보호시스템 보증시험 적용이 장외영향평가 안전성 확보에 미치는 영향
The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the likelihood of failure at the facility. Also, the protective system has different effects on the likelihood of failure according to the proof te...
Saved in:
Published in | 한국안전학회지 Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 46 - 53 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Korean |
Published |
한국안전학회
31.12.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1738-3803 2383-9953 |
Cover
Abstract | The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the likelihood of failure at the facility. Also, the protective system has different effects on the likelihood of failure according to the proof test cycle. However, when assessing risks in the Off-site Risk Assessment (ORA) system, the variation in risk was not reflected according to the proof test cycle of protective system. This study was conducted to examine the need for proof test and the importance of cycle setting by applying periodic proof test of the protective system to ORA. The results showed that the likelihood of failure and the risk increased with longer proof test cycle. The risk of a two-yearly proof test was eight times greater than that of a three-month cycle. From the results, the protective system needs periodic proof test. Untested protective system for a long term cannot be reliable because it is more likely to be failed state when it is called upon to operate. In order to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, it is effective to differently set the proof test cycle according to the priority. This study suggested a more systematic and accurate risk analysis standard than ORA. This standard is expected to enable an acceptable level of risk management by systematically setting the priority and proof test cycle of the protective system. It is also expected to contribute to securing the safety of chemical facilities and at the same time, will lead to the development of the ORA system. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the likelihood of failure at the facility. Also, the protective system has different effects on the likelihood of failure according to the proof test cycle. However, when assessing risks in the Off-site Risk Assessment (ORA) system, the variation in risk was not reflected according to the proof test cycle of protective system. This study was conducted to examine the need for proof test and the importance of cycle setting by applying periodic proof test of the protective system to ORA. The results showed that the likelihood of failure and the risk increased with longer proof test cycle. The risk of a two-yearly proof test was eight times greater than that of a three-month cycle. From the results, the protective system needs periodic proof test. Untested protective system for a long term cannot be reliable because it is more likely to be failed state when it is called upon to operate. In order to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, it is effective to differently set the proof test cycle according to the priority. This study suggested a more systematic and accurate risk analysis standard than ORA. This standard is expected to enable an acceptable level of risk management by systematically setting the priority and proof test cycle of the protective system. It is also expected to contribute to securing the safety of chemical facilities and at the same time, will lead to the development of the ORA system. The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the likelihood of failure at the facility. Also, the protective system has different effects on the likelihood of failure according to the proof test cycle. However, when assessing risks in the Off-site Risk Assessment (ORA) system, the variation in risk was not reflected according to the proof test cycle of protective system. This study was conducted to examine the need for proof test and the importance of cycle setting by applying periodic proof test of the protective system to ORA. The results showed that the likelihood of failure and the risk increased with longer proof test cycle. The risk of a two-yearly proof test was eight times greater than that of a three-month cycle. From the results, the protective system needs periodic proof test. Untested protective system for a long term cannot be reliable because it is more likely to be failed state when it is called upon to operate. In order to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, it is effective to differently set the proof test cycle according to the priority. This study suggested a more systematic and accurate risk analysis standard than ORA. This standard is expected to enable an acceptable level of risk management by systematically setting the priority and proof test cycle of the protective system. It is also expected to contribute to securing the safety of chemical facilities and at the same time, will lead to the development of the ORA system. KCI Citation Count: 4 |
Author | Junheon Yoon 김재영 Min-su Kim 윤준헌 Eun-byeol Lee 김민수 박재학 Jai Hak Park 이은별 Jae-young Kim |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 김민수 – sequence: 2 fullname: Min-su Kim – sequence: 3 fullname: 김재영 – sequence: 4 fullname: Jae-young Kim – sequence: 5 fullname: 이은별 – sequence: 6 fullname: Eun-byeol Lee – sequence: 7 fullname: 윤준헌 – sequence: 8 fullname: Junheon Yoon – sequence: 9 fullname: 박재학 – sequence: 10 fullname: Jai Hak Park |
BackLink | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002304375$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNo9zM9KAlEYBfAhCjLzCdrMpkWLgev9nLnfXYr0xxKEcN1lZvTGMDbGTJt2CQZli1pkjqHhIoNWFbmwV8o775BmtDoc-J2zpi0HjaC2pKUoIBicm7CspbIM0AAksKploshziAnAGABNaUfTz3EST9RNX7Wfk8u-PuvqZTDrSTfW1bCpHl_VYKyrp5HqTVTcTB5Gye319_uFrjpXathSrQ896XXms-6dPn2bqK942r7XF3RdW5F2Papl_jKtVXa2K4U9o1TeLRbyJcPHnGWAJBxRcuBYJWgzbtkWWA5Si1C0bLcKNcpAopQORZc6HKTMMcpMl1DO0Ia0trW4DUIpfNcTDdv7zeOG8EORP6wUBaUmoTlrZjcX1veiM08E1agu9vMHZUqyjCAzGSJyMncb_y4Sp6F3YofnAkxGwOLwA6mWhLE |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | HZB Q5X JDI ACYCR |
DEWEY | 363.11 |
DatabaseName | Korea Information Science Society (KISS) Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type KoreaScience Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Social Welfare & Social Work |
DocumentTitleAlternate | 보호시스템 보증시험 적용이 장외영향평가 안전성 확보에 미치는 영향 Effect of Proof Test of Protective System on Securing Safety of Off-site Risk Assessment |
EISSN | 2383-9953 |
EndPage | 53 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2250246 JAKO201708757888906 3570369 |
GroupedDBID | .UV HZB Q5X JDI ACYCR |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-k846-3f0988f9398d08a796a636b8260286acd3e273f8ffb28c2b93ff47275c02978a3 |
ISSN | 1738-3803 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:41:05 EST 2023 Fri Dec 22 12:04:05 EST 2023 Sat Sep 06 10:40:09 EDT 2025 |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | false |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | likelihood of failure protective system proof test off-site risk assessment risk analysis |
Language | Korean |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-k846-3f0988f9398d08a796a636b8260286acd3e273f8ffb28c2b93ff47275c02978a3 |
Notes | Korean Society of Safety KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201708757888906 |
OpenAccessLink | http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/LinkingDetailView?cn=JAKO201708757888906&dbt=JAKO&org_code=O481&site_code=SS1481&service_code=01 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2250246 kisti_ndsl_JAKO201708757888906 kiss_primary_3570369 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20171231 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-12-31 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2017 text: 20171231 day: 31 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | 한국안전학회지 |
PublicationTitleAlternate | 한국안전학회지 |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | 한국안전학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: 한국안전학회 |
SSID | ssib053377332 ssib012146287 ssib001535083 ssib008451743 ssib016108132 |
Score | 1.6417512 |
Snippet | The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the... |
SourceID | nrf kisti kiss |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Publisher |
StartPage | 46 |
SubjectTerms | likelihood of failure off-site risk assessment proof test protective system risk analysis 안전공학 |
Title | 보호시스템 보증시험 적용이 장외영향평가 안전성 확보에 미치는 영향 |
URI | https://kiss.kstudy.com/ExternalLink/Ar?key=3570369 http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/LinkingDetailView?cn=JAKO201708757888906&dbt=JAKO&org_code=O481&site_code=SS1481&service_code=01 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002304375 |
Volume | 32 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | 한국안전학회지, 2017, 32(6), 146, pp.46-53 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Nb9MwFLe2nbggYCAGY4oQ5jIVtXPj2Mck7TSGBpchdlqU5gNNnVrUbRcOiElDgnGAA2Md2tAODIkTIHYo_xJL_wd-drI2nSrxcXEd-73nF78k7_fS-JmQW7wUBgAaQG5wl4VygHDHj2u48WDigFuRLDG1GnnhPp97WJ5fMpdGRpdzXy1trNfuBE-Hriv5H6uiDXZVq2T_wbI9oWhAHfZFCQuj_Csb06pDHUadMq1WqBTUEbTqUuFQ6eqKTW3dJUy0TOeoXWpzKis5avBbEDGt-4rAl6oiIUDqSgVsuk9WqW3qisyGw7iKGgK47sJws1SAzaYOBBVTNpMKcSpbK4DSKU1rPqm688opVYpaX3s2G8WRaiC04KRkpsrAwHmUrRtNfV5QwqR2ZZgOKY3UFZsKPWW2RUXvDxzNLdW3IJkm6awKKsUQknRu3J5mfZJs_rJKKg7nKsoDJK42li4ViTaIcPNvZeDps9yPPUdiwZEwUUwf3pFuAzpiBSnT5Min3qf_dveMK8nezKagJOMZSBd-xo33Pq6ct-89UCqlexUIIVVG-lFWUl5g4Vk1B5bZwF4AoqyylveOS2rL95k-eEdoAPjYX4WMOMGymN4BsHeywDUIe9YQ6KnoZwV4rdGKc3ht8QI5nwVahp3eNRfJSL15iUymq9GNR9Fq7Lci47Zx2tBs1cfJ8smP4267k7zeT7Y_dV_sGzhOPh_guLvbNpLDzeTDl-Tg2Eg-HiV7naS92X1_1H3z6te350ay8zI53Eq2vhvdvR3FtvvWOPnaSX62T7bfGSnpZbI4W1105wrZBiSFOmB5gcVFKUQsmRRhUfiW5D5nvIaAHKCc-0HIIoD_WMR4uIlgpiZZHJcRD5iB2hFO-OwKGWs0G9FVYiicHvIZK44RwJRkLEQUmyGXPEQAFfh8goyrifOepClmPKYT48kJMqUn0muEa6veEMNOkJuYYa8erHgqT7z6fdz06i0P0fBdD74aEJxf-5OU6-Rc_xqeJGPrrY3oBrD2em1KXzK_AdYUrR8 |
linkProvider | ISSN International Centre |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%EB%B3%B4%ED%98%B8%EC%8B%9C%EC%8A%A4%ED%85%9C+%EB%B3%B4%EC%A6%9D%EC%8B%9C%ED%97%98+%EC%A0%81%EC%9A%A9%EC%9D%B4+%EC%9E%A5%EC%99%B8%EC%98%81%ED%96%A5%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80+%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EC%84%B1+%ED%99%95%EB%B3%B4%EC%97%90+%EB%AF%B8%EC%B9%98%EB%8A%94+%EC%98%81%ED%96%A5&rft.jtitle=%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C%EC%A7%80&rft.au=%EA%B9%80%EB%AF%BC%EC%88%98&rft.au=%EA%B9%80%EC%9E%AC%EC%98%81&rft.au=%EC%9D%B4%EC%9D%80%EB%B3%84&rft.au=%EC%9C%A4%EC%A4%80%ED%97%8C&rft.date=2017-12-31&rft.issn=1738-3803&rft.eissn=2383-9953&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=53&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=JAKO201708757888906 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1738-3803&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1738-3803&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1738-3803&client=summon |