Induced Systemic Resistance and Promotion of Plant Growth by Bacillus spp
ABSTRACT Elicitation of induced systemic resistance (ISR) by plant-associated bacteria was initially demonstrated using Pseudomonas spp. and other gram-negative bacteria. Several reviews have summarized various aspects of the large volume of literature on Pseudomonas spp. as elicitors of ISR. Fewer...
Saved in:
Published in | Phytopathology Vol. 94; no. 11; p. 1259 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.11.2004
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | ABSTRACT Elicitation of induced systemic resistance (ISR) by plant-associated bacteria was initially demonstrated using Pseudomonas spp. and other gram-negative bacteria. Several reviews have summarized various aspects of the large volume of literature on Pseudomonas spp. as elicitors of ISR. Fewer published accounts of ISR by Bacillus spp. are available, and we review this literature for the first time. Published results are summarized showing that specific strains of the species B. amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis, B. pasteurii, B. cereus, B. pumilus, B. mycoides, and B. sphaericus elicit significant reductions in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts. Elicitation of ISR by these strains has been demonstrated in greenhouse or field trials on tomato, bell pepper, muskmelon, watermelon, sugar beet, tobacco, Arabidopsis sp., cucumber, loblolly pine, and two tropical crops (long cayenne pepper and green kuang futsoi). Protection resulting from ISR elicited by Bacillus spp. has been reported against leaf-spotting fungal and bacterial pathogens, systemic viruses, a crown-rotting fungal pathogen, root-knot nematodes, and a stem-blight fungal pathogen as well as damping-off, blue mold, and late blight diseases. Reductions in populations of three insect vectors have also been noted in the field: striped and spotted cucumber beetles that transmit cucurbit wilt disease and the silver leaf whitefly that transmits Tomato mottle virus. In most cases, Bacillus spp. that elicit ISR also elicit plant growth promotion. Studies on mechanisms indicate that elicitation of ISR by Bacillus spp. is associated with ultrastructural changes in plants during pathogen attack and with cytochemical alterations. Investigations into the signal transduction pathways of elicited plants suggest that Bacillus spp. activate some of the same pathways as Pseudomonas spp. and some additional pathways. For example, ISR elicited by several strains of Bacillus spp. is independent of salicylic acid but dependent on jasmonic acid, ethylene, and the regulatory gene NPR1-results that are in agreement with the model for ISR elicited by Pseudomonas spp. However, in other cases, ISR elicited by Bacillus spp. is dependent on salicylic acid and independent of jasmonic acid and NPR1. In addition, while ISR by Pseudomonas spp. does not lead to accumulation of the defense gene PR1 in plants, in some cases, ISR by Bacillus spp. does. Based on the strains and results summarized in this review, two products for commercial agriculture have been developed, one aimed mainly at plant growth promotion for transplanted vegetables and one, which has received registration from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for disease protection on soybean. |
---|---|
AbstractList | ABSTRACT Elicitation of induced systemic resistance (ISR) by plant-associated bacteria was initially demonstrated using Pseudomonas spp. and other gram-negative bacteria. Several reviews have summarized various aspects of the large volume of literature on Pseudomonas spp. as elicitors of ISR. Fewer published accounts of ISR by Bacillus spp. are available, and we review this literature for the first time. Published results are summarized showing that specific strains of the species B. amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis, B. pasteurii, B. cereus, B. pumilus, B. mycoides, and B. sphaericus elicit significant reductions in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts. Elicitation of ISR by these strains has been demonstrated in greenhouse or field trials on tomato, bell pepper, muskmelon, watermelon, sugar beet, tobacco, Arabidopsis sp., cucumber, loblolly pine, and two tropical crops (long cayenne pepper and green kuang futsoi). Protection resulting from ISR elicited by Bacillus spp. has been reported against leaf-spotting fungal and bacterial pathogens, systemic viruses, a crown-rotting fungal pathogen, root-knot nematodes, and a stem-blight fungal pathogen as well as damping-off, blue mold, and late blight diseases. Reductions in populations of three insect vectors have also been noted in the field: striped and spotted cucumber beetles that transmit cucurbit wilt disease and the silver leaf whitefly that transmits Tomato mottle virus. In most cases, Bacillus spp. that elicit ISR also elicit plant growth promotion. Studies on mechanisms indicate that elicitation of ISR by Bacillus spp. is associated with ultrastructural changes in plants during pathogen attack and with cytochemical alterations. Investigations into the signal transduction pathways of elicited plants suggest that Bacillus spp. activate some of the same pathways as Pseudomonas spp. and some additional pathways. For example, ISR elicited by several strains of Bacillus spp. is independent of salicylic acid but dependent on jasmonic acid, ethylene, and the regulatory gene NPR1-results that are in agreement with the model for ISR elicited by Pseudomonas spp. However, in other cases, ISR elicited by Bacillus spp. is dependent on salicylic acid and independent of jasmonic acid and NPR1. In addition, while ISR by Pseudomonas spp. does not lead to accumulation of the defense gene PR1 in plants, in some cases, ISR by Bacillus spp. does. Based on the strains and results summarized in this review, two products for commercial agriculture have been developed, one aimed mainly at plant growth promotion for transplanted vegetables and one, which has received registration from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for disease protection on soybean. ABSTRACT Elicitation of induced systemic resistance (ISR) by plant-associated bacteria was initially demonstrated using Pseudomonas spp. and other gram-negative bacteria. Several reviews have summarized various aspects of the large volume of literature on Pseudomonas spp. as elicitors of ISR. Fewer published accounts of ISR by Bacillus spp. are available, and we review this literature for the first time. Published results are summarized showing that specific strains of the species B. amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis, B. pasteurii, B. cereus, B. pumilus, B. mycoides, and B. sphaericus elicit significant reductions in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts. Elicitation of ISR by these strains has been demonstrated in greenhouse or field trials on tomato, bell pepper, muskmelon, watermelon, sugar beet, tobacco, Arabidopsis sp., cucumber, loblolly pine, and two tropical crops (long cayenne pepper and green kuang futsoi). Protection resulting from ISR elicited by Bacillus spp. has been reported against leaf-spotting fungal and bacterial pathogens, systemic viruses, a crown-rotting fungal pathogen, root-knot nematodes, and a stem-blight fungal pathogen as well as damping-off, blue mold, and late blight diseases. Reductions in populations of three insect vectors have also been noted in the field: striped and spotted cucumber beetles that transmit cucurbit wilt disease and the silver leaf whitefly that transmits Tomato mottle virus. In most cases, Bacillus spp. that elicit ISR also elicit plant growth promotion. Studies on mechanisms indicate that elicitation of ISR by Bacillus spp. is associated with ultrastructural changes in plants during pathogen attack and with cytochemical alterations. Investigations into the signal transduction pathways of elicited plants suggest that Bacillus spp. activate some of the same pathways as Pseudomonas spp. and some additional pathways. For example, ISR elicited by several strains of Bacillus spp. is independent of salicylic acid but dependent on jasmonic acid, ethylene, and the regulatory gene NPR1-results that are in agreement with the model for ISR elicited by Pseudomonas spp. However, in other cases, ISR elicited by Bacillus spp. is dependent on salicylic acid and independent of jasmonic acid and NPR1. In addition, while ISR by Pseudomonas spp. does not lead to accumulation of the defense gene PR1 in plants, in some cases, ISR by Bacillus spp. does. Based on the strains and results summarized in this review, two products for commercial agriculture have been developed, one aimed mainly at plant growth promotion for transplanted vegetables and one, which has received registration from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for disease protection on soybean.ABSTRACT Elicitation of induced systemic resistance (ISR) by plant-associated bacteria was initially demonstrated using Pseudomonas spp. and other gram-negative bacteria. Several reviews have summarized various aspects of the large volume of literature on Pseudomonas spp. as elicitors of ISR. Fewer published accounts of ISR by Bacillus spp. are available, and we review this literature for the first time. Published results are summarized showing that specific strains of the species B. amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis, B. pasteurii, B. cereus, B. pumilus, B. mycoides, and B. sphaericus elicit significant reductions in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts. Elicitation of ISR by these strains has been demonstrated in greenhouse or field trials on tomato, bell pepper, muskmelon, watermelon, sugar beet, tobacco, Arabidopsis sp., cucumber, loblolly pine, and two tropical crops (long cayenne pepper and green kuang futsoi). Protection resulting from ISR elicited by Bacillus spp. has been reported against leaf-spotting fungal and bacterial pathogens, systemic viruses, a crown-rotting fungal pathogen, root-knot nematodes, and a stem-blight fungal pathogen as well as damping-off, blue mold, and late blight diseases. Reductions in populations of three insect vectors have also been noted in the field: striped and spotted cucumber beetles that transmit cucurbit wilt disease and the silver leaf whitefly that transmits Tomato mottle virus. In most cases, Bacillus spp. that elicit ISR also elicit plant growth promotion. Studies on mechanisms indicate that elicitation of ISR by Bacillus spp. is associated with ultrastructural changes in plants during pathogen attack and with cytochemical alterations. Investigations into the signal transduction pathways of elicited plants suggest that Bacillus spp. activate some of the same pathways as Pseudomonas spp. and some additional pathways. For example, ISR elicited by several strains of Bacillus spp. is independent of salicylic acid but dependent on jasmonic acid, ethylene, and the regulatory gene NPR1-results that are in agreement with the model for ISR elicited by Pseudomonas spp. However, in other cases, ISR elicited by Bacillus spp. is dependent on salicylic acid and independent of jasmonic acid and NPR1. In addition, while ISR by Pseudomonas spp. does not lead to accumulation of the defense gene PR1 in plants, in some cases, ISR by Bacillus spp. does. Based on the strains and results summarized in this review, two products for commercial agriculture have been developed, one aimed mainly at plant growth promotion for transplanted vegetables and one, which has received registration from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for disease protection on soybean. |
Author | Zhang, Shouan Kloepper, Joseph W Ryu, Choong-Min |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joseph W surname: Kloepper fullname: Kloepper, Joseph W – sequence: 2 givenname: Choong-Min surname: Ryu fullname: Ryu, Choong-Min – sequence: 3 givenname: Shouan surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Shouan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18944464$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo1j09LwzAchnOYuD_6EZTcPLUmzS9Jc9Sh22CwoRP0VNI0wY62qU2K7NsrOE_P5eHhfedo0vnOInRDSUqJgvv9-uOwSzNCIFWQUprSjKsJmhHCaKJAvU_RPIQjIUTmXFyiKc0VAAiYoc2mq0ZjK_x6CtG2tcEvNtQh6s5YrLsK7wff-lj7DnuH943uIl4N_jt-4vKEH7Wpm2YMOPT9Fbpwugn2-swFent-OizXyXa32iwftskxkxATJaQruZBlrmWVCxAid446A45o6yQlgpVgHFNZVQnuSi2AZqC4yIEwrjVboLu_bj_4r9GGWLR1MLb5nWb9GArJmATBmfo1b8_mWLa2KvqhbvVwKv7fsx8fcFz5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1259 |
DatabaseName | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture Botany |
ExternalDocumentID | 18944464 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .GJ 123 29O 2WC 3V. 53G 7X2 7X7 88A 88E 8AO 8CJ 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FW 8R4 8R5 AAHBH AAYJJ ABOGM ABPPZ ABUWG ACBNA ACBTR ACNCT ACPRK ADBBV ADNWM AENEX AEUYN AFFNX AFKRA AFRAH AIDBO ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ATCPS BAWUL BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CCPQU CS3 D1J DIK EBS EJD F5P FRP FYUFA HCIFZ HMCUK HYO H~9 K-O L7B LK8 M0K M0L M1P M7P MVM NEJ NHB NPM OHT OK1 PCBAR PKN PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X RPS S0X TR2 TWZ UKHRP UKR VQA WH7 XJT XOL YCJ YR5 ZCG ZXP ~KM 7X8 AAFWJ PHGZM PHGZT PPXIY PQGLB |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-j274t-967fb567b8a7d864668ff1fc4f0aef71063b4cf392dd65fba6412495684035aa3 |
ISSN | 0031-949X |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 16:35:31 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:47:08 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j274t-967fb567b8a7d864668ff1fc4f0aef71063b4cf392dd65fba6412495684035aa3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 18944464 |
PQID | 733746539 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_733746539 pubmed_primary_18944464 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2004-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2004-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2004 text: 2004-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Phytopathology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Phytopathology |
PublicationYear | 2004 |
SSID | ssj0007856 |
Score | 2.3997812 |
Snippet | ABSTRACT Elicitation of induced systemic resistance (ISR) by plant-associated bacteria was initially demonstrated using Pseudomonas spp. and other... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1259 |
Title | Induced Systemic Resistance and Promotion of Plant Growth by Bacillus spp |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18944464 https://www.proquest.com/docview/733746539 |
Volume | 94 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3fb9MwEMct2HiABzTGr8E2-YG3KSWtHSd-XKdOBUZXTalUniI7idehKo7WRKj89ZztJO2kIn68JFWU_pA_7uXu7LsvQh8UPMTEIE-9ICPCo2RAPB4I4kVZrjgPA3iC2V2-Ezae0c_zYL5R1LPVJZXspT931pX8D1W4BlxNlew_kO0-FC7Aa-ALRyAMx79ibHQ3zPq9aztut8SvjD-4VQXgVHrsTrclDKLJNf2oFsbpHIr0brmsV2erstx2UaeLdaWNUPGDhPuXpc7L0vF1qwZnXXbmZl27lXuti1vv61033zbZ6IWum2nYZhhoU2q3ZTVJ3-PUSt52VtNJE7ezo79lA8Fl4juNM0SSMKLT8bf42gbmPU7BYvfa-x82w55cJ5ezq6skHs3jx2h_AFGAEagI5108Dc6NFeftfl5boMXpx51f8vsgwjoT8QF63kQB-NwhfYEe5cUhenZ-e990QskP0ZOhBpDrl-hTQxm3lPGGMgbKuKOMtcKWMnaUsVzjljIGyq_Q7HIUX4y9RgDD-z4IaeVxFioZsFBGIswiRhmLlOqrlCpf5Ap8Q0YkTRW4uFnGAiUFc1ripoEP_AUFeY32Cl3kbxH2mUgjQYRSvqRMBZL7gnE4MZ8KmtIjhNuxScDAmFUjUeS6XiUhIaFpwseP0Bs3ZknpGqEk_YhTShl99-c3v0dPN1PrGO1V93V-Au5cJU8t1FO0PxxNpje_ANUGS7I |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Induced+Systemic+Resistance+and+Promotion+of+Plant+Growth+by+Bacillus+spp&rft.jtitle=Phytopathology&rft.au=Kloepper%2C+Joseph+W&rft.au=Ryu%2C+Choong-Min&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Shouan&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.issn=0031-949X&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094%2FPHYTO.2004.94.11.1259&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0031-949X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0031-949X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0031-949X&client=summon |