보호시스템 보증시험 적용이 장외영향평가 안전성 확보에 미치는 영향

The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the likelihood of failure at the facility. Also, the protective system has different effects on the likelihood of failure according to the proof te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in한국안전학회지 Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 46 - 53
Main Authors 김민수, Min-su Kim, 김재영, Jae-young Kim, 이은별, Eun-byeol Lee, 윤준헌, Junheon Yoon, 박재학, Jai Hak Park
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한국안전학회 31.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1738-3803
2383-9953

Cover

Abstract The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the likelihood of failure at the facility. Also, the protective system has different effects on the likelihood of failure according to the proof test cycle. However, when assessing risks in the Off-site Risk Assessment (ORA) system, the variation in risk was not reflected according to the proof test cycle of protective system. This study was conducted to examine the need for proof test and the importance of cycle setting by applying periodic proof test of the protective system to ORA. The results showed that the likelihood of failure and the risk increased with longer proof test cycle. The risk of a two-yearly proof test was eight times greater than that of a three-month cycle. From the results, the protective system needs periodic proof test. Untested protective system for a long term cannot be reliable because it is more likely to be failed state when it is called upon to operate. In order to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, it is effective to differently set the proof test cycle according to the priority. This study suggested a more systematic and accurate risk analysis standard than ORA. This standard is expected to enable an acceptable level of risk management by systematically setting the priority and proof test cycle of the protective system. It is also expected to contribute to securing the safety of chemical facilities and at the same time, will lead to the development of the ORA system.
AbstractList The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the likelihood of failure at the facility. Also, the protective system has different effects on the likelihood of failure according to the proof test cycle. However, when assessing risks in the Off-site Risk Assessment (ORA) system, the variation in risk was not reflected according to the proof test cycle of protective system. This study was conducted to examine the need for proof test and the importance of cycle setting by applying periodic proof test of the protective system to ORA. The results showed that the likelihood of failure and the risk increased with longer proof test cycle. The risk of a two-yearly proof test was eight times greater than that of a three-month cycle. From the results, the protective system needs periodic proof test. Untested protective system for a long term cannot be reliable because it is more likely to be failed state when it is called upon to operate. In order to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, it is effective to differently set the proof test cycle according to the priority. This study suggested a more systematic and accurate risk analysis standard than ORA. This standard is expected to enable an acceptable level of risk management by systematically setting the priority and proof test cycle of the protective system. It is also expected to contribute to securing the safety of chemical facilities and at the same time, will lead to the development of the ORA system.
The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the likelihood of failure at the facility. Also, the protective system has different effects on the likelihood of failure according to the proof test cycle. However, when assessing risks in the Off-site Risk Assessment (ORA) system, the variation in risk was not reflected according to the proof test cycle of protective system. This study was conducted to examine the need for proof test and the importance of cycle setting by applying periodic proof test of the protective system to ORA. The results showed that the likelihood of failure and the risk increased with longer proof test cycle. The risk of a two-yearly proof test was eight times greater than that of a three-month cycle. From the results, the protective system needs periodic proof test. Untested protective system for a long term cannot be reliable because it is more likely to be failed state when it is called upon to operate. In order to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, it is effective to differently set the proof test cycle according to the priority. This study suggested a more systematic and accurate risk analysis standard than ORA. This standard is expected to enable an acceptable level of risk management by systematically setting the priority and proof test cycle of the protective system. It is also expected to contribute to securing the safety of chemical facilities and at the same time, will lead to the development of the ORA system. KCI Citation Count: 4
Author Junheon Yoon
김재영
Min-su Kim
윤준헌
Eun-byeol Lee
김민수
박재학
Jai Hak Park
이은별
Jae-young Kim
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 김민수
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Min-su Kim
– sequence: 3
  fullname: 김재영
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Jae-young Kim
– sequence: 5
  fullname: 이은별
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Eun-byeol Lee
– sequence: 7
  fullname: 윤준헌
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Junheon Yoon
– sequence: 9
  fullname: 박재학
– sequence: 10
  fullname: Jai Hak Park
BackLink https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002304375$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNo9zM9KAlEYBfAhCjLzCdrMpkWLgev9nLnfXYr0xxKEcN1lZvTGMDbGTJt2CQZli1pkjqHhIoNWFbmwV8o775BmtDoc-J2zpi0HjaC2pKUoIBicm7CspbIM0AAksKploshziAnAGABNaUfTz3EST9RNX7Wfk8u-PuvqZTDrSTfW1bCpHl_VYKyrp5HqTVTcTB5Gye319_uFrjpXathSrQ896XXms-6dPn2bqK942r7XF3RdW5F2Papl_jKtVXa2K4U9o1TeLRbyJcPHnGWAJBxRcuBYJWgzbtkWWA5Si1C0bLcKNcpAopQORZc6HKTMMcpMl1DO0Ia0trW4DUIpfNcTDdv7zeOG8EORP6wUBaUmoTlrZjcX1veiM08E1agu9vMHZUqyjCAzGSJyMncb_y4Sp6F3YofnAkxGwOLwA6mWhLE
ContentType Journal Article
DBID HZB
Q5X
JDI
ACYCR
DEWEY 363.11
DatabaseName Korea Information Science Society (KISS)
Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type
KoreaScience
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitleList


DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Social Welfare & Social Work
DocumentTitleAlternate 보호시스템 보증시험 적용이 장외영향평가 안전성 확보에 미치는 영향
Effect of Proof Test of Protective System on Securing Safety of Off-site Risk Assessment
EISSN 2383-9953
EndPage 53
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2250246
JAKO201708757888906
3570369
GroupedDBID .UV
HZB
Q5X
JDI
ACYCR
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-k846-3f0988f9398d08a796a636b8260286acd3e273f8ffb28c2b93ff47275c02978a3
ISSN 1738-3803
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:41:05 EST 2023
Fri Dec 22 12:04:05 EST 2023
Sat Sep 06 10:40:09 EDT 2025
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 6
Keywords likelihood of failure
protective system
proof test
off-site risk assessment
risk analysis
Language Korean
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-k846-3f0988f9398d08a796a636b8260286acd3e273f8ffb28c2b93ff47275c02978a3
Notes Korean Society of Safety
KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201708757888906
OpenAccessLink http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/LinkingDetailView?cn=JAKO201708757888906&dbt=JAKO&org_code=O481&site_code=SS1481&service_code=01
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2250246
kisti_ndsl_JAKO201708757888906
kiss_primary_3570369
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20171231
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-12-31
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2017
  text: 20171231
  day: 31
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle 한국안전학회지
PublicationTitleAlternate 한국안전학회지
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher 한국안전학회
Publisher_xml – name: 한국안전학회
SSID ssib053377332
ssib012146287
ssib001535083
ssib008451743
ssib016108132
Score 1.6417512
Snippet The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the...
SourceID nrf
kisti
kiss
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Publisher
StartPage 46
SubjectTerms likelihood of failure
off-site risk assessment
proof test
protective system
risk analysis
안전공학
Title 보호시스템 보증시험 적용이 장외영향평가 안전성 확보에 미치는 영향
URI https://kiss.kstudy.com/ExternalLink/Ar?key=3570369
http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/LinkingDetailView?cn=JAKO201708757888906&dbt=JAKO&org_code=O481&site_code=SS1481&service_code=01
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002304375
Volume 32
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX 한국안전학회지, 2017, 32(6), 146, pp.46-53
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Nb9MwFLe2nbggYCAGY4oQ5jIVtXPj2Mck7TSGBpchdlqU5gNNnVrUbRcOiElDgnGAA2Md2tAODIkTIHYo_xJL_wd-drI2nSrxcXEd-73nF78k7_fS-JmQW7wUBgAaQG5wl4VygHDHj2u48WDigFuRLDG1GnnhPp97WJ5fMpdGRpdzXy1trNfuBE-Hriv5H6uiDXZVq2T_wbI9oWhAHfZFCQuj_Csb06pDHUadMq1WqBTUEbTqUuFQ6eqKTW3dJUy0TOeoXWpzKis5avBbEDGt-4rAl6oiIUDqSgVsuk9WqW3qisyGw7iKGgK47sJws1SAzaYOBBVTNpMKcSpbK4DSKU1rPqm688opVYpaX3s2G8WRaiC04KRkpsrAwHmUrRtNfV5QwqR2ZZgOKY3UFZsKPWW2RUXvDxzNLdW3IJkm6awKKsUQknRu3J5mfZJs_rJKKg7nKsoDJK42li4ViTaIcPNvZeDps9yPPUdiwZEwUUwf3pFuAzpiBSnT5Min3qf_dveMK8nezKagJOMZSBd-xo33Pq6ct-89UCqlexUIIVVG-lFWUl5g4Vk1B5bZwF4AoqyylveOS2rL95k-eEdoAPjYX4WMOMGymN4BsHeywDUIe9YQ6KnoZwV4rdGKc3ht8QI5nwVahp3eNRfJSL15iUymq9GNR9Fq7Lci47Zx2tBs1cfJ8smP4267k7zeT7Y_dV_sGzhOPh_guLvbNpLDzeTDl-Tg2Eg-HiV7naS92X1_1H3z6te350ay8zI53Eq2vhvdvR3FtvvWOPnaSX62T7bfGSnpZbI4W1105wrZBiSFOmB5gcVFKUQsmRRhUfiW5D5nvIaAHKCc-0HIIoD_WMR4uIlgpiZZHJcRD5iB2hFO-OwKGWs0G9FVYiicHvIZK44RwJRkLEQUmyGXPEQAFfh8goyrifOepClmPKYT48kJMqUn0muEa6veEMNOkJuYYa8erHgqT7z6fdz06i0P0fBdD74aEJxf-5OU6-Rc_xqeJGPrrY3oBrD2em1KXzK_AdYUrR8
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%EB%B3%B4%ED%98%B8%EC%8B%9C%EC%8A%A4%ED%85%9C+%EB%B3%B4%EC%A6%9D%EC%8B%9C%ED%97%98+%EC%A0%81%EC%9A%A9%EC%9D%B4+%EC%9E%A5%EC%99%B8%EC%98%81%ED%96%A5%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80+%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EC%84%B1+%ED%99%95%EB%B3%B4%EC%97%90+%EB%AF%B8%EC%B9%98%EB%8A%94+%EC%98%81%ED%96%A5&rft.jtitle=%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C%EC%A7%80&rft.au=%EA%B9%80%EB%AF%BC%EC%88%98&rft.au=%EA%B9%80%EC%9E%AC%EC%98%81&rft.au=%EC%9D%B4%EC%9D%80%EB%B3%84&rft.au=%EC%9C%A4%EC%A4%80%ED%97%8C&rft.date=2017-12-31&rft.issn=1738-3803&rft.eissn=2383-9953&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=53&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=JAKO201708757888906
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1738-3803&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1738-3803&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1738-3803&client=summon