Comparison of Wound Pain After Appendectomy Via an Alternate Incision Versus Appendectomy Via a Pararectal Incision

Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision (PI). Subjects: The subjects of this study were patients who had undergone appendectomy via an AI or PI at our hospital. Patients who were un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine) Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 529 - 533
Main Authors Nishio, Kenji, Ito, Hiroaki, Shimada, Jin, Yoshida, Yutoku, Otsubo, Takehito, Negishi, Hiroyuki, Koizumi, Satoshi, Noda, Akiyoshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine 31.03.2013
日本腹部救急医学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1340-2242
1882-4781
DOI10.11231/jaem.33.529

Cover

Abstract Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision (PI). Subjects: The subjects of this study were patients who had undergone appendectomy via an AI or PI at our hospital. Patients who were under 25 y of age, had abscesses, and/or had difficulty in communicating were excluded from the study. Out of the 45 subjects of this study, 24 had undergone appendectomy via an AI (AI group) and 21 had undergone the surgery via a PI (PI group). Method: A questionnaire survey was carried out to evaluate the following parameters: (1) wound length, (2) wound length index (wound length ÷ body surface area), (3) total pain score calculated using the modified Prince-Henry score (mPHS), (4) days required to reach Grade B in mPHS, (5) and duration of painkiller use. Results: The wound length in the PI group was higher than that in the AI group (AI, 4.10 cm; PI, 6.64 cm; p < 0.001). The severity of the wound pain was greater in the PI group than that in the AI group (total pain score: AI, 4.29; PI, 7.81; p = 0.013; day to Grade B: AI, 2.33 days; PI, 3.62 days; p = 0.022). The duration of painkiller use was longer in the PI group than that in the AI group (AI, 1.21 days; PI, 2.88 days; p = 0.042). However, when the analysis was limited to only patients with a drain, no significant difference in the total pain score, days to development of Grade B, or duration of painkiller use was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: In order to reduce postoperative wound pain after appendectomy, surgeons should choose AI over PI as far as possible. Furthermore, drainage is no longer needed and should never be implemented?.
AbstractList Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision (PI). Subjects: The subjects of this study were patients who had undergone appendectomy via an AI or PI at our hospital. Patients who were under 25 y of age, had abscesses, and/or had difficulty in communicating were excluded from the study. Out of the 45 subjects of this study, 24 had undergone appendectomy via an AI (AI group) and 21 had undergone the surgery via a PI (PI group). Method: A questionnaire survey was carried out to evaluate the following parameters: (1) wound length, (2) wound length index (wound length ÷ body surface area), (3) total pain score calculated using the modified Prince-Henry score (mPHS), (4) days required to reach Grade B in mPHS, (5) and duration of painkiller use. Results: The wound length in the PI group was higher than that in the AI group (AI, 4.10 cm; PI, 6.64 cm; p < 0.001). The severity of the wound pain was greater in the PI group than that in the AI group (total pain score: AI, 4.29; PI, 7.81; p = 0.013; day to Grade B: AI, 2.33 days; PI, 3.62 days; p = 0.022). The duration of painkiller use was longer in the PI group than that in the AI group (AI, 1.21 days; PI, 2.88 days; p = 0.042). However, when the analysis was limited to only patients with a drain, no significant difference in the total pain score, days to development of Grade B, or duration of painkiller use was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: In order to reduce postoperative wound pain after appendectomy, surgeons should choose AI over PI as far as possible. Furthermore, drainage is no longer needed and should never be implemented?. 急性虫垂炎に対する虫垂切除術における,切開法の明確な選定基準は存在しない。今回交叉切開法と傍腹直筋切開法の2群間における術後創痛の比較を行い有用性の検討を行った。対象は25歳以上,意志疎通可能で,膿瘍形成性虫垂炎を除く急性虫垂炎の診断で開腹手術を施行した45症例(交叉切開24例,傍腹直筋切開21例)。(1)創長,(2)体表面積での換算創長,(3)modified Prince―Henry score(以下,PHS変法)を用いた累積疼痛点数,(4)PHS変法Grade B到達日数,(5)鎮痛剤必要期間(日数)を評価項目としアンケート法で調査した。結果は,交叉切開が『創が短く』((1)p<0.001,(2)p<0.001),『創痛は軽度』((3)p=0.016,(4)p=0.022)で,『鎮痛剤も少なかった』((5)p=0.042)。術後疼痛軽減のためには,極力交叉切開法を選択すべきである。
Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision (PI). Subjects: The subjects of this study were patients who had undergone appendectomy via an AI or PI at our hospital. Patients who were under 25 y of age, had abscesses, and/or had difficulty in communicating were excluded from the study. Out of the 45 subjects of this study, 24 had undergone appendectomy via an AI (AI group) and 21 had undergone the surgery via a PI (PI group). Method: A questionnaire survey was carried out to evaluate the following parameters: (1) wound length, (2) wound length index (wound length ÷ body surface area), (3) total pain score calculated using the modified Prince-Henry score (mPHS), (4) days required to reach Grade B in mPHS, (5) and duration of painkiller use. Results: The wound length in the PI group was higher than that in the AI group (AI, 4.10 cm; PI, 6.64 cm; p < 0.001). The severity of the wound pain was greater in the PI group than that in the AI group (total pain score: AI, 4.29; PI, 7.81; p = 0.013; day to Grade B: AI, 2.33 days; PI, 3.62 days; p = 0.022). The duration of painkiller use was longer in the PI group than that in the AI group (AI, 1.21 days; PI, 2.88 days; p = 0.042). However, when the analysis was limited to only patients with a drain, no significant difference in the total pain score, days to development of Grade B, or duration of painkiller use was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: In order to reduce postoperative wound pain after appendectomy, surgeons should choose AI over PI as far as possible. Furthermore, drainage is no longer needed and should never be implemented?.
Author Shimada, Jin
Nishio, Kenji
Yoshida, Yutoku
Negishi, Hiroyuki
Ito, Hiroaki
Koizumi, Satoshi
Otsubo, Takehito
Noda, Akiyoshi
Author_FL 西尾 乾司
吉田 有徳
大坪 毅人
嶋田 仁
伊藤 弘昭
小泉 哲
野田 顕義
根岸 宏行
Author_FL_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 嶋田 仁
– sequence: 2
  fullname: 小泉 哲
– sequence: 3
  fullname: 野田 顕義
– sequence: 4
  fullname: 根岸 宏行
– sequence: 5
  fullname: 西尾 乾司
– sequence: 6
  fullname: 吉田 有徳
– sequence: 7
  fullname: 伊藤 弘昭
– sequence: 8
  fullname: 大坪 毅人
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Nishio, Kenji
  organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Ito, Hiroaki
  organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Shimada, Jin
  organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Yoshida, Yutoku
  organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Otsubo, Takehito
  organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Negishi, Hiroyuki
  organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Koizumi, Satoshi
  organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Noda, Akiyoshi
  organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital
BackLink https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390282679712728960$$DView record in CiNii
BookMark eNptUD1rwzAQFaWFpmm2_gANXZ1KOimWl0II_QgE2iGkoznLcqtgy0Zyhvz7KqRk6vLuuPfB8e7Ite-9JeSBsznnAvjTHm03B5grUVyRCddaZDLX_DrtIFkmhBS3ZBajqxjjSjEu9YTEVd8NGFzsPe0b-tUffE0_0Xm6bEYb6HIYrK-tGfvuSHcOKSamTYzH0dK1Ny66ZN3ZEA_xH3XKChjSBduL-p7cNNhGO_ubU7J9fdmu3rPNx9t6tdxke53-rZCrAupK1rXJFRqNhqscmdBGSK6xsbjIGwGVrJiVgKAqW4GqG5V2Y2qYksdzrHeuNO6EHIrkF4u8yLnIhS4WLMmez7J9HPHblkNwHYZjiWF0prXlqdYSoIQTpG4vhPnBUFoPv-0-dZE
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine
DBID RYH
DOI 10.11231/jaem.33.529
DatabaseName CiNii Complete
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate 切開法の違いによる虫垂炎術後疼痛に関する検討
DocumentTitle_FL 切開法の違いによる虫垂炎術後疼痛に関する検討
EISSN 1882-4781
EndPage 533
ExternalDocumentID 10031170931
article_jaem_33_3_33_529_article_char_en
GroupedDBID ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
JSP
KQ8
RJT
2WC
RYH
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-j840-ba1593db4ddc75ac8ac157a028c2418afea67f23b4b0e43a35beb35df53a3ccd3
ISSN 1340-2242
IngestDate Thu Jun 26 22:56:25 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:30:10 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language Japanese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j840-ba1593db4ddc75ac8ac157a028c2418afea67f23b4b0e43a35beb35df53a3ccd3
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jaem/33/3/33_529/_article/-char/en
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs nii_cinii_1390282679712728960
jstage_primary_article_jaem_33_3_33_529_article_char_en
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013/03/31
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-03-31
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2013
  text: 2013/03/31
  day: 31
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine)
PublicationTitleAlternate J Abdom Emerg Med
PublicationTitle_FL J Abdom Emerg Med
日本腹部救急医学会雑誌
日腹部救急医会誌
Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine
Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine
日本腹部救急医学会
Publisher_xml – name: Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine
– name: 日本腹部救急医学会
References 2) 大内清太: 虫垂炎. 木本誠二編, 現代外科学大系 小腸・結腸・虫垂, 36B. 東京, 中山書店, 1970: 231-284.
3) 山村武平, 渡邊昌彦: 虫垂炎. 松野正紀編, 標準外科学 第11版. 東京, 医学書院, 2007: 630-635.
4) 岡田真樹: 腸間膜, 虫垂. 武藤徹一郎, 幕内雅敏編, 新臨床外科学 第4版. 東京, 医学書院, 2006: 591-592.
6) Neil R Borley: Vermiform appendix. Ed. By Jeremiah C Healy. Gray's Anatomy, 39th edision. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005: 1189-1190.
9) Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D: LaparoscoPIc versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 545-553.
1) 田中公貴, 田本英司, 中久保善敬, ほか: 急性虫垂炎に対する腹腔鏡下虫垂切除術と開腹手術の比較検討. 日外科連会誌 2007; 32: 839-841.
5) 佐藤達夫: 虫垂の位置. 佐藤達夫編, 臨床のための解剖学. 東京, メディカル・サイエンス・インターナショナル, 2008: 265-268.
7) Bonica JJ: The management of pain. Lea&Febiger. Philadelphia 1954.
8) 岩村吉晃: 体性感覚. 本郷利憲編, 標準生理学, 第6版. 東京, 医学書院, 2005: 225-236.
References_xml – reference: 6) Neil R Borley: Vermiform appendix. Ed. By Jeremiah C Healy. Gray's Anatomy, 39th edision. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005: 1189-1190.
– reference: 7) Bonica JJ: The management of pain. Lea&Febiger. Philadelphia 1954.
– reference: 4) 岡田真樹: 腸間膜, 虫垂. 武藤徹一郎, 幕内雅敏編, 新臨床外科学 第4版. 東京, 医学書院, 2006: 591-592.
– reference: 8) 岩村吉晃: 体性感覚. 本郷利憲編, 標準生理学, 第6版. 東京, 医学書院, 2005: 225-236.
– reference: 5) 佐藤達夫: 虫垂の位置. 佐藤達夫編, 臨床のための解剖学. 東京, メディカル・サイエンス・インターナショナル, 2008: 265-268.
– reference: 9) Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D: LaparoscoPIc versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 545-553.
– reference: 1) 田中公貴, 田本英司, 中久保善敬, ほか: 急性虫垂炎に対する腹腔鏡下虫垂切除術と開腹手術の比較検討. 日外科連会誌 2007; 32: 839-841.
– reference: 3) 山村武平, 渡邊昌彦: 虫垂炎. 松野正紀編, 標準外科学 第11版. 東京, 医学書院, 2007: 630-635.
– reference: 2) 大内清太: 虫垂炎. 木本誠二編, 現代外科学大系 小腸・結腸・虫垂, 36B. 東京, 中山書店, 1970: 231-284.
SSID ssib001550148
ssib039893137
ssib058493785
ssib002484627
ssj0061899
Score 1.9111948
Snippet Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision...
SourceID nii
jstage
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 529
SubjectTerms 交叉切開
傍腹直筋切開
虫垂炎
術後疼痛
Title Comparison of Wound Pain After Appendectomy Via an Alternate Incision Versus Appendectomy Via a Pararectal Incision
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jaem/33/3/33_529/_article/-char/en
https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390282679712728960
Volume 33
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine), 2013/03/31, Vol.33(3), pp.529-533
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbWIRAviKsYMOQH3qKWJs6tj9O0qTCtElKBwUtkxw5NQxu0NQ_l1_M5zsUVFRp7sSLn2HJ8vtifj318CHknQplKzBRDX8Zq6EcsHHKhDflMunLMBCiI3tG9nIXTz_7Hq-DqYHDfOrVUbcQo_b3Xr-QuWkUe9Kq9ZP9Ds12lyMAz9IsUGkZ6Kx2f2kEEna86QhIoobZg1JG_wTC1gTvdlKut86X2vnJOfhoLoD4yaaLrONpkVt3skUZdWEojp76Pw0jbZHaWL1D8vCoqUTkX26rYVs6HH7woeO58Bylf5Jq_2pRXyNIEETvrvD4vm819yyQx03axsvEaWuYdeuuIT840vy5BezvT0CJfcWlO_ObrfhBDFSb3W7Upi8q2buhIE6ydFuqZB4xBR-LcOcP6r8ZaQzkDAkFQzFivTJ5eT2jnWnv8NxdxNDhn1mAeNB9ueEFg5P6ecsCQ61gHajVibNQV2rnEu4FIoqUSxhKmE4gm7QvtYwdID8g9L4rq8wYXn3a2M8f2utXzQRu9jjeyCVin2_NMkEqwzn4dGLpxHUi165LWAwRNf281HCxsiTWJvmxisM5zi2jNH5NHDVzoiWnyE3Kw5E_Jg7bnn5GbHvW0zGiNeqpRT2vUUxvHFDimHG9a1NMWx9Sgfo807VHfST8n8_Oz-el02IQOGS5jfKPgYOlMCl_KNAp4GvPUDSIOLp2CscY8UzyMMo8JX4yVzzgLhBIskFmA5zSV7AU5XJdr9ZJQ9K1U3ItcCSKXYQaUTI0VCscqE-GEH5HI9Fnyy1wPk9xW10fkGJ2coO-QYiGmrR9hNIlcL_LiSTh-deeaX5OH_b_0hhxurit1DO68EW9rXP0Bw7fH8w
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Wound+Pain+After+Appendectomy+Via+an+Alternate+Incision+Versus+Appendectomy+Via+a+Pararectal+Incision&rft.jtitle=Nihon+Fukubu+Kyukyu+Igakkai+Zasshi+%28Journal+of+Abdominal+Emergency+Medicine%29&rft.au=Nishio%2C+Kenji&rft.au=Ito%2C+Hiroaki&rft.au=Shimada%2C+Jin&rft.au=Yoshida%2C+Yutoku&rft.date=2013-03-31&rft.pub=Japanese+Society+for+Abdominal+Emergency+Medicine&rft.issn=1340-2242&rft.eissn=1882-4781&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=533&rft_id=info:doi/10.11231%2Fjaem.33.529&rft.externalDocID=article_jaem_33_3_33_529_article_char_en
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1340-2242&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1340-2242&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1340-2242&client=summon