숲 체험 활동이 유아의 사회성 발달의 효과에 관한 메타분석
This study aims to examine the effects of infant's social development forest experience activities through meta-analysis. The final nine studies(total of 165 in the experimental group and 159 in the control group) were selected as a method of systematic review. Meta-analysis on overall effect s...
Saved in:
Published in | 농촌지도와 개발 Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 225 - 250 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Korean |
Published |
한국농촌지도학회
31.12.2022
Korean Association of Agricultural Extension |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1976-3107 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study aims to examine the effects of infant's social development forest experience activities through meta-analysis. The final nine studies(total of 165 in the experimental group and 159 in the control group) were selected as a method of systematic review. Meta-analysis on overall effect size estimation, chi-square test, significance analysis, publication bias analysis, and subgroup analysis was performed using the R program. The overall effect size of 9 studies was 1.59, indicating a large effect size. As a result of subgroup analysis of the sub-factors of sociality, autonomy showed the largest effect size at 1.47, the adjusted effect size of cooperation was 1.34, the effect size adjusted for peer interaction was 1.29, and the adjusted effect size for perspective-taking ability was 0.97. All were found to have a statistically significant effect. To analyze the moderating effect, a meta-regression analysis was conducted on the participation period(4, 5~6, 7~8weeks), the number of sessions(6~10, 11~15, 16~20), the frequency per week(1, 2, 5), and the participation time(40, 60, 90, 120, 150min), but there was no statistical difference. Although not statistically significant, the effect size was larger when the participation period was 4 weeks, the number of sessions was 16 to 20, the frequency was 2 times per week, and the participation time was 40 minutes. This results can be usefully utilized by policy makers and forest commentators related to the vitalization of forest education through forest experience activities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO202215243232710 |
ISSN: | 1976-3107 |