롤랑 바르트의 기호학 접근을 통한 시베리아 샤먼복식의 해석

This study attempts to analyze the social and cultural meanings of the ethnic groups to which different types of shamans belong in Siberia from the appearance characteristics in terms of clothing through Roland Barthes’s semiotic theory. The research method here is to analyze three types of shaman c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Research Journal of the Costume Culture Vol. 28; no. 6; pp. 858 - 874
Main Authors 유수, Shuai Liu, 권미정, Mi Jeong Kwon
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 복식문화학회 31.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1226-0401
2383-6334
DOI10.29049/rjcc.2020.28.6.858

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study attempts to analyze the social and cultural meanings of the ethnic groups to which different types of shamans belong in Siberia from the appearance characteristics in terms of clothing through Roland Barthes’s semiotic theory. The research method here is to analyze three types of shaman costume classified by Holmberg, which are bird-type, deer-type, and bear-type, through theoretical research and to investigate the analysis process of Roland Barthes’s semiotics theory. Roland Barthes’s approach to semiotics presents an analysis model that can explore the sociocultural meaning of the Siberian shaman costume. The research results are as follows. In the first type, to be closer to the god of the upperworld, shamans transform themselves into birds by decorating their costumes with the characteristic elements of birds such as feathers and wings. In the second type, the shamans’ costumes are made of deerskin, and the headdress is shown in the shape of antlers to make it easier to receive messages from the upperworld and run fast in the underworld. In the third type, the shaman’s costume is made of bearskin, the head is covered with bearskin, and the body is decorated with bear pendants. Through the power of the bear, the shaman is sent to the underworld to defeat evil gods and remove diseases. Shamans can show their particularity of being a demigod and non-binary gender through clothing. They use this to reflect their authority as a medium of communication between man and god.
Bibliography:The Costume Culture Association
KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO202009135418957
https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2020.28.6.858
ISSN:1226-0401
2383-6334
DOI:10.29049/rjcc.2020.28.6.858