A comparative study of the features of face-to-face and that of online communication: From the viewpoint of co-creation
This paper examines the characteristics of face-to-face communication and online communication from the viewpoint of group co-creation. First, we review the previous studies of face-to-face communication and that of online communication to discuss the merits and demerits of each communication style....
Saved in:
| Published in | Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 163 - 173 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | Japanese |
| Published |
Japanese Cognitive Science Society
01.06.2022
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | This paper examines the characteristics of face-to-face communication and online communication from the viewpoint of group co-creation. First, we review the previous studies of face-to-face communication and that of online communication to discuss the merits and demerits of each communication style. Then we present observational results of our pilot face-to-face co-creation conversation data that shows the collage nature of such interaction: the ideation process often consisted of step-by-step accumulations of fragmentary pieces of information that were incomplete and vague per se, fully utilizing the abundant nonverbal cues and a shared collaboration environment. These findings are expected to contribute to designing matching strategies of communication styles and the characteristics of collaborative tasks. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | This paper examines the characteristics of face-to-face communication and online communication from the viewpoint of group co-creation. First, we review the previous studies of face-to-face communication and that of online communication to discuss the merits and demerits of each communication style. Then we present observational results of our pilot face-to-face co-creation conversation data that shows the collage nature of such interaction: the ideation process often consisted of step-by-step accumulations of fragmentary pieces of information that were incomplete and vague per se, fully utilizing the abundant nonverbal cues and a shared collaboration environment. These findings are expected to contribute to designing matching strategies of communication styles and the characteristics of collaborative tasks. |
| Author | Umata, Ichiro Kato, Tsuneo Ijuin, Koki Yamamoto, Seiichi |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Umata, Ichiro organization: KDDI Research, Inc – sequence: 2 fullname: Ijuin, Koki organization: National Institute of Advansed Science and Technology – sequence: 3 fullname: Kato, Tsuneo organization: National Institute of Advansed Science and Technology – sequence: 4 fullname: Yamamoto, Seiichi organization: Doshisha University |
| BookMark | eNo9kM1uwjAQhK2KSqWUWx8gL2AaO4l_ekOotJWQeuEeLc6mGBEb2QbE2zdJq152djSj7zCPZOK8Q0KeWb5gjPPqxcQFzzlf5EzekSlTitFK62rS_0XJqNS8fCDzGO0uzyXLuSzYlFyXmfHdCQIke8EspnNzy3ybpT1mLUI6B4yDb8EgTZ4OmoFr-gKkIfDuaB0OkO7srOkx3r1m6-C7kXGxeD1568au8dQEHCtP5L6FY8T5n87Idv22XX3Qzdf752q5oQelSyoQecNbIxVo2eidEJUCBg0XZYVty7DdoTaSFygEY6IAUJWQQnKplFGFKGZk9Ys9xATfWJ-C7SDcagjJmiPWBxNjzXXNx9OvV_fr_admD6FGV_wAyKVs1w |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2022 Japanese Cognitive Science Society |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 Japanese Cognitive Science Society |
| DOI | 10.11225/cs.2022.017 |
| DatabaseTitleList | |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Psychology |
| EISSN | 1881-5995 |
| EndPage | 173 |
| ExternalDocumentID | article_jcss_29_2_29_2022_017_article_char_en |
| GroupedDBID | ACGFS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS JSF KQ8 OK1 RJT |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-j894-6ee2d2fc78a97d9b6658a1ad2645eff1efbe9c723e661163aa8567672788c8363 |
| ISSN | 1341-7924 |
| IngestDate | Wed Apr 05 05:24:20 EDT 2023 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | false |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Language | Japanese |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j894-6ee2d2fc78a97d9b6658a1ad2645eff1efbe9c723e661163aa8567672788c8363 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcss/29/2/29_2022.017/_article/-char/en |
| PageCount | 11 |
| ParticipantIDs | jstage_primary_article_jcss_29_2_29_2022_017_article_char_en |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022/06/01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2022 text: 2022/06/01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Cognitive Studies |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | Japanese Cognitive Science Society |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Japanese Cognitive Science Society |
| References | Holler, J., & Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Unaddressed participants' gaze in multi-person interaction: Optimizing recipiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 98. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00098 Whittaker, S., Geelhoed, E., & Robinson, E. (1993). Shared workspaces: How do they work and when are they useful? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39 (5), 813-842. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1085 Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell, & T. Stivers, (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 308-329). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch15 Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 (1), 62-81. Yamamoto, S., Taguchi, K., Ijuin, K., Umata, I., & Nishida, M. (2015). Multimodal corpus of multiparty conversations in L1 and L2 languages and findings obtained from it. Language Resources and Evaluation, 49, 857-882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-015-9299-2 人事院 (2007). 国家公務員のテレワークに資する勤務時間の在り方に関する研究会 第1回議事要旨・資料人事院 Retrieved from https://www.jinji.go.jp/kenkyukai/telework/shiryou01.html (2022年3月21日) Ijuin, K., Umata, I., Kato, T., & Yamamoto, S. (2018). Difference in eye gaze for floor apportionment in native and second-language conversations. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 42 (1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-017-0262-3 Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitivesocial-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1 (1), 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00006.x Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84 (5), 963-976. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.963 Bernier, F. J., Davis, J. M., Rosenthal, R., & Knee, C. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20 (3), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294203008 Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (6), 893-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 Kalma, A. (1992). Gazing in triads: A powerful signal in floor apportionment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309. 1992.tb00953.x Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (4), 685-718. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393872 Argyle, M., Lalljee, M., & Cook, M. (1968). The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad. Human Relations, 21 (1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676802100101 Cappella, J. N. (1981). Mutual inuence in expressive behavior: Adult-adult and infant-adult dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 89 (1), 101-132. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University. Press. https://doi.org/10.2277/0521561582 Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1991). Disembodied conduct: Communication through video in a multi-media office environment. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '91), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108859 Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnik, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.127-149). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006 Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100 (1), 78-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78 Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Science, 2, Article 1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5 Beattie, G. W. (1978). Floor apportionment and gaze in conversational dyads. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17 (1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00889.x Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The contextsensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32 (2), 177-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X Rains, S. A. (2005). Leveling the organizational playing field-virtually: A meta-analysis of experimental research assessing the impact of group support system use on member influence behaviors. Communication Research, 32 (2), 193-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204273763 Guild, P. D. (2020). Mediated person-to-person communication: A social psychological perspective. International Journal of Social Science and Technology, 5 (6), 1-15. Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26 (1), 22-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4 DeRosa, D. M., Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (3), 1549-1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.003 Ishii, R., Otsuka, K., Kumano, S., & Yamato, J. (2016). Prediction of who will be the next speaker and when using gaze behavior in multiparty meetings. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 6 (1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757284 Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12 (1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1201_1 筑波大学働く人への心理支援開発研究センター (2020). 「テレワークによる社内コミュニケーションの変化」 に関する調査結果 (速報) Retrieved from https://www.human.tsukuba.ac.jp/counseling/w/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/surveyresult20201002.pdf (2022年3月21日) Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., & Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI02), 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503401 Sellen, A. J. (1995). Remote conversations: The effects of mediating talk with technology. Human-Computer Interaction, 10 (4), 401-444. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1004_2 東京都新型コロナウイルス感染症対策本部 (2020). 東京都報道発表資料：テレワーク助成金募集期間延長等(第330 報) 東京都 Retrieved from https://www.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/tosei/hodohappyo/press/2020/05/12/10.html (2022年3月21日) Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking (Rev ed.). Scribner. Dubé, L., & Robey, D. (2009). Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. Information Systems Journal, 19 (1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00313.x Whittaker, S. (1995). Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: Theory and design implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42 (5), 501-529. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1022 Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge University Press. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (3), 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497 Strickland, L. H., Guild, P. D., Barefoot, J. C., & Paterson, S. A.(1978). Teleconferencing and leadership emergence. Human Relations, 31 (7), 583-596. Auer, P. (2017). Gaze, addressee selection and turn-taking in three-party interaction. InLiSt: Interaction and Linguistic Structures, 60. http://www.inlist.uni-bayreuth.de/iss ues/60/index.htm Jokinen, K., Furukawa, H., Nishida, M., & Yamamoto, S. (2013). Gaze and turn-taking behavior in casual conversational interactions. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 3 (2), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2499474.2499481 |
| References_xml | |
| SSID | ssib007102731 ssj0055613 ssib002484563 ssib001106414 |
| Score | 2.321946 |
| Snippet | This paper examines the characteristics of face-to-face communication and online communication from the viewpoint of group co-creation. First, we review the... |
| SourceID | jstage |
| SourceType | Publisher |
| StartPage | 163 |
| SubjectTerms | co-creation face-to-face communication group interaction online communication |
| Title | A comparative study of the features of face-to-face and that of online communication: From the viewpoint of co-creation |
| URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcss/29/2/29_2022.017/_article/-char/en |
| Volume | 29 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| ispartofPNX | Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 2022/06/01, Vol.29(2), pp.163-173 |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LbxMxELZCufSCeIq3fOBWOWS9Ly_iElVUpRVIiFQqp5XXa4vdimzVJKrKX-fCjB8b8zi0cHES27GsnW8939gzY0JeZYVSTZJqZhTPWcYlvHOaa5YYDfozK1pjo9I-fCwOT7Kj0_x0MvkReS1t1s1Uff9rXMm_SBXqQK4YJXsDyY6DQgV8B_lCCRKG8loynnsXcpe8exXyQyOXNNpm7LSOGkYqzdYDw0_vMSmtA4BLk4GDbINEcIvgIMSc4LnB-dA5dwE1sEAxY0q7PzogeZ9EHCFk9Q7TOQKdjHdd7kW9_ari_UaD5E-AQltC-1597S6GEbr9xmU7OB7OulFLSHsJ1N5itVnqsesX-U0CAG3LZ911ME68twFm8eiD5fTO9ebmVm5Qx6ysXED2VLs6IRKGGdXi5d5vsHSR1e3W7sSvtI4GJO6GlT81DLf3RSlM9c75dOYiT3_L2e0RUfdqtap5VXNbQP8a-tehFePqAMa3yG1eVjnuHBx_io4wwVjPoiNungkgu9vFFKlhmY7-THjNqY0mCc8hRHnAfF9HswWm1YPdEXwWLY1a3CV3vP1D525y98ikl_fJ7qiGrx6QyzmNUE0tqulgKMCIBlTj7xjVFFBNEdXY4FBNf0H1G4qYtmOMmMa-EaYfksXBu8X-IfPXg7BeVBkrtOYtN6oUsirbqimAS8tEtsDwc21Mok2jK1XyVAMFBdlKKXLMTshLIZRIi_QR2VkOS_2Y0LxRUjRgG1UzneVNIZoZV4kSmA_R5Hn7hLx1z6w-dylg6hsJ-On__f0Z2d2-G8_Jzvpio18AE143Ly1ifgKFHbpU |
| link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,27957,27958 |
| linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparative+study+of+the+features+of+face-to-face+and+that+of+online+communication%3A+From+the+viewpoint+of+co-creation&rft.jtitle=Cognitive+Studies%3A+Bulletin+of+the+Japanese+Cognitive+Science+Society&rft.au=Umata%2C+Ichiro&rft.au=Ijuin%2C+Koki&rft.au=Kato%2C+Tsuneo&rft.au=Yamamoto%2C+Seiichi&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.pub=Japanese+Cognitive+Science+Society&rft.issn=1341-7924&rft.eissn=1881-5995&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=173&rft_id=info:doi/10.11225%2Fcs.2022.017&rft.externalDocID=article_jcss_29_2_29_2022_017_article_char_en |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1341-7924&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1341-7924&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1341-7924&client=summon |