INTRODUCTION: Gender Reforms, Electoral Quotas, and Women's Political Representation in Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore

• Published in: Pacific affairs Vol. 89; no. 2; pp. 309 - 323
• Main Author: Tan, Netina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Vancouver University of British Columbia 01.06.2016; Pacific Affairs. The University of British Columbia
• Subjects: Affirmative action; Attitudes; Candidates; Case studies; Civil society; Competition; Data analysis; Economic development; Election results; Elections; Electoral College; Electoral reform; Electoral systems; Equality; Females; Feminism; Gender equity; Institutionalization (Social); International agreements; Local elections; Nominations; Political participation; Political parties; Political representation; Qualitative research; Quantitative analysis; Quotas; Sexes; Special Section; Women; Singapore; Taiwan
• DOI: 10.5509/2016892309
• ISSN: 0030-851X

In the last two decades, more than 118 countries and political parties around the world have introduced gender quotas to guarantee women's political representation. While the study of gender quotas and electoral systems is an exciting field, few studies have focused on East Asia. Why do traditionally male-dominated parties engage in gender reforms? Have gender reforms improved women's political representation and participation? To address these questions, this introductory article offers an overview of the electoral rules, gender quotas, and candidate selection methods adopted in three broadly similar cases with different outcomes in Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore. Taiwan and South Korea introduced mixed electoral systems and legislated candidate quotas to improve women's legislative representation at the local and national levels. Singapore resisted legislating gender quotas while the ruling party voluntarily introduced a party quota in 2009. These gender equality strategies have brought slow and uneven results. Based on qualitative and quantitative methods as well as survey and electoral data, this paper offers new evidence showing why the effects of electoral systems and quota strategies are not automatic or mechanical, but dependent on the degree of party system institutionalization, electoral competitiveness, legal enforcement, and social-cultural attitudes toward women.