Effects of Feeder Cell Types on Culture of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell In Vitro

The suitable feeder cell layer is important for culture of embryonic stem (ES) cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of two kinds of the feeder cell, MEF cells and STO cells, layer to mouse ES (mES) cell culture for maintenance of stemness. We compare the colony formations, alkaline phosp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBalsaeng'gwa saengsig Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 119 - 126
Main Authors Park, Yun-Gwi, Lee, Seung-Eun, Kim, Eun-Young, Hyun, Hyuk, Shin, Min-Young, Son, Yeo-Jin, Kim, Su-Young, Park, Se-Pill
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) 한국발생생물학회 01.09.2015
The Korean Society of Developmental Biology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The suitable feeder cell layer is important for culture of embryonic stem (ES) cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of two kinds of the feeder cell, MEF cells and STO cells, layer to mouse ES (mES) cell culture for maintenance of stemness. We compare the colony formations, alkaline phosphatase (AP) activities, expression of pluripotency marker genes and proteins of D3 cell colonies cultured on MEF feeder cell layer (D3/MEF) or STO cell layers (D3/STO) compared to feeder free condition (D3/-) as a control group. Although there were no differences to colony formations and AP activities, interestingly, the transcripts level of pluripotency marker genes, Pou5f1 and Nanog were highly expressed in D3/MEF (79 and 93) than D3/STO (61and 77) or D3/- (65 and 81). Also, pluripotency marker proteins, NANOG and SOX-2, were more synthesized in D3/MEF (72.8±7.69 and 81.2±3.56) than D3/STO (32.0±4.30 and 56.0±4.90) or D3/- (55.0±4.64 and 62.0±6.20). These results suggest that MEF feeder cell layer is more suitable to mES cell culture.
Bibliography:These authors contributed equally to this work.
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.
G704-001746.2015.19.3.006
ISSN:2465-9525
2465-9541
DOI:10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.119