BRAFV600E 変異を認めたエナメル上皮癌の1例

The usual treatment for ameloblastic carcinoma is surgical resection. The effectiveness of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the disease has not been determined, and few effective treatments are available for local recurrence and distant metastasis. Recently, molecular targeting using BRAFV600E inhi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in日本口腔外科学会雑誌 Vol. 69; no. 4; pp. 197 - 201
Main Authors 長縄, 鋼亮, 村松, 泰徳, 江原, 雄一, 鵜飼, 哲, 渡邉, 一弘, 宮本, 侑果
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published 公益社団法人 日本口腔外科学会 20.04.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-5163
2186-1579
DOI10.5794/jjoms.69.197

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The usual treatment for ameloblastic carcinoma is surgical resection. The effectiveness of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the disease has not been determined, and few effective treatments are available for local recurrence and distant metastasis. Recently, molecular targeting using BRAFV600E inhibitors has attracted interest as a treatment for ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma. Vemurafenib and dabrafenib are BRAF inhibitors that strongly and selectively inhibit BRAFV600E mutant kinases and exhibit anti-tumor effects. Although they are adapted for some malignant melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer, they are expected to be effective as a molecular targeting therapy for ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma with BRAFV600E mutation. We experienced a case of ameloblastic carcinoma that developed in the maxillary molar region and spread into the maxillary sinus. The patient was a 27-year-old male who presented to our hospital with the chief complaint of swelling and pain in the right maxillary molar region. Under the diagnosis of ameloblastic carcinoma, we performed a total maxillectomy, right neck dissection, and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Following the surgery, we conducted a BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry examination on the resected tumor and found that the solid and cystic tissues were positive for BRAF mutation.
ISSN:0021-5163
2186-1579
DOI:10.5794/jjoms.69.197