Mental workload in robotic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy

  Doctors’ working hours are restricted due to work style reforms. Thus, it is necessary to consider the improvement of working environments aiming at patient safety and the health and safety of medical staff. There have been no reports on the mental workload experienced by urologists during surgery...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese Journal of Endourology and Robotics Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 137 - 141
Main Authors 古御堂 純, 加藤 諒, 永森 聖人, 菊地 央, 柏木 明, 熊谷 章
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics 2024
一般社団法人 日本泌尿器内視鏡・ロボティクス学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2436-875X
DOI10.11302/jserjje.37.1_137

Cover

Abstract   Doctors’ working hours are restricted due to work style reforms. Thus, it is necessary to consider the improvement of working environments aiming at patient safety and the health and safety of medical staff. There have been no reports on the mental workload experienced by urologists during surgery. We compared patient backgrounds and surgical outcomes for cases of laparoscopic and robot-assisted nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy performed in our department. In addition, we collected the background of the four urologists who performed the operations and investigated their mental workload using the NASA-Task Load Index questionnaire.  Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 14 cases (nephrectomy : 11 cases, nephroureterectomy : 3 cases) and robot-assisted surgery in 18 cases (nephrectomy : 5 cases, nephroureterectomy : 13 cases). Robot-assisted surgery was performed more frequently among patients who received nephroureterectomy (p=0.0035). The operation time was 189 minutes for laparoscopic surgery and 202 minutes for robot-assisted surgery (p=0.4866), and the amount of blood loss was 55 cc and 45 cc (p=0.6632), respectively. There was one case of open conversion in laparoscopic surgery because of adhesion due to pyonephrosis, and there was one case of small bowel injury in robot-assisted surgery. We found that the operator’s mental workload was significantly lower in the robotic surgery group than the laparoscopic surgery group (p=0.0254). Our findings suggest that robot-assisted surgery was as safe as laparoscopic surgery. As robot-assisted surgery is a surgical procedure with less mental workload on doctors, and its use should be expanded in the future.
AbstractList   Doctors’ working hours are restricted due to work style reforms. Thus, it is necessary to consider the improvement of working environments aiming at patient safety and the health and safety of medical staff. There have been no reports on the mental workload experienced by urologists during surgery. We compared patient backgrounds and surgical outcomes for cases of laparoscopic and robot-assisted nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy performed in our department. In addition, we collected the background of the four urologists who performed the operations and investigated their mental workload using the NASA-Task Load Index questionnaire.  Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 14 cases (nephrectomy : 11 cases, nephroureterectomy : 3 cases) and robot-assisted surgery in 18 cases (nephrectomy : 5 cases, nephroureterectomy : 13 cases). Robot-assisted surgery was performed more frequently among patients who received nephroureterectomy (p=0.0035). The operation time was 189 minutes for laparoscopic surgery and 202 minutes for robot-assisted surgery (p=0.4866), and the amount of blood loss was 55 cc and 45 cc (p=0.6632), respectively. There was one case of open conversion in laparoscopic surgery because of adhesion due to pyonephrosis, and there was one case of small bowel injury in robot-assisted surgery. We found that the operator’s mental workload was significantly lower in the robotic surgery group than the laparoscopic surgery group (p=0.0254). Our findings suggest that robot-assisted surgery was as safe as laparoscopic surgery. As robot-assisted surgery is a surgical procedure with less mental workload on doctors, and its use should be expanded in the future.
  Doctors’ working hours are restricted due to work style reforms. Thus, it is necessary to consider the improvement of working environments aiming at patient safety and the health and safety of medical staff. There have been no reports on the mental workload experienced by urologists during surgery. We compared patient backgrounds and surgical outcomes for cases of laparoscopic and robot-assisted nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy performed in our department. In addition, we collected the background of the four urologists who performed the operations and investigated their mental workload using the NASA-Task Load Index questionnaire.  Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 14 cases (nephrectomy : 11 cases, nephroureterectomy : 3 cases) and robot-assisted surgery in 18 cases (nephrectomy : 5 cases, nephroureterectomy : 13 cases). Robot-assisted surgery was performed more frequently among patients who received nephroureterectomy (p=0.0035). The operation time was 189 minutes for laparoscopic surgery and 202 minutes for robot-assisted surgery (p=0.4866), and the amount of blood loss was 55 cc and 45 cc (p=0.6632), respectively. There was one case of open conversion in laparoscopic surgery because of adhesion due to pyonephrosis, and there was one case of small bowel injury in robot-assisted surgery. We found that the operator’s mental workload was significantly lower in the robotic surgery group than the laparoscopic surgery group (p=0.0254). Our findings suggest that robot-assisted surgery was as safe as laparoscopic surgery. As robot-assisted surgery is a surgical procedure with less mental workload on doctors, and its use should be expanded in the future.  当科で施行された腹腔鏡ならびにロボット支援腎悪性腫瘍手術症例を対象に, 患者背景および手術成績を比較検討した. 対象泌尿器科医師4名の背景因子を収集し, NASA-Task Load Indexを用いてメンタルワークロードを調査した. 腹腔鏡手術は14例, ロボット支援手術は18例行われた. 手術時間は189分, 202分, 出血量は55 cc, 45 ccと差は認めなかった. 腹腔鏡手術で開腹移行 (膿腎症による癒着) が1例, ロボット支援手術で小腸損傷が1例, 術後皮下出血が1例認められた. 腹腔鏡手術に比べてロボット支援手術の術者のメンタルワークロードが低かった (p=0.0254). ロボット支援手術は腹腔鏡手術と同様に安全に施行できるが, 医師への精神身体的な負担も少ない術式であり今後拡大していくだろう.
Author 加藤 諒
菊地 央
柏木 明
永森 聖人
古御堂 純
熊谷 章
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 古御堂 純
  organization: 手稲渓仁会病院 泌尿器科
– sequence: 2
  fullname: 加藤 諒
  organization: 手稲渓仁会病院 泌尿器科
– sequence: 3
  fullname: 永森 聖人
  organization: 手稲渓仁会病院 泌尿器科
– sequence: 4
  fullname: 菊地 央
  organization: 手稲渓仁会病院 泌尿器科
– sequence: 5
  fullname: 柏木 明
  organization: 手稲渓仁会病院 泌尿器科
– sequence: 6
  fullname: 熊谷 章
  organization: 手稲渓仁会病院 泌尿器科
BackLink https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390863629154704384$$DView record in CiNii
BookMark eNo1UMtOwzAQtBBIlNIP4JYD1xTbG8f2gUNV8ZKKuPTAzfJjQxNSu3KCUP-eQsthZzU7o5Vmrsh5TBEJuWF0zhhQftcNmLsO5yDnzDCQZ2TCK6hLJcX7JZkNQ0cpBc4pV_WE3L9iHG1ffKf82ScbijYWObk0tr6IuNtk9GPa7gsbw5Gnr4wjns7X5KKx_YCz056S9ePDevlcrt6eXpaLVdkpWZVYCw3eC9BWNo2TjQtc61BrpYN0UlgZvPKNcxxACC2ptTQ4zqgHbBy3MCW3x7exbY1vf5GBpqqGmmsmKkkrUNXBtjjaumG0H2h2ud3avDc2H9L0aE7NGJCG_cFh_jW_sdlghB8w_2Q0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics
DBID RYH
DOI 10.11302/jserjje.37.1_137
DatabaseName CiNii Complete
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate ロボット支援腎摘除術・腎尿管全摘除術の初期経験 : メンタルワークロードの解析
DocumentTitle_FL ロボット支援腎摘除術・腎尿管全摘除術の初期経験 : メンタルワークロードの解析
EISSN 2436-875X
EndPage 141
ExternalDocumentID article_jserjje_37_1_37_137_article_char_en
GroupedDBID JMI
JSF
JSH
M~E
RJT
RZJ
RYH
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-j874-e6593cc539a7ffb7fbd299d6989d7b75a7dc8cfbb23355970aa0db210c3efb2a3
IngestDate Thu Jun 26 21:06:42 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:30:37 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 1
Language Japanese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j874-e6593cc539a7ffb7fbd299d6989d7b75a7dc8cfbb23355970aa0db210c3efb2a3
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jserjje/37/1/37_137/_article/-char/en
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs nii_cinii_1390863629154704384
jstage_primary_article_jserjje_37_1_37_137_article_char_en
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2024
  text: 2024
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Japanese Journal of Endourology and Robotics
PublicationTitleAlternate JJER
PublicationTitle_FL Japanese Journal of Endourology and Robotics
JJER
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics
一般社団法人 日本泌尿器内視鏡・ロボティクス学会
Publisher_xml – name: Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics
– name: 一般社団法人 日本泌尿器内視鏡・ロボティクス学会
References 4) Huang YP, Huang EY, Chung HJ, et al. (2023) Is robotic superior to laparoscopic approach for radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision in treating upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma? J Endourol 37 (2) : 139-146
7) Li J, Peng L, Cao D, et al. (2020) Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic radical nephrectomy : A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 10 : 551052
5) Miyake H, Motoyama D, Kawakami A, et al. (2022) Initial experience of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy in Japan : Single institutional study of 12 cases. Asian J Endosc Surg 15 (1) : 162-167
3) O’Sullivan NJ, Naughton A, Temperley HC, et al. (2023) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy ; a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJUI Compass 4 (3) : 246-255
9) Law KE, Lowndes BR, Kelley SR, et al. (2020) NASA-Task load index differentiates surgical approach : Opportunities for improvement in colon and rectal surgery. Ann Surg 271 (5) : 906-912
2) 矢嶋習吾, 中西泰一, 安嶋陸人, 他 (2023) 当院におけるロボット支援下根治的腎摘除術およびロボット支援下腎尿管全摘除術の初期経験と手術における工夫についての報告. Jpn J Endourol Robot 36 : 135-139
6) Ji R, He Z, Fang S, et al. (2022) Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma : a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative studies. Front Oncol 12 : 964256
8) Grivas N, Zachos I, Georgiadis G, et al. (2022) Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery : a systematic search and review. World J Urol 40 (4) : 929-949
1) Hart SG, Staveland LE (1998) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) : Results of empirical and theoretical research. In : Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Advances in Psychology 52 : 139-183
References_xml – reference: 6) Ji R, He Z, Fang S, et al. (2022) Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma : a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative studies. Front Oncol 12 : 964256
– reference: 2) 矢嶋習吾, 中西泰一, 安嶋陸人, 他 (2023) 当院におけるロボット支援下根治的腎摘除術およびロボット支援下腎尿管全摘除術の初期経験と手術における工夫についての報告. Jpn J Endourol Robot 36 : 135-139
– reference: 5) Miyake H, Motoyama D, Kawakami A, et al. (2022) Initial experience of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy in Japan : Single institutional study of 12 cases. Asian J Endosc Surg 15 (1) : 162-167
– reference: 9) Law KE, Lowndes BR, Kelley SR, et al. (2020) NASA-Task load index differentiates surgical approach : Opportunities for improvement in colon and rectal surgery. Ann Surg 271 (5) : 906-912
– reference: 1) Hart SG, Staveland LE (1998) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) : Results of empirical and theoretical research. In : Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Advances in Psychology 52 : 139-183
– reference: 8) Grivas N, Zachos I, Georgiadis G, et al. (2022) Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery : a systematic search and review. World J Urol 40 (4) : 929-949
– reference: 4) Huang YP, Huang EY, Chung HJ, et al. (2023) Is robotic superior to laparoscopic approach for radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision in treating upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma? J Endourol 37 (2) : 139-146
– reference: 3) O’Sullivan NJ, Naughton A, Temperley HC, et al. (2023) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy ; a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJUI Compass 4 (3) : 246-255
– reference: 7) Li J, Peng L, Cao D, et al. (2020) Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic radical nephrectomy : A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 10 : 551052
SSID ssj0003220286
Score 1.9379399
Snippet   Doctors’ working hours are restricted due to work style reforms. Thus, it is necessary to consider the improvement of working environments aiming at patient...
SourceID nii
jstage
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 137
SubjectTerms メンタルワークロード
ロボット支援手術
腎尿管全摘除術
腎摘除術
Title Mental workload in robotic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jserjje/37/1/37_137/_article/-char/en
https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390863629154704384
Volume 37
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Japanese Journal of Endourology and Robotics, 2024, Vol.37(1), pp.137-141
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZ2lwsXBALEAotywKcqJYmT2OaWZFOtkJYDKlJvUZyH1AjaFepeOPDb-cbOtimLxONQa2JnxmPPxJ5x7TFjb2WnFbwKfGnwJ_w4bHu_TpvIN32H2QMzkuxpHfL6Y3r1Of6wSlYnp8Vk19Ltzsyb7789V_I_UkUe5EqnZP9BsnuiyAAM-SKFhJH-lYxdAB573cuXbd3asylbs6UYrJuOpNTstl9dgCX7DJq0-8VlH5mlmDLpKsrZxD4tNy0eDiGaPjnKexuclwlXC57FBOQlz0ICsoCraMZLyfOY6_jo5YxKS8W1BNaMoCznOjq8k_I84LkiIBM8K-07KuQ65WXM84wfVhVsyYJogrIugDiz1cdAm65kRIc1TEtD0dYOwkXlBbEJDDBPRHKqlHgQXCf7CmeURRwnFigsmn1JFbbl4Hhh8TXPlG1nylViW5dazrXtJvQOUATP8xHILkcANB0ARAIiy4cDFiOQa9u6S6JJnBVcj3Fb7SAexRTwWSar6YzjwtwcfVlu-gjHEmeJhC4k2P1JTtiouQM0eRi6uZDzsALmKXsQSRnSvtbrH4eFRozYsCHT8R99wn33KyasrwG-CAWZON2s1xMDa_mYPRo1z8ucmj9hJ0P9lI0q7t2puLfeeKOKexMV96Cg3n0Vf8aWi3JZXPnjjR_-oGTsd2miRdMkQtey743sTQtrqaU7TltpZFLLtlFNb0wkBHnCQV0HrcEg04iuN1EtnrOzzXbTvWBeipmojlRYd3USh10PN6c3TQt3JmlMZIJz9t41ubpxUV2q8Suuxs6phKxCm-B3V0YnITHwnLMLdFPVrCmFCxWoFHaghjci6Y_1-OUfyl-xh6T_biXvNTvbfbvtLmDb7swbK7ufYgd-fA
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mental+workload+in+robotic+nephrectomy+and+nephroureterectomy&rft.jtitle=Japanese+Journal+of+Endourology+and+Robotics&rft.au=%E5%8F%A4%E5%BE%A1%E5%A0%82+%E7%B4%94&rft.au=%E5%8A%A0%E8%97%A4+%E8%AB%92&rft.au=%E6%B0%B8%E6%A3%AE+%E8%81%96%E4%BA%BA&rft.au=%E8%8F%8A%E5%9C%B0+%E5%A4%AE&rft.date=2024&rft.pub=%E4%B8%80%E8%88%AC%E7%A4%BE%E5%9B%A3%E6%B3%95%E4%BA%BA+%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E6%B3%8C%E5%B0%BF%E5%99%A8%E5%86%85%E8%A6%96%E9%8F%A1%E3%83%BB%E3%83%AD%E3%83%9C%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A&rft.eissn=2436-875X&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=141&rft_id=info:doi/10.11302%2Fjserjje.37.1_137