15.8% 그리고 6.4% 분해가 이루어졌다. Daphnia magna를 이용하여 48시간 동안 수행한 물벼룩급성독성시험에서 sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$)의 반수영향농도($EC_{50}$)는 54.5 mg/L 인 것으로 확인된 반면 4종의 대체물질은 500.0 mg/L에서 아무런 영향이 나타나지 않았다. 500.0 mg/L에서 PFOS sodium salt($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$)의 표면장력은 46.2 mN/m이었으며 대체물질 4종의 표면장력은 모두 PFOS sodium salt 보다 우수한 것으로 확인되었다. $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$ (20.9 mN/m)는 가장 낮은 표면장력을 갖고 있었다. 그 다음은 $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$ (23.4 mN/m), $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$ (27.3 mN/m) 그리고 $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$ (28.2 mN/m) 순인 것으로 확인되었다. 미생물분해시험, 물벼룩급성독성시험 그리고 표면장력측정 결과를 종합해 보면 4종의 PFOS 대체물질($C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$, $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$)은 모두 PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) 보다 우수한 것으로 확인되었으며 특히 3종의 대체물질($C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$)은 미생물분해율이 15.8~21.6%로 상대적으로 높고, 물벼룩급성독성과 표면장력측정이 PFOS sodium salt 보다 상당히 우수하다. 그러므로 이들 4종의 대체물질은 PFOS 대체물질로 활용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.
PFOS sodium salt (C8F17SO3Na)는 28일 동안 미생물에 의한 분해가 이루어지지 않은 반면 4종의 대체물질(C25F17H32S3O13Na3, C15F9H21S2O8Na2, C23F18H28S2O8Na2, C17F9H25S2O8Na2)은 각각 21.6%, 20.5%, 15.8% 그리고 6.4% 분해가 이루어졌다. Daphnia magna를 이용하여 48시간 동안 수행한 물벼룩급성독성시험에서 sodium salt (C8F17SO3Na)의 반수영향농도(EC50)는 54.5 mg/L 인 것으로 확인된 반면 4종의 대체물질은 500.0 mg/L에서 아무런 영향이 나타나지 않았다. 500.0 mg/L에서 PFOS sodium salt (C8F17SO3Na)의 표면장력은 46.2 mN/m이었으며 대체물질 4종의 표면장력은 모두 PFOS sodium salt 보다 우수한 것으로 확인되었다. C23F18H28S2O8Na2 (20.9 mN/m)는 가장 낮은 표면장력을 갖고 있었다. 그 다음은 C15F9H21S2O8Na2 (23.4 mN/m), C17F9H25S2O8Na2 (27.3 mN/m) 그리고 C25F17H32S3O13Na3 (28.2 mN/m) 순인 것으로 확인되었다. 미생물분해시험, 물벼룩급성독성시험 그리고 표면장력측정 결과를 종합해 보면 4종의 PFOS 대체물질(C25F17H32S3O13Na3, C15F9H21S2O8Na2, C23F18H28S2O8Na2, C17F9H25S2O8Na2)은 모두 PFOS sodium salt (C8F17SO3Na) 보다 우수한 것으로 확인되었으며 특히 3종의 대체물질(C15F9H21S2O8Na2, C23F18H28S2O8Na2, C25F17H32S3O13Na3)은 미생물분해율이 15.8~21.6%로 상대적으로 높고, 물벼룩급성독성과 표면장력측정이 PFOS sodium salt 보다 상당히 우수하다. 그러므로 이들 4종의 대체물질은 PFOS 대체물질로 활용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다. While PFOS sodium salt (C8F17SO3Na) was not degraded by microorganisms for 28 days, the 4 alternatives were biodegraded at the rates of 21.6% for C25F17H32S3O13Na3, 20.5% for C15F9H21S2O8Na2, 15.8% for C23F18H28S2O8Na2 and 6.4% for C17F9H25S2O8Na2, respectively. The acute toxicity test using Daphnia magna was conducted for 48 hours, the half effective concentration (EC50) of PFOS sodium salt (C8F17SO3Na) was evaluated in 54.5 mg/L. While the 4 alternatives did not show any effect at 500.0 mg/L. The surface tension of the PFOS salt (C8F17SO3Na) is 46.2 mN/m at a concentration of 500.0 mg/L. While the surface tension of the 4 alternatives was found to be superior to PFOS sodium salt (C8F17SO3Na). The surface tension of C23F18H28S2O8Na2 (20.9 mN/m) has the lowest, followed by C15F9H21S2O8Na2 (23.4 mN/m), C17F9H25S2O8Na2 (27.3 mN/m), C25F17H32S3O13Na3 (28.2 mN/m). The four kinds of alternatives (C15F9H21S2O8Na2, C17F9H25S2O8Na2, C23F18H28S2O8Na2, C25F17H32S3O13Na3) were found to be superior to PFOS sodium salt (C8F17SO3Na) in terms of biodegradation, Daphnia sp. acute toxicity and surface tension, and thus they were considered applicable as PFOS alternatives. Especially biodegradation rate of C15F9H21S2O8Na2, C23F18H28S2O8Na2 and C25F17H32S3O13Na3 was relatively high as 15.8~21.6%, and Daphnia sp. acute toxicity and surface tension were considerably superior (surface tension 39~55%) to PFOS sodium salt. Therefore, these alternatives are considered to be available as an alternative of PFOS. KCI Citation Count: 0
Author 최봉인(Bong-In Choi)
유병택(Byung-Taek Ryu)
신동수(Dong-Soo Shin)
정선용(Seon-Yong Chung)
나숙현(Suk-Hyun Na)
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 최봉인(Bong-In Choi)
– sequence: 2
  fullname: 정선용(Seon-Yong Chung)
– sequence: 3
  fullname: 나숙현(Suk-Hyun Na)
– sequence: 4
  fullname: 신동수(Dong-Soo Shin)
– sequence: 5
  fullname: 유병택(Byung-Taek Ryu)
BackLink https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002125158$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNpFkL1OwlAcxW8MJiLyAk5dTFxa__eL244EQRFijbDf3H6ZplhMq4Mbg4ODgwsBE0zcXBiU4KYvBOUdrGLics4ZfucMZxsV4n7sI7SLwWDMwgetTr1uEMAVg5pGLlhsoCKhJtWFiaGAipgQrnMgfAuV0zR0gDFBGZisiPhZw-5oy4dBNpsvp5_Z6332PNZWT-PF7CubvKyG8-zuPRs9aov5YDWcaNnobfEx3UGbgeqlfvnPS6jTqHdrx3rbPmrWqm09sijRfUcBD0zPcgPsME64LyqCge9Yrim4Z1KHKyUIt7ivmOeCy12eFxwIwAJQtIT216txEsjIDWVfhb9-0ZdRIqvn3aYkQATBObq3RqMwvQ5l7KU9eVJt2T-vEC6YxbgFmPxz8U0SXvpeqORVHlRyK0_twzoIDEAZod-fi3EI
ContentType Journal Article
DBID DBRKI
TDB
JDI
ACYCR
DEWEY 628
DOI 10.4491/KSEE.2016.38.6.317
DatabaseName DBPIA - 디비피아
DBPIA
KoreaScience
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
DocumentTitleAlternate Study on Environmental Hazards of Alternatives for PFOS
DocumentTitle_FL Study on Environmental Hazards of Alternatives for PFOS
EISSN 2383-7810
EndPage 322
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_202721
JAKO201625749459012
NODE07100342
GroupedDBID 9ZL
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
DBRKI
GROUPED_DOAJ
GW5
JDI
MZR
TDB
ZZE
.UV
85H
ACYCR
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-k932-eba05f8d9cf1b4525e76740eb9c875d83b5aa72595ea4dc0c5c505fb0f0900a3
ISSN 1225-5025
IngestDate Sun Dec 31 10:49:49 EST 2023
Fri Dec 22 11:58:46 EST 2023
Thu Mar 13 19:38:14 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords 잔류성유기오염물질
Persistent Organic Pollutants
Alternatives
PerFluorOoctaneSulfonic Acid (PFOS)
대체물질
Language Korean
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-k932-eba05f8d9cf1b4525e76740eb9c875d83b5aa72595ea4dc0c5c505fb0f0900a3
Notes KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201625749459012
G704-000098.2016.38.6.007
OpenAccessLink http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2016.38.6.317
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_202721
kisti_ndsl_JAKO201625749459012
nurimedia_primary_NODE07100342
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2016
  text: 2016
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Daehan hwan'gyeong gonghag hoeji
PublicationTitleAlternate Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher 대한환경공학회
Publisher_xml – name: 대한환경공학회
SSID ssib044734084
ssib053377094
ssj0002782626
ssib022229522
Score 1.9340523
Snippet While PFOS sodium salt ($C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$) was not degraded by microorganisms for 28 days, the 4 alternatives were biodegraded at the rates of 21.6% for...
PFOS sodium salt (C8F17SO3Na)는 28일 동안 미생물에 의한 분해가 이루어지지 않은 반면 4종의 대체물질(C25F17H32S3O13Na3, C15F9H21S2O8Na2, C23F18H28S2O8Na2, C17F9H25S2O8Na2)은 각각 21.6%, 20.5%,...
SourceID nrf
kisti
nurimedia
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Publisher
StartPage 317
SubjectTerms 환경공학
Title PFOS 대체물질의 환경유해성에 관한 연구
URI https://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE07100342
http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/LinkingDetailView?cn=JAKO201625749459012&dbt=JAKO&org_code=O481&site_code=SS1481&service_code=01
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002125158
Volume 38
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX 대한환경공학회지, 2016, 38(6), , pp.317-322
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1Nb9Mw1JrGATggPsX4mIpETlVKmjiJfUzaTGMTG9KGtFuUOE7bdWpR6YTggHbgwIEDl2lDGhI3LjvAVG7wh7b0P_Cek3bRmMTHxbHsZ_vZz3l-z_Z7JuShcBIHVoEIKMCkTmMJv5QtI90Ros4TM6VpfttixVl8Rpc27I2ZmXHp1tL2MK6J1-falfwPVSEN6IpWsv9A2WmlkABxoC-EQGEI_4rGTxdWQQ0PfI018MZC0NB8U_MppngQb2CK52qMYYQ3Nc4AGj4cYlrgKeimygM4Q2XZqjxURzW_rrJcjRtVBU1VIwqIN6pFpm-oPFsrnDgWgm4zkm1gHe2XuMHqtl5JfNOoBUE7alXbfbnZmZBaoY01ItrYBi-w9VkZBPCDdnPMPNVX7mkePwWBUTBVvxrYYegjYso0Rsu1MF8VBtgFBZLDsvLeR26UWTBq4EO6beRG0zWp0kD6sHSXFddkC-5usdIsLrNqK7cZLVZ9K7eOPrugUMpxQVleCwK8BujULFaDYFK07L37zKo6veu45C2vYlHgjZRTNPUFieGCCVoNriNP3gQT9kepa1Hj1GwYBHHXnWjfm_kZsemoBwSnvc_NwBDLR7_jCPoWKiEdEJt6A5C2Lva28ckI4DslEWr9KrlS6D4VL5_I18hMt3-dXC55xLxBbJzSlZP3O9nR6OTwR_blXfZpvzL-uH989DM7-DzeHWVvv2V7HyrHo53x7kEl2_t6_P3wJllbCNYbi3rxsofeBX1Bl3Fk2ClLuEjrMR6sS3QpZciYC1CfE2bFdhS5oJgD16CJMIQtQFBPYyM1uGFE1i0y2-v35G1SYW6SpEK6CZ4nW9ziLIrrtqB1YTNHMjZH5tUQhL3kxVZ4DinmyAMYm7ArOiE6Wsdvqx92ByGok49D3Bk061DJdOTC57kTmHBltRko11gWNe_8qZW75BKm5Ft398jscLAt74MwO4zn1SbQvJoIvwCr1IKb
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PFOS+%EB%8C%80%EC%B2%B4%EB%AC%BC%EC%A7%88%EC%9D%98+%ED%99%98%EA%B2%BD%EC%9C%A0%ED%95%B4%EC%84%B1%EC%97%90+%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C+%EC%97%B0%EA%B5%AC&rft.jtitle=Daehan+hwan%27gyeong+gonghag+hoeji&rft.au=%EC%B5%9C%EB%B4%89%EC%9D%B8&rft.au=%EC%A0%95%EC%84%A0%EC%9A%A9&rft.au=%EB%82%98%EC%88%99%ED%98%84&rft.au=%EC%8B%A0%EB%8F%99%EC%88%98&rft.date=2016&rft.issn=1225-5025&rft.eissn=2383-7810&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=322&rft_id=info:doi/10.4491%2FKSEE.2016.38.6.317&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=JAKO201625749459012
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1225-5025&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1225-5025&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1225-5025&client=summon