西ドイツにおけるギムナジウム上級段階の今日的課題 : ボン協定(一九七二年)の制定経緯およびその問題点(V 研究報告)

• Published in: Bulletin of the Japan Educational Administration Society Vol. 15; pp. 219 - 233
• Main Author: 坂野, 慎二
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Japanese
• Published: 日本教育行政学会 1989; The Japan Educational Administration Society
• Subjects: Abitur; gymnasiale Oberstufe; Gymnasium; Hochschulreife; secondary education
• ISSN: 0919-8393; 2433-1899
• DOI: 10.24491/jeas.15.0_219

"Bonn Agreement", negotiated at the conference of all state ministers of education in West-Germany, changed the purposes of the gymnasiale Oberstufe(GO), and revised its curricula. Before this Agreement, the GO was mainly the institution of the preparation for university studies and its curricula were fixed for this purpose. However, "Bonn Agreement" prescribed the purposes of the GO as the preparation not only for university studies but also vocations, and changed the curricula suited to these two purposes. However, the Agreement caused new problems about the articulation between the GO and the universities. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the change of the principles of the GO by the "Bonn Agreement", and the related problems. In 1960s there were crucial problems about the GO: the articulation with the university sutdies and the vocational relationship, the qualification to the universities; the qualification to be permitted to enter all faculties or the qualification to be permitted to enter limited faculties, the necessary contents to finish the GO and to enter universities and introductions of vocational subjects. To solve these problems, two different plans were proposed by the Educational Council (Bildungsrat) in 1969 and 1970 and the West-Germany President Conference (Westdeutsche-Rektorenkonferenz) in 1969. The Educational Council proposed the entrance qualification to the limited faculties and the curricula, widely based on the interests of students, which had less necessary contents. On the other hand the west-Germany President Conference proposed the entrance qualification to all faculties and the curricula, which still had many contents. "Bonn Agreement" prescribed the purpose of the GO as the institution of the preparation for universities and the vocational relationship and vocational subjects were introduced to the GO. However the Agreement did not strictly determined the necessary contents to finish the GO and to enter universities. The necessary contents were different among the states. Moreover the Agreement kept the entrance qualification to all faculties and the distribution of students to each faculty did not work well. To solve these new problems, it is necessary to link necessary contents in the GO with university studies.