処理流暢性を巡る議論の変遷
Saved in:
| Published in | 心理学研究 Vol. 94; no. 3; pp. 261 - 280 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | Japanese |
| Published |
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
2023
|
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0021-5236 1884-1082 |
| DOI | 10.4992/jjpsy.94.22401 |
Cover
| Author | 笠置, 遊 井上, 和哉 八木, 善彦 |
|---|---|
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 笠置, 遊 organization: 立正大学 – sequence: 1 fullname: 井上, 和哉 organization: 東京都立大学 – sequence: 1 fullname: 八木, 善彦 organization: 立正大学 |
| BookMark | eNo9Tz9Lw0AcPaSCsXb1Kzgl_u5yd7kbpf6FgovOx-W8aEKtJcnSzXRQpIs4OLgpooMoLtIPFBLrtzBWER7vDe_xHm8ZtQZnA4vQKgaPSknWk2SYjTxJPUIo4AXkYCGoi0GQFnIACHYZ8fkS6mRZHAIBGjCKqYPWqsunz-uL-qOo7x7q8-dyfFNN78vxZPb6Pnu5LYu36vHqq5iuoMVI9zPb-dM2OtzeOujuur39nb3uRs9NiMC5SwMABlz6kkkR-kecSUO45Brz0Ia4mQRtAgYWU9KIoYJFTQSw5SFnJvLbaPO3N8lyfWzVMI1PdTpSOs1j07dq_lNJqvwfajD_-2-bE52qRPvfYPpc4Q |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2023 公益社団法人 日本心理学会 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023 公益社団法人 日本心理学会 |
| DOI | 10.4992/jjpsy.94.22401 |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Psychology |
| EISSN | 1884-1082 |
| EndPage | 280 |
| ExternalDocumentID | article_jjpsy_94_3_94_94_22401_article_char_ja |
| GroupedDBID | -~X 53G 5GY ABIVO ABJNI ACGFS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS F5P JSF KQ8 OK1 P2P RJT XOL YNT |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-j281t-4700506939598b3d659c2696a16beb14140ac750e142750c485f59c01e6b65cf3 |
| ISSN | 0021-5236 |
| IngestDate | Wed Sep 03 06:30:47 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Language | Japanese |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j281t-4700506939598b3d659c2696a16beb14140ac750e142750c485f59c01e6b65cf3 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjpsy/94/3/94_94.22401/_article/-char/ja |
| PageCount | 20 |
| ParticipantIDs | jstage_primary_article_jjpsy_94_3_94_94_22401_article_char_ja |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-00-00 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2023 text: 2023-00-00 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | 心理学研究 |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | 心理学研究 |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | 公益社団法人 日本心理学会 |
| Publisher_xml | – name: 公益社団法人 日本心理学会 |
| References | Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Tormala, Z. L. (2006). The malleable meaning of subjective ease. Psychological Science, 17, 200-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01686.x McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11, 424-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00282 Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352251 Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C.Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606853 Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2013). Once more with feeling! Familiarity and positivity as integral consequences of previous exposure. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifender (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 50-69). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078938 Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 8, 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1999.0386 Li, L., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1993). The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1918-1929. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.69.6.1918 Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2013). A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifender (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 11-32). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078938 Suzuki, W. A., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1997). Object and place memory in the macaque entorhinal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 1062-1081. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.1062 Vogel, T., Silva, R. R., Thomas, A., & Wänke, M. (2020). Truth is in the mind, but beauty is in the eye: Fluency effects are moderated by a match between fluency source and judgment dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 1587-1596. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000731 Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the “aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 402-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388803 Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569 Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008a). If itʼs hard to read, itʼs hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x Graf, L. K. M., & Landwehr, J. R. (2017). Aesthetic pleasure versus aesthetic interest: The two routes to aesthetic liking. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00015 Albrecht, S., & Carbon, C. C. (2014). The fluency amplification model: Fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations. Acta Psychologica, 148, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.002 Unkelbach, C., & Stahl, C. (2009). A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 18, 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.006 Corneille, O., Mierop, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2020). Repetition increases both the perceived truth and fakeness of information: An ecological account. Cognition, 205, 104470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104470 Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195 Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 Unkelbach, C., Koch, A., Silva, R. R., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2019). Truth by repetition: Explanations and implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419827854 Weingarten, E., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2018). Does ease mediate the ease-of-retrieval effect? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 227-283. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000122 Lee, A. Y. (2004). The prevalence of metacognitive routes to judgment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_3 Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Van Zandt, B. J. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 646-648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.646 Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If itʼs difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20, 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02267.x Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1 Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-6). University of Florida. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 9369-9372. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601071103 Forster, M., Leder, H., & Ansorge, U. (2016). Exploring the subjective feeling of fluency. Experimental Psychology, 63, 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000311 Landwehr, J. R., & Eckman, L. (2020). The nature of processing fluency: Amplification versus hedonic marking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, 103997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103997 Silva, R. R., Garcia-Marques, T., & Mello, J. (2016). The differential effects of fluency due to repetition and fluency due to color contrast on judgments of truth. Psychological Research, 80, 821-837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0692-7 Labroo, A. A., & Pocheptsova, A. (2016). Metacognition and consumer judgment: Fluency is pleasant but disfluency ignites interest. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 154-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.008 Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.326 Topolinski, S. (2010). Moving the eye of the beholder: Motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Psychological Science, 21, 1220-1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610378308 Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2000). The positive feeling of familiarity: Mood as an information processing regulation mechanism. In H. Bless & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 240-261). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783062 Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.347 Carr, T. D., Varricchio, D. J., Sedlmayr, J. C., Roberts, E. M., & Moore, J. R. (2017). A new tyrannosaur with evidence for anagenesis and crocodile-like facial sensory system. Scientific Reports, 7, 44942. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44942 Alter, A. L. (2013). The benefits of cognitive disfluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413498894 Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008b). Fluency and the detection of misleading questions: Low processing fluency attenuates the Moses illusion. Social Cognition, 26, 791-799. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.6.791 Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241 Begg, I., Armour, V., & Kerr, T. (1985). On believing what we remember. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 17, 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080140 Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00289 Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiverʼs processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1255-1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012710002 Oppenheimer, D. M., (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014 Graf, L. K. M., Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R. (2018). Measuring processing fluency: One versus five items. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28, 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1021 Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jc |
| References_xml | – reference: Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2013). Once more with feeling! Familiarity and positivity as integral consequences of previous exposure. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifender (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 50-69). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078938 – reference: Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1255-1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012710002 – reference: Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235-1253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235 – reference: Labroo, A. A., & Pocheptsova, A. (2016). Metacognition and consumer judgment: Fluency is pleasant but disfluency ignites interest. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 154-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.008 – reference: Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195 – reference: Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If itʼs difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20, 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02267.x – reference: Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1 – reference: Begg, I. M., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446 – reference: Lee, A. Y. (2004). The prevalence of metacognitive routes to judgment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_3 – reference: Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008b). Fluency and the detection of misleading questions: Low processing fluency attenuates the Moses illusion. Social Cognition, 26, 791-799. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.6.791 – reference: Graf, L. K. M., & Landwehr, J. R. (2015). A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: The pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 395-410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315574978 – reference: Riches, I. P., Wilson, F. A., & Brown, M. W. (1991). The effects of visual stimulation and memory on neurons of the hippocampal formation and the neighboring parahippocampal gyrus and inferior temporal cortex of the primate. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1763-1779. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.11-06-01763.1991 – reference: Brown, A. S., & Marsh, E. J. (2009). Creating illusions of past encounter through brief exposure. Psychological Science, 20, 534-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02337.x – reference: Haddock, G. (2002). Itʼs easy to like or dislike Tony Blair: Accessibility experiences and the favourability of attitude judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162571 – reference: Schwarz, N., Jalbert, M., Noah, T., & Zhang, L. (2021). Metacognitive experiences as information: Processing fluency in consumer judgment and decision making. Consumer Psychology Review, 4, 4-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1067 – reference: Lanska, M., & Westerman, D. (2018). Transfer appropriate fluency: Encoding and retrieval interactions in fluency-based memory illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1001-1012. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000496 – reference: Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 8, 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1999.0386 – reference: Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19, 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02062.x – reference: Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989-1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989 – reference: Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277011 – reference: Butler, L. T., & Berry, D. C. (2004). Understanding the relationship between repetition priming and mere exposure. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369776 – reference: Oppenheimer, D. M., & Alter, A. L. (2013). Disfluency sleeper effect: Disfluency today prompts fluency tomorrow. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifeneder (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 85-98). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078938 – reference: Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2000). The positive feeling of familiarity: Mood as an information processing regulation mechanism. In H. Bless & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 240-261). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783062 – reference: Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126 – reference: Cian, L., Krishna, A., & Schwarz, N. (2015). Positioning rationality and emotion: Rationality is up and emotion is down. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 632-651. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv046 – reference: Rothman, A. J., & Hardin, C. D. (1997). Differential use of the availability heuristic in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232002 – reference: Challis, B. H., & Sidhu, R. (1993). Dissociative effect of massed repetition on implicit and explicit measures of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.1.115 – reference: Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008a). If itʼs hard to read, itʼs hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x – reference: Reber, R., Wurtz, P., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004). Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00049-7 – reference: McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11, 424-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00282 – reference: Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306 – reference: Unkelbach, C., Koch, A., Silva, R. R., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2019). Truth by repetition: Explanations and implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419827854 – reference: Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241 – reference: Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C.Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606853 – reference: Topolinski, S. (2012). The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 260-281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025658 – reference: Alter, A. L. (2013). The benefits of cognitive disfluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413498894 – reference: Claypool, H. M., Hugenberg, K., Housley, M. K., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Familiar eyes are smiling: On the role of familiarity in the perception of facial affect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.422 – reference: Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 – reference: Vogel, T., Silva, R. R., Thomas, A., & Wänke, M. (2020). Truth is in the mind, but beauty is in the eye: Fluency effects are moderated by a match between fluency source and judgment dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 1587-1596. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000731 – reference: Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564 – reference: Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098 – reference: Carr, T. D., Varricchio, D. J., Sedlmayr, J. C., Roberts, E. M., & Moore, J. R. (2017). A new tyrannosaur with evidence for anagenesis and crocodile-like facial sensory system. Scientific Reports, 7, 44942. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44942 – reference: Li, L., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1993). The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1918-1929. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.69.6.1918 – reference: Rothman, A. J., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053-1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982410003 – reference: Bornstein, R. F., & DʼAgostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 545-552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545 – reference: Oppenheimer, D. M., (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014 – reference: Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569 – reference: Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Tormala, Z. L. (2006). The malleable meaning of subjective ease. Psychological Science, 17, 200-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01686.x – reference: Lanska, M., Olds, J. M., & Westerman, D. L. (2014). Fluency effects in recognition memory: Are perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency interchangeable? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034309 – reference: Brown, A. S., Brown, L. A., & Zoccoli, S. L. (2002). Repetition-based credibility enhancement of unfamiliar faces. The American Journal of Psychology, 115, 199-209. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423435 – reference: Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2004). Positivity can cue familiarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 585-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262856 – reference: Unkelbach, C. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17, 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01708.x – reference: Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 – reference: Okuhara, T., Ishikawa, H., Okada, M., Kato, M., & Kiuchi, T. (2017). Designing persuasive health materials using processing fluency: A literature review. BMC Research Notes, 10, 198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2524-x – reference: Unkelbach, C., & Stahl, C. (2009). A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 18, 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.006 – reference: Corneille, O., Mierop, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2020). Repetition increases both the perceived truth and fakeness of information: An ecological account. Cognition, 205, 104470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104470 – reference: Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014678 – reference: Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 459-498. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000085 – reference: Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2013). A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifender (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 11-32). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078938 – reference: Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., & Nowak, A. (2002). Affect and processing dynamics: Perceptual fluency enhances evaluations. In S. C. Moore & M. Oaksford (Eds.), Emotional cognition: From brain to behaviour (pp. 111-135). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.44 – reference: Weingarten, E., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2018). Does ease mediate the ease-of-retrieval effect? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 227-283. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000122 – reference: Bornstein, R. F., Leone, D. R., & Galley, D. J. (1987). The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects: Influence of stimuli perceived without awareness on social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1070-1079. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1070 – reference: Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151 – reference: Albrecht, S., & Carbon, C. C. (2014). The fluency amplification model: Fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations. Acta Psychologica, 148, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.002 – reference: Silva, R. R., Garcia-Marques, T., & Mello, J. (2016). The differential effects of fluency due to repetition and fluency due to color contrast on judgments of truth. Psychological Research, 80, 821-837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0692-7 – reference: Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008 – reference: Begg, I., Armour, V., & Kerr, T. (1985). On believing what we remember. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 17, 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080140 – reference: Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiverʼs processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 – reference: Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Van Zandt, B. J. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 646-648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.646 – reference: Olds, J. M., & Westerman, D. L. (2012). Can fluency be interpreted as novelty? Retraining the interpretation of fluency in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 653-664. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026784 – reference: Topolinski, S. (2010). Moving the eye of the beholder: Motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Psychological Science, 21, 1220-1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610378308 – reference: Garcia-Marques, L., Ferreira, M. B., Nunes, L. D., Garrido, M. V., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2010). False memories and impressions of personality. Social Cognition, 28, 556-568. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.4.556 – reference: Tamir, M., Robinson, M. D., Clore, G. L., Martin, L. L., & Whitaker, D. J. (2004). Are we puppets on a string? The contextual meaning of unconscious expressive cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203259934 – reference: Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 9369-9372. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601071103 – reference: Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-6). University of Florida. – reference: Bornstein, R. F., & DʼAgostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103 – reference: Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665 – reference: Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219 – reference: Topolinski, S. (2013). The sources of fluency: Identifying the underlying mechanisms of fluency effects. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifender (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 33-49). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078938 – reference: Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.326 – reference: Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2010). False fame prevented: Avoiding fluency effects without judgmental correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 721-733. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019260 – reference: Jacoby, L. L., & Kelley, C. M. (1987). Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 314-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287133003 – reference: Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.347 – reference: Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352251 – reference: Graf, L. K. M., Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R. (2018). Measuring processing fluency: One versus five items. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28, 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1021 – reference: Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (1999). How often did I do it? Experienced ease of retrieval and frequency estimates of past behavior. Acta Psychologica, 103, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00035-9 – reference: Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 – reference: Graf, L. K. M., & Landwehr, J. R. (2017). Aesthetic pleasure versus aesthetic interest: The two routes to aesthetic liking. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00015 – reference: Whittlesea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 716-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90045-2 – reference: Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2009). Mix me a list: Context moderates the truth effect and the mere-exposure effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1117-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.019 – reference: Landwehr, J. R., & Eckman, L. (2020). The nature of processing fluency: Amplification versus hedonic marking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, 103997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103997 – reference: Reber, R., & Greifeneder, R. (2017). Processing fluency in education: How metacognitive feelings shape learning, belief formation, and affect. Educational Psychologist, 52, 84-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1258173 – reference: Forster, M., Leder, H., & Ansorge, U. (2016). Exploring the subjective feeling of fluency. Experimental Psychology, 63, 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000311 – reference: Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_2 – reference: Huber, D. E., Clark, T. F., Curran, T., & Winkielman, P. (2008). Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: Testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1305-1324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013370 – reference: Unkelbach, C., Bayer, M., Alves, H., Koch, A., & Stahl, C. (2011). Fluency and positivity as possible causes of the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 20, 594-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.015 – reference: Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149 – reference: Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00289 – reference: Karelaia, N., & Hogarth, R. M. (2008). Determinants of linear judgment: A meta-analysis of lens model studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 404-426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.404 – reference: Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends donʼt? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00040-1 – reference: Wänke, M., Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1995). The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologica, 89, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(93)E0072-A – reference: Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848 – reference: Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the “aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 402-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388803 – reference: Kelley, C. M., & Rhodes, M. G. (2002). Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 41, pp. 293-320). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80010-X – reference: Suzuki, W. A., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1997). Object and place memory in the macaque entorhinal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 1062-1081. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.1062 – reference: Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., & Gallo, D. A. (1998). Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious processes. Psychological Science, 9, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00004 – reference: Chae, B. G., & Hoegg, J. (2013). The future looks “right”: Effects of the horizontal location of advertising images on product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1086/669476 – reference: Laham, S. M., Koval, P., & Alter, A. L. (2012). The name-pronunciation effect: Why people like Mr. Smith more than Mr. Colquhoun. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 752-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.002 |
| SSID | ssib020475414 ssib004214181 ssj0000389740 ssib000954412 ssib012097151 ssib001536321 ssib021063718 ssib002543261 ssib060125843 |
| Score | 2.3342078 |
| SourceID | jstage |
| SourceType | Publisher |
| StartPage | 261 |
| Title | 処理流暢性を巡る議論の変遷 |
| URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjpsy/94/3/94_94.22401/_article/-char/ja |
| Volume | 94 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| ispartofPNX | 心理学研究, 2023, Vol.94(3), pp.261-280 |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV29b9QwFI9KWbogPsW3OmAxoBxxYjv2wOCkqSqQQEit1C1KfLnhhlLBdSgT1wGEWBADAxsIwYBALKh_0OmO8l_wnp3kUoQQBSmyXuxn-9kvyfu9yM_2vGuDuBAVN3almvRZGCtfgV3w4z6TvDB9jL7E1RZ3xdoGu73JNxeO3eusWtoZlT3z-LdxJf-iVcgDvWKU7BE02zYKGUCDfiEFDUP6VzomGSfgzGtBspiogEggBEkgkyKhNNEhEjIgOiZZRGRIVIi1EqhF6xyZkEwSvUKSwBIJUcIWUaIzZNaANxXJFOYkcRfO2qZWiYw6AnBsyomkA6KYJRRJ2l-ANiPFQiCSFewE9Fy3L_WcjZFEE8UtIaHEsXEcgkwtAUKqOT-Mm6P4OHRoX7b8MAPMioqCdf9zuCBk-0w21VM7lAS7QzmhazsHkKMjO7tRI5KG64btDPh402v6xzmBainopWsrQopuer1RtzMPUjIwXPKQ_XCHNNfvSdQ1Bm6b-RpXhO7Eql9NFnicuAXucLj9aLenWA8hFp0b53bJZP2Q5ZYxVyyPMIHLVsibYozVy4fgMBwP45jiGtc79zt4W-GRc51AaR6JqIvfOAM4TzsfdMo6gckYZw2NtvdhwGI8Rr69pwB4O2AHnP2QN-cJWWgE8DhmLiysnl23kSrOws3DcwCQcAgOUrO40uK99ZPeidpRW9ZuxKe8hWFx2ltq8cLuGe_69NmH7y-fzr6NZ2_ezZ58nOy9mu6_ney9OPj89eDT68n4y_T98x_j_bPexmq2nq759bkj_jCUdOSzGHdFEipSXMky6guuTCiUKKgoAdrAgIPCANKuKMPTEQx81QbAEtBKlIKbQXTOW9x6sFWd95ZNxXmpjDLMlMzIWFYKPJZ-QUvRjyoTXPBuuUHm225zmfxoer74n_UveUv4rrl_ipe9xdHDneoKoOxRedU-OT8BqJOfWQ |
| linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E5%87%A6%E7%90%86%E6%B5%81%E6%9A%A2%E6%80%A7%E3%82%92%E5%B7%A1%E3%82%8B%E8%AD%B0%E8%AB%96%E3%81%AE%E5%A4%89%E9%81%B7&rft.jtitle=%E5%BF%83%E7%90%86%E5%AD%A6%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6&rft.au=%E7%AC%A0%E7%BD%AE%2C+%E9%81%8A&rft.au=%E4%BA%95%E4%B8%8A%2C+%E5%92%8C%E5%93%89&rft.au=%E5%85%AB%E6%9C%A8%2C+%E5%96%84%E5%BD%A6&rft.date=2023&rft.pub=%E5%85%AC%E7%9B%8A%E7%A4%BE%E5%9B%A3%E6%B3%95%E4%BA%BA+%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%BF%83%E7%90%86%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A&rft.issn=0021-5236&rft.eissn=1884-1082&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=280&rft_id=info:doi/10.4992%2Fjjpsy.94.22401&rft.externalDocID=article_jjpsy_94_3_94_94_22401_article_char_ja |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-5236&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-5236&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-5236&client=summon |