The minimum clinically important difference and minimal detectable change in the assessment of upper limb function after stroke: A systematic review
[Objective] To investigate and summarize the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the assessment of upper limb function after stroke. [Methods] Studies that calculated the MCID using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Motor Activity Log (MAL) w...
Saved in:
Published in | Japanese Occupational Therapy Research Vol. 42; no. 5; pp. 572 - 580 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Japanese |
Published |
Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists
15.10.2023
一般社団法人 日本作業療法士協会 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0289-4920 2434-4419 |
DOI | 10.32178/jotr.42.5_572 |
Cover
Summary: | [Objective] To investigate and summarize the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the assessment of upper limb function after stroke. [Methods] Studies that calculated the MCID using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Motor Activity Log (MAL) were extracted from multiple search databases. [Results] Four FMA (4.0-12.4 points), one ARAT (12-17 points), and one MAL (1.0-1.1 points) studies were included, all of which differed in terms of time since stroke onset and intervention details. [Conclusion] It is necessary to consider the subjects and intervention conditions of each study when referring to MCID values for the assessment of upper limb function after stroke. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0289-4920 2434-4419 |
DOI: | 10.32178/jotr.42.5_572 |