The minimum clinically important difference and minimal detectable change in the assessment of upper limb function after stroke: A systematic review

[Objective] To investigate and summarize the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the assessment of upper limb function after stroke. [Methods] Studies that calculated the MCID using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Motor Activity Log (MAL) w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese Occupational Therapy Research Vol. 42; no. 5; pp. 572 - 580
Main Authors Kurakata, Hiroshi, Yuine, Hiroshi, Shiraishi, Hideki, Jinbo, Kazumasa, Miyata, Kazuhiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists 15.10.2023
一般社団法人 日本作業療法士協会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0289-4920
2434-4419
DOI10.32178/jotr.42.5_572

Cover

More Information
Summary:[Objective] To investigate and summarize the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the assessment of upper limb function after stroke. [Methods] Studies that calculated the MCID using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Motor Activity Log (MAL) were extracted from multiple search databases. [Results] Four FMA (4.0-12.4 points), one ARAT (12-17 points), and one MAL (1.0-1.1 points) studies were included, all of which differed in terms of time since stroke onset and intervention details. [Conclusion] It is necessary to consider the subjects and intervention conditions of each study when referring to MCID values for the assessment of upper limb function after stroke.
ISSN:0289-4920
2434-4419
DOI:10.32178/jotr.42.5_572