Comparison of Wound Pain After Appendectomy Via an Alternate Incision Versus Appendectomy Via a Pararectal Incision
Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision (PI). Subjects: The subjects of this study were patients who had undergone appendectomy via an AI or PI at our hospital. Patients who were un...
Saved in:
Published in | Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine) Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 529 - 533 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Japanese |
Published |
Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine
31.03.2013
日本腹部救急医学会 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1340-2242 1882-4781 |
DOI | 10.11231/jaem.33.529 |
Cover
Abstract | Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision (PI). Subjects: The subjects of this study were patients who had undergone appendectomy via an AI or PI at our hospital. Patients who were under 25 y of age, had abscesses, and/or had difficulty in communicating were excluded from the study. Out of the 45 subjects of this study, 24 had undergone appendectomy via an AI (AI group) and 21 had undergone the surgery via a PI (PI group). Method: A questionnaire survey was carried out to evaluate the following parameters: (1) wound length, (2) wound length index (wound length ÷ body surface area), (3) total pain score calculated using the modified Prince-Henry score (mPHS), (4) days required to reach Grade B in mPHS, (5) and duration of painkiller use. Results: The wound length in the PI group was higher than that in the AI group (AI, 4.10 cm; PI, 6.64 cm; p < 0.001). The severity of the wound pain was greater in the PI group than that in the AI group (total pain score: AI, 4.29; PI, 7.81; p = 0.013; day to Grade B: AI, 2.33 days; PI, 3.62 days; p = 0.022). The duration of painkiller use was longer in the PI group than that in the AI group (AI, 1.21 days; PI, 2.88 days; p = 0.042). However, when the analysis was limited to only patients with a drain, no significant difference in the total pain score, days to development of Grade B, or duration of painkiller use was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: In order to reduce postoperative wound pain after appendectomy, surgeons should choose AI over PI as far as possible. Furthermore, drainage is no longer needed and should never be implemented?. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision (PI). Subjects: The subjects of this study were patients who had undergone appendectomy via an AI or PI at our hospital. Patients who were under 25 y of age, had abscesses, and/or had difficulty in communicating were excluded from the study. Out of the 45 subjects of this study, 24 had undergone appendectomy via an AI (AI group) and 21 had undergone the surgery via a PI (PI group). Method: A questionnaire survey was carried out to evaluate the following parameters: (1) wound length, (2) wound length index (wound length ÷ body surface area), (3) total pain score calculated using the modified Prince-Henry score (mPHS), (4) days required to reach Grade B in mPHS, (5) and duration of painkiller use. Results: The wound length in the PI group was higher than that in the AI group (AI, 4.10 cm; PI, 6.64 cm; p < 0.001). The severity of the wound pain was greater in the PI group than that in the AI group (total pain score: AI, 4.29; PI, 7.81; p = 0.013; day to Grade B: AI, 2.33 days; PI, 3.62 days; p = 0.022). The duration of painkiller use was longer in the PI group than that in the AI group (AI, 1.21 days; PI, 2.88 days; p = 0.042). However, when the analysis was limited to only patients with a drain, no significant difference in the total pain score, days to development of Grade B, or duration of painkiller use was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: In order to reduce postoperative wound pain after appendectomy, surgeons should choose AI over PI as far as possible. Furthermore, drainage is no longer needed and should never be implemented?.
急性虫垂炎に対する虫垂切除術における,切開法の明確な選定基準は存在しない。今回交叉切開法と傍腹直筋切開法の2群間における術後創痛の比較を行い有用性の検討を行った。対象は25歳以上,意志疎通可能で,膿瘍形成性虫垂炎を除く急性虫垂炎の診断で開腹手術を施行した45症例(交叉切開24例,傍腹直筋切開21例)。(1)創長,(2)体表面積での換算創長,(3)modified Prince―Henry score(以下,PHS変法)を用いた累積疼痛点数,(4)PHS変法Grade B到達日数,(5)鎮痛剤必要期間(日数)を評価項目としアンケート法で調査した。結果は,交叉切開が『創が短く』((1)p<0.001,(2)p<0.001),『創痛は軽度』((3)p=0.016,(4)p=0.022)で,『鎮痛剤も少なかった』((5)p=0.042)。術後疼痛軽減のためには,極力交叉切開法を選択すべきである。 Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision (PI). Subjects: The subjects of this study were patients who had undergone appendectomy via an AI or PI at our hospital. Patients who were under 25 y of age, had abscesses, and/or had difficulty in communicating were excluded from the study. Out of the 45 subjects of this study, 24 had undergone appendectomy via an AI (AI group) and 21 had undergone the surgery via a PI (PI group). Method: A questionnaire survey was carried out to evaluate the following parameters: (1) wound length, (2) wound length index (wound length ÷ body surface area), (3) total pain score calculated using the modified Prince-Henry score (mPHS), (4) days required to reach Grade B in mPHS, (5) and duration of painkiller use. Results: The wound length in the PI group was higher than that in the AI group (AI, 4.10 cm; PI, 6.64 cm; p < 0.001). The severity of the wound pain was greater in the PI group than that in the AI group (total pain score: AI, 4.29; PI, 7.81; p = 0.013; day to Grade B: AI, 2.33 days; PI, 3.62 days; p = 0.022). The duration of painkiller use was longer in the PI group than that in the AI group (AI, 1.21 days; PI, 2.88 days; p = 0.042). However, when the analysis was limited to only patients with a drain, no significant difference in the total pain score, days to development of Grade B, or duration of painkiller use was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: In order to reduce postoperative wound pain after appendectomy, surgeons should choose AI over PI as far as possible. Furthermore, drainage is no longer needed and should never be implemented?. |
Author | Shimada, Jin Nishio, Kenji Yoshida, Yutoku Negishi, Hiroyuki Ito, Hiroaki Koizumi, Satoshi Otsubo, Takehito Noda, Akiyoshi |
Author_FL | 西尾 乾司 吉田 有徳 大坪 毅人 嶋田 仁 伊藤 弘昭 小泉 哲 野田 顕義 根岸 宏行 |
Author_FL_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 嶋田 仁 – sequence: 2 fullname: 小泉 哲 – sequence: 3 fullname: 野田 顕義 – sequence: 4 fullname: 根岸 宏行 – sequence: 5 fullname: 西尾 乾司 – sequence: 6 fullname: 吉田 有徳 – sequence: 7 fullname: 伊藤 弘昭 – sequence: 8 fullname: 大坪 毅人 |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Nishio, Kenji organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Ito, Hiroaki organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Shimada, Jin organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Yoshida, Yutoku organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Otsubo, Takehito organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Negishi, Hiroyuki organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Koizumi, Satoshi organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Noda, Akiyoshi organization: Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Hospital |
BackLink | https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390282679712728960$$DView record in CiNii |
BookMark | eNptUD1rwzAQFaWFpmm2_gANXZ1KOimWl0II_QgE2iGkoznLcqtgy0Zyhvz7KqRk6vLuuPfB8e7Ite-9JeSBsznnAvjTHm03B5grUVyRCddaZDLX_DrtIFkmhBS3ZBajqxjjSjEu9YTEVd8NGFzsPe0b-tUffE0_0Xm6bEYb6HIYrK-tGfvuSHcOKSamTYzH0dK1Ny66ZN3ZEA_xH3XKChjSBduL-p7cNNhGO_ubU7J9fdmu3rPNx9t6tdxke53-rZCrAupK1rXJFRqNhqscmdBGSK6xsbjIGwGVrJiVgKAqW4GqG5V2Y2qYksdzrHeuNO6EHIrkF4u8yLnIhS4WLMmez7J9HPHblkNwHYZjiWF0prXlqdYSoIQTpG4vhPnBUFoPv-0-dZE |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine |
DBID | RYH |
DOI | 10.11231/jaem.33.529 |
DatabaseName | CiNii Complete |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | 切開法の違いによる虫垂炎術後疼痛に関する検討 |
DocumentTitle_FL | 切開法の違いによる虫垂炎術後疼痛に関する検討 |
EISSN | 1882-4781 |
EndPage | 533 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10031170931 article_jaem_33_3_33_529_article_char_en |
GroupedDBID | ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS JSP KQ8 RJT 2WC RYH |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-j840-ba1593db4ddc75ac8ac157a028c2418afea67f23b4b0e43a35beb35df53a3ccd3 |
ISSN | 1340-2242 |
IngestDate | Thu Jun 26 22:56:25 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 06:30:10 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | Japanese |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j840-ba1593db4ddc75ac8ac157a028c2418afea67f23b4b0e43a35beb35df53a3ccd3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jaem/33/3/33_529/_article/-char/en |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | nii_cinii_1390282679712728960 jstage_primary_article_jaem_33_3_33_529_article_char_en |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013/03/31 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-03-31 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2013 text: 2013/03/31 day: 31 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Abdom Emerg Med |
PublicationTitle_FL | J Abdom Emerg Med 日本腹部救急医学会雑誌 日腹部救急医会誌 Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine 日本腹部救急医学会 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine – name: 日本腹部救急医学会 |
References | 2) 大内清太: 虫垂炎. 木本誠二編, 現代外科学大系 小腸・結腸・虫垂, 36B. 東京, 中山書店, 1970: 231-284. 3) 山村武平, 渡邊昌彦: 虫垂炎. 松野正紀編, 標準外科学 第11版. 東京, 医学書院, 2007: 630-635. 4) 岡田真樹: 腸間膜, 虫垂. 武藤徹一郎, 幕内雅敏編, 新臨床外科学 第4版. 東京, 医学書院, 2006: 591-592. 6) Neil R Borley: Vermiform appendix. Ed. By Jeremiah C Healy. Gray's Anatomy, 39th edision. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005: 1189-1190. 9) Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D: LaparoscoPIc versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 545-553. 1) 田中公貴, 田本英司, 中久保善敬, ほか: 急性虫垂炎に対する腹腔鏡下虫垂切除術と開腹手術の比較検討. 日外科連会誌 2007; 32: 839-841. 5) 佐藤達夫: 虫垂の位置. 佐藤達夫編, 臨床のための解剖学. 東京, メディカル・サイエンス・インターナショナル, 2008: 265-268. 7) Bonica JJ: The management of pain. Lea&Febiger. Philadelphia 1954. 8) 岩村吉晃: 体性感覚. 本郷利憲編, 標準生理学, 第6版. 東京, 医学書院, 2005: 225-236. |
References_xml | – reference: 6) Neil R Borley: Vermiform appendix. Ed. By Jeremiah C Healy. Gray's Anatomy, 39th edision. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005: 1189-1190. – reference: 7) Bonica JJ: The management of pain. Lea&Febiger. Philadelphia 1954. – reference: 4) 岡田真樹: 腸間膜, 虫垂. 武藤徹一郎, 幕内雅敏編, 新臨床外科学 第4版. 東京, 医学書院, 2006: 591-592. – reference: 8) 岩村吉晃: 体性感覚. 本郷利憲編, 標準生理学, 第6版. 東京, 医学書院, 2005: 225-236. – reference: 5) 佐藤達夫: 虫垂の位置. 佐藤達夫編, 臨床のための解剖学. 東京, メディカル・サイエンス・インターナショナル, 2008: 265-268. – reference: 9) Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D: LaparoscoPIc versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 545-553. – reference: 1) 田中公貴, 田本英司, 中久保善敬, ほか: 急性虫垂炎に対する腹腔鏡下虫垂切除術と開腹手術の比較検討. 日外科連会誌 2007; 32: 839-841. – reference: 3) 山村武平, 渡邊昌彦: 虫垂炎. 松野正紀編, 標準外科学 第11版. 東京, 医学書院, 2007: 630-635. – reference: 2) 大内清太: 虫垂炎. 木本誠二編, 現代外科学大系 小腸・結腸・虫垂, 36B. 東京, 中山書店, 1970: 231-284. |
SSID | ssib001550148 ssib039893137 ssib058493785 ssib002484627 ssj0061899 |
Score | 1.9111948 |
Snippet | Purpose: We compared the degree of wound pain after appendectomy through an alternate incision (AI) with that after appendectomy through a pararectal incision... |
SourceID | nii jstage |
SourceType | Publisher |
StartPage | 529 |
SubjectTerms | 交叉切開 傍腹直筋切開 虫垂炎 術後疼痛 |
Title | Comparison of Wound Pain After Appendectomy Via an Alternate Incision Versus Appendectomy Via a Pararectal Incision |
URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jaem/33/3/33_529/_article/-char/en https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390282679712728960 |
Volume | 33 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine), 2013/03/31, Vol.33(3), pp.529-533 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbWIRAviKsYMOQH3qKWJs6tj9O0qTCtElKBwUtkxw5NQxu0NQ_l1_M5zsUVFRp7sSLn2HJ8vtifj318CHknQplKzBRDX8Zq6EcsHHKhDflMunLMBCiI3tG9nIXTz_7Hq-DqYHDfOrVUbcQo_b3Xr-QuWkUe9Kq9ZP9Ds12lyMAz9IsUGkZ6Kx2f2kEEna86QhIoobZg1JG_wTC1gTvdlKut86X2vnJOfhoLoD4yaaLrONpkVt3skUZdWEojp76Pw0jbZHaWL1D8vCoqUTkX26rYVs6HH7woeO58Bylf5Jq_2pRXyNIEETvrvD4vm819yyQx03axsvEaWuYdeuuIT840vy5BezvT0CJfcWlO_ObrfhBDFSb3W7Upi8q2buhIE6ydFuqZB4xBR-LcOcP6r8ZaQzkDAkFQzFivTJ5eT2jnWnv8NxdxNDhn1mAeNB9ueEFg5P6ecsCQ61gHajVibNQV2rnEu4FIoqUSxhKmE4gm7QvtYwdID8g9L4rq8wYXn3a2M8f2utXzQRu9jjeyCVin2_NMkEqwzn4dGLpxHUi165LWAwRNf281HCxsiTWJvmxisM5zi2jNH5NHDVzoiWnyE3Kw5E_Jg7bnn5GbHvW0zGiNeqpRT2vUUxvHFDimHG9a1NMWx9Sgfo807VHfST8n8_Oz-el02IQOGS5jfKPgYOlMCl_KNAp4GvPUDSIOLp2CscY8UzyMMo8JX4yVzzgLhBIskFmA5zSV7AU5XJdr9ZJQ9K1U3ItcCSKXYQaUTI0VCscqE-GEH5HI9Fnyy1wPk9xW10fkGJ2coO-QYiGmrR9hNIlcL_LiSTh-deeaX5OH_b_0hhxurit1DO68EW9rXP0Bw7fH8w |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Wound+Pain+After+Appendectomy+Via+an+Alternate+Incision+Versus+Appendectomy+Via+a+Pararectal+Incision&rft.jtitle=Nihon+Fukubu+Kyukyu+Igakkai+Zasshi+%28Journal+of+Abdominal+Emergency+Medicine%29&rft.au=Nishio%2C+Kenji&rft.au=Ito%2C+Hiroaki&rft.au=Shimada%2C+Jin&rft.au=Yoshida%2C+Yutoku&rft.date=2013-03-31&rft.pub=Japanese+Society+for+Abdominal+Emergency+Medicine&rft.issn=1340-2242&rft.eissn=1882-4781&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=533&rft_id=info:doi/10.11231%2Fjaem.33.529&rft.externalDocID=article_jaem_33_3_33_529_article_char_en |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1340-2242&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1340-2242&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1340-2242&client=summon |